This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Thomson, William

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V88-4808NXB-1/2/b09aa58d102633408dcaa56546963b8e
File Format:
File Function:
Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Publisher Info
Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Mathematical Social Sciences.

Volume (Year): 45 (2003)
Issue (Month): 3 (July)
Pages: 249-297
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML, plain text, BibTeX, RIS (EndNote), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:eee:matsoc:v:45:y:2003:i:3:p:249-297

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505565

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Heidi Boesdal).

Related research
Keywords:

Other versions of this item:

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
  1. Nir Dagan, 2008. "An axiomatization of the leveling tax-transfer policy," Economic theory and game theory 020, Nir Dagan. [Downloadable!]
  2. Herrero & C., 2004. "On the Adjudication of Conflicting Claims: An Experimental Study," Econometric Society 2004 North American Summer Meetings 166, Econometric Society. [Downloadable!]
  3. José M. Jiménez Gómez & María del Carmen Marco, 2008. "A New Approach for Bounding Awards in Bankruptcy Problems," Working Papers. Serie AD 2008-07, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie). [Downloadable!]
  4. Quant, M. & Borm, P.E.M. & Hendrickx, R.L.P. & Zwikker, P., 2004. "Compromise solutions based on bankruptcy," Discussion Paper 33, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  5. Simon Gächter & Arno Riedl, 2003. "Moral Property Rights in Bargaining with Infeasible Claims," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 03-055/1, Tinbergen Institute. [Downloadable!]
  6. Hendrickx, Ruud & Borm, Peter & Elk, Roel van & Quant, Marieke, 2005. "Minimal overlap rules for bankruptcy," Discussion Paper 87, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research. [Downloadable!]
  7. José Alcalde & María Marco & José Silva, 2008. "The minimal overlap rule revisited," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 109-128, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  8. Juan de Dios Moreno Ternero & Antonio Villar Notario, 2003. "The Talmud Rule And The Securement Of Agents? Awards," Working Papers. Serie AD 2003-05, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie). [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  9. R.I. Luttens, 2006. "Minimal rights based solidarity," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 06/356, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration. [Downloadable!]
  10. Estevez-Fernandez, A. & Borm, P.E.M. & Hamers, H., 2004. ""The museum pass game and its value" revisited," Discussion Paper 7, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research. [Downloadable!]
  11. T. Marchant, 2004. "Rationing : dynamic considerations, equivalent sacrifice and links between the two approaches," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 04/244, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration. [Downloadable!]
  12. Youngsub Chun & William Thomson, 2004. "Convergence under Replication of Rules to Adjudicate Conflicting Claims," RCER Working Papers 512, University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER). [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  13. Quant, M. & Borm, Peter & Maaten, Rogier, 2005. "A concede-and-divide rule for bankruptcy problems," Discussion Paper 20, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research. [Downloadable!]
  14. Marco Mariotti, 2003. "Even Allocations For Generalised Rationing Problems," Working Papers. Serie AD 2003-10, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie). [Downloadable!]
  15. Voorneveld, Mark, 2003. "Probabilistic choice in games: properties of Rosenthal's t-solutions," Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance 542, Stockholm School of Economics, revised 31 Oct 2003. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  16. Caprari, E. & Patrone, F. & Pusillo, L. & Tijs, S. & Torre, A., 2006. "Share opportunity sets and cooperative games," Discussion Paper 115, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research. [Downloadable!]
  17. Miller, Alan D., . "Separation of decision in group identification," Working Papers 1249, California Institute of Technology, Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences. [Downloadable!]
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? There are over 16000 authors registered on RePEc Author Service.

This page was last updated on 2008-9-22.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.