IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/e/pgi25.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Maria Jose Gil Molto

Personal Details

First Name:Maria
Middle Name:Jose
Last Name:Gil Molto
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pgi25
[This author has chosen not to make the email address public]
Dpt. Economics, Universitat Jaume I, Avda. Sos Baynat, s/n, E-12071, Castellon (Spain).
Terminal Degree:2004 Laboratori d'Economia Experimental (LEE); Universitat Jaume I (from RePEc Genealogy)

Affiliation

Departament d'Economia
Universitat Jaume I

Castellón de la Plana, Spain
http://www.eco.uji.es/
RePEc:edi:ueujies (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles Chapters

Working papers

  1. Bouwe Dijkstra & Maria J. Gil-Moltó, 2014. "Is Emission Intensity or Output U-shaped in the Strictness of Environmental Policy," CESifo Working Paper Series 4833, CESifo.
  2. Maria Jose Gil-Molto & Dimitrios Varvarigos, 2014. "Environmental Investments in Mixed vs Private Oligopoly: What are the Implications of Privatization?," Discussion Papers in Economics 14/15, Division of Economics, School of Business, University of Leicester.
  3. Maria José Gil-Moltó & Dimitrios Varvarigos, 2013. "Endogenous Market Structure, Occupational Choice, and Growth Cycles," Discussion Papers in Economics 13/05, Division of Economics, School of Business, University of Leicester.
  4. Maria José Gil-Moltó & Dimitrios Varvarigos, 2012. "Industry Dynamics and Indeterminacy in an OLG Economy with Endogenous Occupational Choice," Discussion Papers in Economics 12/09, Division of Economics, School of Business, University of Leicester, revised Sep 2012.
  5. Maria J. Gil-Molto & Bouwe Dijkstra, 2011. "Strictness of Environmental Policy and Investment in Abatement," Discussion Papers in Economics 11/35, Division of Economics, School of Business, University of Leicester.
  6. Maria José Gil-Moltó & Dimitrios Varvarigos, 2011. "Emission Taxes and the Adoption of Cleaner Technologies: The Case of Environmentally Conscious Consumers," Discussion Papers in Economics 11/49, Division of Economics, School of Business, University of Leicester.
  7. Maria José Gil Moltó & Joanna Poyago.Theotoky & Vasileios Zikos, 2010. "R&D Subsidies, Spillovers and Privatization in Mixed Markets," Discussion Papers in Economics 10/19, Division of Economics, School of Business, University of Leicester.
  8. Elias Asproudis & Maria José Gil-Moltó, 2009. "Technological choice under environmentalists’ participation in Emissions Trading Systems," Discussion Papers in Economics 09/9, Division of Economics, School of Business, University of Leicester.
  9. Maria J. Gil-Moltó, 2008. "Economic Aspects of the Microsoft Case: Networks, Interoperability and Competition," Discussion Papers in Economics 08/39, Division of Economics, School of Business, University of Leicester.
  10. María José Gil-Moltó & Joanna Poyago-Theotoky & Vasileios Zikos, 2006. "R&D policy and privatization in a mixed oligopoly," Discussion Paper Series 2006_25, Department of Economics, Loughborough University.
  11. Maria Jose Gil-Molto & Joanna Poyago-Theotoky, 2006. "Flexible vs Dedicated Technology Adoption in the Presence of a Public Firm," Discussion Paper Series 2006_1, Department of Economics, Loughborough University, revised Jan 2006.
  12. Aurora Garcia-Gallego & Nikolaos Georgantzis & Maria Jose Gil Molto & Vicente Orts, 2006. "An Experiment on subjective Game Valuations," Discussion Paper Series 2006_4, Department of Economics, Loughborough University, revised Apr 2006.
  13. María José Gil-Moltó & Joanna Poyago-Theotoky & Vasileios Zikos, 2006. "Public Policy towards R&D in a Mixed Duopoly with Spillovers," Discussion Paper Series 2006_17, Department of Economics, Loughborough University.
  14. Maria J. Gil-Molto & Claudio A. Piga, 2005. "Entry and Exit in a Liberalised Market," Discussion Paper Series 2005_10, Department of Economics, Loughborough University, revised May 2006.
  15. María José Gil Moltó & Nikolaos Georgantzís & Vicente Orts, 2004. "Cooperative R&D with Endogenous Technology Differentiation," Industrial Organization 0401009, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  16. María José Gil-Moltó & Arne Risa Hole, 2003. "Tests for the consistency of three-level nested logit models with utility maximization," Econometrics 0312001, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 08 Jan 2004.

    repec:san:crieff:1008 is not listed on IDEAS

Articles

  1. Gil-Moltó, Maria José & Poyago-Theotoky, Joanna & Rodrigues-Neto, José A. & Zikos, Vasileios, 2020. "Mixed oligopoly, cost-reducing research and development, and privatisation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(3), pages 1094-1106.
  2. Bouwe R. Dijkstra & Maria J. Gil‐Moltó, 2018. "Is emission intensity or output U‐shaped in the strictness of environmental policy?," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 20(2), pages 177-201, April.
  3. Varvarigos, Dimitrios & Gil-Moltó, Maria José, 2016. "Endogenous Market Structure, Occupational Choice, And Growth Cycles," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(1), pages 70-94, January.
  4. Elias Asproudis & Maria Gil-Moltó, 2015. "Green Trade Unions: Structure, Wages and Environmental Technology," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 60(2), pages 165-189, February.
  5. Asproudis, Elias & Gil-Moltó, Maria José, 2014. "Pollution and Environmentalists' Participation in Emissions Trading Systems," Strategic Behavior and the Environment, now publishers, vol. 4(1), pages 59-87, April.
  6. Gil-Moltó, Maria José & Varvarigos, Dimitrios, 2013. "Emission taxes and the adoption of cleaner technologies: The case of environmentally conscious consumers," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 486-504.
  7. Maria José Gil-Moltó & Joanna Poyago-Theotoky & Vasileios Zikos, 2011. "R&D Subsidies, Spillovers, and Privatization in Mixed Markets," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 78(1), pages 233-255, July.
  8. María José Gil‐Moltó & Joanna Poyago‐Theotoky, 2008. "Flexible versus Dedicated Technology Adoption in the Presence of a Public Firm," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 74(4), pages 997-1016, April.
  9. Maria José Gil-Moltó & Claudio A. Piga, 2007. "Entry and Exit in a Liberalised Market," Rivista di Politica Economica, SIPI Spa, vol. 97(1), pages 3-38, January-F.
  10. María José Gil-Moltó & Vicente Orts & Nikolaos Georgantzís & Aurora García-Gallego, 2006. "An experiment on subjective game valuations," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 3(10), pages 1-6.
  11. Garcia-Gallego, Aurora & Georgantzis, Nikolaos & Gil-Molto, Maria Jose & Orts, Vicente, 2006. "Game-theoretic aspects of international mergers: Theory and case studies," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 395-409, September.
  12. María José Gil Moltó & Nikolaos Georgantzís & Vicente Orts, 2005. "Cooperative R&D with Endogenous Technology Differentiation," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(2), pages 461-476, June.
  13. Gil-Molto, Maria Jose & Hole, Arne Risa, 2004. "Tests for the consistency of three-level nested logit models with utility maximization," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 85(1), pages 133-137, October.

Chapters

  1. Maria J. Gil-Moltó, 2010. "Economic Aspects of the Microsoft Case: Networks, Interoperability and Competition," Chapters, in: Luca Rubini (ed.), Microsoft on Trial, chapter 11, Edward Elgar Publishing.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Bouwe Dijkstra & Maria J. Gil-Moltó, 2014. "Is Emission Intensity or Output U-shaped in the Strictness of Environmental Policy," CESifo Working Paper Series 4833, CESifo.

    Cited by:

    1. Luca Lambertini & Joanna Poyago-Theotoky & Alessandro Tampieri, 2015. "Cournot Competition and "Green" Innovation: An Inverted-U Relationship," Working Papers 2015.73, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    2. Paolo Casini & Edilio Valentini, 2019. "Emissions Markets with Price Stabilizing Mechanisms: Possible Unpleasant Outcomes," Working Papers 2019.16, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    3. Alfred Endres & Tim Friehe & Bianca Rundshagen, 2020. "Diffusion and adoption of advanced emission abatement technology induced by permit trading," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 22(5), pages 1313-1337, September.
    4. Poyago-Theotoky Joanna & Yong Soo Keong, 2019. "Managerial Delegation Contracts, “Green” R&D and Emissions Taxation," The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 19(2), pages 1-10, June.

  2. Maria Jose Gil-Molto & Dimitrios Varvarigos, 2014. "Environmental Investments in Mixed vs Private Oligopoly: What are the Implications of Privatization?," Discussion Papers in Economics 14/15, Division of Economics, School of Business, University of Leicester.

    Cited by:

    1. Clò, Stefano & Ferraris, Matteo & Florio, Massimo, 2017. "Ownership and environmental regulation: Evidence from the European electricity industry," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 298-312.
    2. Shoji Haruna & Rajeev K. Goel, 2019. "Optimal pollution control in a mixed oligopoly with research spillovers," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(1), pages 21-40, March.

