IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/e/pow11.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Bruce Manning Owen

Personal Details

First Name:Bruce
Middle Name:Manning
Last Name:Owen
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pow11
Terminal Degree:1970 Department of Economics; Stanford University (from RePEc Genealogy)

Affiliation

Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research (SIEPR)
Stanford University

Stanford, California (United States)
http://siepr.stanford.edu/

: (650) 725-1874
(650) 723-8611
366 Galvez Street, Stanford, California 94305-6015
RePEc:edi:cestaus (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles

Working papers

  1. Bruce Owen, 2012. "Communication Policy Reform, Interest Groups, and Legislative Capture," Discussion Papers 11-006, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.
  2. Bruce Owen, 2010. "Shooting in the Dark -- Owen Comments Waikiki Conference," Discussion Papers 10-013, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.
  3. Bruce Owen, 2009. "Old Media Policy Failures, New Media Policy Challenges," Discussion Papers 08-038, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.
  4. Bruce Owen, 2008. "A Fresh Start in Communications Policy," Discussion Papers 08-016, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.
  5. Bruce Owen, 2008. "Why Media Regulation is so Tempting," Discussion Papers 07-027, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.
  6. Bruce Owen, 2007. "The Net Neutrality Debate: Twenty Five Years after United States v. AT&T and 120 Years after the Act to Regulate Commerce," Discussion Papers 06-015, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.
  7. Bruce Owen & Wentong Zheng & Su Sun, 2007. "China's Competition Policy Reforms: The Antimonopoly Law and Beyond," Discussion Papers 06-032, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.
  8. Bruce M. Owen, 2005. "Competition Policy in Emerging Economies," Discussion Papers 04-010, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.
  9. Bruce M. Owen & Su Sun & Wentong Zheng, 2004. "Antitrust in China: The Problem of Incentive Compatibility," Discussion Papers 03-040, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.
  10. Bruce M. Owen, 2004. "Confusing Success with Access: "Correctly" Measuring Concentration of Ownership and Control in Mass Media and Online Services," Discussion Papers 03-026, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.
  11. Bruce M. Owen, 2004. "Assigning Broadband Rights," Discussion Papers 03-027, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.
  12. Bruce M. Owen, "undated". ""To Promote the General Welfare": Addressing Political Corruption in America," Discussion Papers 15-027, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.

Articles

  1. Bruce Owen, 2011. "Antitrust and Vertical Integration in “New Economy” Industries with Application to Broadband Access," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 38(4), pages 363-386, June.
  2. Owen, Bruce M., 2006. "A. Giroud, Transnational Corporations, Technology and Economic Development: Backward Linkages and Knowledge Transfer in South East Asia, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK (2003) (386 pp., price $115, ISBN ," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 189-191, February.
  3. Bruce M. Owen & Su Sun & Wentong Zheng, 2005. "Antitrust in China: The Problem of Incentive Compatibility," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 1(1), pages 123-148.
  4. Owen, Bruce M., 1988. "Seven dirty words and six other stories: Controlling the content of print and broadcast : by Matthew L. Spitzer (Yale University Press, New Haven) 1986, 163 pages," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 3(1), pages 82-85.
  5. Bruce M. Owen & Peter R. Greenhalgh, 1986. "Competitive Considerations In Cable Television Franchising," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 4(2), pages 69-79, April.
  6. Michael Spence & Bruce Owen, 1977. "Television Programming, Monopolistic Competition, and Welfare," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 91(1), pages 103-126.
  7. Owen, Bruce M, 1974. "The Economics of the First Amendment: Discussion," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 64(2), pages 400-402, May.
  8. Owen, Bruce M, 1969. "The Perfectly Competitive Production of Collective Goods: Comment," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 51(4), pages 475-476, November.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Bruce Owen, 2007. "The Net Neutrality Debate: Twenty Five Years after United States v. AT&T and 120 Years after the Act to Regulate Commerce," Discussion Papers 06-015, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Shane Greenstein, 2007. "Economic Experiments and Neutrality in Internet Access," NBER Working Papers 13158, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

