Single-Crossing Random Utility Models
Download full text from publisher
Other versions of this item:
References listed on IDEAS
- Jose Apesteguia & Miguel A. Ballester, 2018.
"Monotone Stochastic Choice Models: The Case of Risk and Time Preferences,"
Journal of Political Economy,
University of Chicago Press, vol. 126(1), pages 74-106.
- Jose Apesteguia & Miguel Ángel Ballester, 2015. "Monotone Stochastic Choice Models: The Case of Risk and Time Preferences," Working Papers 859, Barcelona Graduate School of Economics.
- Jose Apesteguia & Miguel A. Ballester, 2015. "Monotone stochastic choice models: The case of risk and time preferences," Economics Working Papers 1499, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
- Faruk Gul & Paulo Natenzon & Wolfgang Pesendorfer, 2014. "Random Choice as Behavioral Optimization," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 82, pages 1873-1912, September.
- Ian Jewitt, 1987. "Risk Aversion and the Choice Between Risky Prospects: The Preservation of Comparative Statics Results," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 54(1), pages 73-85.
CitationsCitations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Natalia Lazzati & John K.-H. Quah & Koji Shirai, 2018. "Nonparametric analysis of monotone choice," Discussion Paper Series 184, School of Economics, Kwansei Gakuin University.
- Carlos Alos-Ferrer & Ernst Fehr & Nick Netzer, 2018.
"Time will tell - Recovering Preferences when Choices are Noisy,"
- Carlos Alós-Ferrer & Ernst Fehr & Nick Netzer, 2018. "Time will tell: recovering preferences when choices are noisy," ECON - Working Papers 306, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.
- Carlos Alós-Ferrer & Ernst Fehr & Nick Netzer, 2018. "Time Will Tell: Recovering Preferences when Choices Are Noisy," CESifo Working Paper Series 7333, CESifo Group Munich.
- Alós-Ferrer, Carlos & Fehr, Ernst & Netzer, Nick, 2018. "Time Will Tell: Recovering Preferences When Choices Are Noisy," IZA Discussion Papers 11918, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Mira Frick & Ryota Iijima & Tomasz Strzalecki, 2019.
"Dynamic Random Utility,"
Econometric Society, vol. 87(6), pages 1941-2002, November.
- Mira Frick & Ryota Iijima & Tomasz Strzalecki, 2017. "Dynamic Random Utility," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2092R, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, revised Nov 2018.
- Mira Frick & Ryota Iijima & Tomasz Strzalecki, 2017. "Dynamic Random Utility," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2092, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
- Manzini, Paola & Mariotti, Marco, 2018.
"Dual random utility maximisation,"
Journal of Economic Theory,
Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 162-182.
- Paola Manzini & Marco Mariotti, 2016. "Dual Random Utility Maximisation," Discussion Paper Series, School of Economics and Finance 201605, School of Economics and Finance, University of St Andrews, revised 12 Mar 2017.
- Levon Barseghyan & Francesca Molinari & Matthew Thirkettle, 2019.
"Discrete choice under risk with limited consideration,"
CeMMAP working papers
CWP08/19, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
- Levon Barseghyan & Francesca Molinari & Matthew Thirkettle, 2019. "Discrete Choice under Risk with Limited Consideration," Papers 1902.06629, arXiv.org.
- Victor H. Aguiar & Maria Jose Boccardi & Nail Kashaev & Jeongbin Kim, 2018. "Does Random Consideration Explain Behavior when Choice is Hard? Evidence from a Large-scale Experiment," Papers 1812.09619, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2019.
- Matheus Costa & Paulo Henrique Ramos & Gil Riella, 2020. "Single-crossing choice correspondences," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 54(1), pages 69-86, January.
- Duffy, Sean & Gussman, Steven & Smith, John, 2019. "Judgments of length in the economics laboratory: Are there brains in choice?," MPRA Paper 93126, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Lu, Jay & Saito, Kota, 2018. "Random intertemporal choice," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 780-815.
- Andrew Caplin & Mark Dean & John Leahy, 2017. "Rationally Inattentive Behavior: Characterizing and Generalizing Shannon Entropy," NBER Working Papers 23652, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- D. Pennesi, 2016. "Deciding fast and slow," Working Papers wp1082, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
More about this item
Keywordsstochastic choice; single-crossing property; random utility models; monotone comparative statics;
- D00 - Microeconomics - - General - - - General
NEP fieldsThis paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-DCM-2016-04-09 (Discrete Choice Models)
- NEP-DCM-2016-04-16 (Discrete Choice Models)
- NEP-MIC-2016-04-09 (Microeconomics)
- NEP-MIC-2016-04-16 (Microeconomics)
- NEP-UPT-2016-04-09 (Utility Models & Prospect Theory)
- NEP-UPT-2016-04-16 (Utility Models & Prospect Theory)
StatisticsAccess and download statistics
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bge:wpaper:891. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Bruno Guallar). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/bargses.html .
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.