IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/c/pba849.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Miguel Ballester

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Miguel à ngel Ballester & Jose Apesteguia, 2023. "The Rationalizability of Survey Responses," Working Papers 1393, Barcelona School of Economics.

    Cited by:

    1. Carlos Alos Ferrer & Michele Garagnani, 2025. "Who Likes It More?," Working Papers 424225030, Lancaster University Management School, Economics Department.
    2. Manzini, Paola & Mariotti, Marco & Ülkü, Levent, 2024. "A model of approval with an application to list design," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).

  2. Jose Apesteguia & Miguel Ángel Ballester, 2020. "Separating predicted randomness from residual behavior," Economics Working Papers 1757, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.

    Cited by:

    1. Jose Apesteguia & Miguel Ángel Ballester, 2020. "Random utility models with ordered types and domains," Economics Working Papers 1719, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    2. Nail Kashaev & Victor H. Aguiar, 2022. "A Random Attention and Utility Model," University of Western Ontario, Departmental Research Report Series 20223, University of Western Ontario, Department of Economics.
    3. Victor H. Aguiar & Maria Jose Boccardi & Nail Kashaev & Jeongbin Kim, 2023. "Random utility and limited consideration," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 14(1), pages 71-116, January.
    4. Petri, Henrik, 2023. "Binary single-crossing random utility models," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 311-320.
    5. Leandro Nascimento, 2024. "Bounded arbitrage and nearly rational behavior," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 77(4), pages 941-974, June.
    6. Georgios Gerasimou, 2020. "Decision Conflict and Deferral in A Class of Logit Models with a Context-Dependent Outside Option," Papers 2008.04229, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2025.
    7. Leandro Nascimento, 2022. "Bounded arbitrage and nearly rational behavior," Papers 2212.02680, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2025.
    8. Doğan, Serhat & Yıldız, Kemal, 2021. "Odds supermodularity and the Luce rule," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 443-452.
    9. Efe A. Ok & Gerelt Tserenjigmid, 2023. "Measuring Stochastic Rationality," Papers 2303.08202, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2023.

  3. Miguel à ngel Ballester & Jose Apesteguia, 2020. "Random Utility Models with Ordered Types and Domains," Working Papers 1176, Barcelona School of Economics.

    Cited by:

    1. Paul H. Y. Cheung & Yusufcan Masatlioglu, 2025. "Frame-dependent Random Utility," Papers 2502.00209, arXiv.org.
    2. Masatlioglu, Yusufcan & Vu, Tri Phu, 2024. "Growing attention," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).

  4. Miguel à ngel Ballester & Jose Apesteguia, 2019. "Random Models for the Joint Treatment of Risk and Time Preferences," Working Papers 1117, Barcelona School of Economics.

    Cited by:

    1. Brañas-Garza, Pablo & Estepa Mohedano, Lorenzo & Jorrat, Diego & Orozco, Víctor & Rascon-Ramirez, Ericka, 2020. "To pay or not to pay: Measuring risk preferences in lab and field," MPRA Paper 103088, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Patrick DeJarnette & David Dillenberger & Daniel Gottlieb & Pietro Ortoleva, 2014. "Time Lotteries and Stochastic Impatience," PIER Working Paper Archive 18-021, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania, revised 13 Jun 2018.
    3. David Dillenberger & Daniel Gottlieb & Pietro Ortoleva, 2018. "Stochastic Impatience and the Separation of Time and Risk Preferences," PIER Working Paper Archive 18-020, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania, revised 08 Sep 2018.

  5. Miguel à ngel Ballester & Jose Apesteguia, 2018. "Separating Predicted Randomness from Noise," Working Papers 1018, Barcelona School of Economics.

    Cited by:

    1. Victor H. Aguiar & Maria Jose Boccardi & Nail Kashaev & Jeongbin Kim, 2023. "Random utility and limited consideration," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 14(1), pages 71-116, January.

  6. Miguel à ngel Ballester & Jose Apesteguia, 2016. "Monotone Stochastic Choice Models: The Case of Risk and Time Preferences," Working Papers 859, Barcelona School of Economics.

    Cited by:

    1. Brañas-Garza, Pablo & Estepa Mohedano, Lorenzo & Jorrat, Diego & Orozco, Víctor & Rascon-Ramirez, Ericka, 2020. "To pay or not to pay: Measuring risk preferences in lab and field," MPRA Paper 103088, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Lihui Lin, 2023. "Does risk aversion explain behavior in a lemon market?," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(2), pages 413-425, April.
    3. Carlos Alós-Ferrer & Ernst Fehr & Nick Netzer, 2018. "Time will tell: recovering preferences when choices are noisy," ECON - Working Papers 306, Department of Economics - University of Zurich, revised Jun 2020.
    4. Mira Frick & Ryota Iijima & Tomasz Strzalecki, 2019. "Dynamic Random Utility," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 87(6), pages 1941-2002, November.
    5. Brett Williams, 2023. "Violations of first-order stochastic dominance," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 9(2), pages 239-251, December.
    6. Duffy, Sean & Smith, John, 2020. "An economist and a psychologist form a line: What can imperfect perception of length tell us about stochastic choice?," MPRA Paper 99417, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Harrison, Glenn W. & Lau, Morten I. & Yoo, Hong Il, 2019. "Risk Attitudes, Sample Selection and Attrition in a Longitudinal Field Experiment," Working Papers 2-2019, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Economics.
    8. Felix Holzmeister & Christop Huber & Stefan Palan, 2021. "A Critical Perspective on the Conceptualization of Risk in Behavioral and Experimental Finance," Working Papers 2021-11, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Universität Innsbruck.
    9. D Aycinena & S Blazsek & L Rentschler & C Sprenger, 2020. "Intertemporal Choice Experiments and Large-Stakes Behavior," Documentos de Trabajo 18357, Universidad del Rosario.
    10. Watanabe, Masahide & Fujimi, Toshio, 2022. "Ambiguity of scientific probability predictions and willingness-to-pay for climate change mitigation policies," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(4), pages 386-402.
    11. Jose Apesteguia & Miguel Ángel Ballester, 2020. "Random utility models with ordered types and domains," Economics Working Papers 1719, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    12. Ola Andersson & H�kan J. Holm & Jean-Robert Tyran & Erik Wengström, 2018. "Robust Inference in Risk Elicitation Tasks," Discussion Papers 18-09, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics.
    13. Yao Thibaut Kpegli & Brice Corgnet & Adam Zylbersztejn, 2020. "All at Once! A Comprehensive and Tractable Semi-Parametric Method to Elicit Prospect Theory Components," Working Papers halshs-03016517, HAL.
    14. Alger, Ingela & Van Leeuwen, Boris, 2019. "Estimating Social Preferences and Kantian Morality in Strategic Interactions," IAST Working Papers 19-100, Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse (IAST), revised Nov 2023.
    15. Jose Apesteguia & Miguel A Ballester, 2021. "Separating Predicted Randomness from Residual Behavior," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 19(2), pages 1041-1076.
    16. Thomas Dohmen & Georgios Gerasimou, 2024. "Learning to Maximize Ordinal and Expected Utility, and the Indifference Hypothesis," Papers 2402.16538, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2025.
    17. C. Grace Haaf & Devansh Singh & Cinny Lin & Scofield Zou, 2021. "Rational AI: A comparison of human and AI responses to triggers of economic irrationality in poker," Papers 2111.07295, arXiv.org.
    18. Francesco Cerigioni & Simone Galperti, 2021. "Listing specs: The effect of framing attributes on choice," Economics Working Papers 1775, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    19. Carlos Alós-Ferrer & Ernst Fehr & Michele Garagnani, 2022. "Identifying nontransitive preferences," ECON - Working Papers 415, Department of Economics - University of Zurich, revised Jan 2023.
    20. Jose Apesteguia & Miguel A. Ballester, 2016. "Single-crossing random utility models," Economics Working Papers 1515, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    21. Patrick DeJarnette & David Dillenberger & Daniel Gottlieb & Pietro Ortoleva, 2014. "Time Lotteries and Stochastic Impatience," PIER Working Paper Archive 18-021, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania, revised 13 Jun 2018.
    22. Ryan Webb, 2019. "The (Neural) Dynamics of Stochastic Choice," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(1), pages 230-255, January.
    23. Levon Barseghyan & Francesca Molinari & Matthew Thirkettle, 2020. "Discrete choice under risk with limited consideration," CeMMAP working papers CWP28/20, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    24. Levon Barseghyan & Francesca Molinari, 2023. "Risk Preference Types, Limited Consideration, and Welfare," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(4), pages 1011-1029, October.
    25. Felix Holzmeister & Matthias Stefan, 2019. "The risk elicitation puzzle revisited: Across-methods (in)consistency?," Working Papers 2019-19, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Universität Innsbruck.
    26. Kelsey Jack & Kathryn McDermott & Anja Sautmann, 2022. "Multiple Price Lists for Willingness to Pay Elicitation," NBER Working Papers 30433, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    27. Friedman, Daniel & Habib, Sameh & James, Duncan & Williams, Brett, 2022. "Varieties of risk preference elicitation," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 58-76.
    28. Levon Barseghyan & Maura Coughlin & Francesca Molinari & Joshua C. Teitelbaum, 2019. "Heterogeneous Choice Sets and Preferences," CeMMAP working papers CWP37/19, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    29. Jose Apesteguia & Jörg Oechssler & Simon Weidenholzer, 2020. "Copy Trading," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(12), pages 5608-5622, December.
      • Jose Apesteguia & Jörg Oechssler & Simon Weidenholzer, 2018. "Copy trading," Economics Working Papers 1615, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, revised Sep 2019.
      • Jörg Oechssler & Simon Weidenholzer & Jose Apesteguia, 2018. "Copy Trading," Working Papers 1048, Barcelona School of Economics.
      • Apesteguia, Jose & Oechssler, Jörg & Weidenholzer, Simon, 2018. "Copy Trading," Working Papers 0649, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.
    30. Lu, Jay & Saito, Kota, 2018. "Random intertemporal choice," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 780-815.
    31. Adrian Bruhin & Maha Manai & Luís Santos-Pinto, 2022. "Risk and rationality: The relative importance of probability weighting and choice set dependence," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 65(2), pages 139-184, October.
    32. Cheung, Stephen L. & Johnstone, Lachlan, 2017. "True Overconfidence, Revealed through Actions: An Experiment," IZA Discussion Papers 10545, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    33. Jonathan P. Beauchamp & Daniel J. Benjamin & David I. Laibson & Christopher F. Chabris, 2020. "Measuring and controlling for the compromise effect when estimating risk preference parameters," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 23(4), pages 1069-1099, December.
    34. Janssens, Wendy & Kramer, Berber & Swart, Lisette, 2017. "Be patient when measuring hyperbolic discounting: Stationarity, time consistency and time invariance in a field experiment," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 77-90.
    35. D. Pennesi, 2016. "Intertemporal discrete choice," Working Papers wp1061, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    36. Carlos Alós-Ferrer & Michele Garagnani, 2019. "Strength of preference and decisions under risk," ECON - Working Papers 330, Department of Economics - University of Zurich, revised Feb 2022.
    37. Aurélien Baillon & Olivier L’Haridon, 2021. "Discrete Arrow–Pratt indexes for risk and uncertainty," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 72(4), pages 1375-1393, November.
    38. Carlos Alós-Ferrer & Georg D. Granic, 2023. "Does choice change preferences? An incentivized test of the mere choice effect," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 26(3), pages 499-521, July.
    39. Mel Win Khaw & Ziang Li & Michael Woodford, 2021. "Cognitive Imprecision and Small-Stakes Risk Aversion [Linear Mapping of Numbers onto Space Requires Attention]," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 88(4), pages 1979-2013.
    40. Tomáš Jagelka, 2024. "Are Economists’ Preferences Psychologists’ Personality Traits? A Structural Approach," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 132(3), pages 910-970.
    41. Chew, Soo Hong & Miao, Bin & Shen, Qiang & Zhong, Songfa, 2022. "Multiple-switching behavior in choice-list elicitation of risk preference," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    42. Thomas Meissner & Xavier Gassmann & Corinne Faure & Joachim Schleich, 2022. "Individual characteristics associated with risk and time preferences: A multi country representative survey," Papers 2204.13664, arXiv.org, revised May 2022.
    43. Biener, Christian & Eling, Martin & Lehmann, Martin, 2020. "Balancing the desire for privacy against the desire to hedge risk," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 608-620.
    44. David Scrogin, 2023. "Estimating risk and time preferences over public lotteries: Findings from the field and stream," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 67(1), pages 73-106, August.
    45. Christian Belzil & Tomáš Jagelka, 2024. "Separating Preferences from Endogenous Effort and Cognitive Noise in Observed Decisions," ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 350, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
    46. Tymula, Agnieszka & Wang, Xueting, 2021. "Increased risk-taking, not loss tolerance, drives adolescents’ propensity to choose risky prospects more often under peer observation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 439-457.
    47. Paolo Crosetto & Antonio Filippin, 2023. "Safe options and gender differences in risk attitudes," Post-Print hal-04152612, HAL.
    48. Guo, Liang, 2021. "Contextual deliberation and the choice-valuation preference reversal," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    49. Blavatskyy, Pavlo, 2019. "Future plans and errors," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 85-92.
    50. Duffy, Sean & Gussman, Steven & Smith, John, 2021. "Visual judgments of length in the economics laboratory: Are there brains in stochastic choice?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    51. Barrafrem, Kinga & Hausfeld, Jan, 2020. "Tracing risky decisions for oneself and others: The role of intuition and deliberation," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    52. Haoge Chang & Yusuke Narita & Kota Saito, 2022. "Approximating Choice Data by Discrete Choice Models," Papers 2205.01882, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2023.
    53. Felix Holzmeister & Matthias Stefan, 2021. "The risk elicitation puzzle revisited: Across-methods (in)consistency?," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 24(2), pages 593-616, June.
    54. Carlos Alós-Ferrer & Ernst Fehr & Helga Fehr-Duda & Michele Garagnani, 2024. "Common ratio and common consequence effects arise from true preferences," ECON - Working Papers 459, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.
    55. Grosskopf, Brit & Pearce, Graeme, 2017. "Discrimination in a deprived neighbourhood: An artefactual field experiment," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 29-42.
    56. Kettlewell, Nathan & Tymula, Agnieszka & Yoo, Hong Il, 2023. "The Heritability of Economic Preferences," IZA Discussion Papers 16633, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    57. Daniel J. Benjamin & Mark Alan Fontana & Miles S. Kimball, 2020. "Reconsidering Risk Aversion," NBER Working Papers 28007, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    58. Anna Conte & John D. Hey, 2018. "Rehabilitating the Random Utility Model. A comment on Apesteguia and Ballester (2018)," Discussion Papers 18/12, Department of Economics, University of York.
    59. Aurélien Nioche & Basile Garcia & Germain Lefebvre & Thomas Boraud & Nicolas P. Rougier & Sacha Bourgeois-Gironde, 2019. "Coordination over a unique medium of exchange under information scarcity," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-11, December.
    60. Holden , Stein T. & Tilahun , Mesfin, 2019. "The Devil is in the Details: Risk Preferences, Choice List Design, and Measurement Error," CLTS Working Papers 3/19, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Centre for Land Tenure Studies, revised 16 Oct 2019.
    61. Duffy, Sean & Gussman, Steven & Smith, John, 2019. "Judgments of length in the economics laboratory: Are there brains in choice?," MPRA Paper 93126, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    62. Horan, Sean & Manzini, Paola & Mariotti, Marco, 2022. "When is coarseness not a curse? Comparative statics of the coarse random utility model," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    63. Glenn W. Harrison & Morten I. Lau & Hong Il Yoo, 2025. "Constant Discounting, Temporal Instability, And Dynamic Inconsistency In Denmark: A Longitudinal Field Experiment," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 66(1), pages 363-392, February.
    64. Carlos Alós-Ferrer & Johannes Buckenmaier & Michele Garagnani, 2020. "Stochastic choice and preference reversals," ECON - Working Papers 370, Department of Economics - University of Zurich, revised Jul 2021.
    65. Liu Shi & Jianying Qiu & Jiangyan Li & Frank Bohn, 2024. "Consciously stochastic in preference reversals," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 68(3), pages 255-297, June.
    66. Victoria R. Marone & Adrienne Sabety, 2022. "When Should There Be Vertical Choice in Health Insurance Markets?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 112(1), pages 304-342, January.
    67. Holzmeister, Felix & Stefan, Matthias, 2019. "The Risk Elicitation Puzzle Revisited: Across-Methods (In)consistency?," OSF Preprints pj9u2, Center for Open Science.
    68. Lin, Lihui, 2021. "Does the procedure matter?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    69. Wilfried Youmbi, 2024. "Nonparametric Analysis of Random Utility Models Robust to Nontransitive Preferences," Papers 2406.13969, arXiv.org.
    70. Sara Arts & Qiyan Ong & Jianying Qiu, 2024. "Measuring decision confidence," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 27(3), pages 582-603, July.
    71. Tomas Pedro Sanguinetti, 2019. "How Do Couples Choose Individual Insurance Plans? Evidence from Medicare Part D," 2019 Papers psa1760, Job Market Papers.
    72. Jose Apesteguia & Miguel A. Ballester & Ángelo Gutiérrez-Daza, 2024. "Random Discounted Expected Utility," Working Papers 2024-03, Banco de México.
    73. Mia Lu & Nick Netzer, 2022. "The swaps index for consumer choice," ECON - Working Papers 418, Department of Economics - University of Zurich, revised May 2023.
    74. Kirchkamp, Oliver & Oechssler, Joerg & Sofianos, Andis, 2021. "The Binary Lottery Procedure does not induce risk neutrality in the Holt & Laury and Eckel & Grossman tasks," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 348-369.
    75. Henk Keffert & Nikolaus Schweizer, 2024. "Stochastic Monotonicity and Random Utility Models: The Good and The Ugly," Papers 2409.00704, arXiv.org.
    76. Andrew Ellis & Heidi Christina Thysen, 2021. "Subjective Causality in Choice," Papers 2106.05957, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2025.

  7. Miguel à ngel Ballester & Jose Apesteguia, 2016. "Single-Crossing Random Utility Models," Working Papers 891, Barcelona School of Economics.

