IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/dij/wpfarg/1110504.html

L’introduction des TIC au sein de PME appartenant à un groupe:le poids du contexte - The introduction of ICT in small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) belonging to a group of companies:the weight of context

Author

Listed:
  • Françoise Pierson

    (Université de Franche-Comté - LEG/FARGO UMR Cnrs 5118)

  • Karine Rymeyko

    (Université de Franche-Comté - LEG/FARGO UMR Cnrs 5118)

Abstract

(VF)L’objet de cette recherche est d’étudier l’impact des TIC sur le fonctionnement organisationnel d’une PME appartenant à un groupe. Cette technologie est-elle source d’homogénéisation des pratiques de GRH ou conduit-elle à une persistance de fonctionnements existants ? Une grille d’analyse contextualiste et une étude de cas nous ont permis d’appréhender le poids du contexte organisationnel quant aux changements engendrés par les TIC.(VA)The purpose of this research is to study the impact of ICTs on organizational functioning of SMEs belonging to a group. Does this technology allow to homogenize the practices of Human Resource Management (HRM) or does it lead to a persistence of existing way of functioning? An analytical contextualist and a study of case allowed us to arrest the weight of the organizational functioning about possible changes caused by ICTs.

Suggested Citation

  • Françoise Pierson & Karine Rymeyko, 2011. "L’introduction des TIC au sein de PME appartenant à un groupe:le poids du contexte - The introduction of ICT in small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) belonging to a group of companies:the weight of context," Working Papers CREGO 1110504, Université de Bourgogne - CREGO EA7317 Centre de recherches en gestion des organisations.
    • Handle: RePEc:dij:wpfarg:1110504
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec-crego.u-bourgogne.fr/images/stories/wp/1110504.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Serge Amabile & Martine Gadille & Régis Meissonier, 2000. "Information, organisation, décision : étude empirique sur les apports des NTIC dans des PME "Internautes"," Post-Print hal-01794468, HAL.
    2. Andrew M. Pettigrew, 1987. "Context And Action In The Transformation Of The Firm," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(6), pages 649-670, November.
    3. Henry Mintzberg, 1978. "Patterns in Strategy Formation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(9), pages 934-948, May.
    4. John Sloman, 2008. "Principes d'économie," Post-Print hal-02189754, HAL.
    5. Gerardine DeSanctis & Marshall Scott Poole, 1994. "Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(2), pages 121-147, May.
    6. Sarah Kaplan, 2008. "Framing Contests: Strategy Making Under Uncertainty," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(5), pages 729-752, October.
    7. Wanda J. Orlikowski, 2002. "Knowing in Practice: Enacting a Collective Capability in Distributed Organizing," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 249-273, June.
    8. Andrew M. Pettigrew, 1990. "Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(3), pages 267-292, August.
    9. M. Lynne Markus & Daniel Robey, 1988. "Information Technology and Organizational Change: Causal Structure in Theory and Research," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(5), pages 583-598, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Boriana Rukanova & Mark Reuver & Stefan Henningsson & Fatemeh Nikayin & Yao-Hua Tan, 2020. "Emergence of collective digital innovations through the process of control point driven network reconfiguration and reframing: the case of mobile payment," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(1), pages 107-129, March.
    2. Vesa, Mikko & Franck, Henrika, 2013. "Bringing strategy to time, studying strategy as experiential vectors," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 23-34.
    3. Orlikowski, Wanda J. & Scott, Susan V., 2008. "The entanglement of technology and work in organizations," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 33898, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Karim Messeghem & Françoise Pierson, 2005. "Intranet RH:outil de contrôle des pratiques de gestion des ressources humaines de l’encadrement intermédiaire?," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 8(2), pages 237-261, June.
    5. Martha S. Feldman & Wanda J. Orlikowski, 2011. "Theorizing Practice and Practicing Theory," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 1240-1253, October.
    6. Tamim Elbasha & Alex Wright, 2017. "Reconciling structure and agency in strategy -as-practice research: Towards a strong- structuration theory approach," Post-Print hal-01557268, HAL.
    7. Elisabeth Yang & Julia DiBenigno, 2025. "Opportunistic Change During a Punctuation: How and When the Front Lines Can Drive Bursts of Incremental Change," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(1), pages 40-64, January.
    8. Emmanuelle Vaast & Geoff Walsham, 2009. "Trans-Situated Learning: Supporting a Network of Practice with an Information Infrastructure," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 547-564, December.
    9. Swan, Jacky & Goussevskaia, Anna & Newell, Sue & Robertson, Maxine & Bresnen, Mike & Obembe, Ademola, 2007. "Modes of organizing biomedical innovation in the UK and US and the role of integrative and relational capabilities," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 529-547, May.
    10. Pamela J. Hinds & Diane E. Bailey, 2003. "Out of Sight, Out of Sync: Understanding Conflict in Distributed Teams," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(6), pages 615-632, December.
    11. Wanda J. Orlikowski & C. Suzanne Iacono, 2001. "Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the “IT” in IT Research—A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 121-134, June.
    12. Islam, A.K.M. Najmul & Mäntymäki, Matti & Turunen, Marja, 2019. "Why do blockchains split? An actor-network perspective on Bitcoin splits," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    13. Claude Paraponaris, 2009. "La diffusion des connaissances au sein des multinationales par le développement des relations locales," Post-Print halshs-04124617, HAL.
    14. S. Weaver & Pam Ellen & Lars Mathiassen, 2015. "Contextualist Inquiry into Organizational Citizenship: Promoting Recycling Across Heterogeneous Organizational Actors," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 129(2), pages 413-428, June.
    15. Gwendolyn L. Kolfschoten & Bruce A. Reinig, 2013. "Introduction to the Special Issue: “Cognitive Perspectives on Group Decision and Negotiation”," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 867-872, September.
    16. Paola Perez-Aleman, 2011. "Collective Learning in Global Diffusion: Spreading Quality Standards in a Developing Country Cluster," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 173-189, February.
    17. Nutt, Paul C., 2005. "Search during decision making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(3), pages 851-876, February.
    18. M. Lynne Markus & Frantz Rowe, 2018. "Is IT changing the world?," Post-Print hal-03716243, HAL.
    19. Daniel Geiger & Jochen Koch, 2008. "Von der individuellen Routine zur organisationalen Praktik — Ein neues Paradigma für die Organisationsforschung?," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 60(7), pages 693-712, November.
    20. Matt Beane & Wanda J. Orlikowski, 2015. "What Difference Does a Robot Make? The Material Enactment of Distributed Coordination," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(6), pages 1553-1573, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • M19 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dij:wpfarg:1110504. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Angèle RENAUD (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.