IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sip/dpaper/03-027.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Assigning Broadband Rights

Author

Listed:
  • Bruce M. Owen

    (Stanford University)

Abstract

Should rights of access to local broadband facilities be reassigned from investors and, if so, to whom: users, ISPs and content providers, a collective, or no one? A prominent reason for considering such a policy would be a barrier that prevented the voluntary transfer of such rights in response to a differentially higher valuation by someone other than the initial investor. No such barrier appears to exist. Indeed, access to broadband facilities is now routinely offered for sale and broadband facilities investors adhere, not surprisingly, to the prevailing technical standards that permit their transmission services to be useful for transmission. This article is devoted to analysis of the costs and benefits of alternative rights assignments in the cases of, first, access to broadband facilities, and second, the right to define and use technical standards that establish interconnection and transmission possibilities. A market reassignment cannot be relied upon in the case of rights of broadband access or standard-setting. Therefore, unless content providers are indeed the most efficient holders of access rights, it would be an error, potentially grave and costly for the government to assign access rights to them. The “natural” or default initial assignment of rights to control the use of a commercial facility is with the person who invested in its creation. Otherwise, the facility is unlikely to be constructed. There may be reason to disturb the “natural” assignment if market transfers to more efficient holders are difficult and expensive. One obvious reason for reassignment is market power. A second reason for favoring reassignment of initial property rights is spillover effects, or “externalities”. A third reason for intervention to reassign initial property rights may be that leaving those rights where they fall can lead to technical decisions that inadvertently discourage innovation and investment by others. Overall, local broadband access meets none of the criteria for state intervention to transfer rights away from facilities investors involuntarily. If local broadband Internet services were supplied by an entrenched monopolist, and if that monopolist sought to integrate vertically into Internet content and standards creation, or to restrict use of its proprietary standards, in order to extend or perfect its market power, there would be a case for reassignment of access (and/or standard-setting) rights to users or others. But those conditions are not yet met, so such intervention is not justified.

Suggested Citation

  • Bruce M. Owen, 2004. "Assigning Broadband Rights," Discussion Papers 03-027, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:sip:dpaper:03-027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www-siepr.stanford.edu/repec/sip/03-027.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sip:dpaper:03-027. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anne Shor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cestaus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.