IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i12p5479-d1678708.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing International Technological Competitiveness in Renewable Energy: An IPC-Based Analysis of Granted Patents

Author

Listed:
  • Soojung Kim

    (Graduate School of Management of Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, 2066 Seobu-Ro, Jangan-Gu, Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea)

  • Keuntae Cho

    (Department of Systems Management Engineering, Graduate School of Management of Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, 2066 Seobu-Ro, Jangan-Gu, Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

With climate change mitigation and carbon emission reduction as global priorities, the expansion of renewable energy has become a core strategy globally. The purpose of this study is to identify trends in key renewable energy technologies, such as solar, wind, geothermal, and water technologies, and to compare and evaluate their competitiveness across leading nations. To this end, we performed trend analyses and both patent and technology portfolio assessments employing indicators such as the number of patents granted, claim count ratio, citation ratio, and patent family ratio on 194,485 granted patents collected from 1975 to 2024, according to International Patent Classification (IPC) codes, for the five major energy powers—the United States, European Union, Japan, China, and Korea. Trend analysis revealed a sharp increase in energy-related patents from 2010, with solar technologies accounting for over 60 percent of the total. Patent portfolio results positioned the United States as the Technology Leader, leading in both activity and quality; China stood out for its quantitative expansion and Europe for its qualitative strengths. Technology portfolio findings show that, although core technologies are shared globally, application-level technologies vary by country, reflecting each nation’s industrial base, policy orientation, and technological maturity. This study delineates priority technology domains, identifies optimal R&D collaboration pathways, and recommends policy levers that accelerate commercialization—enabling policymakers and industry stakeholders to allocate resources strategically and construct balanced technology portfolios aligned with global initiatives such as carbon-neutrality targets and the RE100 commitment.

