IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/qsh/wpaper/40033.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Dynamic Logit with Choice Aversion

Author

Listed:
  • Drew Fudenberg
  • Tomasz Strzalecki

Abstract

We characterize a generalization of discounted logistic choice that incorporates a parameter to capture different views the agent might have about the costs and benefits of larger choice sets. The discounted logit model used in the empirical literature is the special case that displays a “preference for flexibility†in the sense that the agent always prefers to add additional items to a menu. Other cases display varying levels of “choice aversion,†where the agent prefers to remove items from a menu if their ex ante value is below a threshold. We show that higher choice aversion, as measured by dislike of bigger menus, also corresponds to an increased preference for putting off decisions as late as possible.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Drew Fudenberg & Tomasz Strzalecki, "undated". "Dynamic Logit with Choice Aversion," Working Paper 40033, Harvard University OpenScholar.
  • Handle: RePEc:qsh:wpaper:40033
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://scholar.harvard.edu/tomasz/node/40033
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:qsh:wpaper:40033. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Richard Brandon (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbrssus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.