  3. Maria José Gil-Moltó & Dimitrios Varvarigos, 2013. "Endogenous Market Structure, Occupational Choice, and Growth Cycles," Discussion Papers in Economics 13/05, Division of Economics, School of Business, University of Leicester.

    Cited by:

    1. David Urbano & Sebastian Aparicio & David Audretsch, 2019. "Twenty-five years of research on institutions, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: what has been learned?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 53(1), pages 21-49, June.
    2. Dimitrios Varvarigos, 2017. "Endogenous cycles and human capital," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 120(1), pages 31-45, January.
    3. Vera Ivanova & Philip Ushchev, 2019. "Product Differentiation, Competitive Toughness, and Intertemporal Substitution," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 121(3), pages 1244-1269, July.

  4. Maria José Gil-Moltó & Dimitrios Varvarigos, 2012. "Industry Dynamics and Indeterminacy in an OLG Economy with Endogenous Occupational Choice," Discussion Papers in Economics 12/09, Division of Economics, School of Business, University of Leicester, revised Sep 2012.

    Cited by:

    1. Federico Etro, 2014. "The Theory Of Endogenous Market Structures," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(5), pages 804-830, December.
    2. Vera Ivanova & Philip Ushchev, 2015. "When Ricardo Meets Chamberlin: A Simple Dynamic Model Of Monopolistic Competition," HSE Working papers WP BRP 99/EC/2015, National Research University Higher School of Economics.

  5. Maria J. Gil-Molto & Bouwe Dijkstra, 2011. "Strictness of Environmental Policy and Investment in Abatement," Discussion Papers in Economics 11/35, Division of Economics, School of Business, University of Leicester.

    Cited by:

    1. Inge M. Bijgaart & Sjak Smulders, 2018. "Does a Recession Call for Less Stringent Environmental Policy? A Partial-Equilibrium Second-Best Analysis," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 70(4), pages 807-834, August.
    2. Li, Shoude & Fu, Tong, 2022. "Abatement technology innovation, worker productivity and firm profitability: A dynamic analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    3. BRECHET, Thierry & MEUNIER, Guy, 2012. "Are clean technology and environmental quality conflicting policy goals?," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2012006, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    4. van den Bijgaart, Inge, 2016. "Essays in environmental economics and policy," Other publications TiSEM 298bee2a-cb08-4173-9fe1-8, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.

  6. Maria José Gil-Moltó & Dimitrios Varvarigos, 2011. "Emission Taxes and the Adoption of Cleaner Technologies: The Case of Environmentally Conscious Consumers," Discussion Papers in Economics 11/49, Division of Economics, School of Business, University of Leicester.

    Cited by:

    1. Ángela García-Alamino & Santiago J. Rubio, 2019. "Emission Taxes, Feed-in Subsidies and the Investment in a Clean Technology by a Polluting Monopoly," Working Papers 2019.15, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    2. Langinier, Corinne & Ray Chaudhuri, A., 2019. "Green Technology and Patents in the Presence of Green Consumers," Other publications TiSEM 03e766c3-0046-4ddf-b9aa-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    3. Luca Lambertini & Joanna Poyago-Theotoky & Alessandro Tampieri, 2015. "Cournot Competition and "Green" Innovation: An Inverted-U Relationship," Working Papers 2015.73, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    4. Moner-Colonques, R. & Rubio, S., 2015. "The timing of environmental policy in a duopolistic market," Economia Agraria y Recursos Naturales, Spanish Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 15(01).
    5. Wen, Wen & Zhou, P. & Zhang, Fuqiang, 2018. "Carbon emissions abatement: Emissions trading vs consumer awareness," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 34-47.
    6. Christos Constantatos & Christos Pargianas & Eftichios S. Sartzetakis, 2021. "Green consumers and environmental policy," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 23(1), pages 105-140, February.
    7. Wenjun Sun & Naoto Jinji, 2014. "The Effects of Emission Taxes on Pollution through the Diffusion of Clean Technology:The Presence of Green Consumers," Discussion papers e-14-014, Graduate School of Economics Project Center, Kyoto University.
    8. Jason M. Walter, 2018. "Understanding the dynamics of clean technology: implications for policy and industry," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 20(2), pages 365-386, April.
    9. Dongdong Li, 2022. "Dynamic optimal control of firms' green innovation investment and pricing strategies with environmental awareness and emission tax," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(4), pages 920-932, June.
    10. Pang, Yu, 2018. "Profitable pollution abatement? A worker productivity perspective," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 33-49.
    11. Zhang, Wenjie & He, Lingling & Yuan, Hongping, 2022. "Enterprises’ decisions on adopting low-carbon technology by considering consumer perception disparity," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    12. Guo, Jian-Xin & Zhu, Kaiwei, 2021. "Implications for enterprise to adopt cleaner technology: From the perspective of energy market and commodity market," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    13. Abdulla, Eman & Lim, King Yoong & Morris, Diego & Saliba, Faten, 2022. "Climate Change, Gender Equality, and Firm-Level Innovation : Cross-Country Evidence," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1429, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
    14. Manman Wang & Shuai Lian & Shi Yin & Hengmin Dong, 2020. "A Three-Player Game Model for Promoting the Diffusion of Green Technology in Manufacturing Enterprises from the Perspective of Supply and Demand," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-26, September.
    15. Jinhuan Tang & Shoufeng Ji & Liwen Jiang, 2016. "The Design of a Sustainable Location-Routing-Inventory Model Considering Consumer Environmental Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-20, February.
    16. Gongbing Bi & Minyue Jin & Liuyi Ling & Feng Yang, 2017. "Environmental subsidy and the choice of green technology in the presence of green consumers," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 255(1), pages 547-568, August.

