IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03832175.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The valorisation of research of small and medium-sized universities within an innovation system
[La Valorisation de la Recherche dans les Petites et Moyennes Universités au sein d’un Système d’Innovation : Le cas de l’Université Picardie Jules Verne (UPJV)]

Author

Listed:
  • Vanessa Casadella

    (LEFMI - Laboratoire d’Économie, Finance, Management et Innovation - UR UPJV 4286 - UPJV - Université de Picardie Jules Verne)

  • Sofiane Tahi

    (LEFMI - Laboratoire d’Économie, Finance, Management et Innovation - UR UPJV 4286 - UPJV - Université de Picardie Jules Verne)

Abstract

Concept souple et peu récent, le Système d'Innovation (S.I) sert de référence dans l'orientation des politiques d'innovation et/ou de Science et Technologie (S&T). Il a toutefois été moins utilisé dans l'interrelation entre les systèmes productifs et éducatifs. La valorisation de la recherche permet de nouer les liens Université-entreprises en rendant utilisables ou commercialisables les résultats, les connaissances et les compétences de la recherche. Notre article met en évidence la question de la valorisation de la recherche à l'Université Picardie Jules Verne (UPJV) et son impact au sein du système régional d'innovation. Quelles sont les formes de sa valorisation dans le cadre de la Petite et Moyenne Université (P.M.U) française qu'elle représente ? A-t-elle des spécificités liées à sa taille ? En quoi et comment permet-elle de créer et transférer des connaissances avec le secteur productif local et national ? Nous travaillerons sur l'ensemble de ces questions, par une méthodologie reposant à la fois sur des sources secondaires mais surtout sur une enquête quantitative et qualitative réalisée en 2020 auprès des services centraux, VP Recherche et Directeurs de Laboratoire de l'UPJV.