    Cited by:

    1. Heufer, Jan & van Bruggen, Paul & Yang, Jingni, 2020. "Giving According to Agreement," Discussion Paper 2020-035, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    2. Natalia Lazzati & John K.-H. Quah & Koji Shirai, 2018. "Nonparametric analysis of monotone choice," Discussion Paper Series 184, School of Economics, Kwansei Gakuin University.
    3. Chambers, Christopher P. & Turansick, Christopher, 2025. "The limits of identification in discrete choice," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 537-551.
    4. Carlos Alós-Ferrer & Ernst Fehr & Nick Netzer, 2018. "Time will tell: recovering preferences when choices are noisy," ECON - Working Papers 306, Department of Economics - University of Zurich, revised Jun 2020.
    5. Mira Frick & Ryota Iijima & Tomasz Strzalecki, 2019. "Dynamic Random Utility," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 87(6), pages 1941-2002, November.
    6. Paul H. Y. Cheung & Yusufcan Masatlioglu, 2025. "Frame-dependent Random Utility," Papers 2502.00209, arXiv.org.
    7. Roy Allen & Pawel Dziewulski & John Rehbeck, 2019. "Revealed Statistical Consumer Theory," University of Western Ontario, Departmental Research Report Series 20195, University of Western Ontario, Department of Economics.
    8. Duffy, Sean & Smith, John, 2020. "An economist and a psychologist form a line: What can imperfect perception of length tell us about stochastic choice?," MPRA Paper 99417, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Caliari, Daniele, 2023. "Rationality is not consistency," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Economics of Change SP II 2023-304, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    10. Andrew Caplin & Mark Dean & John Leahy, 2022. "Rationally Inattentive Behavior: Characterizing and Generalizing Shannon Entropy," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 130(6), pages 1676-1715.
    11. Jose Apesteguia & Miguel Ángel Ballester, 2020. "Random utility models with ordered types and domains," Economics Working Papers 1719, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    12. Nail Kashaev & Victor H. Aguiar, 2022. "A Random Attention and Utility Model," University of Western Ontario, Departmental Research Report Series 20223, University of Western Ontario, Department of Economics.
    13. Natalia Lazzati & John K.‐H. Quah & Koji Shirai, 2025. "An ordinal approach to the empirical analysis of games with monotone best responses," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 16(1), pages 235-266, January.
    14. Victor H. Aguiar & Maria Jose Boccardi & Nail Kashaev & Jeongbin Kim, 2023. "Random utility and limited consideration," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 14(1), pages 71-116, January.
    15. Demirkan, Yusufcan & Kimya, Mert, 2020. "Hazard rate, stochastic choice and consideration sets," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 142-150.
    16. Petri, Henrik, 2023. "Binary single-crossing random utility models," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 311-320.
    17. Levon Barseghyan & Francesca Molinari & Matthew Thirkettle, 2020. "Discrete choice under risk with limited consideration," CeMMAP working papers CWP28/20, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    18. Angelo Enrico Petralia, 2024. "Harmful Random Utility Models," Papers 2408.01317, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2025.
    19. Lu, Jay & Saito, Kota, 2018. "Random intertemporal choice," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 780-815.
    20. Sprumont, Yves, 2025. "Randomized collective choices based on a fractional tournament," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 20(1), January.
    21. Turansick, Christopher, 2022. "Identification in the random utility model," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    22. D. Pennesi, 2016. "Intertemporal discrete choice," Working Papers wp1061, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    23. Furtado, Bruno A. & Nascimento, Leandro & Riella, Gil, 2023. "Rational choice with full-comparability domains," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 124-135.
    24. Yaron Azrieli & John Rehbeck, 2022. "Marginal stochastic choice," Papers 2208.08492, arXiv.org.
    25. D. Pennesi, 2016. "Deciding fast and slow," Working Papers wp1082, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    26. Manzini, Paola & Mariotti, Marco, 2018. "Dual random utility maximisation," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 162-182.
    27. Mohammad Ghaderi & Kamel Jedidi & Miłosz Kadziński & Bas Donkers, 2025. "Random preference model," Economics Working Papers 1913, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    28. Guo, Liang, 2021. "Contextual deliberation and the choice-valuation preference reversal," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    29. Duffy, Sean & Gussman, Steven & Smith, John, 2021. "Visual judgments of length in the economics laboratory: Are there brains in stochastic choice?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    30. Jose Apesteguia & Miguel A. Ballester, 2016. "Stochastic representatitve agent," Economics Working Papers 1536, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    31. Efe A. Ok & Gerelt Tserenjigmid, 2023. "Measuring Stochastic Rationality," Papers 2303.08202, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2023.
    32. Masatlioglu, Yusufcan & Vu, Tri Phu, 2024. "Growing attention," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    33. Li, Boyao, 2023. "Random utility models with status quo bias," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    34. Yang, Erya & Kopylov, Igor, 2023. "Random quasi-linear utility," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    35. Matheus Costa & Paulo Henrique Ramos & Gil Riella, 2020. "Single-crossing choice correspondences," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 54(1), pages 69-86, January.
    36. Duffy, Sean & Gussman, Steven & Smith, John, 2019. "Judgments of length in the economics laboratory: Are there brains in choice?," MPRA Paper 93126, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    37. Daniele Caliari & Henrik Petri, 2024. "Irrational Random Utility Models," Papers 2403.10208, arXiv.org, revised May 2025.
    38. Valkanova, Kremena, 2024. "Revealed preference domains from random choice," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 288-304.
    39. Daniele Caliari & Henrik Petri, 2025. "The Luce Model, Regularity, and Choice Overload," Papers 2502.21063, arXiv.org.
    40. Piermont, Evan, 2022. "Disentangling strict and weak choice in random expected utility models," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).

  8. Miguel à ngel Ballester & Jose Apesteguia, 2016. "Stochastic Representative Agent," Working Papers 928, Barcelona School of Economics.

    Cited by:

    1. Matthew O. Jackson & Leeat Yariv, 2020. "The Non-Existence of Representative Agents," Working Papers 2020-74, Princeton University. Economics Department..
    2. Victor H. Aguiar & Maria Jose Boccardi & Nail Kashaev & Jeongbin Kim, 2023. "Random utility and limited consideration," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 14(1), pages 71-116, January.

  9. Miguel à ngel Ballester & Jose Apesteguia, 2015. "A Measure of Rationality and Welfare," Working Papers 467, Barcelona School of Economics.

    Cited by:

    1. Laurens Cherchye & Thomas Demuynck & Bram De Rock & Khushboo Surana, 2018. "Revealed preference analysis with normal goods: application to cost of living indices," Working Papers of Department of Economics, Leuven 622433, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Department of Economics, Leuven.
    2. Carlos Alós-Ferrer & Ernst Fehr & Nick Netzer, 2018. "Time will tell: recovering preferences when choices are noisy," ECON - Working Papers 306, Department of Economics - University of Zurich, revised Jun 2020.
    3. Jia, Zhijie & Lin, Boqiang, 2021. "The impact of removing cross subsidies in electric power industry in China: Welfare, economy, and CO2 emission," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(PB).
    4. Miguel A. Costa‐Gomes & Carlos Cueva & Georgios Gerasimou & Matúš Tejiščák, 2022. "Choice, deferral, and consistency," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 13(3), pages 1297-1318, July.
    5. Caliari, Daniele, 2023. "Rationality is not consistency," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Economics of Change SP II 2023-304, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    6. Pawel Dziewulski, 2019. "Just-noticeable difference as a behavioural foundation of the critical cost-efficiency index," Working Paper Series 0519, Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School.
    7. Katherine Baldiga & Jerry Green, 2013. "Assent-maximizing social choice," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 40(2), pages 439-460, February.
    8. Nobuo Koida & Koji Shirai, 2024. "A dual approach to nonparametric characterization for random utility models," Papers 2403.04328, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2024.
    9. Cosaert, Sam & Surana, Khushboo, 2023. "A new interpretation and derivation of the Swaps index," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    10. Patricio S. Dalton & Sayantan Ghosal, 2013. "Characterizing behavioral decisions with choice data," Working Papers 2013_22, Business School - Economics, University of Glasgow.
    11. Salvador Barberà & Geoffroy de Clippel & Alejandro Neme & Kareen Rozen, 2022. "Order-k rationality," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 73(4), pages 1135-1153, June.
      • Salvador Barberà & Geoffroy De Cleppel & Alejandro Neme & Kareen Rozeen, 2020. "Order-k Rationality," Working Papers 4, Red Nacional de Investigadores en Economía (RedNIE).
      • Salvador Barber‡ & Geoffroy de Clippel & Alejandro Neme & Kareen Rozen, 2020. "Order-k Rationality," Working Papers 2020-10, Brown University, Department of Economics.
      • Kareen Rozen & Alejandro Neme & Geoffroy De Clippel & Salvador BarberÃ, 2019. "Order-k Rationality," Working Papers 1130, Barcelona School of Economics.
    12. Yusufcan Masatlioglu & Daisuke Nakajima & Erkut Ozbay, 2009. "Revealed Attention," NajEcon Working Paper Reviews 814577000000000409, www.najecon.org.
    13. Abi Adams, 2015. "Mutually consistent revealed preference bounds," IFS Working Papers W15/20, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    14. Guy Barokas, 2020. "Identifying changing taste from demand data via golden eggs," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 54(1), pages 47-68, January.
    15. Thomas Demuynck & Umutcan Salman, 2022. "On the Revealed Preference Analysis of Stable Aggregate Matchings," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/359108, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    16. Roy Allen & John Rehbeck, 2021. "Measuring rationality: percentages vs expenditures," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 91(2), pages 265-277, September.
    17. Han Bleichrodt & Rogier J. D. Potter van Loon & Drazen Prelec, 2022. "Beta-Delta or Delta-Tau? A Reformulation of Quasi-Hyperbolic Discounting," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(8), pages 6326-6335, August.
    18. Francesco Cerigioni & Simone Galperti, 2021. "Listing specs: The effect of framing attributes on choice," Economics Working Papers 1775, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    19. Hui-Kuan Chung & Nick Doren & Lasse Mononen & Mia Lu & Marcus Grueschow & Helen Hayward Könnecke & Alexander Jetter & Boris B. Quednow & Nick Netzer & Philippe N. Tobler, 2025. "Improving Rationality by Increasing Attention," CESifo Working Paper Series 12078, CESifo.
    20. Guy Barokas & Burak Ünveren, 2022. "Impressionable Rational Choice: Revealed-Preference Theory with Framing Effects," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(23), pages 1-19, November.
    21. Geoffroy de Clippel & Kareen Rozen, 2020. "Relaxed Optimization: e-Rationalizability and the FOC-Departure Index in Consumer Theory," Working Papers 2020-07, Brown University, Department of Economics.
    22. Francesco Cerigioni, 2021. "Dual Decision Processes: Retrieving Preferences When Some Choices Are Automatic," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 129(6), pages 1667-1704.
    23. Andrew Caplin & Daniel Martin & Philip Marx & Anastasiia Morozova & Leshan Xu, 2025. "Testing Capacity-Constrained Learning," Papers 2502.00195, arXiv.org.
    24. Aguiar, Victor H. & Serrano, Roberto, 2017. "Slutsky matrix norms: The size, classification, and comparative statics of bounded rationality," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 163-201.
    25. Apesteguia, Jose & Ballester, Miguel A., 2013. "Choice by sequential procedures," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 90-99.
    26. Luigi Mittone & Mauro Papi, 2017. "Does inducing choice procedures make individuals better off? An experimental study," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 83(1), pages 37-59, June.
    27. Yusufcan Masatlioglu & Daisuke Nakajima, 2015. "Completing Incomplete Revealed Preference Under Limited Attention," The Japanese Economic Review, Japanese Economic Association, vol. 66(3), pages 285-299, September.
    28. Khushboo Surana, 2025. "How different are we? Identifying the degree of revealed preference heterogeneity," Discussion Papers 25/03, Department of Economics, University of York.
    29. Lasse Mononen, 2023. "Computing and comparing measures of rationality," ECON - Working Papers 437, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.
    30. Costa-Gomes, Miguel & Cueva, Carlos & Gerasimou, Georgios, 2014. "Choice, Deferral and Consistency," SIRE Discussion Papers 2015-17, Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE).
    31. Tipoe, Eileen, 2021. "Price inattention: A revealed preference characterisation," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    32. Davide Carpentiere & Alfio Giarlotta & Stephen Watson, 2023. "A rational measure of irrationality," Papers 2302.13656, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2023.
    33. Dziewulski, Paweł & Lanier, Joshua & Quah, John K.-H., 2024. "Revealed preference and revealed preference cycles: A survey," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    34. Sophie Bade, 2016. "Pareto-optimal matching allocation mechanisms for boundedly rational agents," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 47(3), pages 501-510, October.
    35. Federico Echenique, 2021. "On the meaning of the Critical Cost Efficiency Index," Papers 2109.06354, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2022.
    36. Lusk, Jayson L., 2019. "Income and (Ir) rational food choice," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 630-645.
    37. Salador Barera & Kareen Rozen, 2018. "Good Enough," Working Papers 2018-12, Brown University, Department of Economics.
    38. Brocas, Isabelle & Carrillo, Juan D. & Combs, T. Dalton & Kodaverdian, Niree, 2019. "Consistency in simple vs. complex choices by younger and older adults," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 580-601.
    39. Thomas Demuynck & John Rehbeck, 2021. "Computing Revealed Preference Goodness of fit Measures with Integer Programming," Working Papers ECARES 2021-26, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    40. Pawe{l} Dziewulski & Joshua Lanier & John K. -H. Quah, 2024. "Revealed preference and revealed preference cycles: a survey," Papers 2405.08459, arXiv.org.
    41. Smeulders, Bart & Crama, Yves & Spieksma, Frits C.R., 2019. "Revealed preference theory: An algorithmic outlook," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(3), pages 803-815.
    42. Horan, Sean & Sprumont, Yves, 2016. "Welfare criteria from choice: An axiomatic analysis," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 56-70.
    43. Joshua Lanier & John K. -H. Quah, 2024. "Goodness-of-fit and utility estimation: what's possible and what's not," Papers 2405.08464, arXiv.org.
    44. Caliari, Daniele, 2023. "Behavioural welfare analysis and revealed preference: Theory and experimental evidence," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Economics of Change SP II 2023-303, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    45. Yoram Halevy & Dotan Persitz & Lanny Zrill, 2018. "Parametric Recoverability of Preferences," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 126(4), pages 1558-1593.
    46. Mingshi Chen & Tracy Xiao Liu & You Shan & Shu Wang & Songfa Zhong & Yanju Zhou, 2025. "How General Are Measures of Choice Consistency? Evidence from Experimental and Scanner Data," Papers 2505.05275, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2025.
    47. Efe A. Ok & Gerelt Tserenjigmid, 2023. "Measuring Stochastic Rationality," Papers 2303.08202, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2023.
    48. Niels Boissonnet & Alexis Ghersengorin, 2025. "Grabbing the Forbidden Fruit: Restriction-Sensitive Choice," Papers 2509.11673, arXiv.org.
    49. Pawel Dziewulski, 2021. "A comprehensive revealed preference approach to approximate utility maximisation," Working Paper Series 0621, Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School.
    50. Lin, Boqiang & Jia, Zhijie, 2020. "Is emission trading scheme an opportunity for renewable energy in China? A perspective of ETS revenue redistributions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    51. Karolis Liaudinskas, 2022. "Human vs. Machine: Disposition Effect among Algorithmic and Human Day Traders," Working Paper 2022/6, Norges Bank.
    52. Adams-Prassl, Abigail, 2019. "Mutually Consistent Revealed Preference Demand Predictions," CEPR Discussion Papers 13580, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    53. Pawel Dziewulski, 2018. "Just-noticeable difference as a behavioural foundation of the critical cost-efficiency," Economics Series Working Papers 848, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    54. Boqiang Lin & Zhijie Jia, 2020. "Supply control vs. demand control: why is resource tax more effective than carbon tax in reducing emissions?," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-13, December.
    55. Garth Heutel, 2017. "Prospect Theory and Energy Efficiency," NBER Working Papers 23692, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    56. Kohei Shiozawa, 2015. "Note on goodness-of-fit measures for the revealed preference test: The computational complexity of the minimum cost index," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 35(4), pages 2455-2461.
    57. Andrew Caplin & Daniel J. Martin, 2020. "Framing, Information, and Welfare," NBER Working Papers 27265, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    58. Gustav Alexandrie, 2023. "Two impossibility results for social choice under individual indifference intransitivity," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 61(4), pages 919-936, November.
    59. Cuhadaroglu, Tugce, 2015. "Choosing on Influence," SIRE Discussion Papers 2015-59, Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE).
    60. Mark Dean & Daniel Martin, 2011. "Testing for Rationality with Consumption Data: Demographics and Heterogeneity," Working Papers 2011-11, Brown University, Department of Economics.
    61. Laurens Cherchye & Thomas Demuynck & Bram De Rock & Joshua Lanier, 2020. "Are Consumers Rational ?Shifting the Burden of Proof," Working Papers ECARES 2020-19, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    62. Javier A. Birchenall, 2024. "Random choice and market demand," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 57(1), pages 165-198, February.
    63. Barokas, Guy, 2024. "Positively correlated choice," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 62-71.
    64. Chambers, Christopher P. & Hayashi, Takashi, 2012. "Choice and individual welfare," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 147(5), pages 1818-1849.
    65. Mia Lu & Nick Netzer, 2022. "The swaps index for consumer choice," ECON - Working Papers 418, Department of Economics - University of Zurich, revised May 2023.
    66. Barokas, Guy, 2019. "Choice theoretic foundation for libertarian paternalism: Reconciling the behavioral and libertarian approaches to welfare," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 62-73.
    67. Geoffroy de Clippel & Kareen Rozen, 2018. "Consumer Theory with Misperceived Tastes," Working Papers 2018-10, Brown University, Department of Economics.
    68. Maes, Sebastiaan & Malhotra, Raghav, 2024. "Robust Hicksian Welfare Analysis under Individual Heterogeneity," CRETA Online Discussion Paper Series 84, Centre for Research in Economic Theory and its Applications CRETA.
    69. Victor H. Aguiar & Roberto Serrano, 2018. "Classifying bounded rationality in limited data sets: a Slutsky matrix approach," SERIEs: Journal of the Spanish Economic Association, Springer;Spanish Economic Association, vol. 9(4), pages 389-421, November.
    70. Gerelt Tserenjigmid, 2021. "The Order-Dependent Luce Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(11), pages 6915-6933, November.

  10. Miguel à ngel Ballester & Jose Apesteguia, 2015. "A Characterization of Sequential Rationalizability," Working Papers 345, Barcelona School of Economics.

    Cited by:

    1. Xu, Yongsheng & Yoshihara, Naoki, 2011. "Proportional Nash solutions - A new and procedural analysis of nonconvex bargaining problems," Discussion Paper Series 552, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    2. Cherepanov, Vadim & Feddersen, Timothy & ,, 2013. "Rationalization," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 8(3), September.

  11. Miguel à ngel Ballester & Jose Apesteguia, 2015. "Discrete Choice Estimation of Risk Aversion," Working Papers 788, Barcelona School of Economics.

    Cited by:

    1. Odran Bonnet & Alfred Galichon & Yu-Wei Hsieh & Keith O'Hara & Matt Shum, 2021. "Yogurts Choose Consumers? Estimation of Random-Utility Models via Two-Sided Matching," Papers 2111.13744, arXiv.org.
    2. Miguel à ngel Ballester & Jose Apesteguia, 2015. "Discrete Choice Estimation of Time Preferences," Working Papers 787, Barcelona School of Economics.
    3. Liang Chen & Eugene Choo & Alfred Galichon & Simon Weber, 2023. "Existence of a Competitive Equilibrium with Substitutes, with Applications to Matching and Discrete Choice Models," Papers 2309.11416, arXiv.org.
    4. Ranoua Bouchouicha & Ferdinand M. Vieider, 2017. "Accommodating stake effects under prospect theory," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 1-28, August.

  12. Yusufcan Masatlioglu & Miguel à ngel Ballester & Jose Apesteguia, 2015. "A Foundation for Strategic Agenda Voting," Working Papers 607, Barcelona School of Economics.

