IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/e/c/pju22.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Julien Pénin
(Julien Penin)

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Sila Öcalan-Özel & Julien Pénin, 2019. "Invention characteristics and the degree of exclusivity of university licenses : The case of two leading French research universities," Post-Print hal-02182086, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Wu, Xiaokang & Yu, Jinping, 2023. "Does dialect difference impede patent transaction? Evidence from China's inter-city patent license data," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).

  2. Eleni Giannopoulou & Pierre-Jean Barlatier & Julien Pénin, 2019. "Same but different ? Research and technology organizations, universities and the innovation activities of firms," Post-Print hal-02180704, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Alexandre Dias & Beatriz Selan, 2023. "How does university-industry collaboration relate to research resources and technical-scientific activities? An analysis at the laboratory level," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 392-415, February.
    2. Mulligan, Kevin & Lenihan, Helena & Doran, Justin & Roper, Stephen, 2022. "Harnessing the science base: Results from a national programme using publicly-funded research centres to reshape firms’ R&D," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(4).
    3. Lenihan, Helena & Mulligan, Kevin & Doran, Justin & Rammer, Christian & Ipinnaiye, Olubunmi, 2022. "R&D grant and tax credit support for foreign-owned subsidiaries: Does it pay off?," ZEW Discussion Papers 22-003, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    4. Muhammad Zeeshan Younas, 2023. "Regional institutional quality and firm-level innovation: a case of selected south asian economies," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 615-643, February.
    5. Comin, Diego & Licht, Georg & Pellens, Maikel & Schubert, Torben, 2018. "Do Companies Benefit from Public Research Organizations? The Impact of the Fraunhofer Society in Germany," Papers in Innovation Studies 2018/7, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    6. Zhang, Ningning & You, Dingyi & Tang, Le & Wen, Ke, 2023. "Knowledge path dependence, external connection, and radical inventions: Evidence from Chinese Academy of Sciences," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(4).
    7. Cui, Wenyue & Tang, Jie, 2023. "Innovation convergence clubs and their driving factors within urban agglomeration," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    8. Mahdi Khelfaoui & Luc Bernier, 2023. "Research and technology organizations as entrepreneurship instruments: the case of the Institut National d’Optique in the Canadian optics and photonics industry," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, December.
    9. Chen, Kaihua & Zhang, Chao & Feng, Ze & Zhang, Yi & Ning, Lutao, 2022. "Technology transfer systems and modes of national research institutes: evidence from the Chinese academy of sciences," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(3).
    10. Jeffrey O’Neal London & Nasir Jamil Sheikh, 2020. "Innovation in African-American high-tech enterprises: a multi-agent approach," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(4), pages 3101-3121, June.
    11. Mohamed Fellague, 2020. "The Role of Organizational Culture in Commitment to Implement Total Quality Management (Case Study of Algerian Public Companies)," Economics, Sciendo, vol. 8(2), pages 55-68, December.
    12. Ren, Qiuzhen & Albrecht, Johan, 2023. "Toward circular economy: The impact of policy instruments on circular economy innovation for European small medium enterprises," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    13. Zhiying Zhang & Hua Cheng & Yabin Yu, 2020. "Relationships among Government Funding, R&D Model and Innovation Performance: A Study on the Chinese Textile Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-20, January.
    14. Trabelsi Ramzi & Kallal Rahim & Maher Skhiri, 2023. "Scientific Knowledge Valorization in the Public R&D Sector: a Survey and a PLS-SEM Approach," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(1), pages 226-254, March.
    15. Ardito, Lorenzo & Raby, Simon & Albino, Vito & Bertoldi, Bernardo, 2021. "The duality of digital and environmental orientations in the context of SMEs: Implications for innovation performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 44-56.
    16. Wu, Linfei & Sun, Liwen & Chang, Qing & Zhang, Die & Qi, Peixiao, 2022. "How do digitalization capabilities enable open innovation in manufacturing enterprises? A multiple case study based on resource integration perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    17. Ogink, Ruben H.A.J. & Goossen, Martin C. & Romme, A. Georges L. & Akkermans, Henk, 2023. "Mechanisms in open innovation: A review and synthesis of the literature," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    18. Skare, Marinko & Gavurova, Beata & Rigelsky, Martin, 2023. "Innovation activity and the outcomes of B2C, B2B, and B2G E-Commerce in EU countries," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).

  3. Rémy Guichardaz & Julien Pénin, 2019. "Why was Schumpeter not more concerned with patents ?," Post-Print hal-02437831, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Adam Karbowski, 2021. "Unproductive entrepreneurship and patents," Bank i Kredyt, Narodowy Bank Polski, vol. 52(5), pages 473-494.

  4. Rémy Guichardaz & Laurent Bach & Julien Penin, 2019. "Music industry intermediation in the digital era and the resilience of the Majors’ oligopoly : the role of transactional capability," Post-Print hal-02182067, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Laurent Bach & Remy Guichardaz & Eric Schenk, 2020. "Technologie Blockchain et intermédiation dans l'industrie musicale," Working Papers of BETA 2020-16, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.

  5. Eric Schenk & Claude Guittard & Julien Pénin, 2019. "Open or proprietary ? Choosing the right crowdsourcing platform for innovation," Post-Print hal-02286165, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Troise, Ciro & Tani, Mario & Dinsmore, John & Schiuma, Giovanni, 2021. "Understanding the implications of equity crowdfunding on sustainability-oriented innovation and changes in agri-food systems: Insights into an open innovation approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    2. Lai, Xiaobing & Yue, Shujing & Guo, Chong & Zhang, Xinhe, 2023. "Does FinTech reduce corporate excess leverage? Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 281-299.
    3. Pietro, Francesca Di & Bogers, Marcel L.A.M. & Prencipe, Andrea, 2021. "Organisational barriers and bridges to crowd openness in equity crowdfunding," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    4. Ren, Jie & Han, Yue & Genc, Yegin & Yeoh, William & Popovič, Aleš, 2021. "The boundary of crowdsourcing in the domain of creativity✰," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    5. Feng, Yuanyue & Yi, Zihui & Yang, Congcong & Chen, Ruoyi & Feng, Ye, 2022. "How do gamification mechanics drive solvers’ Knowledge contribution? A study of collaborative knowledge crowdsourcing," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    6. Albats, Ekaterina & Alexander, Allen T. & Cunningham, James A., 2022. "Traditional, virtual, and digital intermediaries in university-industry collaboration: exploring institutional logics and bounded rationality," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).

  6. Pierre Jean Barlatier & Eleni Giannopoulou & Julien Pénin, 2016. "The Open Innovation Intermediaries between Information Management and Knowledge Management: The Case of Public Research Valorization [Les intermédiaires de l’innovation ouverte entre gestion de l’i," Post-Print hal-01740243, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Monique Combes-Joret & Sophie Bollinger, 2023. "Le rôle majeur des Établissements et Services d’Aide par le Travail (ESAT) dans les écosystèmes d’innovation sociale pour l’inclusion des personnes en situation de handicap. Le cas de l’ESAT l’ENVOL," Post-Print hal-04142261, HAL.

  7. Christian Le Bas & Julien Pénin, 2014. "Patents and innovation : Are the brakes broken, or how to restore patents’ dynamic efficiency ?," Working Papers of BETA 2014-02, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.

    Cited by:

    1. Christian Bessy, 2019. "The transformations of conventions for patent use and the role of legal intermediaries," Working Papers halshs-01872163, HAL.
    2. Valerio STERZI & Jean-Paul RAMESHKOUMAR & Johannes VAN DER POL, 2020. "Non-practicing entities and transparency in patent ownership in Europe," Bordeaux Economics Working Papers 2020-10, Bordeaux School of Economics (BSE).

  8. Nicolas Jullien & Julien Pénin, 2014. "Innovation ouverte : vers la génération 2.0," Post-Print hal-01009630, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Isabelle Liotard & Valérie Revest, 2014. "Web 2.0 et Open Innovation : un regain d'intérêt pour les concours d'innovation en ligne," Post-Print hal-01141037, HAL.
    2. Isabelle Liotard & Valerie Revest, 2021. "Open innovation and prizes: is the European Commission really committed?," LEM Papers Series 2021/14, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.

