Pay-Tv Versus Free-Tv: A Model Of Sports Broadcasting Rights Sales
In contrast to the U.S., European coverage of top-selling sports tends to move to subscription-TV. The literature provides several explanations for this distinct development in the U.S. and Europe: The TV sports market in the U.S. is characterized by substitution effects due to the existence of other major sports, economies of scale due to the existence of networks covering all of the U.S., and FCC legislation restricting entrance of subscription-TV networks. We present a model which is consistent with the arguments above and points to an additional explanation: If the league sponsors' willingness to pay increases with higher viewer ratings, incentives for a sports league to air its games on free-TV become stronger. Differences in the valuation of such payments might be a factor explaining the different development across the two continents. In order to increase welfare, policymakers should tailor free-TV networks' advertising restrictions to maximize viewer ratings while still ensuring free-TV networks' competitiveness in the market for broadcasting rights. Additionally, increased competition in the sports broadcasting market will increase welfare.
Volume (Year): 33 (2007)
Issue (Month): 3 (Summer)
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Phone: (201) 684-7346
Web page: http://www.ramapo.edu/eea/journal.html
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Spence, A Michael & Owen, Bruce, 1977. "Television Programming, Monopolistic Competition, and Welfare," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, vol. 91(1), pages 103-26, February.
- Paul Klemperer & Jeremy Bulow, 1998.
"Toeholds and Takeovers,"
Economics Series Working Papers
1998-W04, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
- Jeremy Bulow & Ming Huang & Paul Klemperer, 1999. "Toeholds and Takeovers," Finance 9903005, EconWPA.
- Bulow, Jeremy I. & Huang, Ming & Klemperer, Paul, 1996. "Toeholds and Takeovers," CEPR Discussion Papers 1486, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Jeremy Bulow & Ming Huang & Paul Klemperer, 1996. "Toeholds and Takeovers," Finance 9608001, EconWPA.
- Stefan Szymanski, 2003. "The Economic Design of Sporting Contests," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 41(4), pages 1137-1187, December.
- Chae, Suchan & Flores, Daniel, 1998. "Broadcasting versus narrowcasting," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 41-57, March.
- Choi, Jay Pil, 2006. "Broadcast competition and advertising with free entry: Subscription vs. free-to-air," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 181-196, June.
- Hansen, Claus Thustrup & Kyhl, Soren, 2001. "Pay-per-view broadcasting of outstanding events: consequences of a ban," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 19(3-4), pages 589-609, March.
- Wladimir Andreff & Paul D. Staudohar, 2000. "The Evolving European Model of Professional Sports Finance," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 1(3), pages 257-276, August.
- Holden, Steinar, 1993.
"Network or pay-per-view? : A welfare analysis,"
Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 59-64.
- Cave, Martin & Crandall, Robert W, 2001. "Sports Rights and the Broadcast Industry," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 111(469), pages F4-26, February.
- Kruse, Joern & Quitzau, Joern, 2003. "Fussball-Fernsehrechte: Aspekte der Zentralvermarktung," Working Paper 18/2003, Helmut Schmidt University, Hamburg.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eej:eeconj:v:33:y:2007:i:3:p:405-428. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Victor Matheson, College of the Holy Cross)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.