IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: an update

  • William Thomson

    (University of Rochester)

A group of agents have claims on a resource, but there is not enough of it to honor all of the claims. How should it be divided? A group of agents decide to undertake a public project that they can jointly afford. How much should each of them contribute? This essay is an update of Thomson (2003), a survey of the literature devoted to the study of such problems.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://rcer.econ.rochester.edu/RCERPAPERS/rcer_578.pdf
File Function: full text
Download Restriction: None

Paper provided by University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER) in its series RCER Working Papers with number 578.

as
in new window

Length: 64 pages
Date of creation: Aug 2013
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:roc:rocher:578
Contact details of provider: Postal:
University of Rochester, Center for Economic Research, Department of Economics, Harkness 231 Rochester, New York 14627 U.S.A.

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

as in new window
  1. Thomson, William, 2013. "A characterization of a family of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 157-168.
  2. Volij, Oscar & Dagan, Nir & Serrano, Roberto, 1997. "A Non-Cooperative View of Consistent Bankruptcy Rules," Staff General Research Papers 5130, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
  3. Stovall, John, 2014. "Collective Rationality and Monotone Path Division Rules," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1035, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
  4. Nir Dagan & Oscar Volij, 1997. "Bilateral Comparisons and Consistent Fair Division Rules in the Context of Bankruptcy Problems," Economic theory and game theory 004, Nir Dagan.
  5. Jens Leth Hougaard & Juan D. Moreno-Ternero & Lars Peter Østerdal, 2012. "Rationing with Baselines: The Composition Extension Operator," MSAP Working Paper Series 08_2012, University of Copenhagen, Department of Food and Resource Economics.
  6. Juan Moreno-Ternero & Antonio Villar, 2006. "The TAL-Family of Rules for Bankruptcy Problems," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 231-249, October.
  7. Thomson, William, 2012. "On The Axiomatics Of Resource Allocation: Interpreting The Consistency Principle," Economics and Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 28(03), pages 385-421, November.
  8. Ju, Biung-Ghi & Miyagawa, Eiichi & Sakai, Toyotaka, 2007. "Non-manipulable division rules in claim problems and generalizations," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 132(1), pages 1-26, January.
  9. HOUGAARD, Jens L. & MORENO-TERNERO, Juan D. & OSTERDAL, Lars P., 2011. "A unifying framework for the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims," CORE Discussion Papers 2011071, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
  10. Juan D. Moreno-Ternero, 2009. "The Proportional Rule for Multi-Issue Bankruptcy Problems," Working Papers 09.11, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Economics.
  11. Nir Dagan, 1996. "New Characterizations of Old Bankruptcy Rules," Economic theory and game theory 002, Nir Dagan.
  12. Lefebvre, Marianne, 2013. "Can Rationing Rules for Common Resources Impact Self-insurance Decisions?," Strategic Behavior and the Environment, now publishers, vol. 3(3), pages 185-222, March.
  13. Thomson, William & Yeh, Chun-Hsien, 2008. "Operators for the adjudication of conflicting claims," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 177-198, November.
  14. repec:spr:compst:v:61:y:2005:i:3:p:483-500 is not listed on IDEAS
  15. José Alcalde & María Carmen Marco-Gil & José Silva-Reus, 2014. "The minimal overlap rule: restrictions on mergers for creditors’ consensus," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 363-383, April.
  16. Erik Ansink & Hans-Peter Weikard, 2012. "Sequential sharing rules for river sharing problems," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 187-210, February.
  17. Moreno-Ternero, Juan D. & Villar, Antonio, 2004. "The Talmud rule and the securement of agents' awards," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 245-257, March.
  18. MORENO-TERNERO, Juan D. & VILLAR, Antonio, . "New characterizations of a classical bankruptcy rule," CORE Discussion Papers RP 1926, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
  19. Juan D. Moreno-Ternero, 2007. "Bankruptcy Rules And Coalitional Manipulation," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 9(01), pages 105-118.
  20. MORENO-TERNERO, Juan D., . "Composition, securement, and concede-and-divide," CORE Discussion Papers RP 1895, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
  21. BOSMANS, Kristof & SCHOKKAERT, Erik, 2007. "Equality preference in the claims problem: A questionnaire study of cuts in earnings and pensions," CORE Discussion Papers 2007030, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
  22. Brânzei, R. & Dimitrov, D.A. & Tijs, S.H., 2003. "Shapley-like values for interval bankruptcy games," Other publications TiSEM 55aabb66-74af-4980-b6eb-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
  23. Karagozoglu Emin, 2008. "Distributive Concerns in the Bankruptcy Problem with an Endogenous Estate," Research Memorandum 032, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
  24. HERRERO, Carmen & MORENO-TERNERO, Juan D. & PONTI, Giovanni, 2006. "On the adjudication of conflicting claims: an experimental study," CORE Discussion Papers 2006062, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
  25. Ricardo Martínez, 2007. "Strong Composition Down. Characterizations Of New And Classical Bankruptcy Rules," Working Papers. Serie AD 2007-20, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
  26. JU, Biung-Ghi & MORENO-TERNERO, Juan D., 2006. "Progressivity, inequality reduction and merging-proofness in taxation," CORE Discussion Papers 2006075, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
