This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Citations of
Nir Dagan

For current contact information and a more complete listing of works, please see here

The citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.

| Working papers | Articles | Access and download statistics

Working papers

  1. Volij, Oscar & Dagan, Nir, 2003. "The Bankruptcy Problem: A Cooperative Bargaining Approach," Staff General Research Papers 10571, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    Other versions:
    Published as:

    Cited by:

    1. Antonio Villar Notario & Carmen Herrero Blanco, 1998. "- Preeminence And Sustainability In Bankruptcy Problems," Working Papers. Serie AD 1998-17, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie). [Downloadable!]
    2. Carmen Herrero Blanco, 1993. "Endogenous Reference Points And The Adjusted Proportional Solution For Bargaining Problems With Claims," Working Papers. Serie AD 1993-13, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie). [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    3. Nir Dagan, 1996. "New characterizations of old bankruptcy rules," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 51-59, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
      Other versions:
    4. Rene van den Brink & Yukihiko Funaki & Gerard van der Laan, 2008. "The Reverse Talmud Rule for Bankruptcy Problems," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 08-026/1, Tinbergen Institute, revised 27 Mar 2008. [Downloadable!]
    5. Antonio Villar Notario & Carmen Herrero Blanco, 2000. "The Three Musketeers: Four Classical Solutions To Bankruptcy Problems," Working Papers. Serie AD 2000-23, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie). [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    6. Herrero & C., 2004. "On the Adjudication of Conflicting Claims: An Experimental Study," Econometric Society 2004 North American Summer Meetings 166, Econometric Society. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    7. Carmen Herrero, 2000. "The Three Musketeers. Old Solutions to Bankruptcy Problems," Econometric Society World Congress 2000 Contributed Papers 0609, Econometric Society. [Downloadable!]
    8. Luis Corchon & Matthias Dahm, 2007. "Foundations For Contest Success Functions," Economics Working Papers we070401, Universidad Carlos III, Departamento de Economía. [Downloadable!]
    9. Juan de Dios Moreno Ternero & Carmen Herrero Blanco & Giovanni Ponti, 2003. "An Experiment On Bankruptcy," Working Papers. Serie AD 2003-03, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie). [Downloadable!]
    10. Tijs, S. & Koster, M., 1996. "General aggregation of demand and cost sharing methods," Discussion Paper 87, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research. [Downloadable!]
    11. Karagozoglu, Emin, 2008. "A Noncooperative Approach to Bankruptcy Problems with an Endogenous Estate," Research Memoranda 031, Maastricht : METEOR, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization. [Downloadable!]
    12. Marco Mariotti, 2003. "Even Allocations For Generalised Rationing Problems," Working Papers. Serie AD 2003-10, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie). [Downloadable!]

  2. Volij, Oscar & Dagan, Nir, 2002. "Bilateral Comparisons and Consistent Fair Division Rules in the Context of Bankruptcy Problems," Staff General Research Papers 5141, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    Other versions:
    Published as:

    Cited by:

    1. Moulin, Herve, 2001. "Axiomatic Cost and Surplis-Sharing," Working Papers 2001-06, Rice University, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    2. Roberto Serrano & Ken-Ichi Shimomura, 2005. "A Comparison Of The Average Prekernel And The Prekernel," Economics Working Papers we055827, Universidad Carlos III, Departamento de Economía. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    3. William Thomson, 2006. "On the Existence of Consistent Rules to Adjudicate Conflicting Claims: A Constructive Geometric Approach," RCER Working Papers 528, University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER). [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    4. Diego Dominguez & William Thomson, 2004. "A New Solution to the Problem of Adjudicating Conflicting Claims," RCER Working Papers 511, University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER). [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    5. William Thomson, 2006. "The Two-Agent Claims-Truncated Proportional Rule Has No Consistent Extension: A Constructive Proof," RCER Working Papers 529, University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER). [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:

  3. Volij, Oscar & Serrano, Roberto & Dagan, Nir, 2002. "Bargaining, Coalitions and Competition," Staff General Research Papers 5107, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    Other versions:

    Cited by:

    1. Alexander Kovalenkov & Myrna Holtz Wooders, 2000. "Approximate Cores of Games and Economies with Clubs," Econometric Society World Congress 2000 Contributed Papers 1790, Econometric Society. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    2. Muhamet Yildiz, 2002. "Walrasian Bargaining," Theory workshop papers 505798000000000003, UCLA Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    3. Roberto Serrano, 2007. "Bargaining," Working Papers 2007-06, Instituto Madrileño de Estudios Avanzados (IMDEA) Ciencias Sociales. [Downloadable!]
    4. Roberto Serrano & Oscar Volij, 2005. "Mistakes In Cooperation: The Stochastic Stability Of Edgeworth'S Recontracting," Economics Working Papers we056332, Universidad Carlos III, Departamento de Economía. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    5. Takashi Kunimoto & Roberto Serrano, 2002. "Bargaining and Competition Revisited," Working Papers 2002-14, Brown University, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:

  4. Volij, Oscar & Dagan, Nir & Winter, Eyal, 2002. "A Characterization of the Nash Bargaining Solution," Staff General Research Papers 5259, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    Other versions:
    Published as:

    Cited by:

    1. Geoffroy de Clippel, 2004. "An Axiomatization of the Nash Bargaining Solution," Working Papers 2004-17, Brown University, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    2. Haruo Imai & Hannu Salonen, 2009. "Limit Solutions for Finite Horizon Bargaining Problems," Discussion Papers 51, Aboa Centre for Economics. [Downloadable!]
    3. Nir Dagan & Oscar Volij & Eyal Winter, 2001. "The time-preference Nash solution," Economic theory and game theory 019, Nir Dagan. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    4. Frank A. Schmid, 2001. "Equity financing of the entrepreneurial firm," Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, issue Nov., pages 15-28. [Downloadable!]

  5. Volij, Oscar & Dagan, Nir, 2002. "Formation of Nations in a Welfare-State Minded World," Staff General Research Papers 5201, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    Other versions:
    Published as:

    Cited by:

    1. Fritz Grafe & Ana Mauleon, 2000. "Externalities and Free Trade Agreements," Annales d'Economie et de Statistique, ADRES, issue 59, pages 04, Juillet-S. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    2. T. Kämpke & R. Pestel & F.J. Radermacher, 2003. "A Computational Concept for Normative Equity," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 129-163, March. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

  6. Volij, Oscar & Dagan, Nir & Serrano, Roberto, 2002. "A Non-Cooperative View of Consistent Bankruptcy Rules," Staff General Research Papers 5130, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    Other versions:
    Published as:

    Cited by:

    1. Antonio villar, 2005. "How to distribute when there is scarce situation," Lecturas de Economía, Universidad de Antioquia, Departamento de Economía, issue 62, pages 9-33, Enero-Jun. [Downloadable!]
    2. Nir Dagan & Roberto Serrano & Oscar Volij, 1999. "Feasible Implementation of Taxation Methods," Economic theory and game theory 009, Nir Dagan. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    3. Ignacio García-Jurado & Julio González-Díaz & Antonio Villar, 2006. "A Non-cooperative Approach to Bankruptcy Problems," Spanish Economic Review, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 189-197, September. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    4. José M. Jiménez Gómez & María del Carmen Marco, 2008. "A New Approach for Bounding Awards in Bankruptcy Problems," Working Papers. Serie AD 2008-07, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie). [Downloadable!]
    5. Juan de Dios Moreno Ternero & Antonio Villar Notario, 2002. "Bankruptcy Rules And Progressive Taxation," Working Papers. Serie AD 2002-15, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie). [Downloadable!]
    6. Antonio Villar Notario & Carmen Herrero Blanco, 2000. "The Three Musketeers: Four Classical Solutions To Bankruptcy Problems," Working Papers. Serie AD 2000-23, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie). [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    7. Herrero & C., 2004. "On the Adjudication of Conflicting Claims: An Experimental Study," Econometric Society 2004 North American Summer Meetings 166, Econometric Society. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    8. Yuan Ju & David Wettstein, 2009. "Implementing cooperative solution concepts: a generalized bidding approach," Economic Theory, Springer, vol. 39(2), pages 307-330, May. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
      Other versions:
    9. Carmen Herrero, 2000. "The Three Musketeers. Old Solutions to Bankruptcy Problems," Econometric Society World Congress 2000 Contributed Papers 0609, Econometric Society. [Downloadable!]
    10. Carmen Herrero & Juan D. Moreno-Ternero & Giovanni Ponti, 2009. "On the Adjudication of Conflicting Claims: An Experimental Study," Working Papers 09.10, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
    11. Veronika Grimm & Giovanni Ponti & Jaromir Kovarik, 2006. "Fixed Price Plus Rationing: An Experiment," Working Papers. Serie AD 2006-26, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie). [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    12. De MESNARD, Louis, 2008. "On the Talmud division : equity and robustness," LEG - Document de travail - Economie 2008-07, LEG, Laboratoire d'Economie et de Gestion, CNRS UMR 5118, Université de Bourgogne. [Downloadable!]
    13. Simon Gächter & Arno Riedl, 2006. "Dividing Justly in Bargaining Problems with Claims," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 571-594, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
      Other versions:
    14. Luis Corchon & Matthias Dahm, 2007. "Foundations For Contest Success Functions," Economics Working Papers we070401, Universidad Carlos III, Departamento de Economía. [Downloadable!]
    15. Juan de Dios Moreno Ternero & Carmen Herrero Blanco & Giovanni Ponti, 2003. "An Experiment On Bankruptcy," Working Papers. Serie AD 2003-03, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie). [Downloadable!]
    16. Chun-Hsien Yeh, 2004. "Protective properties and the constrained equal awards rule for claims problems," Econometric Society 2004 Far Eastern Meetings 463, Econometric Society. [Downloadable!]
    17. Karagozoglu, Emin, 2008. "A Noncooperative Approach to Bankruptcy Problems with an Endogenous Estate," Research Memoranda 031, Maastricht : METEOR, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization. [Downloadable!]

  7. Nir Dagan & Oscar Volij & Eyal Winter, 2001. "The Time-Preference Nash Solution," Discussion Paper Series dp265, Center for Rationality and Interactive Decision Theory, Hebrew University, Jerusalem. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:

    Cited by:

    1. Klaus Kultti & Hannu Vartiainen, 2007. "Von Neumann-Morgenstern Stable Set Bridges Time-Preferences to the Nash Solution," The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, Berkeley Electronic Press, vol. 7(1). [Downloadable!]
    2. Oscar Volij, 1999. "On Risk Aversion and Bargaining Outcomes," Economic theory and game theory 010, Oscar Volij. [Downloadable!]

  8. Nir Dagan & Roberto Serrano, 1998. "Invariance and Randomness in the Nash Program for Coalitional Games," Economic theory and game theory 006, Nir Dagan. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
    Published as:

    Cited by:

    1. Roberto Serrano, 2004. "Fifty Years of the Nash Program, 1953-2003," Working Papers 2004-20, Brown University, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    2. Luis C. Corchon & Matteo Triosi, 2005. "Implementation With State Dependent Feasible Sets And Preferences: A Renegotiation Approach," Economics Working Papers we057136, Universidad Carlos III, Departamento de Economía. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    3. David Pérez-Castrillo & David Wettstein, . "Bidding For The Surplus: A Non-Cooperative Approach To The Shapley Value," UFAE and IAE Working Papers 461.00, Unitat de Fonaments de l'Anàlisi Econòmica (UAB) and Institut d'Anàlisi Econòmica (CSIC). [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    4. Claus-Jochen Haake, 2005. "Two support results for the Kalai-Smorodinsky solution in small object division markets," Working Papers 366, Bielefeld University, Institute of Mathematical Economics. [Downloadable!]
    5. Walter Trockel, 1999. "On the Nash Program for the Nash Bargaining Solution," UCLA Economics Working Papers 788, UCLA Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    6. Trockel,W., 1999. "Integrating the Nash program into mechanism theory," Working Papers 305, Bielefeld University, Institute of Mathematical Economics. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    7. Trockel,W., 2001. "Can and should the Nash program be looked at as a part of mechanism theory?," Working Papers 322, Bielefeld University, Institute of Mathematical Economics. [Downloadable!]
    8. Claus-Jochen Haake & Walter Trockel, 2007. "On Maskin monotonicity of solution based social choice rules," Working Papers 393, Bielefeld University, Institute of Mathematical Economics. [Downloadable!]
    9. Trockel,W., 1999. "Unique Nash implementation for a class of bargaining solutions," Working Papers 308, Bielefeld University, Institute of Mathematical Economics. [Downloadable!]

