IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/wirtsc/v100y2020i9d10.1007_s10273-020-2744-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Weltklassepatente — das „Gold“ der Wissensökonomie?
[World Class Patents — The Gold of the Knowledge Economy?]

Author

Listed:
  • Markus Overdiek

    (Bertelsmann Stiftung)

  • Thomas Rausch

    (Bertelsmann Stiftung)

  • Kai Gramke

    (EconSight GmbH)

Abstract

Zusammenfassung Für Volkswirtschaften ist die eigene Innovationsfähigkeit ein entscheidender Faktor, um in der Wissensgesellschaft erfolgreich sein zu können. Das Innovationspotenzial wird häufig mit der Zahl der Patentanmeldungen gemessen — ohne dabei nach Bedeutung zu differenzieren oder ihre tatsächliche Anwendung zu untersuchen. Unser Ansatz versucht dagegen, ein realitätsnäheres Bild zu zeichnen, indem sie nur die wichtigsten Patente (Weltklassepatente) in den Blick nimmt. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass der Vorsprung der USA im Patentbereich bei dieser Betrachtungsweise noch deutlicher zutage tritt, China auch in Sachen Patentqualität stark aufholt und Europa vor allem in digitalen Technologien dringenden Handlungsbedarf hat.

Suggested Citation

  • Markus Overdiek & Thomas Rausch & Kai Gramke, 2020. "Weltklassepatente — das „Gold“ der Wissensökonomie? [World Class Patents — The Gold of the Knowledge Economy?]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 100(9), pages 718-723, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:wirtsc:v:100:y:2020:i:9:d:10.1007_s10273-020-2744-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10273-020-2744-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10273-020-2744-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10273-020-2744-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ernst, Holger & Omland, Nils, 2011. "The Patent Asset Index - A new approach to benchmark patent portfolios," World Patent Information, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 34-41, March.
    2. Julien Pénin & Daniel Neicu, 2018. "Patents and Open Innovation: Bad Fences Do Not Make Good Neighbors," Journal of Innovation Economics, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(1), pages 57-85.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaodong Yuan & Weiling Song, 2022. "Evaluating technology innovation capabilities of companies based on entropy- TOPSIS: the case of solar cell companies," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 65-76, June.
    2. Ardito, Lorenzo & D'Adda, Diego & Messeni Petruzzelli, Antonio, 2018. "Mapping innovation dynamics in the Internet of Things domain: Evidence from patent analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 317-330.
    3. Song, Kisik & Kim, Kyuwoong & Lee, Sungjoo, 2018. "Identifying promising technologies using patents: A retrospective feature analysis and a prospective needs analysis on outlier patents," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 118-132.
    4. Song, Haoyang & Hou, Jianhua & Zhang, Yang, 2023. "The measurements and determinants of patent technological value: Lifetime, strength, breadth, and dispersion from the technology diffusion perspective," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1).
    5. Călin Florin Băban & Marius Băban, 2022. "An Orchestration Perspective on Open Innovation between Industry–University: Investigating Its Impact on Collaboration Performance," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(15), pages 1-23, July.
    6. Julia Anna Bingler, 2022. "Expect the worst, hope for the best: The valuation of climate risks and opportunities in sovereign bonds," CER-ETH Economics working paper series 22/371, CER-ETH - Center of Economic Research (CER-ETH) at ETH Zurich.
    7. Gamarra, Yanis Luca & Friedl, Gunther, 2023. "Declared essential patents and average total R&D expenditures per patent family," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(7).
    8. Cheng-Wen Lee & Budi Hasyim & Jan-Yan Lin, 2024. "Digital Technology for Supply Chain Management- marketing Integration," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 14(1), pages 1-4.
    9. Buggenhagen, Magnus & Blind, Knut, 2022. "Development of 5G – Identifying organizations active in publishing, patenting, and standardization," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(4).
    10. Noh, Heeyong & Song, Young-Keun & Lee, Sungjoo, 2016. "Identifying emerging core technologies for the future: Case study of patents published by leading telecommunication organizations," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(10), pages 956-970.
    11. Carsten C. Guderian, 2019. "Identifying Emerging Technologies with Smart Patent Indicators: The Example of Smart Houses," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(02), pages 1-24, April.
    12. Tomoko Saiki, 2015. "Information quality management of patent searches from the practical viewpoint," International Journal of Data Science, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(1), pages 58-72.
    13. Guijie Zhang & Guang Yu & Yuqiang Feng & Luning Liu & Zhenhua Yang, 2017. "Improving the publication delay model to characterize the patent granting process," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(2), pages 621-637, May.
    14. Grimaldi, Michele & Cricelli, Livio & Di Giovanni, Martina & Rogo, Francesco, 2015. "The patent portfolio value analysis: A new framework to leverage patent information for strategic technology planning," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 286-302.
    15. Benno Buehler & Daniel Coublucq & Cyril Hariton & Gregor Langus & Tommaso Valletti, 2017. "Recent Developments at DG Competition: 2016/2017," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 51(4), pages 397-422, December.
    16. Weresa Marzenna Anna, 2019. "Technological competitiveness of the EU member states in the era of the fourth industrial revolution," Economics and Business Review, Sciendo, vol. 5(3), pages 50-71, September.
    17. Dong HUO & Jianwei DANG & MOTOHASHI Kazuyuki, 2021. "Leveraging Standard Essential Patents for Capturing Innovation Rents: The Strategic Disclosure of License Rules," Discussion papers 21028, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    18. Yue, Xian-Ping, 2017. "Behavior of inter-enterprises patent portfolio for different market structure," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 24-31.
    19. Lee, Pei-Chun & Su, Hsin-Ning, 2014. "How to forecast cross-border patent infringement? — The case of U.S. international trade," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 125-131.
    20. Reher, Leonie & Runst, Petrik & Thomä, Jörg, 2022. "Personality and regional innovativeness: An empirical analysis of German patent data," ifh Working Papers 39/2022, Volkswirtschaftliches Institut für Mittelstand und Handwerk an der Universität Göttingen (ifh).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • O30 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - General
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:wirtsc:v:100:y:2020:i:9:d:10.1007_s10273-020-2744-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.