Suggested Citation

  • Vanessa Casadella & Sofiane Tahi, 2021. "The valorisation of research of small and medium-sized universities within an innovation system [La Valorisation de la Recherche dans les Petites et Moyennes Universités au sein d’un Système d’Inno," Post-Print hal-03832175, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03832175
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://u-picardie.hal.science/hal-03832175
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://u-picardie.hal.science/hal-03832175/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Galliano, Danielle & Nadel, Simon, 2016. "Les processus sectoriels de l’innovation environnementale : les spécificités des firmes agroalimentaires françaises," Économie rurale, French Society of Rural Economics (SFER Société Française d'Economie Rurale), vol. 356(November-).
    2. Howells, Jeremy, 2006. "Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 715-728, June.
    3. Pierre-Jean Barlatier & Eleni Giannopoulou & Julien Pénin, 2016. "Les intermédiaires de l’innovation ouverte entre gestion de l’information et gestion des connaissances : le cas de la valorisation de la recherche publique," Innovations, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(1), pages 55-77.
    4. Marine Agogué & Anna Yström & Pascal Le Masson, 2013. "Rethinking The Role Of Intermediaries As An Architect Of Collective Exploration And Creation Of Knowledge In Open Innovation," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(02), pages 1-24.
    5. Christoph Grimpe & Katrin Hussinger, 2013. "Formal and Informal Knowledge and Technology Transfer from Academia to Industry: Complementarity Effects and Innovation Performance," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(8), pages 683-700, November.
    6. Vanessa Casadella & Sofiane Tahi, 2017. "Capacités et politiques d’innovation dans les pays moins avancés : enseignements tirés du cas du Sénégal," Innovations, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(2), pages 13-39.
    7. Elias G. Carayannis & David F. J. Campbell, 2017. "Les systèmes d’innovation de la quadruple et de la quintuple hélice," Innovations, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(3), pages 173-195.
    8. Michel Grossetti & Marie-Pierre Bès, 2002. "Proximité spatiale et relations science - industrie : savoirs tacites ou encastrement (Polanyi ou Polanyi) ?," Revue d'économie régionale et urbaine, Armand Colin, vol. 0(5), pages 777-787.
    9. Grimaldi, Rosa & Kenney, Martin & Siegel, Donald S. & Wright, Mike, 2011. "30 years after Bayh-Dole: Reassessing academic entrepreneurship," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(8), pages 1045-1057, October.
    10. Currie-Alder, Bruce & Kanbur, Ravi & Malone, David M. & Medhora, Rohinton (ed.), 2014. "International Development: Ideas, Experience, and Prospects," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199671663.
    11. Lundvall, Bengt-Ake & Johnson, Bjorn & Andersen, Esben Sloth & Dalum, Bent, 2002. "National systems of production, innovation and competence building," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 213-231, February.
    12. Bengt-Åke Lundvall & Jesper Lindgaard Christensen, 1999. "Extending and Deepening the Analysis of Innovation Systems - with Empirical Illustrations from the DISCO-project," DRUID Working Papers 99-12, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
    13. Marine Agogué & Anna Yström & Pascal Le Masson, 2013. "Rethinking the role of intermediaries as an architect of collective exploration and creation of knowledge in open innovation," Post-Print hal-00707376, HAL.
    14. Niosi, Jorge, 2002. "National systems of innovations are "x-efficient" (and x-effective): Why some are slow learners," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 291-302, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maxim Kotsemir & Alexander Abroskin & Dirk Meissner, 2013. "Innovation concepts and typology – an evolutionary discussion," HSE Working papers WP BRP 05/STI/2013, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    2. Chamaret, Cécile & Steyer, Véronique & Mayer, Julie C., 2020. "“Hands off my meter!” when municipalities resist smart meters: Linking arguments and degrees of resistance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    3. Kreiling, Laura & Serval, Sarah & Peres, Raphaële & Bounfour, Ahmed, 2020. "University technology transfer organizations: Roles adopted in response to their regional innovation system stakeholders," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 218-229.
    4. Damien Dietsch & Rim Khemiri, 2018. "Impact Of The Use Of Knowledge Obtained Through Informal Exchanges On The Performance Of Innovation Projects: For The Enrichment Of Inbound Open Innovation Practices," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(06), pages 1-35, August.
    5. Kerr, Clive & Phaal, Robert, 2018. "Directing the technology intelligence activity: An ‘information needs’ template for initiating the search," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 265-276.
    6. Signe Pedersen & Christian Clausen & Michael Søgaard Jørgensen, 2023. "Navigating value networks to co‐create sustainable business models: An actionable staging approach," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 240-258, January.
    7. Kathleen Diener & Dirk Luettgens & Frank Thomas Piller, 2019. "Intermediation For Open Innovation: Comparing Direct Versus Delegated Search Strategies Of Innovation Intermediaries," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(04), pages 1-20, June.
    8. Jennifer Goodman & Angelina Korsunova & Minna Halme, 2017. "Our Collaborative Future: Activities and Roles of Stakeholders in Sustainability‐Oriented Innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(6), pages 731-753, September.
    9. Anna Yström & Hedvig Aspenberg, 2017. "Open For Innovation? Practices Supporting Collaboration In Swedish Regional Clusters," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(05), pages 1-28, June.
    10. Ileana Palaco & Suk Kyoung Kim & Min Jae Park & Jae Jeung Rho, 2022. "Exploring capabilities of international technology transfer intermediaries between emerging and developed countries," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 307-352, February.
    11. Monique Combes-Joret & Sophie Bollinger, 2023. "Le rôle majeur des Établissements et Services d’Aide par le Travail (ESAT) dans les écosystèmes d’innovation sociale pour l’inclusion des personnes en situation de handicap. Le cas de l’ESAT l’ENVOL," Post-Print hal-04142261, HAL.
    12. Tinnakorn Phongthiya & Khaleel Malik & Eva Niesten & Tanyanuparb Anantana, 2022. "Innovation intermediaries for university-industry R&D collaboration: evidence from science parks in Thailand," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(6), pages 1885-1920, December.
    13. Erik G. Hansen & Julia C. Schmitt, 2021. "Orchestrating cradle‐to‐cradle innovation across the value chain: Overcoming barriers through innovation communities, collaboration mechanisms, and intermediation," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(3), pages 627-647, June.
    14. Alejandro Bengoa & Amaia Maseda & Txomin Iturralde & Gloria Aparicio, 2021. "A bibliometric review of the technology transfer literature," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(5), pages 1514-1550, October.
    15. De Silva, Muthu & Howells, Jeremy & Meyer, Martin, 2018. "Innovation intermediaries and collaboration: Knowledge–based practices and internal value creation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 70-87.
    16. Tindara Abbate & Anna Codini & Barbara Aquilani & Demetris Vrontis, 2022. "From Knowledge Ecosystems to Capabilities Ecosystems: When Open Innovation Digital Platforms Lead to Value Co-creation," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(1), pages 290-304, March.
    17. Schenk, Eric & Guittard, Claude & Pénin, Julien, 2019. "Open or proprietary? Choosing the right crowdsourcing platform for innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 303-310.
    18. Marine Agogué & Elsa Berthet & Tobias Fredberg & Pascal Le Masson & Blanche Segrestin & Martin Stoetzel & Martin Wiener & Anna Yström, 2017. "Explicating the role of innovation intermediaries in the 'unknown': a contingency approach," Post-Print hal-01481878, HAL.
    19. Rossi, Federica & Caloffi, Annalisa & Colovic, Ana & Russo, Margherita, 2022. "New business models for public innovation intermediaries supporting emerging innovation systems: The case of the Internet of Things," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    20. Yutao Sun & Seamus Grimes, 2016. "The emerging dynamic structure of national innovation studies: a bibliometric analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 106(1), pages 17-40, January.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03832175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.