This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Citations of
Vincenzo Denicolo'

For current contact information and a more complete listing of works, please see here

The citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.

| Working papers | Articles | Access and download statistics

Working papers

  1. V. Denicolo, 1997. "Pollution-Reducing Innovations Under Taxes or Permits," Working Papers 281, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    Published as:

    Cited by:

    1. Ivana Capozza, . "A Dynamic Game of Technology Diffusion under an Emission Trading Regulation: A Pilot Experiment," series 0008, Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche - Università di Bari. [Downloadable!]
    2. Andreas Nicklisch & Leon Zucchini, . "Dynamic Efficiency of Emission Trading Markets: An Experimental Study," Papers on Strategic Interaction 2005-07, Max Planck Institute of Economics, Strategic Interaction Group. [Downloadable!]
    3. Adam Jaffe & Richard Newell & Robert Stavins, 2002. "Environmental Policy and Technological Change," Environmental & Resource Economics, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 22(1), pages 41-70, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    4. von Döllen, Andreas & Requate, Till, 2007. "Environmental Policy and Incentives to Invest in Advanced Abatement Technology if Arrival of Future Technology is Uncertain - Extended Version," Economics Working Papers 2007,04, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]

  2. Flavio Delbono & Vincenzo Denicolo, 1991. "Regulating Innovative Activity: the Role of a Public Firm," Working Papers 117, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    Published as:

    Cited by:

    1. Naseem, Anwar & Oehmke, James F., 2006. "Spillovers, Joint Ventures and Social Welfare in a Mixed Duopoly R&D Race," 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA 21351, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association). [Downloadable!]
    2. Kazuhiro Ohnishi, 2008. "International mixed duopoly and strategic commitments," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 4(4), pages 421-432, February. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    3. Susumu Cato, 2008. "Public monopoly, mixed oligopoly and productive efficiency: a generalization," Economics Bulletin, Economics Bulletin, vol. 12(24), pages 1-7. [Downloadable!]
    4. Rajeev K. Goel, 1999. "On contracting for uncertain R&D," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(2), pages 99-106.
    5. Giannakas, Konstantinos & Fulton, Murray, 2003. "Agricultural Cooperatives And Cost-Reducing R&D In The Agri-Food System," 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada 22193, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association). [Downloadable!]
    6. Vasileios Zikos, 2007. "A Reappraisal of the Irrelevance result in mixed duopoly: A note on R&D competition," Economics Bulletin, Economics Bulletin, vol. 12(8), pages 1-6. [Downloadable!]
    7. David Sappington & J. Sidak, 2003. "Incentives for Anticompetitive Behavior by Public Enterprises," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 183-206, May. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    8. Vasileios Zikos, 2007. "Equilibrium and Optimal R&D Roles in a Mixed Market," Discussion Paper Series 2007_08, Department of Economics, Loughborough University, revised Mar 2007. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    9. Vasileios Zikos, 2008. "R&D Collaboration Networks in Mixed Oligopoly," Working Papers 2008.25, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei. [Downloadable!]
    10. Susumu Cato, 2008. "Mixed oligopoly, productive efficiency, and spillover," Economics Bulletin, Economics Bulletin, vol. 12(33), pages 1-5. [Downloadable!]

  3. Vincenzo Denicolo, 1989. "Fixed Agenda Social Choice Theory: Correspondence and Impossibility Theorems for Social Choice Corrispondences and Social Decision Functions," Working Papers 84, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    Published as:

    Cited by:

    1. Bertrand Tchantcho & Lawrence Diffo Lambo, 2008. "A characterization of social choice correspondences that implement the core of simple games," Economic Theory, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 533-542, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    2. Josep Enric Peris Ferrando & Mª Carmen Sánchez, 1998. "- Fixed Agenda Social Choice Correspondences," Working Papers. Serie AD 1998-05, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie). [Downloadable!]