  7. Maria José Gil Moltó & Joanna Poyago.Theotoky & Vasileios Zikos, 2010. "R&D Subsidies, Spillovers and Privatization in Mixed Markets," Discussion Papers in Economics 10/19, Division of Economics, School of Business, University of Leicester.

    Cited by:

    1. Fan Zhang & Susu Cheng, 2021. "Behavioral choices in a dynamic duopoly with process innovation and sticky price: Myopia versus farsightedness," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(3), pages 662-674, April.
    2. Junichi Haraguchi & Toshihiro Matsumura, 2020. "Implicit protectionism via state enterprises and technology transfer from foreign enterprises," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(3), pages 723-743, August.
    3. Marie‐Laure Cabon‐Dhersin & Romain Gibert, 2020. "R&D cooperation, proximity and distribution of public funding between public and private research sectors," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 88(6), pages 773-800, December.
    4. Kesavayuth, Dusanee & Zikos, Vasileios, 2013. "R&D versus output subsidies in mixed markets," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 118(2), pages 293-296.
    5. Chen, Jiaqi & Lee, Sang-Ho & Muminov, Timur, 2020. "Mixed ownership and R&D under discriminatory output subsidies," MPRA Paper 105015, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Haraguchi, Junichi & Matsumura, Toshihiro, 2017. "Firms' Costs, Profits, Entries, and Innovation under Optimal Privatization Policy," MPRA Paper 80927, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Sang-Ho Lee & Timur K. Muminov, 2021. "Endogenous Timing of R&D Decisions and Privatization Policy with Research Spillovers," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 505-525, December.
    8. Bogoroditskaya, N., 2021. "Tax evasion and R&D subsidy in a mixed market," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 51(3), pages 30-49.
    9. Junichi Haraguchi & Toshihiro Matsumura, 2020. "Optimal privatization policy with asymmetry among private firms," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(3), pages 213-224, July.
    10. Nie, Pu-Yan & Yang, Yong-Cong, 2015. "Cost-reduction innovation under mixed economy," Economics Discussion Papers 2015-68, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    11. Daquan Gao & Christina W. Y. Wong & Kee-hung Lai, 2023. "Development of Ecosystem for Corporate Green Innovation: Resource Dependency Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-28, March.
    12. Matsumura, Toshihiro & Okumura, Yasunori, 2013. "Privatization neutrality theorem revisited," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 118(2), pages 324-326.
    13. Lee, Sang-Ho & Muminov, Timur & Tomaru, Yoshihiro, 2017. "Partial Privatization and Subsidization in a Mixed Duopoly: R&D versus Output Subsidies," MPRA Paper 79778, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Liu, Yi & Tan, Yu & Fang, Yu, 2019. "Innovation spillover, licensing, and ex-post privatization in international duopoly," MPRA Paper 95467, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Mariel Leal & Arturo García & Sang-Ho Lee, 2021. "Sequencing R&D decisions with a consumer-friendly firm and spillovers," The Japanese Economic Review, Springer, vol. 72(2), pages 243-260, April.
    16. Lin, Ming Hsin & Matsumura, Toshihiro, 2017. "Optimal Privatization and Uniform Subsidy Policies: A Synthesis," MPRA Paper 77285, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Lee, Sang-Ho & Muminov, Timur, 2017. "R&D Output Sharing in a Mixed Duopoly and Incentive Subsidy Policy," MPRA Paper 81732, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Toshihiro Matsumura & Makoto Okamura, 2015. "Competition and privatization policies revisited: the payoff interdependence approach," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 116(2), pages 137-150, October.
    19. Tai-Liang Chen, 2017. "Privatization and efficiency: a mixed oligopoly approach," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 120(3), pages 251-268, April.
    20. Jingjing Wang & Chi Leung & Yue Kwok, 2015. "Stochastic control model for R&D race in a mixed duopoly with spillovers and knowledge stocks," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 38(2), pages 177-195, October.
    21. Shoji Haruna & Rajeev K. Goel, 2017. "Output subsidies in mixed oligopoly with research spillovers," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 41(2), pages 235-256, April.
    22. Jiaqi Chen & Sang‐Ho Lee, 2023. "Cournot–Bertrand comparisons under R&D competition: Output versus R&D subsidies," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 19(1), pages 77-100, March.
    23. Shoji Haruna & Rajeev K. Goel, 2019. "Optimal pollution control in a mixed oligopoly with research spillovers," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(1), pages 21-40, March.
    24. Marie-Laure Cabon-Dhersin & Romain Gibert, 2017. "Cooperation or non-cooperation in R&D: how should research be funded? ," Working Papers hal-01587014, HAL.
    25. Wensheng Yang & Yinyuan Si & Jinxing Zhang & Sen Liu & Andrea Appolloni, 2021. "Coordination Mechanism of Dual-Channel Supply Chains Considering Retailer Innovation Inputs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-22, January.
    26. Marie-Laure Cabon-Dhersin & Romain Gibert, 2018. "Cooperation or non-cooperation in R&D: how should research be funded?," Post-Print hal-02006515, HAL.

  8. Elias Asproudis & Maria José Gil-Moltó, 2009. "Technological choice under environmentalists’ participation in Emissions Trading Systems," Discussion Papers in Economics 09/9, Division of Economics, School of Business, University of Leicester.

    Cited by:

    1. Maria J. Gil-Molto & Bouwe Dijkstra, 2011. "Strictness of Environmental Policy and Investment in Abatement," Discussion Papers in Economics 11/35, Division of Economics, School of Business, University of Leicester.
    2. Asproudis, Elias, 2011. "Trade union structure with environmental concern and firms' technological choice," MPRA Paper 28767, University Library of Munich, Germany.

  9. María José Gil-Moltó & Joanna Poyago-Theotoky & Vasileios Zikos, 2006. "R&D policy and privatization in a mixed oligopoly," Discussion Paper Series 2006_25, Department of Economics, Loughborough University.

    Cited by:

    1. Vasileios Zikos, 2007. "A Reappraisal of the Irrelevance result in mixed duopoly: A note on R&D competition," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 12(8), pages 1-6.
    2. Nie, Pu-Yan & Yang, Yong-Cong, 2015. "Cost-reduction innovation under mixed economy," Economics Discussion Papers 2015-68, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).

  10. María José Gil-Moltó & Joanna Poyago-Theotoky & Vasileios Zikos, 2006. "Public Policy towards R&D in a Mixed Duopoly with Spillovers," Discussion Paper Series 2006_17, Department of Economics, Loughborough University.

    Cited by:

    1. Vasileios Zikos, 2007. "A Reappraisal of the Irrelevance result in mixed duopoly: A note on R&D competition," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 12(8), pages 1-6.
    2. Vasileios Zikos, 2007. "Equilibrium and Optimal R&D Roles in a Mixed Market," Discussion Paper Series 2007_08, Department of Economics, Loughborough University, revised Mar 2007.

  11. Maria J. Gil-Molto & Claudio A. Piga, 2005. "Entry and Exit in a Liberalised Market," Discussion Paper Series 2005_10, Department of Economics, Loughborough University, revised May 2006.

    Cited by:

    1. Claudio A. Piga & Enrico Bachis, 2006. "Do Prices grow more in Euroland? Evidence from the Airline Industry," Discussion Paper Series 2006_8, Department of Economics, Loughborough University, revised Nov 2006.

  12. María José Gil Moltó & Nikolaos Georgantzís & Vicente Orts, 2004. "Cooperative R&D with Endogenous Technology Differentiation," Industrial Organization 0401009, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Cited by:

    1. Jeitschko Thomas D. & Zhang Nanyun, 2014. "Adverse Effects of Patent Pooling on Product Development and Commercialization," The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 14(1), pages 1-31, January.
    2. Rockett, Katharine, 2012. "Perspectives on the knowledge-based society: An introduction to the special issue," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 6, pages 1-22.
    3. Clark, Derek J. & Sand, Jan Yngve, 2009. "Endogenous Technology Sharing in R&D Intensive Industries," Economics Discussion Papers 2009-28, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    4. Noriaki Matsushima & Koki Arai & Ikuo Ishibashi & Fumio Sensui, 2011. "The effects of non-assertion of patents provisions: R&D incentives in vertical relationships," ISER Discussion Paper 0807, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.
    5. Jost, Peter-J., 2011. "Joint ventures in patent contests with spillovers and the role of strategic budgeting," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 63(6), pages 605-637.
    6. Neary, Peter & Leahy, Dermot, 2004. "Absorptive Capacity, R&D Spillovers and Public Policy," CEPR Discussion Papers 4171, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    7. Buccella Domenico & Fanti Luciano & Gori Luca, 2023. "The R&D Investment Decision Game with Product Differentiation," The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 23(2), pages 601-637, June.
    8. Constantine Manasakis & Emmanuel Petrakis, 2007. "Union Structure and Firms Incentives for Cooperative R&D Investments," Working Papers 0705, University of Crete, Department of Economics.
    9. Tran, Tat Thanh & Zikos, Vasileios, 2014. "Together at Last: The Endogenous Formation of Free Trade Agreements and International R&D Networks," MPRA Paper 66187, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Alipranti, Maria & Milliou, Chrysovalantou & Petrakis, Emmanuel, 2015. "On vertical relations and the timing of technology adoption," DICE Discussion Papers 198, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    11. Buccella, Domenico & Fanti, Luciano & Gori, Luca, 2021. "A contribution to the theory of R&D investments," GLO Discussion Paper Series 940, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    12. Xin (Shane) Wang & Yuying Xie & Harsharanjeet S. Jagpal & Sengun Yeniyurt, 2016. "Coordinating R&D, Product Positioning, and Pricing Strategy: A Duopoly Model," Customer Needs and Solutions, Springer;Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), vol. 3(2), pages 104-114, June.
    13. Shixun Wang & Lihong Yang, 2022. "The Network Structure of Innovation Networks," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 65-96, March.
    14. Milliou, Chrysovalantou, 2006. "Endogenous protection of R and D investments," UC3M Working papers. Economics we066325, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía.
    15. Thomas Jeitschko & Nanyun Zhang, 2011. "Patent Pools and Product Development," Working Papers 2011-02, Towson University, Department of Economics, revised Feb 2011.
    16. Issaka Dialga, 2017. "Changing the Africa's impoverishing economic model: Towards a rewarding sustainable specialization model with a new factor of production," Working Papers halshs-01500431, HAL.
    17. Werner Bönte & Lars Wiethaus, 2007. "Knowledge Disclosure and Transmission in Buyer–Supplier Relationships," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 31(4), pages 275-288, December.
    18. Yao, Liming & He, Linhuan & Chen, Xudong & Yang, Ling, 2021. "A study on the profit distribution mechanism of the resource - Based supply chain considering low-carbon constraints and ecological restoration," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    19. Chrysovalantou Milliou, 2009. "Endogenous protection of R&D investments," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(1), pages 184-205, February.
    20. Guohao Li & Tao Wang, 2022. "Long-Term Leases vs. One-Off Purchases: Game Analysis on Battery Swapping Mode Considering Cascade Utilization and Power Structure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-28, December.
    21. Joanna Poyago-Theotoky & Huw Edwards, 2012. "Regulatory protection when firms decide first on technical collaboration and R&D," Working Papers 2012.05, School of Economics, La Trobe University.
    22. Soo Keong Yong & Stuart McDonald, 2018. "Emissions tax and second-mover advantage in clean technology R&D," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 20(1), pages 89-108, January.
    23. Wang, Shixun & Yang, Lihong, 2022. "Spatial competition, strategic R&D and the structure of innovation networks," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 13-31.
    24. Constantine Manasakis & Emmanuel Petrakis, 2005. "Downstream Research Joint Venture with Upstream Market Power," Working Papers 0513, University of Crete, Department of Economics.
    25. Dusanee Kesavayuth & Constantine Manasakis & Vasileios Zikos, 2012. "Upstream R&D Networks," Working Papers 1201, University of Crete, Department of Economics.
    26. Leppälä, Samuli, 2014. "Theoretical Perspectives on Localised Knowledge Spillovers and Agglomeration," Cardiff Economics Working Papers E2014/10, Cardiff University, Cardiff Business School, Economics Section.
    27. Falvey, Rod & Poyago-Theotoky, Joanna & Teerasuwannajak, Khemarat Talerngsri, 2013. "Coordination costs and research joint ventures," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 965-976.
    28. Hui Li & Chuanxu Wang & Meng Shang & Wei Ou, 2017. "Pricing, Carbon Emission Reduction, Low-Carbon Promotion and Returning Decision in a Closed-Loop Supply Chain under Vertical and Horizontal Cooperation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-26, November.

