IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/url/upravl/v10y2019i2p21-30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mechanisms for coordinating stakeholders of the higher education market: Theoretical approaches to identification

Author

Listed:
  • Natalya Yu. VLASOVA

    (Ural State University of Economics)

  • Elena L. MOLOKOVA

    (Ural State University of Economics)

Abstract

Massive shifts in public relations and enhancing interaction between stakeholders damage the effectiveness of standard coordination models through changing the architecture of business entities’ activity. The paper aims to identify the mechanisms for coordinating stakeholders of the higher education market by clarifying theoretical and methodological approaches to the concept and classification. The methodological basis includes the theories falling within the institutional paradigm. The authors view the higher education market as a network of neoclassical and relational contracts. The theory shifts the focus from the analysis of the market actors to UPRAVLENETS/THE MANAGER 2019. Vol. 10. No. 2 Market Development: A Management Aspect 29 the analysis of the horizontal relationships between them. Performing the comparative analysis, the authors reveal the theoretical and methodological problems, such as lack of a single approach to the concept of coordination mechanisms and criteria for distinguishing them. The fundamental coordination mechanisms underlying the current research are only constructs for creating a contemporary coordination model whose construction process is continuous and dynamic. In science, there is a shift in focus from analyzing the current coordination mechanisms (market, hierarchy and networks) to studying the dynamics of coordination processes and identifying intermediate and brand-new coordination mechanisms. Having evaluated stakeholders’ interaction in the higher education market, the authors found the existence of a wide array of coordination mechanisms, which allowed establishing the hybrid nature of coordination. The most intensive development is typical of network communications that take the form of mutual agreement based on informal norms. The paper systematizes the scientific approaches applied within the research field under review, as well as identifies the mechanisms for coordinating stakeholders of the higher education market.

Suggested Citation

  • Natalya Yu. VLASOVA & Elena L. MOLOKOVA, 2019. "Mechanisms for coordinating stakeholders of the higher education market: Theoretical approaches to identification," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 10(2), pages 21-30, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:url:upravl:v:10:y:2019:i:2:p:21-30
    DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2019-10-2-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://upravlenets.usue.ru/images/78/3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://upravlenets.usue.ru/en/issues-2019/560
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.29141/2218-5003-2019-10-2-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Williamson, Oliver E, 1979. "Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractural Relations," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 22(2), pages 233-261, October.
    2. Elsner, Wolfram & Hocker, Gero & Schwardt, Henning, 2009. "Simplistic vs. Complex Organization: Markets, Hierarchies, and Networks in an 'Organizational Triangle'," MPRA Paper 14315, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. B. Demil & X. Lecocq, 2006. "Neither Market nor Hierarchy nor Network: The Emergence of Bazaar Governance," Post-Print hal-00185026, HAL.
    4. Jon I Martinez & J Carlos Jarillo, 1989. "The Evolution of Research on Coordination Mechanisms in Multinational Corporations," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 20(3), pages 489-514, September.
    5. Paul S. Adler, 2001. "Market, Hierarchy, and Trust: The Knowledge Economy and the Future of Capitalism," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 215-234, April.
    6. Ivo Zander, 2007. "Do You See What I Mean? An Entrepreneurship Perspective on the Nature and Boundaries of the Firm," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(7), pages 1141-1164, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vitaly L. Tambovtsev, 2022. "Clusters: Coordination, inter-firm relationships and competitive advantages," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 13(1), pages 20-36, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vegard Kolbjørnsrud, 2018. "Collaborative organizational forms: on communities, crowds, and new hybrids," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 7(1), pages 1-21, December.
    2. Ranjith Appuhami & Sujatha Perera & Hector Perera, 2011. "Management Controls in Public–Private Partnerships: An Analytical Framework," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 21(1), pages 64-79, March.
    3. Lorino, Philippe & Mourey, Damien, 2013. "The experience of time in the inter-organizing inquiry: A present thickened by dialog and situations," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 48-62.
    4. Miller, Peter & Kurunmäki, Liisa & O'Leary, Ted, 2008. "Accounting, hybrids and the management of risk," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(7-8), pages 942-967.
    5. A. Willem & M. Buelens, 2003. "Making Competencies Cross Business Unit Boundaries: The Interplay between Inter-Unit Coordination, Trust and Knowledge Transferability," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 03/176, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    6. Fang, F., 2019. "When performance shortfall arises, contract or trust? A multi-method study of the impact of contractual and relational governances on performance in public – private partnerships," Other publications TiSEM 473840ee-6945-4a93-9326-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    7. Hao-Fan Chumg & Jia-Wen Shin & Hsiu-Yen Chiang & Man-ting Ho, 2022. "What Drives Working Habits for Sharing Knowledge in Virtual Teams? An Organizational Embeddedness Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, March.
    8. Katsuki Aoki & Miriam Wilhelm, 2017. "The Role of Ambidexterity in Managing Buyer–Supplier Relationships: The Toyota Case," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(6), pages 1080-1097, December.
    9. Randi Lunnan & Sverre Tomassen & Ulf Andersson & Gabriel R. G. Benito, 2019. "Dealing with headquarters in the multinational corporation: a subsidiary perspective on organizing costs," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 8(1), pages 1-24, December.
    10. Thambar, Paul J. & Brown, David A. & Sivabalan, Prabhu, 2019. "Managing systemic uncertainty: The role of industry-level management controls and hybrids," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 1-1.
    11. Morrow, J.L., Jr. & Joyce, Richard Patrick, III & McMahon, William J. & DeMaia, Antonio M. & McVicker, S. Caleb & Parsons, Ashley E. & Wilcox, Kristin, 2017. "Cooperation among Ugandan farmers: cultivating social capital," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 20(5).
    12. Hamann-Lohmer, Jacob & Bendig, Miriam & Lasch, Rainer, 2023. "Investigating the impact of digital transformation on relationship and collaboration dynamics in supply chains and manufacturing networks – A multi-case study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    13. Nadine Arnold & Raimund Hasse, 2015. "Escalation of Governance: Effects of Voluntary Standardization on Organizations, Markets and Standards in Swiss Fair Trade[1]," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 20(3), pages 94-109, August.
    14. Idris Adjerid & Julia Adler-Milstein & Corey Angst, 2018. "Reducing Medicare Spending Through Electronic Health Information Exchange: The Role of Incentives and Exchange Maturity," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 341-361, June.
    15. Fabianski, Caroline, 2018. "Partnering for quality and performance: A standpoint for enhanced services," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 135-143.
    16. Pao, Huei-Wen & Wu, Hsueh-Liang & Lee, Cheng-Yu, 2020. "Project interface choice and knowledge creation: Evidence of international science cooperation in Taiwan," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    17. Han, Shaojie & Su, Jingqin & Lyu, Yibo & Liu, Qing, 2022. "How do business incubators govern incubation relationships with different new ventures?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    18. Mariani, Marcello M. & Fosso Wamba, Samuel, 2020. "Exploring how consumer goods companies innovate in the digital age: The role of big data analytics companies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 338-352.
    19. Engelhardt, Sebastian v. & Freytag, Andreas, 2013. "Institutions, culture, and open source," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 90-110.
    20. Junyon Im & Sunny Sun, 2015. "Profits and outreach to the poor: The institutional logics of microfinance institutions," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 95-117, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    coordination mechanism; higher education market; stakeholder; price coordination; hierarchy; hybrid nature of coordination.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B52 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - Historical; Institutional; Evolutionary; Modern Monetary Theory;
    • D86 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Economics of Contract Law
    • I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:url:upravl:v:10:y:2019:i:2:p:21-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Victor Blaginin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/usueeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.