  4. Flavio Delbono & Vincenzo Denicolo, 1988. "Incentives to Innovate in a Cournot Oligopoly," Working Papers 44, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    Published as:

    Cited by:

    1. Donja Darai & Dario Sacco & Armin Schmutzler, 2009. "Competition and Innovation: An Experimental Investigation," Working Papers 0608, University of Zurich, Socioeconomic Institute, revised Apr 2007. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    2. Gianluca Femminis & Gianmaria Martini, 2007. "Spillovers, disclosure lags, and incentives to innovate. Do oligopolies over-invest in R&D?," DISCE - Quaderni dell'Istituto di Teoria Economica e Metodi Quantitativi itemq0744, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimenti e Istituti di Scienze Economiche (DISCE). [Downloadable!]
    3. Gianluca Femminis & Gianmaria Martini, 2009. "First mover advantage in a dynamic duopoly with spillover," DISCE - Quaderni dell'Istituto di Teoria Economica e Metodi Quantitativi itemq0955, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimenti e Istituti di Scienze Economiche (DISCE). [Downloadable!]
    4. L. Lambertini & G. Rossini, 1998. "Endogenous choice of capacity and product innovation in a differential duopoly," Working Papers 320, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna. [Downloadable!]
    5. Shuntian Yao & Lydia L. Gan, 2006. "The Welfare Effects of Monopoly Innovation," Economic Growth centre Working Paper Series 0609, Nanyang Technolgical University, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Economic Growth centre. [Downloadable!]
    6. L. Lambertini & A. Mantovani, 2000. "Price vs Quantity in a Duopoly with Technological Spillovers: A Welfare Re-Appraisal," Working Papers 389, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna. [Downloadable!]

  5. Basevi, Giorgio & Delbono, Flavio & Denicolo, Vincenzo, 1988. "International Monetary Cooperation under Tariff Threats," CEPR Discussion Papers 235, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
    Published as:

    Cited by:

    1. Marion Kohler, . "Optimal currency areas and customs unions: are they connected?," Bank of England working papers 89, Bank of England. [Downloadable!]

Articles

  1. Vincenzo Denicolo, 2007. "Do patents over-compensate innovators?," Economic Policy, CEPR, CES, MSH, vol. 22, pages 679-729, October. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

    Cited by:

    1. Cugno Franco & Ottoz Elisabetta, 2007. "Patent-secret mix in complex product firms," Department of Economics Working Papers 200707, University of Turin. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    2. Silvia Galli, 2006. "Patents and Research Tools in a Schumpeterian Growth Model with Sequential Innovation," Rivista di Politica Economica, SIPI Spa, vol. 96(6), pages 63-104, November-. [Downloadable!]

  2. Vincenzo Denicolo & Luigi Alberto Franzoni, 2004. "Patents, Secrets, and the First-Inventor Defense," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 13(3), pages 517-538, 09. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

    Cited by:

    1. Carlos J. POnce, 2007. "More secrecy... more knowledge disclosure? : On disclosure outside of patents," Economics Working Papers we077241, Universidad Carlos III, Departamento de Economía. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    2. Carl Shapiro, 2006. "Prior User Rights," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 96(2), pages 92-96, May. [Downloadable!]
    3. Carlos J. Ponce, 2007. "Knowledge disclosure as intellectual property rights," Economics Working Papers we077140, Universidad Carlos III, Departamento de Economía. [Downloadable!]
    4. Sudipto Bhattacharya & Sergei Guriev, 2004. "Patents vs Trade Secrets: Knowledge Licensing and Spillover," Working Papers w0064, Center for Economic and Financial Research (CEFIR), revised Feb 2006. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    5. Nisvan Erkal & Suzanne Scotchmer, 2009. "Scarcity of Ideas and R&D Options: Use it, Lose it or Bank it," NBER Working Papers 14940, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    6. Klaus Kultti & Tuomas Takalo & Juuso Toikka, 2006. "Simultaneous Model of Innovation, Secrecy, and Patent Policy," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 96(2), pages 82-86, May. [Downloadable!]

  3. Denicolo, Vincenzo & Franzoni, Luigi Alberto, 2003. "The contract theory of patents," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 365-380, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

    Cited by:

    1. Cugno Franco & Ottoz Elisabetta, 2007. "Patent-secret mix in complex product firms," Department of Economics Working Papers 200707, University of Turin. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    2. Sudipto Bhattacharya & Sergei Guriev, 2004. "Patents vs Trade Secrets: Knowledge Licensing and Spillover," Working Papers w0064, Center for Economic and Financial Research (CEFIR), revised Feb 2006. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    3. Klaus Kultti & Tuomas Takalo & Juuso Toikka, 2006. "Simultaneous Model of Innovation, Secrecy, and Patent Policy," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 96(2), pages 82-86, May. [Downloadable!]