    Cited by:

    1. Wagner, Alexander K. & Granic, Dura-Georg, 2017. "Tie-Breaking Power in Committees," VfS Annual Conference 2017 (Vienna): Alternative Structures for Money and Banking 168187, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    2. Gregorio Curello & Ludvig Sinander, 2020. "Agenda-manipulation in ranking," Papers 2001.11341, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2022.
    3. Gregorio Curello & Ludvig Sinander, 2023. "Agenda-Manipulation in Ranking," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 90(4), pages 1865-1892.
    4. Guney, Begum, 2014. "A theory of iterative choice in lists," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 26-32.
    5. Gershkov, Alex & Moldovanu, Benny & Shi, Xianwen, 2013. "Optimal Voting Rules," Discussion Paper Series of SFB/TR 15 Governance and the Efficiency of Economic Systems 417, Free University of Berlin, Humboldt University of Berlin, University of Bonn, University of Mannheim, University of Munich.
    6. Horan, Sean Michael, 2021. "Agendas in legislative decision-making," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 16(1), January.
    7. S. Nageeb Ali & B. Douglas Bernheim & Alexander W. Bloedel & Silvia Console Battilana, 2022. "Who Controls the Agenda Controls the Polity," Papers 2212.01263, arXiv.org.
    8. Barberà, Salvador & Gerber, Anke, 2017. "Sequential voting and agenda manipulation," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 12(1), January.
    9. Anke Gerber & Salvador BarberÃ, 2015. "Sequential Voting and Agenda Manipulation: The Case of Forward Looking Tie-Breaking," Working Papers 782, Barcelona School of Economics.
    10. Arlegi, Ritxar & Dimitrov, Dinko, 2020. "Manipulative agendas in four-candidate elections," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    11. Andrei Gomberg, 2018. "Revealed votes," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 51(2), pages 281-296, August.

  13. Miguel à ngel Ballester & Jose Apesteguia, 2015. "On The Complexity of Rationalizing Behavior," Working Papers 320, Barcelona School of Economics.

    Cited by:

    1. Christopher J. Tyson, 2007. "Cognitive Constraints, Contraction Consistency, and the Satisficing Criterion," Working Papers 614, Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance.
    2. Tyson, Chris, 2001. "The Foundations of Imperfect Decision Making," Research Papers 1714, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.

  14. Miguel à ngel Ballester & Jose Apesteguia, 2015. "Discrete Choice Estimation of Time Preferences," Working Papers 787, Barcelona School of Economics.

    Cited by:

    1. Miguel à ngel Ballester & Jose Apesteguia, 2015. "Discrete Choice Estimation of Risk Aversion," Working Papers 788, Barcelona School of Economics.

  15. Miguel à ngel Ballester & Jose Apesteguia, 2015. "A Theory of Reference-Dependent Behavior," Working Papers 323, Barcelona School of Economics.

    Cited by:

    1. Bary S. R. Pradelski & Bassel Tarbush, 2024. "Satisficing Equilibrium," Papers 2409.00832, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2025.
    2. Shaofang Qi, 2016. "A characterization of the n-agent Pareto dominance relation," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 46(3), pages 695-706, March.
    3. Amedeo Piolatto & Matthew D. Rablen, 2017. "Prospect theory and tax evasion: a reconsideration of the Yitzhaki puzzle," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 82(4), pages 543-565, April.
    4. Torben Andersen & Joydeep Bhattacharya, 2008. "On Myopia as Rationale for Social Security," CESifo Working Paper Series 2401, CESifo.
    5. Özgür Evren, 2012. "Scalarization Methods and Expected Multi-Utility Representations," Working Papers w0174, Center for Economic and Financial Research (CEFIR).
    6. Buturak, Gökhan & Evren, Özgür, 2017. "Choice overload and asymmetric regret," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 12(3), September.
    7. Guney, Begum & Richter, Michael, 2018. "Costly switching from a status quo," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 55-70.
    8. Tserenjigmid, Gerelt, 2019. "Choosing with the worst in mind: A reference-dependent model," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 631-652.
    9. Freeman, David J., 2017. "Preferred personal equilibrium and simple choices," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 165-172.
    10. Han Bleichrodt & Jason N. Doctor & Yu Gao & Chen Li & Daniella Meeker & Peter P. Wakker, 2019. "Resolving Rabin’s paradox," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 59(3), pages 239-260, December.
    11. Juan Sebastián Lleras & Evan Piermont & Richard Svoboda, 2019. "Asymmetric gain–loss reference dependence and attitudes toward uncertainty," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 68(3), pages 669-699, October.
    12. Apesteguia, Jose & Ballester, Miguel A., 2013. "Choice by sequential procedures," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 90-99.
    13. Raphaël Giraud, 2012. "Money matters: an axiomatic theory of the endowment effect," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 50(2), pages 303-339, June.
    14. Ghossoub, Mario, 2011. "Towards a Purely Behavioral Definition of Loss Aversion," MPRA Paper 37628, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 23 Mar 2012.
    15. Bosi, Gianni & Herden, Gerhard, 2012. "Continuous multi-utility representations of preorders," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 212-218.
    16. Raphaël Giraud, 2010. "On the interpretation of the WTP/WTA gap as imprecise utility: an axiomatic analysis," Post-Print halshs-00490846, HAL.
    17. Papi, Mauro, 2012. "Satisficing choice procedures," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 84(1), pages 451-462.
    18. Qin, Dan, 2021. "Exclusive shortlisting choice with reference," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    19. Kovach, Matthew, 2020. "Twisting the truth: foundations of wishful thinking," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 15(3), July.
    20. Dean, Mark & Kıbrıs, Özgür & Masatlioglu, Yusufcan, 2017. "Limited attention and status quo bias," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 93-127.
    21. Andrew Ellis & Yusufcan Masatlioglu, 2022. "Choice with Endogenous Categorization," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 89(1), pages 240-278.
    22. Daniel Krähmer & Rebecca Stone, 2013. "Anticipated regret as an explanation of uncertainty aversion," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 52(2), pages 709-728, March.
    23. Ioana Alexandra HORODNIC & Colin C WILLIAMS & Rodica IANOLE-CÄ‚LIN, 2020. "Does higher cash-in-hand income motivate young people to engage in under-declared employment?," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 11, pages 48-69, December.
    24. McCarthy, David & Mikkola, Kalle & Thomas, Teruji, 2017. "Representation of strongly independent preorders by sets of scalar-valued functions," MPRA Paper 79284, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    25. Katarzyna M. Werner & Horst Zank, 2019. "A revealed reference point for prospect theory," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 67(4), pages 731-773, June.
    26. Lisa Bruttel & Tim Friehe, 2010. "On the path-dependence of tax compliance," TWI Research Paper Series 59, Thurgauer Wirtschaftsinstitut, Universität Konstanz.
    27. Qin, Dan, 2024. "Differentiating roles of the reference alternative," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 196-221.
    28. Daniele Pennesi, 2013. "Endogenous Status Quo," Carlo Alberto Notebooks 314, Collegio Carlo Alberto.
    29. Gerelt Tserenjigmid, 2020. "On the characterization of linear habit formation," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 70(1), pages 49-93, July.
    30. Bougherara, Douadia & Gassmann, Xavier & Piet, Laurent, 2011. "A structural estimation of French farmers’ risk preferences: an artefactual field experiment," Working Papers 208109, Institut National de la recherche Agronomique (INRA), Departement Sciences Sociales, Agriculture et Alimentation, Espace et Environnement (SAE2).
    31. Park, Hyeon, 2019. "Inter-temporal choices with temporal reference dependence," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 107-122.
    32. Kovach, Matthew & Suleymanov, Elchin, 2023. "Reference dependence and random attention," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 421-441.
    33. Bahar Leventoğlu, 2017. "Bargaining with habit formation," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 64(3), pages 477-508, October.
    34. Özgür Kıbrıs & Yusufcan Masatlioglu & Elchin Suleymanov, 2023. "A theory of reference point formation," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 75(1), pages 137-166, January.
    35. Evren, Özgür, 2014. "Scalarization methods and expected multi-utility representations," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 30-63.
    36. Xiaosheng Mu, 2021. "Sequential Choice with Incomplete Preferences," Working Papers 2021-35, Princeton University. Economics Department..
    37. Michael J. Best & Xili Zhang, 2011. "Degeneracy Resolution for Bilinear Utility Functions," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 150(3), pages 615-634, September.
    38. Evren, Özgür & Ok, Efe A., 2011. "On the multi-utility representation of preference relations," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(4-5), pages 554-563.

  16. Miguel à ngel Ballester & Jose Apesteguia, 2015. "Choice By Sequential Procedures," Working Papers 615, Barcelona School of Economics.