  9. Thierry Burger-Helmchen & Antoine Dintrich & Claude Guittard & Eric Schenk, 2013. "L'innovation ouverte définition, pratiques et perspectives," Post-Print hal-02189768, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Amel Attour & Thierry Burger-Helmchen, 2014. "Écosystèmes et modèles d'affaires : introduction," Revue d'économie industrielle, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(2), pages 11-25.
    2. Amel Attour & Pierre Barbaroux, 2015. "Le rôle des processus de connaissances dans le cycle de vie d'un écosystème d'affaires," Post-Print halshs-01244401, HAL.
    3. Amel ATTOUR & Pierre BARBAROUX, 2015. "Nouvelles approches de l’innovation et gestion des connaissances : quelle articulation ? quels enjeux ? quels changements ? [New approaches to innovation and knowledge management: What articulation," Working Papers 14, Réseau de Recherche sur l’Innovation. / Research Network on Innovation.
    4. Isabelle Liotard & Valerie Revest, 2021. "Open innovation and prizes: is the European Commission really committed?," LEM Papers Series 2021/14, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    5. Isabelle Liotard & Valérie Revest, 2022. "Open innovation and prizes: is the European Commission really comitted?," CEPN Working Papers hal-03524203, HAL.
    6. Saïd Oubaziz & Dalila Matmar, 2021. "Open Innovation: A New Source of Business Competitiveness," Athens Journal of Business & Economics, Athens Institute for Education and Research (ATINER), vol. 7(4), pages 365-378, October.
    7. Amel Attour & Thierry Burger-Helmchen, 2014. "Écosystèmes et modèles d'affaires," Post-Print hal-02153063, HAL.
    8. Isabelle Liotard & Valérie Revest, 2022. "Open innovation and prizes: is the European Commission really comitted?," Working Papers hal-03524203, HAL.
    9. Amel Attour & Pierre Barbaroux, 2021. "The Role of Knowledge Processes in a Business Ecosystem’s Lifecycle," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(1), pages 238-255, March.

  10. Julien Pénin, 2012. "Motivation crowding-out: Is there a risk for science?," Working Papers of BETA 2012-13, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.

    Cited by:

    1. Olivier CARDI & Romain RESTOUT, 2015. "Fiscal Shocks in a Two-Sector Open Economy with Endogenous Markups," LEO Working Papers / DR LEO 2299, Orleans Economics Laboratory / Laboratoire d'Economie d'Orleans (LEO), University of Orleans.
    2. Ragip Ege & Herrade Igersheim & Charlotte Le Chapelain, 2012. "Transcendental vs. Comparative Approaches to Justice : A Reappraisal of Sen’s Dichotomy," Working Papers of BETA 2012-15, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.

  11. Julien Pénin & Thierry Burger-Helmchen, 2012. "Crowdsourcing d’activités inventives et frontières des organisations," Post-Print hal-02189752, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Eric von Hippel & Georg von Krogh, 2016. "CROSSROADS—Identifying Viable “Need–Solution Pairs”: Problem Solving Without Problem Formulation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 207-221, February.

  12. Julien Pénin & Thierry Burger-Helmchen, 2011. "Crowdsourcing of inventive activities," Post-Print hal-02302862, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. José Luis Sánchez García & Enrique Estellés-Arolas, 2015. "Crowdfunding: A Study of Present Creative Trends and Institutional Reaction," International Journal of Business and Economics, School of Management Development, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan, vol. 14(2), pages 131-144, December.
    2. Nguyen Hoang Thuan & Pedro Antunes & David Johnstone, 2016. "Factors influencing the decision to crowdsource: A systematic literature review," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 47-68, February.
    3. Eric Schenk & Claude Guittard & Julien Pénin, 2019. "Open or proprietary ? Choosing the right crowdsourcing platform for innovation," Post-Print hal-02286165, HAL.
    4. Antonello Cammarano & Vincenzo Varriale & Francesca Michelino & Mauro Caputo, 2022. "Open and Crowd-Based Platforms: Impact on Organizational and Market Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-26, February.
    5. Piazza, Mariangela & Mazzola, Erica & Perrone, Giovanni, 2022. "How can I signal my quality to emerge from the crowd? A study in the crowdsourcing context," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    6. Silvia Blasi & Silvia Rita Sedita, 2018. "Leveraging the power of creative crowds for innovative brands: the eYeka crowdsourcing initiatives," "Marco Fanno" Working Papers 0228, Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche "Marco Fanno".
    7. Regina Lenart-Gansiniec, 2018. "Methodological Challenges of Research on Crowdsourcing," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 4(4), pages 107-126.
    8. Regina LENART-GANSINIEC, 2016. "Crowdsourcing And Organisational Learning €“ A Systematic Literature Review," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 10(1), pages 115-125, November.
    9. Francesco Cappa & Federica Rosso & Antonio Capaldo, 2020. "Visitor-Sensing: Involving the Crowd in Cultural Heritage Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-14, February.
    10. Leimeister, Jan Marco & Zogaj, Shkodran, 2013. "Neue Arbeitsorganisation durch Crowdsourcing: Eine Literaturstudie," Arbeitspapiere 287, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.
    11. Kokshagina, Olga & Gillier, Thomas & Cogez, Patrick & Le Masson, Pascal & Weil, Benoit, 2017. "Using innovation contests to promote the development of generic technologies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 152-164.
    12. Francesco Cappa & Federica Rosso & Darren Hayes, 2019. "Monetary and Social Rewards for Crowdsourcing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-14, May.
    13. Palacios, Miguel & Martinez-Corral, Alberto & Nisar, Arsalan & Grijalvo, Mercedes, 2016. "Crowdsourcing and organizational forms: Emerging trends and research implications," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 1834-1839.
    14. Milis Nilgun Caibula & Constantin Militaru, 2021. "Stakeholders Influence on the Closing Phase of Projects," Postmodern Openings, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 12(1Sup1), pages 136-148, April.
    15. Cappa, Francesco & Oriani, Raffaele & Pinelli, Michele & De Massis, Alfredo, 2019. "When does crowdsourcing benefit firm stock market performance?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(9), pages 1-1.
    16. Prpić, John, 2017. "A Geography of Participation in IT-Mediated Crowds," SocArXiv a7k27, Center for Open Science.
    17. Steffen Roth & Jari Kaivo-Oja & Thomas Hirschmann, 2013. "Smart regions: two cases of crowdsourcing for regional development," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 20(3), pages 272-285.
    18. Nathalie Colasanti & Chiara Fantauzzi & Rocco Frondizi, 2021. "Innovating Public Service Delivery Through Crowdsourcing: What Role for The Third Sector and Civil Society?," International Journal of Business Research and Management (IJBRM), Computer Science Journals (CSC Journals), vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, February.

  13. Thierry Burger-Helmchen & Julien Pénin, 2011. "Crowdsourcing : définition, enjeux, typologie," Post-Print hal-02302843, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Catherine Allix-Desfautaux & Magali Chaudey & Muriel Fadairo & Nabil Khelil & Anne-Laure Le Nadant & Frédéric Perdreau & Fanny Simon-Lee, 2014. "Conditions d'émergence et de diffusion de l'innovation au sein des réseaux de franchise," Working Papers hal-01675707, HAL.

  14. Thierry Burger-Helmchen & Caroline Hussler & Julien Pénin, 2011. "General presentation. Rethinking boundaries for innovation: exploring the shapes and stakes of the open innovation phenomenon," Post-Print hal-02189354, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Amel Attour & Thierry Burger-Helmchen, 2014. "Écosystèmes et modèles d'affaires : introduction," Revue d'économie industrielle, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(2), pages 11-25.
    2. Amel Attour & Thierry Burger-Helmchen, 2014. "Écosystèmes et modèles d'affaires," Post-Print hal-02153063, HAL.
    3. Robert Stanisławski, 2022. "Characteristics of Open Innovation among Polish SMEs in the Context of Sustainable Innovative Development Focused on the Rational Use of Resources (Energy)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-15, September.