  13. María José Gil-Moltó & Arne Risa Hole, 2003. "Tests for the consistency of three-level nested logit models with utility maximization," Econometrics 0312001, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 08 Jan 2004.

    Cited by:

    1. Birolini, Sebastian & Cattaneo, Mattia & Malighetti, Paolo & Morlotti, Chiara, 2020. "Integrated origin-based demand modeling for air transportation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    2. Stafford, Tess M., 2018. "Accounting for outside options in discrete choice models: An application to commercial fishing effort," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 159-179.
    3. Ma, Chunbo & Burton, Michael P., 2013. "A Nested Logit Model of Green Electricity Consumption in Western Australia," Working Papers 148411, University of Western Australia, School of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    4. Melo, Emerson, 2012. "A representative consumer theorem for discrete choice models in networked markets," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 117(3), pages 862-865.

Articles

  1. Gil-Moltó, Maria José & Poyago-Theotoky, Joanna & Rodrigues-Neto, José A. & Zikos, Vasileios, 2020. "Mixed oligopoly, cost-reducing research and development, and privatisation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(3), pages 1094-1106.

    Cited by:

    1. Fan Zhang & Susu Cheng, 2021. "Behavioral choices in a dynamic duopoly with process innovation and sticky price: Myopia versus farsightedness," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(3), pages 662-674, April.
    2. Marie‐Laure Cabon‐Dhersin & Romain Gibert, 2020. "R&D cooperation, proximity and distribution of public funding between public and private research sectors," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 88(6), pages 773-800, December.
    3. Chen, Jiaqi & Lee, Sang-Ho & Muminov, Timur, 2020. "Mixed ownership and R&D under discriminatory output subsidies," MPRA Paper 105015, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Sang-Ho Lee & Timur K. Muminov, 2021. "Endogenous Timing of R&D Decisions and Privatization Policy with Research Spillovers," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 505-525, December.

  2. Bouwe R. Dijkstra & Maria J. Gil‐Moltó, 2018. "Is emission intensity or output U‐shaped in the strictness of environmental policy?," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 20(2), pages 177-201, April. See citations under working paper version above.
  3. Varvarigos, Dimitrios & Gil-Moltó, Maria José, 2016. "Endogenous Market Structure, Occupational Choice, And Growth Cycles," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(1), pages 70-94, January.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  4. Elias Asproudis & Maria Gil-Moltó, 2015. "Green Trade Unions: Structure, Wages and Environmental Technology," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 60(2), pages 165-189, February.

    Cited by:

    1. Fanti, Luciano & Buccella, Domenico, 2018. "Pollution, green union and network industry," Economics Discussion Papers 2018-40, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    2. Buccella Domenico & Wojna Michał, 2019. "”Green” Managerial Delegation and Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility in Different Market Structures," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 27(4), pages 2-22, December.
    3. Buccella, Domenico & Fanti, Luciano & Gori, Luca, 2020. "To abate, or not to abate? A strategic approach on green production in Cournot and Bertrand duopolies," GLO Discussion Paper Series 636, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    4. Fukuda, Katsufumi & Ouchida, Yasunori, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility (CSR) and the environment: Does CSR increase emissions?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    5. Domenico Buccella & Luciano Fanti & Luca Gori, 2023. "Managerial firms’ profitability, unions, and environmental taxes," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 94(2), pages 575-598, June.
    6. Asproudis, Elias & Filippiadis, Eleftherios & Tian, Mo, 2021. "Climate solidarity, green trade unions and timing of technological choice," MPRA Paper 106329, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Elias Asproudis & Nadeem Khan & Nada Korac-Kakabadse, 2019. "Game of Regional Environmental Policy: Europe and US," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 1-20, March.
    8. Asproudis, Elias & Filippiadis, Eleftherios & Tian, Mo, 2022. "Timing of environmental technological choice and trade unions' climate solidarity," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    9. Elias Asproudis & Eleftherios Filippiadis, 2021. "Environmental Technological Choice in a Cournot-Bertrand Model," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 43-58, March.
    10. Buccella, Domenico & Fanti, Luciano & Gori, Luca, 2023. "Green subsidies as strategic trade policy tools," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1240, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    11. Buccella, Domenico & Fanti, Luciano & Gori, Luca, 2022. "‘Green’ managerial delegation theory," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(3), pages 223-249, June.
    12. Asproudis, Elias & Filippiadis, Eleftherios, 2021. "Bargaining for Community Fishing Quotas," MPRA Paper 107409, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Domenico Buccella & Augustine Abakpa, 2023. "Induced vs. Voluntary Green Production: Which Is Better for Society?," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2023(1), pages 89-103.