  2. Bruce Owen & Wentong Zheng & Su Sun, 2007. "China's Competition Policy Reforms: The Antimonopoly Law and Beyond," Discussion Papers 06-032, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Susan Beth Farmer, 2013. "Recent developments in regulation and competition policy in China: trends in private civil litigation," Chapters,in: The Chinese Anti-Monopoly Law, chapter 1, pages 15-72 Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Mel Marquis, 2013. "Abuse of administrative power to restrict competition in China: four reflections, two ideas and a thought," Chapters,in: The Chinese Anti-Monopoly Law, chapter 2, pages 73-141 Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Gaasbeek, P.B. & van Bergeijk, P.A.G., 2011. "Chinese competition," ISS Working Papers - General Series 22630, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
    4. Li, Yan, 2011. "The competitive landscape of China’s telecommunications industry: Is there a need for further regulatory reform?," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 125-133.
    5. Rock, Michael T. & Toman, Michael & Cui, Yuanshang & Jiang, Kejun & Song, Yun & Wang, Yanjia, 2013. "Technological learning, energy efficiency, and CO2 emissions in China's energy intensive industries," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6492, The World Bank.
    6. Man Li Rita Yi & Yu Li Herru Ching & Mak Cho Kei & Chan Po Kei, 2016. "Rationales for the Implementation of Competition Law in EU, the US and Asia: Content Analysis and Data Visualization Approach," Asian Journal of Law and Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 63-100, April.

  3. Bruce M. Owen, 2005. "Competition Policy in Emerging Economies," Discussion Papers 04-010, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Alvaro Montenegro García, 2007. "Fundamentos de la política de la competencia," DOCUMENTOS DE ECONOMÍA 003930, UNIVERSIDAD JAVERIANA - BOGOTÁ.

  4. Bruce M. Owen & Su Sun & Wentong Zheng, 2004. "Antitrust in China: The Problem of Incentive Compatibility," Discussion Papers 03-040, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Niels J. Philipsen, 2010. "Regulation Of Liberal Professions And Competition Policy: Developments In The Eu And China," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 6(2), pages 203-231.

  5. Bruce M. Owen, 2004. "Confusing Success with Access: "Correctly" Measuring Concentration of Ownership and Control in Mass Media and Online Services," Discussion Papers 03-026, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Evan Kwerel & Jonathan Levy & Chuck Needy & Martin Perry & Mark Uretsky & Tracy Waldon & John Williams, 2004. "Economic Analysis at the Federal Communications Commission," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 25(4), pages 395-430, October.

Articles

  1. Bruce Owen, 2011. "Antitrust and Vertical Integration in “New Economy” Industries with Application to Broadband Access," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 38(4), pages 363-386, June.

    Cited by:

    1. Michael Peneder & Martin Wörter, 2013. "Competition, R&D and Innovation: Testing the Inverted-U in a Simultaneous System," WIFO Working Papers 448, WIFO.
    2. Thomas Lenard, 2011. "Introduction: Antitrust and the Dynamics of Competition in High-Tech Industries," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 38(4), pages 311-317, June.
    3. Thomas W. Hazlett & Joshua D. Wright, 2017. "The Effect of Regulation on Broadband Markets: Evaluating the Empirical Evidence in the FCC’s 2015 “Open Internet” Order," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 50(4), pages 487-507, June.

  2. Bruce M. Owen & Su Sun & Wentong Zheng, 2005. "Antitrust in China: The Problem of Incentive Compatibility," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 1(1), pages 123-148.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  3. Bruce M. Owen & Peter R. Greenhalgh, 1986. "Competitive Considerations In Cable Television Franchising," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 4(2), pages 69-79, April.

    Cited by:

    1. John S. Ying & Mary T. Kelly, 2007. "Testing the Effectiveness of Regulation and Competition on Cable Television Rates," Working Papers 07-07, University of Delaware, Department of Economics.
    2. Diane Bruce Anstine, 2001. "How Much Will Consumers Pay? A Hedonic Analysis of the Cable Television Industry," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 19(2), pages 129-147, September.
    3. Donald J. Boudreaux and Robert B. Ekelund, 1994. "Cable Regulation," Cato Journal, Cato Journal, Cato Institute, vol. 14(1), pages 87-107, Spring/Su.
    4. Sutirtha Bagchi & Jagadeesh Sivadasan, 2017. "Barriers to Entry and Competitive Behavior: Evidence from Reforms of Cable Franchising Regulations," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 65(3), pages 510-558, September.
    5. Kim, Hyunchul & Park, Minsoo & Lee, Sangwoo, 2017. "Do vertically and horizontally integrated firms survive longer? The case of cable networks in Korea," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 84-93.
    6. Hazlett, Thomas W., 1987. "Duopolistic Competition In Catv: Theory, Practice, And Policy," Working Papers 225809, University of California, Davis, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.

  4. Michael Spence & Bruce Owen, 1977. "Television Programming, Monopolistic Competition, and Welfare," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 91(1), pages 103-126.

    Cited by:

    1. M. van Dijk & R. Nahuis & D. Waagmeester, 2005. "Does Public Service Broadcasting Serve the Public? The Future of Television in the Changing Media Landscape," Working Papers 05-13, Utrecht School of Economics.
    2. Marco Antonielli & Lapo Filistrucchi, 2012. "Collusion and the Political Differentiation of Newspapers," Working Papers - Economics wp2012_07.rdf, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Scienze per l'Economia e l'Impresa.
    3. Roger G. Noll, 2007. "Broadcasting And Team Sports," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 54(3), pages 400-421, July.
    4. Simon P. Anderson & Stephen Coate, 2000. "Market Provision of Public Goods: The Case of Broadcasting," NBER Working Papers 7513, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Jean Gabszewicz & Didier Laussel & Nathalie Sonnac, 1999. "TV-Broadcasting Competition and Advertising," Working Papers 99-72, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
    6. Frederick Van der Ploeg, 2005. "The Making of Cultural Policy: A European Perspective," CESifo Working Paper Series 1524, CESifo Group Munich.
    7. Anderson, Simon P & Gabszewicz, Jean Jaskold, 2005. "The Media and Advertising: A Tale of Two-Sided Markets," CEPR Discussion Papers 5223, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    8. Reisinger, Markus & Ambrus, Attila & Calvano, Emilio, 2013. "Either or Both Competition: A "Two-Sided" Theory of Advertising with Overlapping Viewerships," Annual Conference 2013 (Duesseldorf): Competition Policy and Regulation in a Global Economic Order 79912, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    9. Chae, Suchan & Flores, Daniel, 1998. "Broadcasting versus narrowcasting," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 41-57, March.
    10. Doyle, Chris, 1998. "Programming in a competitive broadcasting market: entry, welfare and regulation," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 23-39, March.
    11. Ramon Casadesus-Masanell & Feng Zhu, 2010. "Strategies to Fight Ad-Sponsored Rivals," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(9), pages 1484-1499, September.
    12. George, Lisa, 2007. "What's fit to print: The effect of ownership concentration on product variety in daily newspaper markets," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 19(3-4), pages 285-303, October.
    13. Dewenter, Ralf & Haucap, Justus, 2013. "Ökonomische Auswirkungen der Einführung eines Leistungsschutzrechts für Presseinhalte im Internet (Leistungsschutzrecht für Presseverleger)," DICE Ordnungspolitische Perspektiven 36, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    14. Anthony Boardman & Shaun Hargreaves-Heap, 1999. "Network Externalities and Government Restrictions on Satellite Broadcasting of Key Sporting Events," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 23(3), pages 165-179, August.
    15. Darlene C. Chisholm & Margaret S. McMillan & George Norman, 2005. "Product Differentiation and Film Programming Choice: Do First-Run Movie Theatres Show the Same Films?," Discussion Papers Series, Department of Economics, Tufts University 0523, Department of Economics, Tufts University.
    16. Andrew Sweeting, 2010. "The effects of mergers on product positioning: evidence from the music radio industry," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 41(2), pages 372-397.
    17. Franco Papandrea, 1997. "Improving Regulation of the Domestic Content of Australian Television," Agenda - A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics, vol. 4(4), pages 455-464.
    18. Robert P. Rogers & John R. Woodbury, 1996. "Market Structure, Program Diversity, And Radio Audience Size," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 14(1), pages 81-91, January.
    19. Lapo Filistrucchi & Andrea Mangani & Luigi Luini, 2012. "Banning Ads from Prime-Time State TV: Lessons from France," Working Papers 12-23, NET Institute.
    20. Hafner, Mathias & Neunzig, Alexander R., 1998. "Regulating Television and the Case of Football World Cup," CSLE Discussion Paper Series 98-03, Saarland University, CSLE - Center for the Study of Law and Economics.
    21. Glenn Withers, 2013. "Broadcasting," Chapters,in: Handbook on the Digital Creative Economy, chapter 36, pages 409-415 Edward Elgar Publishing.