  15. Hussler Caroline & Pénin Julien, 2010. "The determinants of scientific research agenda: Why do academic inventors choose to perform patentable versus non-patentable research?," Working Papers of BETA 2010-06, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.

    Cited by:

    1. Meixing Dai, 2012. "External Constraint and Financial Crises with Balance Sheet Effects," International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 567-585, March.
    2. Pénin, Julien, 2011. "Sur les conséquences du brevet d’invention dans la science : résultats d’une enquête auprès des inventeurs académiques français," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 87(2), pages 137-173, juin.

  16. Patrick Cohendet & Matthieu Farcot & Julien Pénin, 2009. "Intellectual property in a knowledge-based economy : Patents to include vs. patents to exclude," Working Papers of BETA 2009-15, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.

    Cited by:

    1. Hussler Caroline & Pénin Julien, 2010. "The determinants of scientific research agenda: Why do academic inventors choose to perform patentable versus non-patentable research?," Working Papers of BETA 2010-06, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.

  17. John Sloman, 2008. "Principes d'économie," Post-Print hal-02189754, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Gérard A. Kokou DOKOU, 2007. "Accompagnement managerial et développement international de la PME. (Managerial accompaniment and internationalisation of SMES)," Working Papers 142, Laboratoire de Recherche sur l'Industrie et l'Innovation. ULCO / Research Unit on Industry and Innovation.
    2. Hervé Goy & Robert Paturel, 2004. "Les problématiques de diagnostic et de projection dans les PMI," Post-Print halshs-00675774, HAL.
    3. Alfonso, Galindo Lucas, 2006. "Repercusiones de la definición de tamaño empresarial en los resultados empíricos sobre eficiencia y financiación [Repercussions of firm size definition on empirical results for firm efficiency and ," MPRA Paper 4731, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 05 Sep 2007.
    4. Véronique Bon & Alain Lacroux & Pierre Teller & Corinne van Der Yeught, 2012. "Les pratiques de développement durable et de RSE en région PACA : la spécificité des petites entreprises en question," Post-Print hal-00689826, HAL.
    5. Cécile Chanut-Guieu & Gilles Guieu, 2012. "Les caractéristiques du dirigeant de PME en hypercroissance : une revue de la littérature," Post-Print halshs-01413710, HAL.
    6. Françoise Pierson & Karine Rymeyko, 2011. "L’introduction des TIC au sein de PME appartenant à un groupe:le poids du contexte - The introduction of ICT in small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) belonging to a group of companies:the weight o," Working Papers CREGO 1110504, Université de Bourgogne - CREGO EA7317 Centre de recherches en gestion des organisations.
    7. Natacha Tréhan, 2002. "Usages de la société holding par des entreprises personnelles et familiales non cotées pratiquant la croissance externe," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 5(2), pages 143-162, June.
    8. Hervé Goy, 2003. "Entre émergence et rationalité, deux cas de pratiques de planification en PME technologiques," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 6(3), pages 23-40, September.
    9. Serge Simen, 2018. "La Responsabilité Sociale de l'Entreprise dans les très petites entreprises sénégalaises : quelles perceptions en ont les propriétaires-dirigeants ?," Post-Print halshs-01782034, HAL.
    10. Nathalie Schieb-Bienfait, 2003. "L'analyse stratégique à l'épreuve des faits : étude de cas à partir d'une petite entreprise artisanale en mutation," Post-Print hal-01416579, HAL.
    11. Hervé Goy, 2003. "Entre émergence et rationalité, deux cas de pratiques de planification en PME technologiques," Post-Print halshs-00675772, HAL.

  18. Julien Pénin, 2008. "More open than open innovation? Rethinking the concept of openness in innovation studies," Working Papers of BETA 2008-18, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.

    Cited by:

    1. José Luis Sánchez García & Enrique Estellés-Arolas, 2015. "Crowdfunding: A Study of Present Creative Trends and Institutional Reaction," International Journal of Business and Economics, School of Management Development, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan, vol. 14(2), pages 131-144, December.
    2. Claude Guittard & Eric Schenk, 2011. "Le Crowdsourcing : Typologie et enjeux d’une externalisation vers la foule," Working Papers of BETA 2011-02, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    3. Heikkinen, I.T.S. & Savin, H. & Partanen, J. & Seppälä, J. & Pearce, J.M., 2020. "Towards national policy for open source hardware research: The case of Finland," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    4. Eric Schenk & Claude Guittard, 2011. "Towards a characterization of crowdsourcing practices," Post-Print halshs-00439256, HAL.

  19. Paul Muller & Julien Pénin, 2007. "Why do firms disclose knowledge and how does it matter ?," Post-Print hal-00279198, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Diego Useche & Philippe Gorry, 2016. "Orphan Drug Designations as valuable Intangible assets for IPO Investors in Pharma-Biotech Companies," Post-Print hal-02195744, HAL.
    2. Yin Li & Jan Youtie & Philip Shapira, 2015. "Why do technology firms publish scientific papers? The strategic use of science by small and midsize enterprises in nanotechnology," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 40(6), pages 1016-1033, December.
    3. Sebastian Spaeth & Georg von Krogh & Fang He, 2015. "Research Note —Perceived Firm Attributes and Intrinsic Motivation in Sponsored Open Source Software Projects," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 224-237, March.
    4. Roberto Camerani & Daniele Rotolo & Nicola Grassano, 2018. "Do Firms Publish? A Multi-Sectoral Analysis," SPRU Working Paper Series 2018-21, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    5. Useche, Diego, 2014. "Are patents signals for the IPO market? An EU–US comparison for the software industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(8), pages 1299-1311.
    6. Rotolo, Daniele & Camerani, Roberto & Grassano, Nicola & Martin, Ben R., 2022. "Why do firms publish? A systematic literature review and a conceptual framework," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(10).
    7. Li, Yin & Arora, Sanjay & Youtie, Jan & Shapira, Philip, 2018. "Using web mining to explore Triple Helix influences on growth in small and mid-size firms," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 76, pages 3-14.
    8. Liu Li & Chaoying Tang, 2020. "How Does Inter-Organizational Cooperation Impact Organizations’ Scientific Knowledge Generation? Evidence from the Biomass Energy Field," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    9. Csomós György, 2017. "Mapping Spatial and Temporal Changes of Global Corporate Research and Development Activities by Conducting a Bibliometric Analysis," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 36(1), pages 65-77, March.
    10. Benjamin Weber & Sven Heidenreich, 2016. "Improving Innovation Capabilities By Cooperation: Examining Effects Of Core Network Management Functions And Relational Mechanisms In The Industrial Goods Sector," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(07), pages 1-29, October.
    11. Delgado-Verde, Miriam & Martín-de Castro, Gregorio & Cruz-González, Jorge & Navas-López, José Emilio, 2021. "Complements or substitutes? The contingent role of corporate reputation on the interplay between internal R&D and external knowledge sourcing," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 70-83.
    12. Margherita Balconi & Valeria Lorenzi & Pier Paolo Saviotti & Antonella Zucchella, 2013. "Cognitive distance in research collaborations," DEM Working Papers Series 051, University of Pavia, Department of Economics and Management.
    13. Sonja Lück & Benjamin Balsmeier & Florian Seliger & Lee Fleming, 2020. "Early Disclosure of Invention and Reduced Duplication: An Empirical Test," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(6), pages 2677-2685, June.

  20. Antoine Bureth & Moritz Mueller & Julien Pénin & Sandrine Wolff, 2007. "Brevet, innovation modulaire et collaboration : Le cas des vaccins géniques," Working Papers of BETA 2007-22, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.

    Cited by:

    1. Li Qin & Eleftherios Spyromitros & Moïse Sidiropoulos, 2007. "Monetary Policy with Uncertain Central Bank Preferences for Robustness," Working Papers of BETA 2007-23, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.

  21. Julien Pénin, 2006. "Enveloppe Soleau et droit de possession antérieure : Définition et analyse économique," Working Papers of BETA 2006-23, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.

    Cited by:

    1. Estelle Dhont-Peltrault & Etienne Pfister, 2007. "R&D cooperation versus R&D subcontracting: empirical evidence from French survey data," Working Papers of BETA 2007-17, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    2. Sofia Pessoa e Costa & Stéphane Robin, 2007. "The Impact Of Training Programmes On Wages In France: An Evaluation Of The “Qualifying Contract” Using Propensity Scores," Working Papers of BETA 2007-18, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    3. Gisèle Umbhauer, 2007. "De l’amiante au chrysotile, un glissement stratégique dans la désinformation," Working Papers of BETA 2007-15, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    4. Li Qin & Eleftherios Spyromitros & Moïse Sidiropoulos, 2007. "Monetary Policy with Uncertain Central Bank Preferences for Robustness," Working Papers of BETA 2007-23, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.

  22. Antoine Bureth & Julien Pénin & Sandrine Wolff, 2006. "Entrepreneurship in biotechnology: The case of four start-ups in the Upper-Rhine Biovalley," Working Papers of BETA 2006-21, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.

    Cited by:

    1. Thierry BURGER-HELMCHEN & Claude GUITTARD, 2008. "Are Users The Next Entrepreneurs? A Case Study On The Video Game Industry," Working Papers of BETA 2008-14, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    2. Pénin, Julien & Wack, Jean-Pierre, 2008. "Research tool patents and free-libre biotechnology: A suggested unified framework," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(10), pages 1909-1921, December.
    3. Adenle, Ademola A. & Sowe, Sulayman K. & Parayil, Govindan & Aginam, Obijiofor, 2012. "Analysis of open source biotechnology in developing countries: An emerging framework for sustainable agriculture," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 256-269.
    4. Thierry Burger-Helmchen, 2008. "Plural-entrepreneurial activity for a single start-up : A case study," Post-Print hal-02302933, HAL.
    5. Thierry Burger-Helmchen & Claude Guittard, 2008. "Are users the next entrepreneurs ?," Post-Print hal-02189762, HAL.
    6. Clark Derek J & Pereau Jean-Christophe, 2008. "Passing the Buck in Sequential Negotiation," The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 1-18, December.

  23. Antoine Bureth & Rachel Levy & Julien Pénin & Sandrine Wolff, 2006. "Strategic Reasons for Patenting : Between Exclusion and Coordination Rationales," Post-Print hal-00279139, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Isabel Maria Bodas Freitas & Alessandro Nuvolari, 2012. "Traditional Versus Heterodox Motives for Academic Patenting: Evidence from the Netherlands," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(8), pages 671-695, November.
    2. Pénin, Julien & Wack, Jean-Pierre, 2008. "Research tool patents and free-libre biotechnology: A suggested unified framework," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(10), pages 1909-1921, December.
    3. Faria, Pedro & Schmidt, Tobias, 2007. "International cooperation on innovation: empirical evidence for German and Portuguese firms," Discussion Paper Series 1: Economic Studies 2007,30, Deutsche Bundesbank.
    4. Julien Pénin, 2008. "More open than open innovation? Rethinking the concept of openness in innovation studies," Working Papers of BETA 2008-18, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    5. Schmidt, Tobias, 2006. "An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Patents and Secrecy on Knowledge Spillovers," ZEW Discussion Papers 06-048, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    6. Francesco SCHETTINO & Alessandro STERLACCHINI, 2007. "European Patenting and the Size of Inventors," Working Papers 308, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali.

  24. Julien PENIN, 2005. "Open knowledge disclosure, incomplete information and collective innovations," Working Papers of BETA 2005-10, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.

    Cited by:

    1. Estelle Dhont-Peltrault & Etienne Pfister, 2007. "R&D cooperation versus R&D subcontracting: empirical evidence from French survey data," Working Papers of BETA 2007-17, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    2. Giovanni Dosi & Patrick Llerena & Mauro Sylos Labin, 2005. "Science-Technology-Industry Links and the ”European Paradox”: Some Notes on the Dynamics of Scientific and Technological Research in Europe," Working Papers of BETA 2005-11, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    3. Pénin, Julien & Wack, Jean-Pierre, 2008. "Research tool patents and free-libre biotechnology: A suggested unified framework," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(10), pages 1909-1921, December.
    4. Nicolas Carayol & Pascale Roux, 2006. "A strategic model of complex networks formation," Working Papers of BETA 2006-02, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    5. Rachel Levy & Paul Muller, 2006. "Do academic laboratories correspond to scientific communities? Evidence from a large European university," Working Papers of BETA 2006-15, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    6. Sofia Pessoa e Costa & Stéphane Robin, 2007. "The Impact Of Training Programmes On Wages In France: An Evaluation Of The “Qualifying Contract” Using Propensity Scores," Working Papers of BETA 2007-18, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    7. Nicolas Carayol & Pascale Roux & Murat Yıldızoglu, 2006. "Coordination failures in network formation," Working Papers of BETA 2006-03, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    8. Gisèle Umbhauer, 2007. "De l’amiante au chrysotile, un glissement stratégique dans la désinformation," Working Papers of BETA 2007-15, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    9. Jalal EL OUARDIGHI & Rabija SOMUN-KAPETANOVIC, 2006. "Convergence des contributions aux inégalités de richesse dans le développement des pays européens," Working Papers of BETA 2006-19, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    10. Stéphane Betrand & Kene Boun My & Alban Verchère, 2005. "Faire émerger la coopération internationale : une approche expérimentale comparée du bilatéralisme et du multilatéralisme," Working Papers of BETA 2005-13, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    11. Tapas K. Mishra, 2006. "A Further Look into the Demography-based GDP Forecasting Method," Working Papers of BETA 2006-17, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    12. Li Qin & Eleftherios Spyromitros & Moïse Sidiropoulos, 2007. "Monetary Policy with Uncertain Central Bank Preferences for Robustness," Working Papers of BETA 2007-23, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    13. Julien Pénin, 2007. "Open Knowledge Disclosure: An Overview Of The Evidence And Economic Motivations," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(2), pages 326-347, April.
    14. Patrick Cohendet & Matthieu Farcot & Julien Pénin, 2009. "Intellectual property in a knowledge-based economy : Patents to include vs. patents to exclude," Working Papers of BETA 2009-15, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.

  25. Julien Pénin, 2004. "Open Knowledge Disclosure : An Overview of the Evidence and Economic Motivations," Post-Print hal-00279229, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Catalina Martínez & Sarah Parlane, 2018. "On the firms’ decision to hire academic scientists," Working Papers 1801, Instituto de Políticas y Bienes Públicos (IPP), CSIC.
    2. Ashish Arora & Sharon Belenzon & Andrea Patacconi & Jungkyu Suh, 2019. "The Changing Structure of American Innovation: Some Cautionary Remarks for Economic Growth," NBER Working Papers 25893, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Sandrine Labory, 2011. "Role of external knowledge flows in cluster upgrading: an empirical analysis of the Mirandola biomedical district in Italy," Working Papers 2011R05, Orkestra - Basque Institute of Competitiveness.
    4. Della Malva, Antonio & Hussinger, Katrin, 2010. "Corporate science in the patent system: An analysis of the semiconductor technology," ZEW Discussion Papers 10-098, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    5. Roberto Camerani & Daniele Rotolo & Nicola Grassano, 2018. "Do Firms Publish? A Multi-Sectoral Analysis," SPRU Working Paper Series 2018-21, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    6. Liu, Ziyu & Du, Yushen, 2022. "Open knowledge disclosure and technical standard competition in transition economies: A legitimacy perspective," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    7. Noriaki Matsushima & Laixun Zhao, 2018. "Technology spillovers and outside options in a bilateral duopoly," ISER Discussion Paper 1039, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.
    8. James Bessen & Alessandro Nuvolari, 2019. "Diffusing new technology without dissipating rents: some historical case studies of knowledge sharing," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 28(2), pages 365-388.
    9. Marcus Simeth & Michele Cincera, 2013. "Corporate Science, Innovation and Firm Value," Working Papers TIMES² 2013-006, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    10. Junichiro Ishida & Toshihiro Matsumura & Noriaki Matsushima, 2010. "Market Competition, R&D and Firm Profits in Asymmetric Oligopoly," ISER Discussion Paper 0777, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.
    11. Rotolo, Daniele & Camerani, Roberto & Grassano, Nicola & Martin, Ben R., 2022. "Why do firms publish? A systematic literature review and a conceptual framework," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(10).
    12. Sauermann, Henry & Roach, Michael, 2014. "Not all scientists pay to be scientists: PhDs’ preferences for publishing in industrial employment," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 32-47.
    13. Markus Simeth & Julio Raffo, 2013. "What makes companies pursue an open science strategy?," WIPO Economic Research Working Papers 06, World Intellectual Property Organization - Economics and Statistics Division, revised Apr 2013.
    14. Milliou, Chrysovalantou & Petrakis, Emmanuel, 2012. "Vertical integration, knowledge disclosure and decreasing rival's cost," UC3M Working papers. Economics we1213, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía.
    15. Simeth, Markus & Lhuillery, Stephane, 2015. "How do firms develop capabilities for scientific disclosure?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(7), pages 1283-1295.
    16. Henry Sauermann & Paula Stephan, 2013. "Conflicting Logics? A Multidimensional View of Industrial and Academic Science," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 889-909, June.
    17. Henry Sauermann & Michael Roach, 2011. "Not All Scientists pay to be Scientists:," DRUID Working Papers 11-03, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.

  26. Julien Pénin, 2003. "Patents versus ex-post rewards : a new look," Cahiers de recherche du Département des sciences économiques, UQAM 20-19, Université du Québec à Montréal, Département des sciences économiques.

    Cited by:

    1. Justice A. Tambo, 2018. "Recognizing farmer-generated innovations through contests: insights from four African countries," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 10(5), pages 1237-1250, October.
    2. Estelle Dhont-Peltrault & Etienne Pfister, 2007. "R&D cooperation versus R&D subcontracting: empirical evidence from French survey data," Working Papers of BETA 2007-17, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    3. Kim, Yeong Jae, 2022. "The countervailing effects of stocks of knowledge on low-carbon innovation through international collaboration," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    4. Isabelle Liotard & Valérie Revest, 2018. "Contests as innovation policy instruments: lessons from the US federal agencies’ experience," Post-Print hal-02067342, HAL.
    5. Antonelli Cristiano, 2012. "Compulsory licensing: the foundations of an institutional innovation," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis LEI & BRICK - Laboratory of Economics of Innovation "Franco Momigliano", Bureau of Research in Innovation, Complexity and Knowledge, Collegio 201207, University of Turin.
    6. Isabel Maria Bodas Freitas & Alessandro Nuvolari, 2012. "Traditional Versus Heterodox Motives for Academic Patenting: Evidence from the Netherlands," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(8), pages 671-695, November.
    7. Roberto Fontana & Aldo Geuna & Mireille Matt, 2006. "Factors Affecting University-Industry R&D Projects : The Importance of Searching, Screening and Signalling," Post-Print hal-00279199, HAL.
    8. Nicolas Carayol & Pascale Roux, 2006. "A strategic model of complex networks formation," Working Papers of BETA 2006-02, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    9. Roper, Stephen & Hewitt-Dundas, Nola, 2015. "Knowledge stocks, knowledge flows and innovation: Evidence from matched patents and innovation panel data," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(7), pages 1327-1340.
    10. Levin, Mark (Левин, Марк) & Matrosova, Kseniya (Матросова, Ксения), 2017. "Development and Analysis of Economic Models of Innovation Incentives [Разработка И Исследование Экономических Моделей Стимулирования Инновационных Процессов]," Working Papers 061713, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
    11. Faria, Pedro & Schmidt, Tobias, 2007. "International cooperation on innovation: empirical evidence for German and Portuguese firms," Discussion Paper Series 1: Economic Studies 2007,30, Deutsche Bundesbank.
    12. Hewitt-Dundas, Nola & Gkypali, Areti & Roper, Stephen, 2019. "Does learning from prior collaboration help firms to overcome the ‘two-worlds’ paradox in university-business collaboration?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(5), pages 1310-1322.
    13. Karbowski Adam & Prokop Jacek, 2020. "The Impact of Patents and R&D Cooperation on R&D Investments in a Differentiated Goods Industry," South East European Journal of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 122-133, June.
    14. Rachel Levy & Paul Muller, 2006. "Do academic laboratories correspond to scientific communities? Evidence from a large European university," Working Papers of BETA 2006-15, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    15. Sofia Pessoa e Costa & Stéphane Robin, 2007. "The Impact Of Training Programmes On Wages In France: An Evaluation Of The “Qualifying Contract” Using Propensity Scores," Working Papers of BETA 2007-18, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    16. Stefan, Ioana & Bengtsson, Lars, 2017. "Unravelling appropriability mechanisms and openness depth effects on firm performance across stages in the innovation process," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 252-260.
    17. Julien Pénin, 2013. "Devrait-on obliger les entreprises à investir en R&D ? Vers une approche des politiques d’innovation par la responsabilité des entreprises," Working Papers of BETA 2013-11, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    18. Pascal Corbel & Christian Le Bas, 2011. "The evolution of patent functions: New trends, main challenges and implications for firm strategy," Working Papers 1106, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Étienne (GATE Lyon St-Étienne), Université de Lyon.
    19. Schmidt, Tobias, 2006. "An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Patents and Secrecy on Knowledge Spillovers," ZEW Discussion Papers 06-048, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    20. Adam Karbowski, 2020. "A Note on Patents and Leniency," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 1, pages 97-108.
    21. Nicolas Carayol & Pascale Roux & Murat Yıldızoglu, 2006. "Coordination failures in network formation," Working Papers of BETA 2006-03, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    22. Gisèle Umbhauer, 2007. "De l’amiante au chrysotile, un glissement stratégique dans la désinformation," Working Papers of BETA 2007-15, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    23. Jalal EL OUARDIGHI & Rabija SOMUN-KAPETANOVIC, 2006. "Convergence des contributions aux inégalités de richesse dans le développement des pays européens," Working Papers of BETA 2006-19, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    24. Pascal Corbel & Christian Le Bas, 2010. "The evolution of patent functions: New trends, main challenges and implications for firm strategy," Post-Print halshs-00569239, HAL.
    25. Delin Yang & Xibao Li & Jiagui Chen, 2010. "Patent Propensity in Small Technology‐based Firms: Evidence from Zhongguancun Science Park," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 18(1), pages 99-116, January.
    26. Stéphane Betrand & Kene Boun My & Alban Verchère, 2005. "Faire émerger la coopération internationale : une approche expérimentale comparée du bilatéralisme et du multilatéralisme," Working Papers of BETA 2005-13, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    27. Bos, Brenda & Broekhuizen, Thijs L.J. & de Faria, Pedro, 2015. "A dynamic view on secrecy management," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(12), pages 2619-2627.
    28. Tapas K. Mishra, 2006. "A Further Look into the Demography-based GDP Forecasting Method," Working Papers of BETA 2006-17, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    29. Li Qin & Eleftherios Spyromitros & Moïse Sidiropoulos, 2007. "Monetary Policy with Uncertain Central Bank Preferences for Robustness," Working Papers of BETA 2007-23, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    30. Blandine Laperche, 2012. "How to Coordinate the Networked Enterprise in a Context of Open Innovation? A New Function for Intellectual Property Rights," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 3(4), pages 354-371, December.
    31. Brennan, Timothy J. & Macauley, Molly & Whitefoot, Kate, 2011. "Prizes, Patents, and Technology Procurement: A Proposed Analytical Framework," RFF Working Paper Series dp-11-21-rev, Resources for the Future.
    32. Zhao, Shengchao & Zeng, Deming & Li, Jian & Feng, Ke & Wang, Yao, 2023. "Quantity or quality: The roles of technology and science convergence on firm innovation performance," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    33. Adam Karbowski, 2021. "Unproductive entrepreneurship and patents," Bank i Kredyt, Narodowy Bank Polski, vol. 52(5), pages 473-494.
    34. Wang, Eric C., 2007. "R&D efficiency and economic performance: A cross-country analysis using the stochastic frontier approach," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 345-360.
    35. Moritz Müller & Robin COWAN & Geert Duysters & Nicolas JONARD, 2009. "Knowledge Structures," Working Papers of BETA 2009-24, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.