    Cited by:

    1. Manzini, Paola & Mariotti, Marco, 2009. "Choice by Lexicographic Semiorders," IZA Discussion Papers 4046, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Jerry R. Green & Daniel Hojman, 2015. "Monotonic Aggregation of Preferences and the Rationalization of Choice Functions," Working Papers wp397, University of Chile, Department of Economics.
    3. Horan, Sean, 2016. "A simple model of two-stage choice," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 372-406.
    4. Riella, Gil & Teper, Roee, 2014. "Probabilistic dominance and status quo bias," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 288-304.
    5. Thomas Demuynck, 2011. "The computational complexity of rationalizing boundedly rational choice behavior," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/252242, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    6. Pinger, Pia & Ruhmer-Krell, Isabel & Schumacher, Heiner, 2016. "The compromise effect in action: Lessons from a restaurant's menu," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 14-34.
    7. Apesteguia, Jose & Ballester, Miguel A. & Masatlioglu, Yusufcan, 2014. "A foundation for strategic agenda voting," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 91-99.
    8. García-Sanz, María D. & Alcantud, José Carlos R., 2015. "Sequential rationalization of multivalued choice," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 29-33.
    9. Geng, Sen & Özbay, Erkut Y., 2021. "Shortlisting procedure with a limited capacity," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    10. Tserenjigmid, Gerelt, 2019. "Choosing with the worst in mind: A reference-dependent model," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 631-652.
    11. Freeman, David J., 2017. "Preferred personal equilibrium and simple choices," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 165-172.
    12. Xiaosheng Mu, 2019. "Amendment Voting with Incomplete Preferences," Working Papers 2019-29, Princeton University. Economics Department..
    13. Davide Carpentiere & Angelo Petralia, 2023. "Identification of consideration sets from choice data," Papers 2302.00978, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2024.
    14. Nicolas Houy, 2008. "Progressive knowledge revealed preferences and sequential rationalizability," Working Papers hal-00360546, HAL.
    15. Paulo Oliva & Philipp Zahn, 2021. "On Rational Choice and the Representation of Decision Problems," Games, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, November.
    16. Christopher Kops, 2018. "(F)Lexicographic shortlist method," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 65(1), pages 79-97, January.
    17. Rohan Dutta & Sean Horan, 2015. "Inferring Rationales from Choice: Identification for Rational Shortlist Methods," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 7(4), pages 179-201, November.
    18. Kops, Christopher, 2022. "Cluster-shortlisted choice," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    19. João V Ferreira & Nicolas Gravel, 2017. "Choice with Time," Working Papers halshs-01577260, HAL.
    20. Thomas Demuynck, 2014. "The computational complexity of rationalizing Pareto optimal choice behavior," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 42(3), pages 529-549, March.
    21. Bade, Sophie & Segal-Halevi, Erel, 2023. "Fairness for multi-self agents," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 321-336.
    22. Luigi Mittone & Mauro Papi, 2017. "Does inducing choice procedures make individuals better off? An experimental study," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 83(1), pages 37-59, June.
    23. Alfio Giarlotta & Angelo Petralia & Stephen Watson, 2022. "On the number of non-isomorphic choices on four elements," Papers 2206.06840, arXiv.org.
    24. Guney, Begum, 2014. "A theory of iterative choice in lists," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 26-32.
    25. Hassan Nosratabadi, 2017. "Referential Revealed Preference Theory," Departmental Working Papers 201705, Rutgers University, Department of Economics.
    26. Sophie Bade, 2016. "Pareto-optimal matching allocation mechanisms for boundedly rational agents," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 47(3), pages 501-510, October.
    27. Ester Sudano, 2024. "Categorize and randomize: a permissive model of stochastic choice," Papers 2412.03554, arXiv.org, revised May 2025.
    28. Giarlotta, Alfio & Petralia, Angelo & Watson, Stephen, 2022. "Bounded rationality is rare," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    29. Georgios, Gerasimou, 2013. "A Behavioural Model of Choice in the Presence of Decision Conflict," SIRE Discussion Papers 2013-25, Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE).
    30. Papi, Mauro, 2012. "Satisficing choice procedures," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 84(1), pages 451-462.
    31. Tonna Emenuga, 2023. "Filtering Down to Size: A Theory of Consideration," Papers 2301.05649, arXiv.org.
    32. Horan, Sean & Sprumont, Yves, 2016. "Welfare criteria from choice: An axiomatic analysis," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 56-70.
    33. Bleile, Jörg, 2016. "Limited Attention in Case-Based Belief Formation," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 518, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    34. Valentino Dardanoni & Paola Manzini & Marco Mariotti & Christopher J. Tyson, 2020. "Inferring Cognitive Heterogeneity From Aggregate Choices," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 88(3), pages 1269-1296, May.
    35. Bhavook Bhardwaj & Kriti Manocha, 2021. "Choice by Rejection," Papers 2108.07424, arXiv.org.
    36. Debasis Mishra & Kolagani Paramahamsa, 2018. "Selling to a naive agent with two rationales," Discussion Papers 18-03, Indian Statistical Institute, Delhi.
    37. Saptarshi Mukherjee, 2014. "Choice in ordered-tree-based decision problems," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 43(2), pages 471-496, August.
    38. Debabrata Pal, 2017. "Rationalizability of Choice Functions: Domain Conditions," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 37(3), pages 1911-1917.
    39. Rohan DUTTA, 2018. "Gradual Pairwise Comparison and Stochastic Choice," Cahiers de recherche 23-2018, Centre interuniversitaire de recherche en économie quantitative, CIREQ.
    40. Lleras, Juan Sebastián & Masatlioglu, Yusufcan & Nakajima, Daisuke & Ozbay, Erkut Y., 2017. "When more is less: Limited consideration," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 70-85.
    41. Apesteguia, Jose & Ballester, Miguel A., 2010. "The Computational Complexity of Rationalizing Behavior," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 356-363, May.
    42. Alfio Giarlotta & Angelo Petralia, 2024. "Simon’s bounded rationality," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 47(1), pages 327-346, June.
    43. João V. Ferreira & Nicolas Gravel, 2025. "Revealing preference discovery: a chronological choice framework," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 98(1), pages 1-32, February.
    44. Domenico Cantone & Alfio Giarlotta & Stephen Watson, 2019. "Congruence relations on a choice space," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 52(2), pages 247-294, February.
    45. Vanaja, Shiuli, 2021. "Are People Making Correct Choices? Drivers of Water Source Choices in Rural Jharkhand, India," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315156, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    46. Ludovic Renou & Karl H. Schlag, 2009. "From Ordients to Optimization: Substitution Effects without Differentiability," Discussion Papers in Economics 09/6, Division of Economics, School of Business, University of Leicester.
    47. Geng, Sen, 2022. "Limited consideration model with a trigger or a capacity," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    48. Niels Boissonnet & Alexis Ghersengorin, 2025. "Grabbing the Forbidden Fruit: Restriction-Sensitive Choice," Papers 2509.11673, arXiv.org.
    49. Gian Caspari & Manshu Khanna, 2025. "Nonstandard Choice In Matching Markets," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 66(2), pages 757-786, May.
    50. Sureka, Keshav & Pal, Debabrata, 2024. "Choice by elimination then selection," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(3).
    51. Paola Manzini & Marco Mariotti, 2015. "State dependent choice," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 45(2), pages 239-268, September.
    52. Kremena Valkanova, 2024. "Markov Stochastic Choice," Papers 2410.22001, arXiv.org.
    53. Mandler, Michael, 2015. "Rational agents are the quickest," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 206-233.
    54. Michael Mandler, 2021. "The lexicographic method in preference theory," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 71(2), pages 553-577, March.
    55. Georgios Gerasimou, 2016. "Partially dominant choice," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 61(1), pages 127-145, January.
    56. Cuhadaroglu, Tugce, 2015. "Choosing on Influence," SIRE Discussion Papers 2015-59, Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE).
    57. Özgür Kıbrıs & Yusufcan Masatlioglu & Elchin Suleymanov, 2023. "A theory of reference point formation," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 75(1), pages 137-166, January.
    58. Cuhadaroglu, Tugce, 2017. "Choosing on influence," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 12(2), May.
    59. Domenico Cantone & Alfio Giarlotta & Stephen Watson, 2021. "Choice resolutions," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 56(4), pages 713-753, May.
    60. Lin, Lihui, 2021. "Does the procedure matter?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    61. Roee Teper, 2010. "Probabilistic Dominance and Status Quo Bias," Working Paper 5864, Department of Economics, University of Pittsburgh.
    62. Nishimura, Hiroki & Ok, Efe A., 2014. "Non-existence of continuous choice functions," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 376-391.
    63. Dinko Dimitrov & Saptarshi Mukherjee & Nozomu Muto, 2016. "‘Divide-and-choose’ in list-based decision problems," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 81(1), pages 17-31, June.
    64. Efe A. Ok & Pietro Ortoleva & Gil Riella, 2015. "Revealed (P)Reference Theory," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(1), pages 299-321, January.
    65. Xiaosheng Mu, 2021. "Sequential Choice with Incomplete Preferences," Working Papers 2021-35, Princeton University. Economics Department..
    66. Qin, Dan, 2024. "A simple model of two-stage choice," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).

  17. Jose Apesteguia & Miguel Ángel Ballester, 2014. "A Measure of Rationality and Welfare," Working Papers 573, Barcelona School of Economics.

    Cited by:

    1. Patricio S. Dalton & Sayantan Ghosal, 2013. "Characterizing behavioral decisions with choice data," Working Papers 2013_22, Business School - Economics, University of Glasgow.
    2. Apesteguia, Jose & Ballester, Miguel A., 2013. "Choice by sequential procedures," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 90-99.
    3. Yusufcan Masatlioglu & Daisuke Nakajima, 2015. "Completing Incomplete Revealed Preference Under Limited Attention," The Japanese Economic Review, Japanese Economic Association, vol. 66(3), pages 285-299, September.
    4. Sophie Bade, 2016. "Pareto-optimal matching allocation mechanisms for boundedly rational agents," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 47(3), pages 501-510, October.
    5. Cuhadaroglu, Tugce, 2015. "Choosing on Influence," SIRE Discussion Papers 2015-59, Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE).

  18. Jose Apesteguia & Miguel A. Ballester, 2011. "Welfare of naive and sophisticated players in school choice," Economics Working Papers 1280, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.

    Cited by:

    1. Papi, Mauro, 2013. "Satisficing and maximizing consumers in a monopolistic screening model," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 66(3), pages 385-389.

  19. Miguel Ángel Ballester Oyarzun & Pedro Rey Biel, 2008. "Sincerity in Simple and Complex Voting Mechanisms," UFAE and IAE Working Papers 722.08, Unitat de Fonaments de l'Anàlisi Econòmica (UAB) and Institut d'Anàlisi Econòmica (CSIC).

    Cited by:

    1. Miguel Ballester & Pedro Rey-Biel, 2009. "Does uncertainty lead to sincerity? Simple and complex voting mechanisms," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 33(3), pages 477-494, September.

  20. Miguel Angel Ballester & Pedro Rey-Biel, 2007. "Sincere Voting with Cardinal Preferences: Approval Voting," UFAE and IAE Working Papers 675.07, Unitat de Fonaments de l'Anàlisi Econòmica (UAB) and Institut d'Anàlisi Econòmica (CSIC).

    Cited by:

    1. Lehtinen, Aki, 2008. "The welfare consequences of strategic behaviour under approval and plurality voting," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 688-704, September.
    2. Jorge Alcalde-Unzu & Marc Vorsatz, 2007. "Size Approval Voting," Documentos de Trabajo - Lan Gaiak Departamento de Economía - Universidad Pública de Navarra 0703, Departamento de Economía - Universidad Pública de Navarra.

  21. Miguel Angel Ballester & Guillaume Haeringer, 2006. "A Characterization of Single-Peaked Preferences," UFAE and IAE Working Papers 656.06, Unitat de Fonaments de l'Anàlisi Econòmica (UAB) and Institut d'Anàlisi Econòmica (CSIC).

    Cited by:

    1. Chatterji, Shurojit & Sanver, Remzi & Sen, Arunava, 2013. "On domains that admit well-behaved strategy-proof social choice functions," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 148(3), pages 1050-1073.
    2. Vicki Knoblauch, 2008. "Recognizing One-Dimensional Euclidean Preference Profiles," Working papers 2008-52, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics.
    3. Walter Bossert & Hans Peters, 2009. "Single-peaked choice," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 41(2), pages 213-230, November.
    4. Vicki Knoblauch, 2008. "Recognizing a Single-Issue Spatial Election," Working papers 2008-26, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics.

  22. José Apesteguía & Miguel A. Ballester, 2005. "Minimal Books Of Rationales," Documentos de Trabajo - Lan Gaiak Departamento de Economía - Universidad Pública de Navarra 0501, Departamento de Economía - Universidad Pública de Navarra.

    Cited by:

    1. Christopher J. Tyson, 2007. "Cognitive Constraints, Contraction Consistency, and the Satisficing Criterion," Working Papers 614, Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance.
    2. Jesper Armouti-Hansen & Christopher Kops, 2018. "This or that? Sequential rationalization of indecisive choice behavior," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 84(4), pages 507-524, June.

Articles

  1. Jose Apesteguia & Miguel A. Ballester, 2015. "A Measure of Rationality and Welfare," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 123(6), pages 1278-1310.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  2. Apesteguia, Jose & Ballester, Miguel A. & Masatlioglu, Yusufcan, 2014. "A foundation for strategic agenda voting," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 91-99.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  3. Apesteguia, Jose & Ballester, Miguel A., 2013. "Choice by sequential procedures," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 90-99.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  4. Apesteguia, Jose & Ballester, Miguel A., 2012. "Welfare of naive and sophisticated players in school choice," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 172-174.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  5. Jose Apesteguia & Miguel A. Ballester & Rosa Ferrer, 2011. "On the Justice of Decision Rules," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 78(1), pages 1-16.

    Cited by:

    1. François Durand & Antonin Macé & Matías Núñez, 2024. "Voter coordination in elections: A case for approval voting," Post-Print halshs-04630490, HAL.
    2. Kwiek, Maksymilian, 2017. "Efficient voting with penalties," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 468-485.
    3. Sandro Ambuehl & B. Douglas Bernheim, 2021. "Social preferences over ordinal outcomes," ECON - Working Papers 395, Department of Economics - University of Zurich, revised Dec 2024.
    4. Giles, Adam & Postl, Peter, 2014. "Equilibrium and effectiveness of two-parameter scoring rules," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 31-52.
    5. Apesteguia, Jose & Ballester, Miguel A. & Masatlioglu, Yusufcan, 2014. "A foundation for strategic agenda voting," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 91-99.
    6. Pivato, Marcus, 2013. "Statistical utilitarianism," MPRA Paper 49561, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Marcus Pivato, 2016. "Asymptotic utilitarianism in scoring rule," Post-Print hal-02980107, HAL.
    8. Kwiek, Maksymilian, 2014. "Conclave," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 258-275.
    9. Alex Gershkov & Benny Moldovanu & Xianwen Shi, 2013. "Optimal Mechanism Design without Money," Working Papers tecipa-481, University of Toronto, Department of Economics.
    10. Jose Apesteguia & Miguel Ángel Ballester, "undated". "Welfare of Naive and Sophisticated Players in School Choice," Working Papers 575, Barcelona School of Economics.
    11. Nuñez, M. & Valletta, G., 2012. "The information simplicity of scoring rules," Research Memorandum 011, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    12. Sandro Ambuehl & B. Douglas Bernheim, 2021. "Interpreting the Will of the People - A Positive Analysis of Ordinal Preference Aggregation," CESifo Working Paper Series 9317, CESifo.
    13. Gershkov, Alex & Moldovanu, Benny & Shi, Xianwen, 2013. "Optimal Voting Rules," Discussion Paper Series of SFB/TR 15 Governance and the Efficiency of Economic Systems 417, Free University of Berlin, Humboldt University of Berlin, University of Bonn, University of Mannheim, University of Munich.
    14. Yaron Azrieli & Semin Kim, 2014. "Pareto Efficiency And Weighted Majority Rules," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 55(4), pages 1067-1088, November.
    15. Semin Kim, 2016. "Ordinal Versus Cardinal Voting Rules: A Mechanism Design Approach," Working papers 2016rwp-94, Yonsei University, Yonsei Economics Research Institute.
    16. James Green-Armytage & T. Tideman & Rafael Cosman, 2016. "Statistical evaluation of voting rules," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 46(1), pages 183-212, January.
    17. Andreas Darmann & Daniel Eckert & Christian Klamler, 2025. "Rank information and inequality in social welfare functions," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 98(4), pages 473-487, June.
    18. Apesteguia, Jose & Ballester, Miguel A., 2012. "Welfare of naive and sophisticated players in school choice," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 172-174.
    19. Miguel Ballester & Pedro Rey-Biel, 2009. "Does uncertainty lead to sincerity? Simple and complex voting mechanisms," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 33(3), pages 477-494, September.
    20. Grofman, Bernard & Feld, Scott L. & Fraenkel, Jon, 2017. "Finding the Threshold of Exclusion for all single seat and multi-seat scoring rules: Illustrated by results for the Borda and Dowdall rules," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 52-56.
    21. Jose Apesteguia & Miguel Ángel Ballester, 2014. "A Measure of Rationality and Welfare," Working Papers 573, Barcelona School of Economics.

  6. Miguel Ballester & Guillaume Haeringer, 2011. "A characterization of the single-peaked domain," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 36(2), pages 305-322, February.

    Cited by:

    1. BOSSERT, Walter & PETERS, Hans, 2013. "Single-basined choice," Cahiers de recherche 2013-03, Universite de Montreal, Departement de sciences economiques.
    2. Jiehua Chen & Sven Grottke, 2021. "Small one-dimensional Euclidean preference profiles," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 57(1), pages 117-144, July.
    3. Massó, Jordi & Moreno de Barreda, Inés, 2011. "On strategy-proofness and symmetric single-peakedness," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 467-484, June.
    4. Smeulders, B., 2018. "Testing a mixture model of single-peaked preferences," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 101-113.
    5. Buechel, Berno, 2011. "A note on Condorcet consistency and the median voter," Working Paper Series in Economics 17, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Department of Economics and Management.
    6. Puppe, Clemens & Slinko, Arkadii, 2022. "Maximal Condorcet domains: A further progress report," Working Paper Series in Economics 159, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Department of Economics and Management.
    7. Reffgen, Alexander, 2015. "Strategy-proof social choice on multiple and multi-dimensional single-peaked domains," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 349-383.
    8. Puppe, Clemens, 2018. "The single-peaked domain revisited: A simple global characterization," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 55-80.
    9. Alexander Karpov, 2019. "On the Number of Group-Separable Preference Profiles," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 501-517, June.
    10. Bredereck, Robert & Chen, Jiehua & Woeginger, Gerhard J., 2016. "Are there any nicely structured preference profiles nearby?," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 61-73.
    11. Walter Bossert & Hans Peters, 2012. "Single-Plateaued Choice," Cahiers de recherche 05-2012, Centre interuniversitaire de recherche en économie quantitative, CIREQ.
    12. Slinko, Arkadii, 2019. "Condorcet domains satisfying Arrow’s single-peakedness," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 166-175.
    13. Dolors Berga & Bernardo Moreno & Salvador BarberÃ, 2018. "Restricted Environments and Incentive Compatibility in Interdependent Values Models," Working Papers 1024, Barcelona School of Economics.
    14. Dolors Berga & Bernardo Moreno & Salvador BarberÃ, 2019. "Arrow on domain conditions: a fruitful road to travel," Working Papers 1095, Barcelona School of Economics.
    15. Akello-Egwel, Dolica & Leedham-Green, Charles & Litterick, Alastair & Markström, Klas & Riis, Søren, 2025. "Condorcet domains on at most seven alternatives," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 23-33.
    16. Tanguiane, Andranick S., 2025. "Analysis of the 2025 Bundestag elections. Part 4 of 4: Changes in the German political spectrum," Working Paper Series in Economics 170, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Department of Economics and Management.
    17. Edith Elkind & Piotr Faliszewski & Piotr Skowron, 2020. "A characterization of the single-peaked single-crossing domain," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 54(1), pages 167-181, January.
    18. Karpov, Alexander, 2016. "Preference diversity orderings," Working Papers 0610, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.
    19. Jiehua Chen & Martin Nollenburg & Sofia Simola & Anais Villedieu & Markus Wallinger, 2022. "Multidimensional Manhattan Preferences," Papers 2201.09691, arXiv.org.
    20. Vannucci, Stefano, 2020. "Single peaked domains with tree-shaped spectra," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 74-80.
    21. Arlegi, Ricardo & Teschl, Miriam, 2022. "Pareto rationalizability by two single-peaked preferences," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 1-11.
    22. Berno Buechel, 2014. "Condorcet winners on median spaces," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 42(3), pages 735-750, March.
    23. Bernardo Moreno & Salvador BarberÃ, 2015. "Top monotonicity: A common root for single peakedness, single crossing and the median voter result," Working Papers 297, Barcelona School of Economics.
    24. Valkanova, Kremena, 2024. "Revealed preference domains from random choice," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 288-304.
    25. Marie-Louise Lackner & Martin Lackner, 2017. "On the likelihood of single-peaked preferences," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 48(4), pages 717-745, April.
    26. Robert Bredereck & Jiehua Chen & Gerhard Woeginger, 2013. "A characterization of the single-crossing domain," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 41(4), pages 989-998, October.
    27. Jiehua Chen & Kirk R. Pruhs & Gerhard J. Woeginger, 2017. "The one-dimensional Euclidean domain: finitely many obstructions are not enough," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 48(2), pages 409-432, February.
    28. Tanguiane, Andranick S., 2022. "Analysis of the 2021 Bundestag elections. 2/4. Political spectrum," Working Paper Series in Economics 152, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Department of Economics and Management.

  7. Jorge Alcalde-Unzu & Miguel Ballester, 2010. "On ranking opportunity distributions," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 34(1), pages 3-31, January.

    Cited by:

    1. Vito Peragine & Maria G. Pittau & Ernesto Savaglio & Stefano Vannucci, 2021. "On multidimensional poverty rankings of binary attributes," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 23(2), pages 248-274, April.
    2. Stefano Vannucci, 2013. "A characterization of height-based extensions of principal filtral opportunity rankings," Revista Cuadernos de Economia, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, FCE, CID.

  8. Apesteguia, Jose & Ballester, Miguel A., 2010. "The Computational Complexity of Rationalizing Behavior," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 356-363, May.

    Cited by:

    1. Thomas Demuynck, 2011. "The computational complexity of rationalizing boundedly rational choice behavior," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/252242, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    2. García-Sanz, María D. & Alcantud, José Carlos R., 2015. "Sequential rationalization of multivalued choice," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 29-33.
    3. Thomas Demuynck, 2014. "The computational complexity of rationalizing Pareto optimal choice behavior," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 42(3), pages 529-549, March.
    4. Sam Cosaert, 2019. "What Types are There?," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 53(2), pages 533-554, February.
    5. Alejandro Neme & Salvador BarberÃ, 2015. "Ordinal Relative Satisficing Behavior: Theory and Experiments," Working Papers 790, Barcelona School of Economics.
    6. Bhavook Bhardwaj & Siddharth Chatterjee, 2022. "Decisions over Sequences," Papers 2203.00070, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2022.
    7. Smeulders, Bart & Cherchye, Laurens & De Rock, Bram & Spieksma, Frits C.R. & Talla Nobibon, Fabrice, 2015. "Complexity results for the weak axiom of revealed preference for collective consumption models," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 82-91.
    8. Mandler, Michael, 2015. "Rational agents are the quickest," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 206-233.
    9. Fabrice Talla Nobibon & Laurens Cherchye & Yves Crama & Thomas Demuynck & Bram De Rock & Frits C. R. Spieksma, 2016. "Revealed Preference Tests of Collectively Rational Consumption Behavior: Formulations and Algorithms," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(6), pages 1197-1216, December.
    10. Ronen Gradwohl & Eran Shmaya, 2013. "Tractable Falsifiability," Discussion Papers 1564, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
    11. Yongjie Yang & Dinko Dimitrov, 2019. "The complexity of shelflisting," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 86(1), pages 123-141, February.
    12. Piermont, Evan, 2017. "Context dependent beliefs," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 63-73.
    13. Jos'e Carlos R. Alcantud & Domenico Cantone & Alfio Giarlotta & Stephen Watson, 2022. "Rationalization of indecisive choice behavior by majoritarian ballots," Papers 2210.16885, arXiv.org.
    14. Alcantud, José Carlos R. & Cantone, Domenico & Giarlotta, Alfio & Watson, Stephen, 2023. "Rationalization of indecisive choice behavior by pluralist ballots," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).

  9. Jose Apesteguia & Miguel Ballester, 2009. "A theory of reference-dependent behavior," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 40(3), pages 427-455, September.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  10. Miguel Ballester & Pedro Rey-Biel, 2009. "Does uncertainty lead to sincerity? Simple and complex voting mechanisms," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 33(3), pages 477-494, September.

    Cited by:

    1. Alessandro Chiaramonte & Aldo Paparo, 2025. "Parties’ and voters’ dilemmas under Italy’s new mixed electoral system," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 204(1), pages 51-74, July.
    2. Matias Nunez, 2013. "The Strategic Sincerity of Approval Voting," Post-Print hal-00917101, HAL.
    3. Yasunori Okumura, 2019. "What proportion of sincere voters guarantees efficiency?," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 53(2), pages 299-311, August.
    4. Yasunori Okumura, 2021. "Rank-dominant strategy and sincere voting," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 90(1), pages 117-145, February.

  11. Alcalde-Unzu, Jorge & Ballester, Miguel A., 2005. "Some remarks on ranking opportunity sets and Arrow impossibility theorems: correspondence results," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 116-123, September.

    Cited by:

    1. Vito Peragine & Ernesto Savaglio & Stefano Vannucci, 2009. "Poverty Rankings Of Opportunity Profiles," CHILD Working Papers wp11_09, CHILD - Centre for Household, Income, Labour and Demographic economics - ITALY.
    2. Jordi Massó & Marc Vorsatz, 2006. "Weighted Approval Voting," UFAE and IAE Working Papers 668.06, Unitat de Fonaments de l'Anàlisi Econòmica (UAB) and Institut d'Anàlisi Econòmica (CSIC).
    3. Vito Peragine & Maria G. Pittau & Ernesto Savaglio & Stefano Vannucci, 2021. "On multidimensional poverty rankings of binary attributes," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 23(2), pages 248-274, April.
    4. Stefano Vannucci, 2013. "A characterization of height-based extensions of principal filtral opportunity rankings," Revista Cuadernos de Economia, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, FCE, CID.
    5. Jorge Alcalde-Unzu & Miguel Ballester & Jorge Nieto, 2012. "Freedom of choice: John Stuart Mill and the tree of life," SERIEs: Journal of the Spanish Economic Association, Springer;Spanish Economic Association, vol. 3(1), pages 209-226, March.

  12. Ballester, Miguel A. & de Miguel, Juan R. & Nieto, Jorge, 2004. "Set comparisons in a general domain: the Indirect Utility Criterion," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 139-150, September.

    Cited by:

    1. AR. Arlegi & AR. M. Besada & J. Nieto & AR. C. Vázquez, 2006. "Freedom of Choice: The Leximax Criterion in the Infinite Case," Documentos de Trabajo - Lan Gaiak Departamento de Economía - Universidad Pública de Navarra 0608, Departamento de Economía - Universidad Pública de Navarra.
    2. Arlegi, R. & Besada, M. & Nieto, J. & Vazquez, C., 2005. "Freedom of choice: the leximax criterion in the infinite case," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 1-15, January.
    3. Ballester, Miguel A. & De Miguel, Juan R., 2006. "On freedom of choice and infinite sets: The Suprafinite Rule," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 291-300, June.
    4. Jorge Alcalde-Unzu & Miguel Ballester & Jorge Nieto, 2012. "Freedom of choice: John Stuart Mill and the tree of life," SERIEs: Journal of the Spanish Economic Association, Springer;Spanish Economic Association, vol. 3(1), pages 209-226, March.

  13. Miguel A. Ballester & Juan R. De Miguel, 2003. "Extending an order to the power set: The Leximax Criterion," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 21(1), pages 63-71, August.

    Cited by:

    1. Ballester, Miguel A. & de Miguel, Juan R. & Nieto, Jorge, 2004. "Set comparisons in a general domain: the Indirect Utility Criterion," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 139-150, September.
    2. Ricardo Arlegi, 2005. "Freedom Of Choice And Conflict Resolution," Documentos de Trabajo - Lan Gaiak Departamento de Economía - Universidad Pública de Navarra 0502, Departamento de Economía - Universidad Pública de Navarra.
    3. Jorge Alcalde-Unzu & Ricardo Arlegi & Jorge Nieto, 2007. "Cardinality-based equality of opportunities," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 10(4), pages 285-304, March.
    4. R. Arlegi & M. Ballester & M. Besada & J.R. De Miguel & J. Nieto & C. Vázquez, 2006. "On the Equivalence of the Two Existing Extensions of the Leximax criterion to the Infinite Case," Documentos de Trabajo - Lan Gaiak Departamento de Economía - Universidad Pública de Navarra 0609, Departamento de Economía - Universidad Pública de Navarra.
    5. Ballester, Miguel A. & De Miguel, Juan R., 2006. "On freedom of choice and infinite sets: The Suprafinite Rule," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 291-300, June.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.