      • Glenn Withers & Katrina Alford, 2011. "Broadcasting," Chapters,in: A Handbook of Cultural Economics, Second Edition, chapter 11 Edward Elgar Publishing.
      • Glenn Withers, 2003. "Broadcasting," Chapters,in: A Handbook of Cultural Economics, chapter 12 Edward Elgar Publishing.
    22. Erik Brynjolfsson & Felix Eggers & Avinash Gannamaneni, 2018. "Using Massive Online Choice Experiments to Measure Changes in Well-being," NBER Working Papers 24514, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    23. Sendhil Mullainathan & Andrei Shleifer, 2005. "The Market for News," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 95(4), pages 1031-1053, September.
    24. Nilssen, Tore & Sørgard, Lars, 2000. "TV Advertising, Program Quality, and Product-Market Oligopoly," Competition Policy Center, Working Paper Series qt2zp943hj, Competition Policy Center, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
    25. Joel Waldfogel, 2016. "The Random Long Tail and the Golden Age of Television," NBER Chapters,in: Innovation Policy and the Economy, Volume 17, pages 1-25 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    26. Frijters Paul & Velamuri Malathi, 2010. "Is the Internet Bad News? The Online News Era and the Market for High-Quality News," Review of Network Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 9(2), pages 1-33, June.
    27. Leroch, Martin A. & Wellbrock, Christian M., 2011. "Saving newspapers with public grants – The effects of press subsidies on the provision of journalistic quality," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 281-286.
    28. Kind, Hans Jarle & Nilssen, Tore & Sørgard, Lars, 2005. "Financing of Media Firms: Does Competition Matter?," Memorandum 01/2005, Oslo University, Department of Economics.
    29. Feng Zhu, 2008. "Ad-sponsored Business Models and Compatibility Incentives of Social Networks," Working Papers 08-20, NET Institute, revised Sep 2008.
    30. Stühmeier, Torben, 2016. "Media market concentration and pluralism," CAWM Discussion Papers 87, University of Münster, Center of Applied Economic Research Münster (CAWM).
    31. Brown, Keith & Alexander, Peter J., 2005. "Market structure, viewer welfare, and advertising rates in local broadcast television markets," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 86(3), pages 331-337, March.
    32. Hansen, Claus Thustrup & Kyhl, Soren, 2001. "Pay-per-view broadcasting of outstanding events: consequences of a ban," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 19(3-4), pages 589-609, March.
    33. Simeon Djankov & Caralee McLiesh & Tatiana Nenova & Andrei Shleifer, 2001. "Who Owns the Media?," NBER Working Papers 8288, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    34. Papandrea, Franco, 1997. "Modelling television programming choices," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 203-218, September.
    35. Anthony E. Boardman & Aidan R. Vining, 1984. "Canadian and British TV Markets: Why the CBC Should Not Be Like the BBC [Market Structure and Television Programming Performance in Canada and the U.K.]," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 10(3), pages 347-352, September.
    36. Stühmeier, Torben, 2011. "Das Leistungsschutzrecht für Presseverleger: Eine ordnungspolitische Analyse," DICE Ordnungspolitische Perspektiven 12, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    37. Waldfogel, Joel, 2003. " Preference Externalities: An Empirical Study of Who Benefits Whom in Differentiated-Product Markets," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 34(3), pages 557-568, Autumn.
    38. Eli Noam, 1987. "A public and private-choice model of broadcasting," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 163-187, September.
    39. Stromberg, David, 2001. "Mass media and public policy," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(4-6), pages 652-663, May.
    40. Crampes, Claude & Hollander, Abraham, 2005. "Product specification, multi-product screening and bundling: the case of pay TV," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 35-59, January.
    41. Kim, Hyunchul & Park, Minsoo & Lee, Sangwoo, 2017. "Do vertically and horizontally integrated firms survive longer? The case of cable networks in Korea," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 84-93.