  27. Julien Pénin, 2002. "Endogénéisation des externalités de recherche: le rôle de la capacité d'émission des connaissances," Cahiers de recherche du Département des sciences économiques, UQAM 20-13, Université du Québec à Montréal, Département des sciences économiques.

    Cited by:

    1. Julien Pénin, 2003. "Patents versus ex-post rewards : a new look," Cahiers de recherche du Département des sciences économiques, UQAM 20-19, Université du Québec à Montréal, Département des sciences économiques.
    2. Julien PENIN, 2005. "Open knowledge disclosure, incomplete information and collective innovations," Working Papers of BETA 2005-10, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.

Articles

  1. Véronique Schaeffer & Sıla Öcalan-Özel & Julien Pénin, 2020. "The complementarities between formal and informal channels of university–industry knowledge transfer: a longitudinal approach," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 31-55, February.

    Cited by:

    1. Perkmann, Markus & Salandra, Rossella & Tartari, Valentina & McKelvey, Maureen & Hughes, Alan, 2021. "Academic engagement: A review of the literature 2011-2019," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(1).
    2. Azagra-Caro, Joaquín M. & Benito-Amat, Carlos & Planells-Aleixandre, Ester, 2021. "Academic artists' engagement and commercialisation," INGENIO (CSIC-UPV) Working Paper Series 202102, INGENIO (CSIC-UPV).
    3. Michele O’Dwyer & Raffaele Filieri & Lisa O’Malley, 2023. "Establishing successful university–industry collaborations: barriers and enablers deconstructed," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 900-931, June.
    4. Sengupta, Abhijit & Rossi, Federica, 2023. "The relationship between universities' funding portfolios and their knowledge exchange profiles: A dynamic capabilities view," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    5. Schaeffer, Paola Rücker & Guerrero, Maribel & Fischer, Bruno Brandão, 2021. "Mutualism in ecosystems of innovation and entrepreneurship: A bidirectional perspective on universities’ linkages," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 184-197.
    6. Irina Isaeva & Marianne Steinmo & Einar Rasmussen, 2022. "How firms use coordination activities in university–industry collaboration: adjusting to or steering a research center?," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(5), pages 1308-1342, October.
    7. Natalia Shmatko & Galina Volkova, 2020. "Bridging the Skill Gap in Robotics: Global and National Environment," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(3), pages 21582440209, September.
    8. Cleverton Rodrigues Fernandes & André Gustavo Carvalho Machado & Glauco Simões Gomes, 2023. "Temporal Flow of Technology Transfer Capability: Beyond the Lifecycle," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 27(Vol. 27 N), pages 210185-2101.
    9. Ileana Palaco & Suk Kyoung Kim & Min Jae Park & Jae Jeung Rho, 2022. "Exploring capabilities of international technology transfer intermediaries between emerging and developed countries," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 307-352, February.
    10. Brown, Austin R. & Wood, Matthew S. & Scheaf, David J., 2022. "Discovery sells, but who’s buying? An empirical investigation of entrepreneurs’ technology license decisions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 403-415.
    11. Halilem, Norrin & De Silva, Muthu & Amara, Nabil, 2022. "Fairly assessing unfairness: An exploration of gender disparities in informal entrepreneurship amongst academics in business schools," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    12. Battaglia, Daniele & Paolucci, Emilio & Ughetto, Elisa, 2021. "The role of Proof-of-Concept programs in facilitating the commercialization of research-based inventions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(6).

  2. Rémy Guichardaz & Julien Pénin, 2019. "Correction to: Why was Schumpeter not more concerned with patents?," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 29(4), pages 1371-1371, September.

    Cited by:

    1. Adam Karbowski, 2021. "Unproductive entrepreneurship and patents," Bank i Kredyt, Narodowy Bank Polski, vol. 52(5), pages 473-494.

  3. Rémy Guichardaz & Julien Pénin, 2019. "Why was Schumpeter not more concerned with patents?," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 29(4), pages 1361-1369, September.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  4. Schenk, Eric & Guittard, Claude & Pénin, Julien, 2019. "Open or proprietary? Choosing the right crowdsourcing platform for innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 303-310.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  5. Giannopoulou, Eleni & Barlatier, Pierre-Jean & Pénin, Julien, 2019. "Same but different? Research and technology organizations, universities and the innovation activities of firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 223-233.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  6. Rémy Guichardaz & Laurent Bach & Julien Penin, 2019. "Music industry intermediation in the digital era and the resilience of the Majors’ oligopoly: the role of transactional capability," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(7), pages 843-869, August.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  7. Öcalan-Özel, Sıla & Pénin, Julien, 2019. "Invention characteristics and the degree of exclusivity of university licenses: The case of two leading French research universities," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(6), pages 1445-1457.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  8. Julien Pénin & Daniel Neicu, 2018. "Patents and Open Innovation: Bad Fences Do Not Make Good Neighbors," Journal of Innovation Economics, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(1), pages 57-85.

    Cited by:

    1. Călin Florin Băban & Marius Băban, 2022. "An Orchestration Perspective on Open Innovation between Industry–University: Investigating Its Impact on Collaboration Performance," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(15), pages 1-23, July.
    2. Dong HUO & Jianwei DANG & MOTOHASHI Kazuyuki, 2021. "Leveraging Standard Essential Patents for Capturing Innovation Rents: The Strategic Disclosure of License Rules," Discussion papers 21028, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    3. Markus Overdiek & Thomas Rausch & Kai Gramke, 2020. "Weltklassepatente — das „Gold“ der Wissensökonomie? [World Class Patents — The Gold of the Knowledge Economy?]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 100(9), pages 718-723, September.
    4. Reher, Leonie & Runst, Petrik & Thomä, Jörg, 2022. "Personality and regional innovativeness: An empirical analysis of German patent data," ifh Working Papers 39/2022, Volkswirtschaftliches Institut für Mittelstand und Handwerk an der Universität Göttingen (ifh).

  9. Sıla Öcalan Özel & Julien Pénin, 2016. "Exclusive or open? An economic analysis of university intellectual property patenting and licensing strategies," Journal of Innovation Economics, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(3), pages 133-153.

    Cited by:

    1. Sila Öcalan-Özel & Julien Pénin, 2019. "Invention characteristics and the degree of exclusivity of university licenses : The case of two leading French research universities," Post-Print hal-02182086, HAL.

  10. Pierre-Jean Barlatier & Eleni Giannopoulou & Julien Pénin, 2016. "Les intermédiaires de l’innovation ouverte entre gestion de l’information et gestion des connaissances : le cas de la valorisation de la recherche publique," Innovations, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(1), pages 55-77.

    Cited by:

    1. Ingrid Fasshauer & Cathy Zadra-Veil, 2017. "Public crowdsourcing and territorial innovation: the case of a rural living lab [Crowdsourcing public et innovation territoriale: le cas d'un living lab rural]," Post-Print hal-02276034, HAL.
    2. Vanessa Casadella & Sofiane Tahi, 2021. "The valorisation of research of small and medium-sized universities within an innovation system [La Valorisation de la Recherche dans les Petites et Moyennes Universités au sein d’un Système d’Inno," Post-Print hal-03832175, HAL.
    3. Ingrid Fasshauer & Cathy Zadra-Veil, 2017. "Public crowdsourcing and territorial innovation: the case of a rural living lab [Crowdsourcing public et innovation territoriale : le cas d’un living lab rural]," Post-Print hal-03465922, HAL.

  11. Pénin, Julien, 2012. "Strategic uses of patents in markets for technology: A story of fabless firms, brokers and trolls," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 84(2), pages 633-641.