  5. Asproudis, Elias & Gil-Moltó, Maria José, 2014. "Pollution and Environmentalists' Participation in Emissions Trading Systems," Strategic Behavior and the Environment, now publishers, vol. 4(1), pages 59-87, April.

    Cited by:

    1. Elias Asproudis & Thomas Weyman-Jones, 2020. "How the ENGOs Can Fight the Industrial/Business Lobby with Their Tools from Their Own Field? ENGOs Participation in Emissions Trading Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-13, October.
    2. Eleni Stathopoulou, 2014. "Environmental campaigns and endogenous technology choice under international oligopoly," Discussion Papers in Economics 14/10, Division of Economics, School of Business, University of Leicester.
    3. Elias Asproudis & Eleftherios Filippiadis, 2021. "Environmental Technological Choice in a Cournot-Bertrand Model," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 43-58, March.

  6. Gil-Moltó, Maria José & Varvarigos, Dimitrios, 2013. "Emission taxes and the adoption of cleaner technologies: The case of environmentally conscious consumers," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 486-504.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  7. Maria José Gil-Moltó & Joanna Poyago-Theotoky & Vasileios Zikos, 2011. "R&D Subsidies, Spillovers, and Privatization in Mixed Markets," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 78(1), pages 233-255, July.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  8. María José Gil‐Moltó & Joanna Poyago‐Theotoky, 2008. "Flexible versus Dedicated Technology Adoption in the Presence of a Public Firm," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 74(4), pages 997-1016, April.

    Cited by:

    1. Armel Jacques, 2022. "Endogenous timing of technological choices of flexibility in a mixed duopoly," TEPP Working Paper 2022-04, TEPP.

  9. Maria José Gil-Moltó & Claudio A. Piga, 2007. "Entry and Exit in a Liberalised Market," Rivista di Politica Economica, SIPI Spa, vol. 97(1), pages 3-38, January-F.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  10. María José Gil Moltó & Nikolaos Georgantzís & Vicente Orts, 2005. "Cooperative R&D with Endogenous Technology Differentiation," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(2), pages 461-476, June.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  11. Gil-Molto, Maria Jose & Hole, Arne Risa, 2004. "Tests for the consistency of three-level nested logit models with utility maximization," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 85(1), pages 133-137, October.
    See citations under working paper version above.

Chapters

    Sorry, no citations of chapters recorded.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 17 papers announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-COM: Industrial Competition (5) 2005-12-20 2006-09-30 2008-11-25 2010-07-31 2010-12-04. Author is listed
  2. NEP-ENV: Environmental Economics (5) 2009-04-18 2012-02-01 2012-02-01 2014-11-12 2014-12-13. Author is listed
  3. NEP-INO: Innovation (5) 2004-02-01 2006-02-19 2010-07-31 2010-12-04 2012-02-01. Author is listed
  4. NEP-ENE: Energy Economics (4) 2009-04-18 2012-02-01 2012-02-01 2014-11-12
  5. NEP-TID: Technology & Industrial Dynamics (4) 2005-12-20 2006-02-19 2010-07-31 2010-12-04
  6. NEP-RES: Resource Economics (3) 2009-04-18 2012-02-01 2012-02-01
  7. NEP-DGE: Dynamic General Equilibrium (2) 2012-05-22 2013-05-22
  8. NEP-ENT: Entrepreneurship (2) 2005-12-20 2012-05-22
  9. NEP-IND: Industrial Organization (2) 2005-12-20 2014-12-13
  10. NEP-MAC: Macroeconomics (2) 2007-01-23 2013-05-22
  11. NEP-SBM: Small Business Management (2) 2010-07-31 2010-12-04
  12. NEP-BEC: Business Economics (1) 2013-05-22
  13. NEP-CBE: Cognitive & Behavioural Economics (1) 2006-03-11
  14. NEP-CWA: Central & Western Asia (1) 2007-01-23
  15. NEP-DCM: Discrete Choice Models (1) 2005-12-20
  16. NEP-ECM: Econometrics (1) 2003-12-07
  17. NEP-EEC: European Economics (1) 2005-12-20
  18. NEP-EXP: Experimental Economics (1) 2006-03-11
  19. NEP-GTH: Game Theory (1) 2006-03-11
  20. NEP-ICT: Information & Communication Technologies (1) 2008-11-25
  21. NEP-IFN: International Finance (1) 2007-01-23
  22. NEP-MIC: Microeconomics (1) 2006-09-30
  23. NEP-MKT: Marketing (1) 2012-02-01
  24. NEP-NET: Network Economics (1) 2008-11-25
  25. NEP-REG: Regulation (1) 2012-02-01
  26. NEP-SOC: Social Norms & Social Capital (1) 2008-11-25

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Maria Jose Gil Molto should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.