    42. Lin Panlang, 2011. "Market Provision of Program Quality in the Television Broadcasting Industry," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, March.
    43. Ronald Goettler & Ron Shachar, 2000. "Estimating Product Characteristics and Spatial Competition in the Network Television Industry," Econometric Society World Congress 2000 Contributed Papers 1691, Econometric Society.
    44. Shishikura, Manabu & Kasuga, Norihiro, 2007. "An Analysis on Market Structure of Broadcast Service – Issues on Optimal Level of Channel Variety –," MPRA Paper 4344, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    45. Ascensión Andina, 2003. "What Do Media Outlets Compete For?," Working Papers. Serie AD 2003-19, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
    46. Benoît Pierre Freyens & Chris Jones, 2014. "Efficient Allocation of Radio Spectrum," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 16(1), pages 1-23, February.
    47. Reisinger, Markus, 2012. "Platform competition for advertisers and users in media markets," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 243-252.
    48. Kremhelmer, Susanne, 2004. "Fairness, Property Rights, and the Market for Media," Munich Dissertations in Economics 2521, University of Munich, Department of Economics.
    49. Roberto Roson, 2008. "Price Discrimination and Audience Composition in Advertising-Based Broadcasting," Journal of Media Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 234-257.
    50. Felix Oberholzer-Gee & Joel Waldfogel, 2001. "Electoral Acceleration: The Effect of Minority Population on Minority Voter Turnout," NBER Working Papers 8252, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    51. Wildman, Steven S., 1998. "Media and multimedia: The challenge for policy and economic analysis," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 1-7, March.
    52. Bremer Patrick, 2010. "Positive Medienökonomik – Institutionenökonomischer Ansatz für eine rationale Medienpolitik. Anmerkungen zu der gleichnamigen Dissertation von Guido Schröder," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 61(1), pages 397-402, January.
    53. Ricard Gil & Fernanda Gutierrez-Navratil, 2017. "Does Television Entry Decrease The Number Of Movie Theaters?," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 55(2), pages 736-756, April.
    54. Mark Armstrong & Helen Weeds, 2005. "Public Service Broadcasting in the Digital World," Industrial Organization 0507010, EconWPA.
    55. Hans Jarle Kind & Tore Nilssen & Lars Sørgard, 2009. "Business Models for Media Firms: Does Competition Matter for how they Raise Revenue?," CESifo Working Paper Series 2713, CESifo Group Munich.
    56. Hansen, Bodil O. & Keiding, Hans, 2006. "Public and Private Activity in Commercial TV Broadcasting," Working Papers 02-2006, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Economics.
    57. Kind, Hans Jarle & Nilssen, Tore & Sørgard, Lars, 2016. "Inter-firm price coordination in a two-sided market," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 101-112.
    58. Simon P. Anderson & Stephen Coate, 2003. "Market Provision of Broadcasting: A Welfare Analysis," Virginia Economics Online Papers 358, University of Virginia, Department of Economics.
    59. Carare, Octavian & Zentner, Alejandro, 2012. "Program substitutability in network television: Evidence from Argentina," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 145-160.
    60. Monic Sun & Feng Zhu, 2011. "Ad Revenue and Content Commercialization: Evidence from Blogs," Working Papers 11-32, NET Institute.
    61. Helmut Dietl & Tariq Hasan, 2007. "Pay-Tv Versus Free-Tv: A Model Of Sports Broadcasting Rights Sales," Eastern Economic Journal, Eastern Economic Association, vol. 33(3), pages 405-428, Summer.
    62. Man-Lui Lau & Bruce Wydick, 2014. "Does New Information Technology Lower Media Quality? The Paradox of Commercial Public Goods," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 145-157, June.
    63. Bourreau, Marc, 2003. "Mimicking vs. counter-programming strategies for television programs," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 35-54, March.
    64. Jarle Kind, Hans & Nilssen, Tore & Sørgard, Lars, 2010. "Price Coordination in Two-Sided Markets: Competition in the TV Industry," Memorandum 18/2010, Oslo University, Department of Economics.
    65. Stanley Besen, 2014. "Trying to Promote Network Entry: From the Chain Broadcasting Rules to the Channel Occupancy Rule and Beyond," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 45(3), pages 275-293, November.