    Cited by:

    1. Sterzi, Valerio & Rameshkoumar, Jean-Paul & Van Der Pol, Johannes, 2021. "Non-practicing entities and transparency of patent ownership in Europe: the case of UK dormant companies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    2. Agnieszka Kupzok & Julien Pénin, 2013. "Les enjeux économiques du brevet unitaire européen," Bulletin de l'Observatoire des politiques économiques en Europe, Observatoire des Politiques Économiques en Europe (OPEE), vol. 29(1), pages 29-34, December.
    3. Capuano, Carlo & Grassi, Iacopo, 2018. "Patent Protection and Threat of Litigation in Oligopoly," EconStor Preprints 175243, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    4. Kwon, Seokbeom & Drev, Matej, 2020. "Defensive Patent Aggregators as Shields against Patent Assertion Entities? Theoretical and Empirical Analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    5. Karbowski Adam & Prokop Jacek, 2020. "The Impact of Patents and R&D Cooperation on R&D Investments in a Differentiated Goods Industry," South East European Journal of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 122-133, June.
    6. Julien Pénin, 2013. "Devrait-on obliger les entreprises à investir en R&D ? Vers une approche des politiques d’innovation par la responsabilité des entreprises," Working Papers of BETA 2013-11, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    7. Adam Karbowski, 2020. "A Note on Patents and Leniency," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 1, pages 97-108.
    8. Agnieszka Kupzok & Julien Pénin, 2013. "Les enjeux économiques du brevet unitaire européen," Post-Print hal-04061569, HAL.
    9. Christian Bessy, 2019. "The transformations of conventions for patent use and the role of legal intermediaries," Working Papers halshs-01872163, HAL.
    10. Steffen Roth & Augusto Sales & Jari Kaivo-oja, 2017. "Multiplying the Division of Labour: Functional Differentiation of the Next Key Variables in Management Research," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(2), pages 195-207, March.
    11. Lee, Jong-Seon & Kim, Nami & Bae, Zong-Tae, 2019. "The effects of patent litigation involving NPEs on firms’ patent strategies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    12. Hung-Chun Huang & Hsin-Yu Shih & Tsung-Han Ke, 2017. "Structure of a patent transaction network," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(1), pages 25-45, April.
    13. Cédric Gossart & Altay Özaygen & Müge Özman, 2020. "Are Litigated Patents More Valuable? The Case of LEDs," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 11(3), pages 825-844, September.
    14. Armin Anzenbacher & Marcus Wagner, 2020. "The role of exploration and exploitation for innovation success: effects of business models on organizational ambidexterity in the semiconductor industry," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 571-594, June.
    15. Christian Le Bas & Julien Pénin, 2014. "Patents and innovation : Are the brakes broken, or how to restore patents’ dynamic efficiency ?," Working Papers of BETA 2014-02, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    16. Valerio Sterzi, 2021. "Patent Assertion Entities and Patent Ownership Transparency: Strategic Recording of Patent Transactions at the Uspto [In Defense of Forum Shopping: A Realistic Look at Selecting a Venue]," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 17(4), pages 978-1006.
    17. Carlo Capuano & Iacopo Grassi, 2020. "Imperfect patent protection, licensing, and willingness to pay for the innovation," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 47(2), pages 333-359, June.
    18. Caviggioli, Federico & Ughetto, Elisa, 2016. "Buyers in the patent auction market: Opening the black box of patent acquisitions by non-practicing entities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 122-132.
    19. Gianluca Orsatti & Valerio Sterzi, 2018. "Do Patent Assertion Entities Harm Innovation? Evidence from Patent Transfers in Europe," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2018-08, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).
    20. Valerio STERZI & Jean-Paul RAMESHKOUMAR & Johannes VAN DER POL, 2020. "Non-practicing entities and transparency in patent ownership in Europe," Bordeaux Economics Working Papers 2020-10, Bordeaux School of Economics (BSE).
    21. Sumita Sarma & Sunny Li Sun, 2017. "The genesis of fabless business model: Institutional entrepreneurs in an adaptive ecosystem," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 587-617, September.
    22. Adam Karbowski, 2021. "Unproductive entrepreneurship and patents," Bank i Kredyt, Narodowy Bank Polski, vol. 52(5), pages 473-494.

  12. Julien Pénin, 2011. "Open source innovation: Towards a generalization of the open source model beyond software," Revue d'économie industrielle, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(4), pages 65-88.

    Cited by:

    1. Hagedoorn, John & Ridder, Ann-Kristin, 2012. "Open innovation, contracts, and intellectual property rights: an exploratory empirical study," MERIT Working Papers 2012-025, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    2. Armelle Mazé & Aida Calabuig Domenech & Isabelle Goldringer, 2021. "Commoning the seeds: alternative models of collective action and open innovation within French peasant seed groups for recreating local knowledge commons," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 38(2), pages 541-559, June.
    3. Anne Branciard, 2012. "Open and collaborative research and development models : towards "commons" ? [Des modèles de recherche-développement ouverts et collaboratifs dans le domaine pharmaceutique : vers des « c," Post-Print halshs-02566715, HAL.
    4. J. Andrei Villarroel & John E. Taylor & Christopher L. Tucci, 2013. "Innovation and learning performance implications of free revealing and knowledge brokering in competing communities: insights from the Netflix Prize challenge," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 42-77, March.
    5. Heikkinen, I.T.S. & Savin, H. & Partanen, J. & Seppälä, J. & Pearce, J.M., 2020. "Towards national policy for open source hardware research: The case of Finland," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    6. Anne Branciard, 2013. "DNDi : from open innovation to commons for essential drugs ? [DNDi : de l'innovation ouverte à l'impulsion de communs pour des médicaments essentiels ?]," Post-Print halshs-02566783, HAL.
    7. Amel Charleux & Anne Mione, 2018. "Open source editing business models; the case of software [Les business models de l’édition open source ; Le cas des logiciels]," Post-Print hal-01988127, HAL.
    8. Veronique Sanguinetti (toudoire) & Chauvet, V. & Goudarzi, K., 2020. "Covid-19, inspirons-nous de l’Open Source pour manager les activités collaboratives à distance," Post-Print hal-03323666, HAL.

  13. Julien Pénin & Caroline Hussler & Thierry Burger-Helmchen, 2011. "New shapes and new stakes: a portrait of open innovation as a promising phenomenon," Journal of Innovation Economics, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(1), pages 11-29.

    Cited by:

    1. Kotsemir, Maxim & Abroskin, Alexander & Meisner, Dirk, 2017. "Innovation Concepts and Typology – An Evolutionary Discussion," OSF Preprints ruyp3, Center for Open Science.
    2. Monique Combes-Joret & Sophie Bollinger, 2023. "Le rôle majeur des Établissements et Services d’Aide par le Travail (ESAT) dans les écosystèmes d’innovation sociale pour l’inclusion des personnes en situation de handicap. Le cas de l’ESAT l’ENVOL," Post-Print hal-04142261, HAL.
    3. Thierry Burger-Helmchen & Patrick Llerena, 2012. "Creativity, human resources and organizational learning," Post-Print hal-02189012, HAL.
    4. Andrea Urbinati & Davide Chiaroni & Vittorio Chiesa & Simone Franzò & Federico Frattini, 2019. "How Incumbents Manage Waves of Disruptive Innovations: An Exploratory Analysis of the Global Music Industry," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(01), pages 1-23, February.
    5. Arrah-Marie Jo, 2019. "Software vulnerability disclosure and security investment [L'impact de la divulgation d’une faille de sécurité : au-delà des motivations de l’éditeur de logiciel]," Post-Print hal-03033198, HAL.
    6. Zobel, Ann-Kristin & Lokshin, Boris & Hagedoorn, John, 2016. "Formal and informal appropriation mechanisms: the role of openness and innovativeness," MERIT Working Papers 2016-059, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    7. Amélie Bohas & Julie Fabbri & Pierre Laniray & François-Xavier de Vaujany, 2018. "Employment‐entrepreneurship hybridization and new work practices: from slashers to alternate‐entrepreneurship [Hybridations salariat-entrepreneuriat et nouvelles pratiques de travail : des slashers," Post-Print hal-01731181, HAL.
    8. Nordhause-Janz, Jürgen, 2013. "Innovationen in der Bauwirtschaft: Patentaktivitäten der deutschen und europäischen Wertschöpfungskette Bau," Forschung Aktuell 08/2013, Institut Arbeit und Technik (IAT), Westfälische Hochschule, University of Applied Sciences.
    9. Cécile Ayerbe & Sandra Dubouloz & Sophie Mignon & Marc Robert, 2020. "Management Innovation and Open Innovation: For and Towards Dialogue," Post-Print hal-02985953, HAL.
    10. Julia K. De Groote & Julia Backmann, 2019. "Initiating Open Innovation Collaborations Between Incumbents And Startups: How Can David And Goliath Get Along?," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(02), pages 1-33, January.
    11. Veronique Sanguinetti (toudoire) & Chauvet, V. & Goudarzi, K., 2020. "Covid-19, inspirons-nous de l’Open Source pour manager les activités collaboratives à distance," Post-Print hal-03323666, HAL.