  9. Nir Dagan & Roberto Serrano & Oscar Volij, 1998. "Comment on McLennan and Sonnenschein "Sequential Bargaining as a Non-Cooperative Foundation for Walrasian Equilibrium"," Economic theory and game theory 007, Nir Dagan. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
    Published as:

    Cited by:

    1. Takashi Kunimoto & Roberto Serrano, 2002. "Bargaining and Competition Revisited," Working Papers 2002-14, Brown University, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:

  10. Nir Dagan, 1996. "A Note on Thomson's Characterizations of the Uniform Rule," Economic theory and game theory 003, Nir Dagan. [Downloadable!]
    Published as:

    Cited by:

    1. Carmen Herrero Blanco & Ricardo Martínez, 2006. "Allocation Problems With Indivisibilities When Preferences Are Single-Peaked," Working Papers. Serie AD 2006-14, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie). [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    2. Nir Dagan, 1995. "Consistent Solutions in Exchange Economies: A Characterization of the Price Mechanism," Economics Working Papers 141, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    3. Pablo Amorós, 1998. "- Single-Peaked Preferences With Several Commodities," Working Papers. Serie AD 1998-23, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie). [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:

  11. Nir Dagan, 1996. "Recontracting and Competition," Economic theory and game theory 013, Nir Dagan, revised Jun 1996. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:

    Cited by:

    1. Sjaak Hurkens & Nir Vulkan, 1996. "Information Acquisition and Entry," Economics Working Papers 155, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    2. Eiichi Miyagawa, 2002. "Reduced-form implementation," Discussion Papers 0203-09, Columbia University, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
    3. Nir Dagan & Roberto Serrano & Oscar Volij, 1996. "Bargaining, Coalitions and Competition," Economics Working Papers 178, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    4. Daron Acemoglu & Fabrizio Zilibotti, 1996. "Agency Costs in the Process of Development," Economics Working Papers 157, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:

  12. Nir Dagan, 1996. "Consistency and the Walrasian Allocations Correspondence," Economic theory and game theory 012, Nir Dagan. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:

    Cited by:

    1. Nir Dagan, 1994. "Recontracting and Competition," Economics Working Papers 152, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, revised Jan 1996. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    2. Sjaak Hurkens & Nir Vulkan, 1996. "Information Acquisition and Entry," Economics Working Papers 155, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    3. Daron Acemoglu & Fabrizio Zilibotti, 1996. "Agency Costs in the Process of Development," Economics Working Papers 157, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:

  13. Nir Dagan, 1996. "New Characterizations of Old Bankruptcy Rules," Economic theory and game theory 002, Nir Dagan. [Downloadable!]
    Published as:

    Cited by:

    1. Antonio Villar Notario & Juan D. Moreno Ternero, 2001. "The Tal-Family Of Rules For Bankruptcy Problems," Working Papers. Serie AD 2001-33, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie). [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    2. Antonio Villar Notario & Carmen Herrero Blanco, 1998. "- Preeminence And Sustainability In Bankruptcy Problems," Working Papers. Serie AD 1998-17, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie). [Downloadable!]
    3. William Thomson & Chun-Hsien Yeh, 2006. "Operators for the adjudication of conflicting claims," RCER Working Papers 531, University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER). [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    4. William Thomson, 2006. "A Characterization of a Family of Rules for the Adjudication of Conflicting Claims," RCER Working Papers 530, University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER). [Downloadable!]
    5. Moulin, Herve, 2001. "Axiomatic Cost and Surplis-Sharing," Working Papers 2001-06, Rice University, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    6. William Thomson, 2007. "On the existence of consistent rules to adjudicate conflicting claims: a constructive geometric approach," Review of Economic Design, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 225-251, November. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
      Other versions:
    7. Carmen Herrero & Antonio Villar, 2002. "Sustainability in bankruptcy problems," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 261-273, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    8. Antonio villar, 2005. "How to distribute when there is scarce situation," Lecturas de Economía, Universidad de Antioquia, Departamento de Economía, issue 62, pages 9-33, Enero-Jun. [Downloadable!]
    9. Juan de Dios Moreno Ternero & Antonio Villar Notario, 2003. "The Talmud Rule And The Securement Of Agents? Awards," Working Papers. Serie AD 2003-05, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie). [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    10. Casas-Mendez, B. & Borm, P. & Carpente, L. & Hendrickx, R., 2002. "The constrained equal award rule for bankruptcy problems with a priori unions," Discussion Paper 83, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research. [Downloadable!]
    11. Nir Dagan, 2008. "An axiomatization of the leveling tax-transfer policy," Economic theory and game theory 020, Nir Dagan. [Downloadable!]
    12. José Alcalde & José Angel Silva & María del Carmen Marco, 2002. "Bankruptcy Games And The Ibn Ezra'S Proposal," Working Papers. Serie AD 2002-28, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie). [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    13. Diego Dominguez & William Thomson, 2004. "A New Solution to the Problem of Adjudicating Conflicting Claims," RCER Working Papers 511, University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER). [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    14. Rene van den Brink & Yukihiko Funaki & Gerard van der Laan, 2008. "The Reverse Talmud Rule for Bankruptcy Problems," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 08-026/1, Tinbergen Institute, revised 27 Mar 2008. [Downloadable!]
    15. Antonio Villar Notario & Carmen Herrero Blanco, 2000. "The Three Musketeers: Four Classical Solutions To Bankruptcy Problems," Working Papers. Serie AD 2000-23, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie). [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    16. José Alcalde & María Marco & José Silva, 2008. "The minimal overlap rule revisited," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 109-128, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    17. Quant, M. & Borm, Peter & Maaten, Rogier, 2005. "A concede-and-divide rule for bankruptcy problems," Discussion Paper 20, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research. [Downloadable!]
    18. Chun-Hsien Yeh, 2006. "Protective Properties and the Constrained Equal Awards Rule for Claims Problems: A Note," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 221-230, October. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    19. Branzei, R. & Dimitrov, D. & Pickl, S. & Tijs, S., 2002. "How to cope with division problems under interval uncertainty of claims?," Discussion Paper 96, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    20. Carmen Herrero, 2000. "The Three Musketeers. Old Solutions to Bankruptcy Problems," Econometric Society World Congress 2000 Contributed Papers 0609, Econometric Society. [Downloadable!]
    21. Juan Moreno-Ternero & Antonio Villar, 2006. "New characterizations of a classical bankruptcy rule," Review of Economic Design, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 73-84, August. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    22. Lorenzo-Freire, Silvia & Casa-Mendez, Balbina & Hendrickx, Ruud, 2005. "The two-stage constrained equal awards and losses rules for multi-issue allocation situation," Discussion Paper 80, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research. [Downloadable!]
    23. Simon Gächter & Arno Riedl, 2006. "Dividing Justly in Bargaining Problems with Claims," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 571-594, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
      Other versions:
    24. Juan de Dios Moreno Ternero & Carmen Herrero Blanco & Giovanni Ponti, 2003. "An Experiment On Bankruptcy," Working Papers. Serie AD 2003-03, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie). [Downloadable!]
    25. HERRERO, Carmen & MARTINEZ, Ricardo, 2006. "Balanced allocation methods for claims problems with indivisibilities," CORE Discussion Papers 2006066, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE). [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    26. William Thomson, 2008. "Two families of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 667-692, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
      Other versions:

  14. Nir Dagan & Roberto Serrano & Oscar Volij, 1995. "Feasible Implementation of Taxation Methods," Working Papers 95-14, Brown University, Department of Economics.
    Other versions:
    Published as:

    Cited by:

    1. Byungchae Rhee, 2008. "A characterization of optimal feasible tax mechanism," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 619-653, May. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    2. Luis C. Corchon & Matteo Triosi, 2005. "Implementation With State Dependent Feasible Sets And Preferences: A Renegotiation Approach," Economics Working Papers we057136, Universidad Carlos III, Departamento de Economía. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    3. David Pérez-Castrillo & David Wettstein, 2002. "Choosing Wisely: A Multibidding Approach," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 92(5), pages 1577-1587, December. [Downloadable!]
    4. Ignacio García-Jurado & Julio González-Díaz & Antonio Villar, 2006. "A Non-cooperative Approach to Bankruptcy Problems," Spanish Economic Review, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 189-197, September. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    5. Luis C. Corchon, 2007. "The theory of implementation : what did we learn?," Economics Working Papers we081207, Universidad Carlos III, Departamento de Economía. [Downloadable!]
    6. Roberto Serrano, 2003. "The Theory of Implementation of Social Choice Rules," Working Papers 2003-19, Brown University, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    7. Byungchae Rhee, 2004. "A Characterization of Optimal Feasible Tax Mechanism," Econometric Society 2004 Far Eastern Meetings 551, Econometric Society. [Downloadable!]

  15. Nir Dagan, 1995. "Consistent Solutions in Exchange Economies: a Characterization of the Price Mechanism," Economic theory and game theory 011, Nir Dagan. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:

    Cited by:

    1. Sjaak Hurkens & Nir Vulkan, 1996. "Information Acquisition and Entry," Economics Working Papers 155, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    2. José V. Rodríguez Mora, 1995. "Shared Knowledge," Economics Working Papers 144, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra. [Downloadable!]
    3. Luisa Fuster, 1995. "Altruism, Uncertain Lifetime, and the Distribution of Wealth," Economics Working Papers 150, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra. [Downloadable!]
    4. Nir Dagan, 1996. "Consistency and the Walrasian Allocations Correspondence," Economics Working Papers 151, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    5. Daron Acemoglu & Fabrizio Zilibotti, 1996. "Agency Costs in the Process of Development," Economics Working Papers 157, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:

  16. Nir Dagan, 1994. "On the Least Sacrifice Principle in Taxation," Economic theory and game theory 008, Nir Dagan, revised Feb 2008. [Downloadable!]

    Cited by:

    1. Nir Dagan & Roberto Serrano & Oscar Volij, 1999. "Feasible Implementation of Taxation Methods," Economic theory and game theory 009, Nir Dagan. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:

Articles

  1. Eyal Winter & Oscar Volij & Nir Dagan, 2002. "A characterization of the Nash bargaining solution," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 811-823. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:

    See citations under working paper version above.

  2. Dagan, Nir & Volij, Oscar, 2000. " Formation of Nations in a Welfare-State Minded World," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 2(2), pages 157-81. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:

    See citations under working paper version above.

  3. Nir Dagan & Oscar Volij & Roberto Serrano, 1999. "Feasible implementation of taxation methods," Review of Economic Design, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 57-72. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:

    See citations under working paper version above.

  4. Nir Dagan & Roberto Serrano & Oscar Volij, 1998. "Comment on McLennan and Sonnenschein 'Sequential Bargaining as a Noncooperative Foundation for Walrasian Equilibrium'," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 66(5), pages 1231-1233, September.
    Other versions:

    See citations under working paper version above.

  5. Dagan, Nir & Serrano, Roberto, 1998. "Invariance and randomness in the Nash program for coalitional games," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 43-49, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:

    See citations under working paper version above.

  6. Oscar Volij & Nir Dagan, 1997. "Bilateral Comparisons and Consistent Fair Division Rules in the Context of Bankruptcy Problems," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 11-25.
    Other versions:

    See citations under working paper version above.

  7. Dagan, Nir & Serrano, Roberto & Volij, Oscar, 1997. "A Noncooperative View of Consistent Bankruptcy Rules," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 55-72, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:

    See citations under working paper version above.

  8. Nir Dagan, 1996. "New characterizations of old bankruptcy rules," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 51-59, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:

    See citations under working paper version above.

  9. Dagan, Nir, 1996. "A Note on Thomson's Characterizations of the Uniform Rule," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 255-261, April. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:

    See citations under working paper version above.

  10. Dagan, Nir & Volij, Oscar, 1993. "The bankruptcy problem: a cooperative bargaining approach," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 287-297, November. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:

    See citations under working paper version above.Sorry, no citations of articles recorded.

Did you know? Citation analysis on IDEAS includes online papers that are freely accessible and whose text could be automatically analyzed, currently about 210000 papers.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-11.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.