  4. Denicolo, Vincenzo & Zanchettin, Piercarlo, 2002. "How should forward patent protection be provided?," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 20(6), pages 801-827, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

    Cited by:

    1. Nisvan Erkal, 2003. "The Decision to Patent, Cumulative Innovation,and Optimal Policy," Department of Economics - Working Papers Series 877, The University of Melbourne. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    2. Moschini, GianCarlo & Yerokhin, Oleg, 2006. "Patents, Research Exemption, and the Incentive for Sequential Innovation," Staff General Research Papers 12598, Iowa State University, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    3. Eaton, Derek & van Tongeren, Frank, 2005. "Should Europe Further Strengthen Intellectual Property for Plant Breeders? An Analysis of Seed Industry Proposals," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24725, European Association of Agricultural Economists. [Downloadable!]
    4. Yann Ménière, 2008. "Non-Obviousness and Complementary Innovations," Post-Print hal-00397192_v1, HAL. [Downloadable!]

  5. Denicolo, Vincenzo, 2001. "Growth with non-drastic innovations and the persistence of leadership," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(8), pages 1399-1413, August. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

    Cited by:

    1. Daniela Grieco, 2006. "Degree of innovativeness and market structure: A model," CESPRI Working Papers 178, CESPRI, Centre for Research on Innovation and Internationalisation, Universita' Bocconi, Milano, Italy, revised May 2006. [Downloadable!]
    2. Piercarlo Zanchettin & Vincenzo Denicolò, 2004. "Competition and Growth in Neo-Schumpeterian Models," Discussion Papers in Economics 04/28, Department of Economics, University of Leicester. [Downloadable!]
    3. Federico Etro, 2004. "Innovation by leaders," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 114(495), pages 281-303, 04. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    4. Emmanuel Duguet & Stéphanie Monjon, 2004. "Is innovation persistent at the firm Level . An econometric examination comparing the propensity score and regression methods," Cahiers de la Maison des Sciences Economiques v04075, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1). [Downloadable!]
    5. Philipp Weinschenk, 2009. "Persistence of Monopoly and Research Specialization," Working Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2009_11, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods. [Downloadable!]

  6. Denicolo, Vincenzo, 2000. "Compatibility and Bundling with Generalist and Specialist Firms," Journal of Industrial Economics, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 48(2), pages 177-88, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

    Cited by:

    1. Reisinger, Markus, 2004. "The Effects of Product Bundling in Duopoly," Discussion Papers in Economics 477, University of Munich, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
    2. SHIM, Sunghee & OH, Jungsuk, 2006. "Service Bundling and the Role of Access Charge in the Broadband Internet Service Market," MPRA Paper 3553, University Library of Munich, Germany. [Downloadable!]
    3. Sue Mialon, 2009. "Exclusionary Bundling: The Motive for Mergers," Emory Economics 0907, Department of Economics, Emory University (Atlanta). [Downloadable!]
    4. Oilver Budzinski & Katharina Wacker, 2007. "The Prohibition of the Proposed Springer-ProSiebenSat.1-Merger: How much Economics in German Merger Control?," Marburg Working Papers on Economics 200704, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung). [Downloadable!]

  7. Vincenzo Denicolo & Massimo Matteuzzi, 2000. "Specific and Ad Valorem Taxation in Asymmetric Cournot Oligopolies," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 335-342, May. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

    Cited by:

    1. Lapan, Harvey E. & Hennessy, David A., 2007. "Unit vs. Ad Valorem Taxes in Multi-Product Cournot Oligopoly," Staff General Research Papers 12780, Iowa State University, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
    2. Ramón Torregrosa, 2008. "Macroeconomic effects of an indirect tax substitution," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 94(3), pages 199-221, September. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    3. X. Wang & Jingang Zhao, 2009. "On the efficiency of indirect taxes in differentiated oligopolies with asymmetric costs," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 96(3), pages 223-239, April. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    4. D. Dragone & L. Lambertini & A. Palestini, 2009. "On the non-neutrality of profit taxation in a Cournot oligopoly with environmental effects," Working Papers 662, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna. [Downloadable!]

  8. Denicolo, Vincenzo, 1999. "Pollution-Reducing Innovations under Taxes or Permits," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 51(1), pages 184-99, January.
    Other versions:

    See citations under working paper version above.

  9. Denicolo, Vincenzo & Garella, Paolo G, 1999. "Market-Share Import Restraints in Oligopoly," Review of International Economics, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 7(4), pages 732-43, November.