  27. William Thomson, 2006. "The Two-Agent Claims-Truncated Proportional Rule Has No Consistent Extension: A Constructive Proof," RCER Working Papers 529, University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER).
  28. Luis Corchón & Carmen Herrero, 2004. "A decent proposal," Spanish Economic Review, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 107-125, 07.
  29. Ansink, Erik, 2011. "The Arctic scramble: Introducing claims in a contest model," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 693-707.
  30. Lars Peter Østerdal & Jens Leth Hougaard, 2004. "Inequality Preserving Rationing," Discussion Papers 04-23, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics.
  31. Thierry Marchant, 2008. "Scale invariance and similar invariance conditions for bankruptcy problems," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 693-707, December.
  32. Ju, Biung-Ghi, 2013. "Coalitional manipulation on networks," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 148(2), pages 627-662.
  33. Juan D. Moreno-Ternero & Antonio Villar, 2006. "On the Relative Equitability of a Family of Taxation Rules," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 8(2), pages 283-291, 05.
  34. Bergantinos, Gustavo & Lorenzo, Leticia, 2008. "The equal award principle in problems with constraints and claims," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 188(1), pages 224-239, July.
  35. Habis Helga & Herings P. Jean-Jacques, 2011. "Stochastic Bankruptcy Games," Research Memorandum 045, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
  36. José M. Jiménez Gómez & María del Carmen Marco, 2008. "A New Approach for Bounding Awards in Bankruptcy Problems," Working Papers. Serie AD 2008-07, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
  37. Moreno-Ternero, Juan D. & Roemer, John E., 2012. "A common ground for resource and welfare egalitarianism," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 75(2), pages 832-841.
  38. Erik Ansink & Hans-Peter Weikard, 2013. "Composition Properties in the River Claims Problem," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 13-199/VIII, Tinbergen Institute.
  39. Ashlagi, Itai & Karagözoğlu, Emin & Klaus, Bettina, 2012. "A non-cooperative support for equal division in estate division problems," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 228-233.
  40. Victor Ginsburgh & ISRAEL Zang, 2003. "The museum pass game and its value," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/1683, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
  41. Borm, P.E.M. & Hendrickx, R.L.P. & Quant, M. & Gonzalez-Diaz, J., 2003. "A Geometric Characterisation of the Compromise Value," Discussion Paper 2003-88, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
  42. José-Manuel Giménez-Gómez & Josep Peris, 2014. "Mediation in claims problems," SERIEs, Spanish Economic Association, vol. 5(4), pages 357-375, November.
  43. Juan D. Moreno-Ternero, 2010. "Voting over piece-wise linear tax methods," Working Papers 10.02, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Economics.
  44. Lorenzo-Freire, S. & Alonso-Meijide, J.M. & Casas-Mendez, B. & Hendrickx, R.L.P., 2005. "Balanced Contributions for Multi-Issue Allocation Situations," Discussion Paper 2005-93, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
  45. Arin, Javier & Inarra, Elena, 1998. "A Characterization of the Nucleolus for Convex Games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 12-24, April.
  46. Kıbrıs, Özgür & Kıbrıs, Arzu, 2013. "On the investment implications of bankruptcy laws," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 85-99.
  47. William Thomson, 2007. "Lorenz rankings of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims," RCER Working Papers 538, University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER).
  48. Ignacio García-Jurado & Julio González-Díaz & Antonio Villar, 2006. "A Non-cooperative Approach to Bankruptcy Problems," Spanish Economic Review, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 189-197, September.
  49. Chun, Y. & Thomson, W., 1989. "Bargaining Problems With Claims," RCER Working Papers 189, University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER).
  50. Chambers, Christopher P. & Thomson, William, 2002. "Group order preservation and the proportional rule for the adjudication of conflicting claims," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 235-252, December.
  51. Endre Bjørndal & Kurt Jörnsten, 2010. "Flow sharing and bankruptcy games," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 11-28, March.
  52. Silvia Lorenzo-Freire & Balbina Casas-Méndez & Ruud Hendrickx, 2010. "The two-stage constrained equal awards and losses rules for multi-issue allocation situations," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 465-480, December.
  53. Chambers, Christopher P., 2006. "Asymmetric rules for claims problems without homogeneity," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 241-260, February.
  54. T. Marchant, 2004. "Rationing : dynamic considerations, equivalent sacrifice and links between the two approaches," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 04/244, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
  55. Rodica Branzei & Giulio Ferrari & Vito Fragnelli & Stef Tijs, 2008. "A Flow Approach to Bankruptcy Problems," Czech Economic Review, Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Economic Studies, vol. 2(2), pages 146-153, September.
  56. M. Josune Albizuri & Justin Leroux & José Manuel Zarzuelo, 2008. "Updating Claims in Bankruptcy Problems," Cahiers de recherche 08-08, HEC Montréal, Institut d'économie appliquée.
  57. Carmen Herrero & Antonio Villar, 2010. "The rights egalitarian solution for NTU sharing problems," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 137-150, March.
  58. JU, Biung-Ghi & MORENO-TERNERO, Juan D., . "Progressive and merging-proof taxation," CORE Discussion Papers RP 2280, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
  59. José M. Jiménez Gómez & Josep Enric Peris Ferrando, 2012. "A proportional approach to bankruptcy. