IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eecrev/v178y2025ics0014292125000984.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Labor market institutions, productivity, and the business cycle: An application to Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Diwambuena, Josué
  • Fonseca, Raquel
  • Schubert, Stefan

Abstract

This paper studies the effect of labor market institutions on the cyclicality of labor productivity and aggregate fluctuations in Italy when two wage bargaining protocols (efficient Nash and right-to-manage) interact with three types of hiring costs. It uses a New Keynesian model with labor market frictions and labor effort estimated with Bayesian techniques using Italian quarterly data from 1996Q1 to 2018Q4. We find that technology shocks mainly explain labor productivity fluctuations. We focus on labor market deregulation by reducing real wage rigidity, hiring costs, and worker’s bargaining power. We show that, when labor effort varies, reforms trigger procyclical productivity under efficient bargaining, and countercyclical productivity under right-to-manage bargaining. Reforms have different effects on the volatility of labor market variables. We carry out several sensitivity analyses which confirm our results.

Suggested Citation

  • Diwambuena, Josué & Fonseca, Raquel & Schubert, Stefan, 2025. "Labor market institutions, productivity, and the business cycle: An application to Italy," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:178:y:2025:i:c:s0014292125000984
    DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2025.105048
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014292125000984
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2025.105048?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:178:y:2025:i:c:s0014292125000984. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eer .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.