Suggested Citation

  • Soojung Kim & Keuntae Cho, 2025. "Assessing International Technological Competitiveness in Renewable Energy: An IPC-Based Analysis of Granted Patents," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-30, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5479-:d:1678708
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5479/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5479/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fabry, Bernd & Ernst, Holger & Langholz, Jens & Köster, Martin, 2006. "Patent portfolio analysis as a useful tool for identifying R&D and business opportunities--an empirical application in the nutrition and health industry," World Patent Information, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 215-225, September.
    2. Florian Egli & Bjarne Steffen & Tobias S. Schmidt, 2018. "A dynamic analysis of financing conditions for renewable energy technologies," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 3(12), pages 1084-1092, December.
    3. Ernst, Holger & Omland, Nils, 2011. "The Patent Asset Index - A new approach to benchmark patent portfolios," World Patent Information, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 34-41, March.
    4. Li, Shuying & Zhang, Xian & Xu, Haiyun & Fang, Shu & Garces, Edwin & Daim, Tugrul, 2020. "Measuring strategic technological strength :Patent Portfolio Model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    5. Grimaldi, Michele & Cricelli, Livio & Di Giovanni, Martina & Rogo, Francesco, 2015. "The patent portfolio value analysis: A new framework to leverage patent information for strategic technology planning," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 286-302.
    6. Leila Tahmooresnejad & Catherine Beaudry, 2019. "Capturing the economic value of triadic patents," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 118(1), pages 127-157, January.
    7. Ivan Haščič & Jérôme Silva & Nick Johnstone, 2015. "The Use of Patent Statistics for International Comparisons and Analysis of Narrow Technological Fields," OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2015/5, OECD Publishing.
    8. George Messinis, 2011. "Triadic citations, country biases and patent value: the case of pharmaceuticals," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 89(3), pages 813-833, December.
    9. Archibugi, Daniele & Coco, Alberto, 2005. "Measuring technological capabilities at the country level: A survey and a menu for choice," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 175-194, March.
    10. Bloem da Silveira Junior, Luiz A. & Vasconcellos, Eduardo & Vasconcellos Guedes, Liliana & Guedes, Luis Fernando A. & Costa, Renato Machado, 2018. "Technology roadmapping: A methodological proposition to refine Delphi results," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 194-206.
    11. Guellec, Dominique & Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, Bruno v., 2000. "Applications, grants and the value of patent," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 109-114, October.
    12. Grupp, Hariolf, 1994. "The measurement of technical performance of innovations by technometrics and its impact on established technology indicators," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 175-193, March.
    13. Ahmed Elkhatat & Shaheen Al-Muhtaseb, 2024. "Climate Change and Energy Security: A Comparative Analysis of the Role of Energy Policies in Advancing Environmental Sustainability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-31, June.
    14. Fang, Kai & Zhou, Yunheng & Wang, Shuang & Ye, Ruike & Guo, Sujian, 2018. "Assessing national renewable energy competitiveness of the G20: A revised Porter's Diamond Model," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 719-731.
    15. Verhoeven, Dennis & Bakker, Jurriën & Veugelers, Reinhilde, 2016. "Measuring technological novelty with patent-based indicators," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 707-723.
    16. Littmann-Hilmer, Gudrun & Kuckartz, Michael, 2009. "SME tailor-designed patent portfolio analysis," World Patent Information, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 273-277, December.
    17. Ernst, Holger, 2003. "Patent information for strategic technology management," World Patent Information, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 233-242, September.
    18. Jingda Ding & Junping Qiu, 2011. "An approach to improve the indicator weights of scientific and technological competitiveness evaluation of Chinese universities," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 86(2), pages 285-297, February.
    19. Xuan Shi & Lingfei Cai & Hongfang Song, 2019. "Discovering Potential Technology Opportunities for Fuel Cell Vehicle Firms: A Multi-Level Patent Portfolio-Based Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-22, November.
    20. Kim, Jeeeun & Lee, Sungjoo, 2015. "Patent databases for innovation studies: A comparative analysis of USPTO, EPO, JPO and KIPO," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 332-345.
    21. Mejer, Malwina & van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, Bruno, 2011. "Patent backlogs at USPTO and EPO: Systemic failure vs deliberate delays," World Patent Information, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 122-127, June.
    22. Rowe, Gene & Wright, George, 1999. "The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 353-375, October.
    23. Surender Mor & Ranjan Aneja & Sonu Madan & Mahesh Ghimire, 2024. "Kyoto Protocol and Paris Agreement: Transition from Bindings to Pledges – A Review," Millennial Asia, , vol. 15(4), pages 690-711, December.
    24. Choi, Jinho & Hwang, Yong-Sik, 2014. "Patent keyword network analysis for improving technology development efficiency," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 170-182.
    25. Antonio Fonfría & Carlos Díaz de la Guardia & Isabel Alvarez, 2002. "The Role of Technology and Competitiveness Policies: A Technology Gap Approach," Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, , vol. 13(1-3), pages 223-241, January.
    26. Albino, Vito & Ardito, Lorenzo & Dangelico, Rosa Maria & Messeni Petruzzelli, Antonio, 2014. "Understanding the development trends of low-carbon energy technologies: A patent analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 836-854.
    27. Loet Leydesdorff & Dieter Franz Kogler & Bowen Yan, 2017. "Mapping patent classifications: portfolio and statistical analysis, and the comparison of strengths and weaknesses," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 112(3), pages 1573-1591, September.
