IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-02566783.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

DNDi : from open innovation to commons for essential drugs ?
[DNDi : de l'innovation ouverte à l'impulsion de communs pour des médicaments essentiels ?]

Author

Listed:
  • Anne Branciard

    (SESSTIM - U1252 INSERM - Aix Marseille Univ - UMR 259 IRD - Sciences Economiques et Sociales de la Santé & Traitement de l'Information Médicale - IRD - Institut de Recherche pour le Développement - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - INSERM - Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale)

Abstract

Notre communication s'intéresse aux apports du modèle de RD de DNDi ( Drugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative) dans la définition d'un mode alternatif de production de médicaments pour répondre à un enjeu de santé publique mondiale, les besoins essentiels des malades les plus vulnérables dans les pays en développement. Nous exposerons quelques composantes du débat sur l'innovation ouverte dans une première section, en nous concentrant plus spécialement sur l'innovation pharmaceutique resituée dans ce contexte, et in fine sur les applications de l'innovation ouverte pour de nouveaux outils de santé dans les PED. Dans une deuxième section, nous analyserons en étude de cas le modèle ouvert collaboratif de recherche-développement de DNDi, en soulignant et discutant les caractéristiques de son originalité open source. Les enseignements tirés de l'expérimentation par DNDi de ce modèle dans ses premiers produits développés, les antipaludéens, et qui mettent en relief ses lacunes, serons mis en perspective dans la troisième section. Finalement ce modèle, en même temps qu'il s'oriente principalement sur le créneau des maladies tropicales négligées (MTN), s'infléchit vers une diversification des collaborations adaptée à chaque maladie et évolue dans un cadre de règles d'usage plus formalisées. Ressources, communautés et règles ébaucheraient-elles alors des « communs » ?

Suggested Citation

  • Anne Branciard, 2013. "DNDi : from open innovation to commons for essential drugs ? [DNDi : de l'innovation ouverte à l'impulsion de communs pour des médicaments essentiels ?]," Post-Print halshs-02566783, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-02566783
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-02566783v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-02566783v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bruno Boidin & Lucie Lesaffre, 2010. "L'accès des pays pauvres aux médicaments et la propriété intellectuelle : quel apport des partenariats multiacteurs ?," Revue internationale de droit économique, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(3), pages 325-350.
    2. Cohen, Wesley M & Levinthal, Daniel A, 1989. "Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 99(397), pages 569-596, September.
    3. repec:hal:cepnwp:hal-00624455 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Etzkowitz, Henry & Leydesdorff, Loet, 2000. "The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and "Mode 2" to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 109-123, February.
    5. Pierre-André Mangolte, 2010. "Les communs du logiciel libre : La naissance du commun, le cadre institutionnel," Working Papers hal-00624455, HAL.
    6. Julien Pénin, 2011. "Open source innovation: Towards a generalization of the open source model beyond software," Revue d'économie industrielle, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(4), pages 65-88.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anne Branciard, 2012. "Open and collaborative research and development models : towards "commons" ? [Des modèles de recherche-développement ouverts et collaboratifs dans le domaine pharmaceutique : vers des « c," Post-Print halshs-02566715, HAL.
    2. Reis, Anabela & Heitor, Manuel & Amaral, Miguel & Mendonça, Joana, 2016. "Revisiting industrial policy: Lessons learned from the establishment of an automotive OEM in Portugal," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 113(PB), pages 195-205.
    3. Rajneesh Narula, 2004. "Understanding absorptive capacities in an "innovation systems" context consequences for economic and employment growth," DRUID Working Papers 04-02, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
    4. Paola Cardamone & Valeria Pupo & Fernanda Ricotta, 2016. "Do Firms Benefit from University Research? Evidence from Italy," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 2(3), pages 445-471, November.
    5. Alberto Gherardini & Alberto Nucciotti, 2017. "Yesterday’s giants and invisible colleges of today. A study on the ‘knowledge transfer’ scientific domain," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 112(1), pages 255-271, July.
    6. Vanessa Casadella & Mohamed Benlahcen-Tlemcani, 2006. "De l'applicabilité du Système National d'Innovation dans les Pays Moins Avancés," Innovations, De Boeck Université, vol. 24(2), pages 59-90.
    7. Amalya L. Oliver & Rotem Rittblat, 2023. "Facilitating Innovation for Complex Societal Challenges: Creating Communities and Innovation Ecosystems for SDG Goal of Forming Partnerships," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-12, June.
    8. Janeiro, Pedro & Proença, Isabel & Gonçalves, Vítor da Conceição, 2013. "Open innovation: Factors explaining universities as service firm innovation sources," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(10), pages 2017-2023.
    9. Diego R. Moraes Silva & André T. Furtado & Nicholas S. Vonortas, 2018. "University-industry R&D cooperation in Brazil: a sectoral approach," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(2), pages 285-315, April.
    10. Leydesdorff, Loet & Dolfsma, Wilfred & Van der Panne, Gerben, 2006. "Measuring the knowledge base of an economy in terms of triple-helix relations among 'technology, organization, and territory'," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 181-199, March.
    11. Mark S Freel, 2002. "On Regional Systems of Innovation: Illustrations from the West Midlands," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 20(5), pages 633-654, October.
    12. Igors Skute & Kasia Zalewska-Kurek & Isabella Hatak & Petra Weerd-Nederhof, 2019. "Mapping the field: a bibliometric analysis of the literature on university–industry collaborations," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 916-947, June.
    13. Paola Cardamone & Valeria Pupo, 2015. "R&D Cooperation Between Firms And Universities. Some Evidence In Five European Countries," Working Papers 201501, Università della Calabria, Dipartimento di Economia, Statistica e Finanza "Giovanni Anania" - DESF.
    14. Ali Mohammadi & Hossein Karami, 2014. "The Role of Universities in Innovation Development as Trainer and Innovator," International Journal of Management Sciences, Research Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 3(7), pages 471-486.
    15. Liefner, Ingo & Schiller, Daniel, 2008. "Academic capabilities in developing countries--A conceptual framework with empirical illustrations from Thailand," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 276-293, March.
    16. Mueller, Pamela, 2005. "Exploring the knowledge filter: how entrepreneurship and university-industry relations drive economic growth," Freiberg Working Papers 2005/17, TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    17. Timo Kleiner-Schaefer & Kerstin J. Schaefer, 2022. "Barriers to university–industry collaboration in an emerging market: Firm-level evidence from Turkey," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 872-905, June.
    18. Iritié, B. G. Jean-Jacques, 2014. "Enjeux des politiques industrielles basées sur les clusters d'innovation: cas des pôles de compétitivité [Issues of Innovative Clusters-based Industrial Policy: Case of Pole of Competitiveness]," MPRA Paper 54429, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Victoria Galan-Muros & Todd Davey, 2019. "The UBC ecosystem: putting together a comprehensive framework for university-business cooperation," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 1311-1346, August.
    20. Giannopoulou, Eleni & Barlatier, Pierre-Jean & Pénin, Julien, 2019. "Same but different? Research and technology organizations, universities and the innovation activities of firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 223-233.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-02566783. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.