  14. Thierry Burger-Helmchen & Caroline Hussler & Julien Pénin, 2011. "General presentation. Rethinking boundaries for innovation: exploring the shapes and stakes of the open innovation phenomenon," Journal of Innovation Economics, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(1), pages 3-10.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  15. Julien Penin, 2010. "On the Consequences of Patenting University Research: Lessons from a Survey of French Academic Inventors," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(5), pages 445-468.

    Cited by:

    1. Isabel Maria Bodas Freitas & Alessandro Nuvolari, 2012. "Traditional Versus Heterodox Motives for Academic Patenting: Evidence from the Netherlands," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(8), pages 671-695, November.
    2. Domenico De Stefano & Susanna Zaccarin, 2013. "Modelling Multiple Interactions in Science and Technology Networks," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 221-240, April.

  16. Antoine Bureth & Julien Pénin & Sandrine Wolff, 2010. "Start-Up Creation In Biotechnology: Lessons From The Case Of Four New Ventures In The Upper Rhine Biovalley," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(02), pages 253-283.

    Cited by:

    1. Anna Bialek-Jaworska & Renata Gabryelczyk & Agnieszka Pugaczewicz, 2016. "Determinants of Business Model Maturity (Determinanty dojrzalosci modeli biznesowych)," Research Reports, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 1(20), pages 7-23.
    2. Moritz Loock & Susan Mueller, 2012. "Talking about a Better Place: How Shai Agassi is Creating a Mass Market for Electric Vehicles," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 21(2), pages 289-313, September.
    3. Carolin Bock & Christian Landau & Moritz Orendt & Maximilian Schmidt, 2018. "Are Public Financing Schemes Beneficial For University Spin-Offs And The Technology Transfer Of Innovations?," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(06), pages 1-30, August.
    4. von Delft, Stephan & Zhao, Yang, 2021. "Business models in process industries: Emerging trends and future research," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).

  17. Julien Pénin, 2010. "Le problème des « patent trolls » : comment limiter la spéculation sur la propriété intellectuelle dans une économie fondée sur les connaissances ?," Innovations, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(2), pages 35-53.

    Cited by:

    1. Pénin, Julien, 2012. "Strategic uses of patents in markets for technology: A story of fabless firms, brokers and trolls," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 84(2), pages 633-641.

  18. Pénin, Julien & Wack, Jean-Pierre, 2008. "Research tool patents and free-libre biotechnology: A suggested unified framework," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(10), pages 1909-1921, December.

    Cited by:

    1. Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, Pia & Yang, Jialei, 2022. "Distinguishing between appropriability and appropriation: A systematic review and a renewed conceptual framing," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(1).
    2. Sebastian von Engelhardt, 2010. "Quality Competition or Quality Cooperation? License-Type and the Strategic Nature of Open Source vs. Closed Source Business Models," Jena Economics Research Papers 2010-034, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    3. Julien Pénin, 2008. "More open than open innovation? Rethinking the concept of openness in innovation studies," Working Papers of BETA 2008-18, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    4. Dr Chiara Rosazza Bondibene, 2012. "A Study of Patent Thickets," National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) Discussion Papers 401, National Institute of Economic and Social Research.
    5. Adenle, Ademola A. & Sowe, Sulayman K. & Parayil, Govindan & Aginam, Obijiofor, 2012. "Analysis of open source biotechnology in developing countries: An emerging framework for sustainable agriculture," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 256-269.
    6. Heikkinen, I.T.S. & Savin, H. & Partanen, J. & Seppälä, J. & Pearce, J.M., 2020. "Towards national policy for open source hardware research: The case of Finland," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    7. Adrián Kovács & Bart Looy & Bruno Cassiman, 2015. "Exploring the scope of open innovation: a bibliometric review of a decade of research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 104(3), pages 951-983, September.
    8. Yaowu Sun & Yi Zhai, 2018. "Mapping the knowledge domain and the theme evolution of appropriability research between 1986 and 2016: a scientometric review," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 116(1), pages 203-230, July.

  19. Julien Pénin, 2008. "Enveloppe Soleau et droit de possession antérieure : définition et analyse économique," Revue d'économie industrielle, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(1), pages 85-102.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  20. Antoine Bureth & Moritz Müller & Julien Pénin & Sandrine Wolf, 2007. "Brevet, innovation modulaire et collaboration. Le cas des vaccins géniques," Revue d'économie industrielle, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(4), pages 8-8.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  21. Bureth, Antoine & Pénin, Julien, 2007. "Modular Innovations and Distributed Processes. The Case of Genetically Engineered Vaccines," European Journal of Economic and Social Systems, Lavoisier, vol. 20(2), pages 251-273.

    Cited by:

    1. Isabel Maria Bodas Freitas & Alessandro Nuvolari, 2012. "Traditional Versus Heterodox Motives for Academic Patenting: Evidence from the Netherlands," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(8), pages 671-695, November.
    2. Pénin, Julien & Wack, Jean-Pierre, 2008. "Research tool patents and free-libre biotechnology: A suggested unified framework," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(10), pages 1909-1921, December.
    3. Rémy Guichardaz & Laurent Bach & Julien Penin, 2016. "Music industry intermediation in the digital era and the resilience of the majors’ oligopoly: The role of transactional capabilities," Working Papers of BETA 2016-47, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    4. Patrick Cohendet & Matthieu Farcot & Julien Pénin, 2009. "Intellectual property in a knowledge-based economy : Patents to include vs. patents to exclude," Working Papers of BETA 2009-15, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.

  22. Julien Pénin, 2007. "Open Knowledge Disclosure: An Overview Of The Evidence And Economic Motivations," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(2), pages 326-347, April.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  23. Paul Muller & Julien Pénin, 2006. "Why do firms disclose knowledge and how does it matter?," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 85-108, April.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  24. Antoine Bureth & Rachel Levy & Julien Pénin & Sandrine Wolff, 2005. "Strategic Reasons for Patenting: Between Exclusion and Coordination Rationales," Rivista di Politica Economica, SIPI Spa, vol. 95(5), pages 19-46, September.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  25. Penin, Julien, 2005. "Patents versus ex post rewards: A new look," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 641-656, June.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  26. Julien Pénin, 2003. "Endogénéisation des externalités de recherche : le rôle de la capacité d'émission des connaissances," Revue d'Économie Industrielle, Programme National Persée, vol. 102(1), pages 7-28.
    See citations under working paper version above.

Chapters

  1. Eric Schenk & Véronique Schaeffer & Julien Pénin & Anne-Laure Mention & Marko Torkkeli, 2020. "Blockchain and the Future of Open Innovation Intermediaries: The Case of Crowdsourcing Platforms," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Pierre-Jean Barlatier & Anne-Laure Mention (ed.), Managing Digital Open Innovation, chapter 15, pages 401-430, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..

    Cited by:

    1. Laurent Bach & Remy Guichardaz & Eric Schenk, 2020. "Technologie Blockchain et intermédiation dans l'industrie musicale," Working Papers of BETA 2020-16, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.

  2. Paul Muller & Julien Pénin, 2007. "Why do firms disclose knowledge and how does it matter?," Springer Books, in: Uwe Cantner & Franco Malerba (ed.), Innovation, Industrial Dynamics and Structural Transformation, pages 149-172, Springer.
    See citations under working paper version above.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.