    28. Hrayshat, Eyad S., 2007. "Analysis of renewable energy situation in Jordan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 11(8), pages 1873-1887, October.
    29. Debackere, Koenraad & Veugelers, Reinhilde, 2005. "The role of academic technology transfer organizations in improving industry science links," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 321-342, April.
    30. Khan, Khalid & Su, Chi Wei & Rehman, Ashfaq U. & Ullah, Rahman, 2022. "Is technological innovation a driver of renewable energy?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    31. Loet Leydesdorff, 2008. "Patent classifications as indicators of intellectual organization," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 59(10), pages 1582-1597, August.
    32. Narin, Francis & Noma, Elliot & Perry, Ross, 1987. "Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 16(2-4), pages 143-155, August.
    33. Lukasz Kuzminski & Tomasz Jalowiec & Piotr Masloch & Henryk Wojtaszek & Ireneusz Miciula, 2020. "Analysis of Factors Influencing the Competitiveness of Manufacturing Companies," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 217-227.
    34. Gao, Lidan & Porter, Alan L. & Wang, Jing & Fang, Shu & Zhang, Xian & Ma, Tingting & Wang, Wenping & Huang, Lu, 2013. "Technology life cycle analysis method based on patent documents," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 80(3), pages 398-407.
    35. Furman, Jeffrey L. & Porter, Michael E. & Stern, Scott, 2002. "The determinants of national innovative capacity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 899-933, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Song, Kisik & Kim, Kyuwoong & Lee, Sungjoo, 2018. "Identifying promising technologies using patents: A retrospective feature analysis and a prospective needs analysis on outlier patents," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 118-132.
    2. Leila Tahmooresnejad & Catherine Beaudry, 2019. "Capturing the economic value of triadic patents," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 118(1), pages 127-157, January.
    3. Yoon, Byungun & Jeong, Yujin & Lee, Keeeun & Lee, Sungjoo, 2020. "A systematic approach to prioritizing R&D projects based on customer-perceived value using opinion mining," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    4. Donghyun Choi & Bomi Song, 2018. "Exploring Technological Trends in Logistics: Topic Modeling-Based Patent Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-26, August.
    5. Youngjae Choi & Sanghyun Park & Sungjoo Lee, 2021. "Identifying emerging technologies to envision a future innovation ecosystem: A machine learning approach to patent data," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(7), pages 5431-5476, July.
    6. Li, Shuying & Zhang, Xian & Xu, Haiyun & Fang, Shu & Garces, Edwin & Daim, Tugrul, 2020. "Measuring strategic technological strength :Patent Portfolio Model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    7. Sergio Cuellar & Alberto Méndez-Morales & Milton M. Herrera, 2022. "Location Matters: a Novel Methodology for Patent’s National Phase Process," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(3), pages 2138-2163, September.
    8. Ardito, Lorenzo & D'Adda, Diego & Messeni Petruzzelli, Antonio, 2018. "Mapping innovation dynamics in the Internet of Things domain: Evidence from patent analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 317-330.
    9. Alptekin Durmuşoğlu, 2017. "Effects of Clean Air Act on Patenting Activities in Chemical Industry: Learning from Past Experiences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-10, May.
    10. Jeeeun Kim & Sungjoo Lee, 2017. "Forecasting and identifying multi-technology convergence based on patent data: the case of IT and BT industries in 2020," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(1), pages 47-65, April.
    11. Park, Jongyong & Lee, Hakyeon & Park, Yongtae, 2009. "Disembodied knowledge flows among industrial clusters: A patent analysis of the Korean manufacturing sector," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 73-84.
    12. Shu-Hao Chang, 2017. "The evolutionary growth estimation model of international cooperative patent networks," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 112(2), pages 711-729, August.
    13. Cheng-Wen Lee & Budi Hasyim & Jan-Yan Lin, 2024. "Digital Technology for Supply Chain Management- marketing Integration," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 14(1), pages 1-4.
    14. Pontus Braunerhjelm & Roger Svensson, 2024. "Inventions, commercialization strategies, and knowledge spillovers in SMEs," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 63(1), pages 275-297, June.
    15. Yuan Zhou & Fang Dong & Yufei Liu & Liang Ran, 2021. "A deep learning framework to early identify emerging technologies in large-scale outlier patents: an empirical study of CNC machine tool," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(2), pages 969-994, February.
    16. Zhao, Xuefeng & Wu, Weiwei & Wu, Delin, 2024. "How does AI perform in industry chain? A patent claims analysis approach," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    17. Richarz, Jan & Wegewitz, Stephan & Henn, Sarah & Müller, Dirk, 2023. "Graph-based research field analysis by the use of natural language processing: An overview of German energy research," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PB).
    18. Francesco Paolo Appio & Luigi de Luca & Robert Morgan & Antonella Martini, 2019. "Patent portfolio diversity and firm profitability: A question of specialization or diversification?," Post-Print halshs-02292360, HAL.
    19. Su, Yu-Shan & Huang, Hsini & Daim, Tugrul & Chien, Pan-Wei & Peng, Ru-Ling & Karaman Akgul, Arzu, 2023. "Assessing the technological trajectory of 5G-V2X autonomous driving inventions: Use of patent analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    20. Katia Angue & Cécile Ayerbe & Liliana Mitkova, 2014. "A method using two dimensions of the patent classification for measuring the technological proximity: an application in identifying a potential R&D partner in biotechnology," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 39(5), pages 716-747, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5479-:d:1678708. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.