    Cited by:

    1. Aditya Bhattacharya, 2008. "Import Quotas, Export Promotion and Intra-industry Trade," Working Papers id:1626, esocialsciences.com. [Downloadable!]
    2. Aditya Bhattacharjea, 2002. "Foreign entry and domestic welfare: lessons for developing countries," Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 11(2), pages 143-162, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    3. Aditya Bhattacharjea, 2000. "Foreign Entry and Domestic Welfare: Can "Market Discipline" Be Excessive?," Working papers 83, Centre for Development Economics, Delhi School of Economics. [Downloadable!]
    4. Aditya Bhattacharya, 2008. "Foreign Entry and Domestic Welfare: Can “Market Discipline†be Excessive," Working Papers id:1536, esocialsciences.com. [Downloadable!]

  10. Vincenzo Denicolo' & Paolo Garella, 1999. "Rationing in a Durable Goods Monopoly," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 30(1), pages 44-55, Spring. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

    Cited by:

    1. Volker Nocke & Martin Peitz, 2003. "Monopoly Pricing under Demand Uncertainty: Final Sales versus Introductory Offers," PIER Working Paper Archive 03-002, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    2. Ari Hyytinen & Lotta Väänänen, 2004. "Could Mr. and Mrs. Capital Market Imperfection Please Step Forward? An Empirical Analysis of Adverse Selection and Moral Hazard in Capital Markets," Discussion Papers 887, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy. [Downloadable!]
    3. Di Maria, Corrado & Köttl, Johannes, 2002. "Lagged Network Externalities and Rationing in a Software Monopoly," Economics Series 120, Institute for Advanced Studies. [Downloadable!]
    4. Paulo Maçãs Nunes, 2006. "The Coase problem: a transformation of the usual utility function," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 13(7), pages 427-429, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

  11. Vincenzo DenicolÔ, 1999. "A characterization of utilitarianism without the transitivity axiom," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 273-278. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

    Cited by:

    1. Nicolas Gravel & Abhiroop Mukhopadhyays, 2007. "Is India Better off Today than 15 Years ago? A Robust Multidimensional Answer," IDEP Working Papers 0704, Institut d'economie publique (IDEP), Marseille, France, revised 18 May 2007. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    2. Nicolas Gravel & Patrick Moyes, 2006. "Ethically Robust Comparisons of Distributions of Two Individual Attributes," IDEP Working Papers 0605, Institut d'economie publique (IDEP), Marseille, France, revised Aug 2006. [Downloadable!]

  12. Denicolo, Vincenzo, 1999. "The optimal life of a patent when the timing of innovation is stochastic," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 17(6), pages 827-846, August. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

    Cited by:

    1. Kenneth Judd & Karl Schmedders, 2002. "Optimal Rules for Patent Races," Discussion Papers 1343, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    2. Oleg Yerokhin & GianCarlo Moschini, 2008. "Intellectual Property Rights and Crop-Improving R&D under Adaptive Destruction," Environmental & Resource Economics, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 40(1), pages 53-72, May. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
      Other versions:
    3. Fershtman, Chaim & Markovich, Sarit, 2006. "Patents, Imitation and Licensing in an Asymmetric Dynamic R&D Race," CEPR Discussion Papers 5481, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    4. Koo, Bonwoo & Wright, Brian D., 2002. "Economics of patenting a research tool: participation and productivity," EPTD discussion papers 88, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). [Downloadable!]
    5. Michael Yuan, 2006. "A better copyright system? comparing welfare of indefinitely renewable copyright versus fixed-length copyright," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 15(6), pages 519-542, September. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    6. Nadolnyak, Denis A. & Sheldon, Ian M., 2002. "A Model Of Development Of Agricultural Biotechnological Innovations: Patent Policy Analysis," 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA 19802, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association). [Downloadable!]

  13. Denicolo, Vincenzo, 1996. "Patent Races and Optimal Patent Breadth and Length," Journal of Industrial Economics, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 44(3), pages 249-65, September. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

    Cited by:

    1. Nancy Gallini and Suzanne Scotchmer., 2001. "Intellectual Property: When Is It the Best Incentive System?," Economics Working Papers E01-303, University of California at Berkeley. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    2. Rune Stenbacka, 2002. "Microeconomic Policies in the New Economy," Finnish Economic Papers, Finnish Economic Association, vol. 15(2), pages 59-75, Autumn. [Downloadable!]
    3. Gianluca Femminis & Gianmaria Martini, 2007. "Spillovers, disclosure lags, and incentives to innovate. Do oligopolies over-invest in R&D?," DISCE - Quaderni dell'Istituto di Teoria Economica e Metodi Quantitativi itemq0744, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimenti e Istituti di Scienze Economiche (DISCE). [Downloadable!]
    4. Stenbacka, Rune, 2001. "Microeconomic Policies in the New Economy," Working Papers UNU-WIDER Research Paper , World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER). [Downloadable!]
    5. Julio R. Robledo, 2005. "Strategic patents and asymmetric litigation costs as entry deterrence instruments," Economics Bulletin, Economics Bulletin, vol. 15(2), pages 1-9. [Downloadable!]
    6. Alexandre Almeida & Aurora A.C. Teixeira, 2007. "Does Patenting negatively impact on R&D investment?An international panel data assessment," FEP Working Papers 255, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto. [Downloadable!]
    7. Shih-Tse Lo, 2004. "Strenghtening Intellectual Property rights: Experience from the 1986 Taiwanese Patent Reforms," Working Papers 04004, Concordia University, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
    8. Alka Chadha & Åke Blomqvist, 2005. "Patent Races, “Me-Too” Drugs, and Generics: A Developing-World Perspective," Departmental Working Papers wp0513, National University of Singapore, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
    9. Nancy Gallini & Suzanne Scotchmer, 2003. "Intellectual Property: When is it the Best Incentive System?," Levine's Working Paper Archive 618897000000000532, David K. Levine. [Downloadable!]
    10. Trommetter, M., 2008. "Intellectual property rights in agricultural and agro-food biotechnologies to 2030 (© OECD International Futures Programme)," Working Papers 200805, Grenoble Applied Economics Laboratory (GAEL). [Downloadable!]
    11. Corinne Langinier & GianCarlo Moschini, 2002. "Economics of Patents: An Overview, The," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 02-wp293, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    12. Michel Trommetter, 2006. "La proprieté intellectuelle dans les biotechnologies agricoles : Quels enjeux pour quelles perspectives ?," Working Papers hal-00243036_v1, HAL. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:
    13. Kurt R. Brekke & Odd Rune Straume, 2008. "Pharmaceutical Patents: Incentives for R&D or Marketing?," CESifo Working Paper Series CESifo Working Paper No. , CESifo Group Munich. [Downloadable!]
    14. Schneider, Cédric, 2005. "Fences and competition in patent races," MPRA Paper 2087, University Library of Munich, Germany. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:

  14. Delbono, Flavio & Denicolo, Vincenzo, 1993. "Regulating innovative activity : The role of a public firm," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 35-48, March. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:

    See citations under working paper version above.

  15. Denicolo Vincenzo, 1993. "Fixed Agenda Social Choice Theory: Correspondence and Impossibility Theorems for Social Choice Correspondences and Social Decision Functions," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 59(2), pages 324-332, April. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:

    See citations under working paper version above.

  16. Delbono, Flavio & Denicolo, Vincenzo, 1991. "Incentives to Innovate in a Cournot Oligopoly," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, vol. 106(3), pages 951-61, August. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:

    See citations under working paper version above.

  17. Basevi, Giorgio & Denicolo, Vincenzo & Delbono, Flavio, 1990. "International monetary cooperation under tariff threats," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(1-2), pages 1-23, February. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:

    See citations under working paper version above.

  18. Delbono, Flavio & Denicolo, Vincenzo, 1990. "R & D investment in a symmetric and homogeneous oligopol : Bertrand vs Cournot," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 8(2), pages 297-313, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

    Cited by:

    1. Gamal Atallah, 2003. "Information sharing and the stability of cooperation in research joint ventures," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 12(6), pages 531-554, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
      Other versions:
    2. Gamal Atallah, 2002. "Vertical R&D Spillovers, Cooperation, Market Structure, and Innovation," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 179-209, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
      Other versions:
    3. Luca Lambertini, 2006. "Process R&D in Monopoly under Demand Uncertainty," Economics Bulletin, Economics Bulletin, vol. 15(14), pages 1-9. [Downloadable!]
      Other versions:

  19. Denicolo, Vincenzo, 1987. "Intransitive social strict preference and the Arrow theorem," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 311-314. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

    Cited by:

    1. Josep Enric Peris Ferrando & Mª Carmen Sánchez, 1998. "- Fixed Agenda Social Choice Correspondences," Working Papers. Serie AD 1998-05, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie). [Downloadable!]

Did you know? No RePEc service, like IDEAS, charges for the use or the display of bibliographic data.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-17.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.