IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03323666.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Covid-19, inspirons-nous de l’Open Source pour manager les activités collaboratives à distance

Author

Listed:
  • Veronique Sanguinetti (toudoire)

    (CRISS - Centre de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Sciences de la Société - UPHF - Université Polytechnique Hauts-de-France)

  • Chauvet, V.

    (CERGAM - Centre d'Études et de Recherche en Gestion d'Aix-Marseille - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - UTLN - Université de Toulon)

  • Kiane Goudarzi

    (MAGELLAN - Laboratoire de Recherche Magellan - UJML - Université Jean Moulin - Lyon 3 - Université de Lyon - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Lyon)

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic is leading organizations to accelerate remote collaborative activities. The article proposes to draw inspiration from organizations practising Open Source to manage these activities. Based on an analysis of sixteen expert interviews, the research identifies three characteristics that are easily transferable in other industries - the role of communication, the recognition of each person's contribution, the use of collaborative tools and principles - and two others that are worth considering at mid-term, the breakdown of tasks into modules and the development of a specific business model.

Suggested Citation

  • Veronique Sanguinetti (toudoire) & Chauvet, V. & Kiane Goudarzi, 2020. "Covid-19, inspirons-nous de l’Open Source pour manager les activités collaboratives à distance," Post-Print hal-03323666, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03323666
    DOI: 10.3166/rfg.2020.00488
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03323666v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-03323666v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3166/rfg.2020.00488?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Josh Lerner & Jean Tirole, 2002. "Some Simple Economics of Open Source," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(2), pages 197-234, June.
    2. Thomas Loilier & Albéric Tellier, 2011. "Que faire du modèle de l’innovation ouverte ?," Post-Print hal-02148087, HAL.
    3. B. Demil & X. Lecocq, 2006. "Neither Market nor Hierarchy nor Network: The Emergence of Bazaar Governance," Post-Print hal-00185026, HAL.
    4. Laure Muselli, 2008. "Le role des licences dans les modeles économiques des éditeurs de logiciels open source," Post-Print hal-02286615, HAL.
    5. Yves Evrard & Bernard Pras & Elyette Roux & Pierre Desmet & Anne-Marie Dussaix & Gary L. Lilien, 2009. "Market - Fondements et méthodes des recherches en marketing," Post-Print hal-00490724, HAL.
    6. Gandal, Neil & Stettner, Uriel, 2016. "Network dynamics and knowledge transfer in virtual organisations," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 270-290.
    7. Laure Muselli, 2008. "Le rôle des licences dans les modèles économiques des éditeurs de logiciels open source," Revue française de gestion, Lavoisier, vol. 0(1), pages 199-214.
    8. Julien Pénin & Caroline Hussler & Thierry Burger-Helmchen, 2011. "New shapes and new stakes: a portrait of open innovation as a promising phenomenon," Journal of Innovation Economics, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(1), pages 11-29.
    9. Benoît Demil & Xavier Lecocq, 2014. "The Rise and Fall of an Open Business Model," Revue d'économie industrielle, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(2), pages 85-113.
    10. repec:dau:papers:123456789/1536 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Julien Pénin, 2011. "Open source innovation: Towards a generalization of the open source model beyond software," Revue d'économie industrielle, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(4), pages 65-88.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amel Charleux & Anne Mione, 2018. "Open source editing business models; the case of software [Les business models de l’édition open source ; Le cas des logiciels]," Post-Print hal-01988127, HAL.
    2. Engelhardt, Sebastian v. & Freytag, Andreas, 2013. "Institutions, culture, and open source," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 90-110.
    3. Bruno S. Frey & Roger Lüthi & Margit Osterloh, 2011. "Community Enterprises - Aliens under Attack," CREMA Working Paper Series 2011-08, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    4. Nordine Benkeltoum, 2012. "Open source et systèmes critiques : le cas Thales," Post-Print hal-00905919, HAL.
    5. Xintong Han & Pu Zhao, 2019. "Pay for Content or Pay for Marketing? An Empirical Study on Content Pricing," Working Papers 19-03, NET Institute.
    6. Teppo Felin & Bruno S. Frey & Roger Lüthi & Margit Osterloh, 2012. "Community Enterprises—An Institutional Innovation," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(5-6), pages 427-439, July.
    7. Sadowski, Bert M. & Sadowski-Rasters, Gaby & Duysters, Geert, 2008. "Transition of governance in a mature open software source community: Evidence from the Debian case," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 323-332, December.
    8. Johannes Loh & Tobias Kretschmer, 2023. "Online communities on competing platforms: Evidence from game wikis," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(2), pages 441-476, February.
    9. Vegard Kolbjørnsrud, 2018. "Collaborative organizational forms: on communities, crowds, and new hybrids," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 7(1), pages 1-21, December.
    10. Param Vir Singh & Corey Phelps, 2013. "Networks, Social Influence, and the Choice Among Competing Innovations: Insights from Open Source Software Licenses," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 539-560, September.
    11. Graziella Marzi, 2009. "If not for money for what? Digging into the OS/FS contributors’ motivations," Working Papers 166, University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Economics, revised Jul 2009.
    12. Bitzer, Jürgen & Geishecker, Ingo, 2010. "Who contributes voluntarily to OSS? An investigation among German IT employees," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 165-172, February.
    13. Arthur Schram & Boris Van Leeuwen & Theo Offerman, 2013. "Superstars Need Social Benefits: An Experiment on Network Formation," Working Papers 1306, Departament Empresa, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, revised Jul 2013.
    14. Jing Wang & Gen Li & Kai-Lung Hui, 2022. "Monetary Incentives and Knowledge Spillover: Evidence from a Natural Experiment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(5), pages 3549-3572, May.
    15. David, Paul A. & Shapiro, Joseph S., 2008. "Community-based production of open-source software: What do we know about the developers who participate?," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 364-398, December.
    16. Liuan Wang & Lu (Lucy) Yan & Tongxin Zhou & Xitong Guo & Gregory R. Heim, 2020. "Understanding Physicians’ Online-Offline Behavior Dynamics: An Empirical Study," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 537-555, June.
    17. Marie-Eve Laporte & Géraldine Michel & Sophie Rieunier, 2017. "Towards a better understanding of eating behaviour through the concept of Perception of Nutritional Risk," Post-Print halshs-02923251, HAL.
    18. Dolata, Ulrich, 2014. "Märkte und Macht der Internetkonzerne: Konzentration - Konkurrenz - Innovationsstrategien," Research Contributions to Organizational Sociology and Innovation Studies, SOI Discussion Papers 2014-04, University of Stuttgart, Institute for Social Sciences, Department of Organizational Sociology and Innovation Studies.
    19. Massimiliano Gambardella, 2011. "The Scope of Open Licenses in Cultural Contents Production and Distribution," Working Papers hal-04140977, HAL.
    20. Natalya Yu. VLASOVA & Elena L. MOLOKOVA, 2019. "Mechanisms for coordinating stakeholders of the higher education market: Theoretical approaches to identification," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 10(2), pages 21-30, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Travail à distance; travail collaboratif; open source; entretiens d'experts;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03323666. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.