IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Old Media Policy Failures, New Media Policy Challenges


  • Bruce Owen

    () (Stanford University)


This paper deals with two related subjects. The first is the failure of economic analysis to trigger elimination of welfare-reducing public policies affecting the older mass media technologies, such as broadcasting. The second is some speculation about policy issues that may continue or arise in the future given the technical characteristics of the new broadband media, combined with advances in social psychology, neuroscience and behavioral economics. I draw two principal conclusions. First, the failure of economic analysis to stimulate fundamental reform of media regulation is largely due to the fact that policy makers have greater incentives to focus on the allocation of economic rents among interest groups than to promote consumer welfare. Second, it is clear that IP-based technology is replacing old media such as newspapers and broadcast stations. The technology has the potential to greatly enhance competition and diversity, and to reduce the cost of access by consumers and suppliers to each other. However, regulation is not likely to be reduced, because a whole new rationale for media regulation is being developed. The new rational will be a market failure—adverse welfare effects of competitive media content responsive to consumers’ cognitive impairments.

Suggested Citation

  • Bruce Owen, 2009. "Old Media Policy Failures, New Media Policy Challenges," Discussion Papers 08-038, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:sip:dpaper:08-038

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Riccardo Puglisi & James M. Snyder, Jr., 2008. "Media Coverage of Political Scandals," NBER Working Papers 14598, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. François Salanié & Nicolas Treich, 2009. "Regulation in Happyville," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 119(537), pages 665-679, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item


    mass media; technology; regulation;

    JEL classification:

    • O38 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sip:dpaper:08-038. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Anne Shor). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.