    66. Ramon Casadesus-Masanell & Feng Zhu, 2009. "Strategies to Fight Ad-sponsored Rivals," Working Papers 09-09, NET Institute, revised Sep 2009.
    67. Mangani, Andrea, 2003. "Profit and audience maximization in broadcasting markets," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 305-315, September.
    68. Massimo Motta & Michele Polo, "undated". "Beyond the Spectrum Constraint: Concentration and Entry in the Broadcasting Industry," Working Papers 115, IGIER (Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research), Bocconi University.
    69. Behringer, Stefan & Filistrucchi, Lapo, 2015. "Hotelling competition and political differentiation with more than two newspapers," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 36-49.
    70. Daniel Flores Curiel, 2001. "Un modelo sobre la competencia entre la telefonía tradicional y el servicio telefónico en la red," Ensayos Revista de Economia, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Facultad de Economia, vol. 0(1), pages 1-16, May.
    71. Alcock, Jamie & Docwra, George, 2005. "A simulation analysis of the market effect of the Australian Broadcasting Corporation," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 407-427, October.
    72. Egon Franck & Stephan Nüesch, 2006. "Explaining the Star Shift in the Media– Why “Manufactured” Celebrities are More Lucrative than “Self-Made” Superstars," Working Papers 0057, University of Zurich, Institute for Strategy and Business Economics (ISU).
    73. Peitz, Martin & Valletti, Tommaso, 2004. "Content and Advertising in the Media: Pay-TV versus Free-To-Air," CEPR Discussion Papers 4771, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    74. Nilssen,T. & Sorgard,L., 2001. "The TV industry : advertising and programming," Memorandum 18/2001, Oslo University, Department of Economics.
    75. Lisa George & Joel Waldfogel, 2000. "Who Benefits Whom in Daily Newspaper Markets?," NBER Working Papers 7944, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    76. Choi, Jay Pil, 2006. "Broadcast competition and advertising with free entry: Subscription vs. free-to-air," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 181-196, June.
    77. Ascensión Andina-Díaz, 2007. "Reinforcement vs. change: The political influence of the media," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 131(1), pages 65-81, April.
    78. Anthony J. Dukes, 2005. "Economic Perspectives on Media Mergers and Consolidation," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 74(3), pages 38-48.
    79. Kevin M. Murphy & Ignacio Palacios-Huerta, 2016. "A Theory of Bundling Advertisements in Media Markets," NBER Working Papers 22994, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    80. Susanne Kremhelmer & Hans Zenger, 2004. "Advertising and the Media," Industrial Organization 0403003, EconWPA.
    81. Simon P. Anderson, 2005. "Regulation of Television advertising," Virginia Economics Online Papers 363, University of Virginia, Department of Economics.
    82. Laurent d'Ursel, 1983. "Politiques de « non-prix » : Equilibre et optimum," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 34(6), pages 1057-1088.
    83. Baron, David P., 2003. "Competing for the Public through the News Media," Research Papers 1808, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    84. Hans Jarle Kind & Tore Nilssen & Lars Sørgard, 2007. "Competition for Viewers and Advertisers in a TV Oligopoly," Journal of Media Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 211-233.
    85. John O'Hagan & Michael Jennings, 2003. "Public Broadcasting in Europe: Rationale, Licence Fee and Other Issues," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 27(1), pages 31-56, February.
    86. Amnon Levy & Michael R. Caputo & Benoît Pierre Freyens, 2013. "Royalties, Entry and Spectrum Allocation to Broadcasting," Economics Working Papers wp13-02, School of Economics, University of Wollongong, NSW, Australia.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 3 papers announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-CDM: Collective Decision-Making (1) 2012-09-03
  2. NEP-LAW: Law & Economics (1) 2012-09-03
  3. NEP-POL: Positive Political Economics (1) 2012-09-03
  4. NEP-REG: Regulation (1) 2011-08-15

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Bruce Manning Owen should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.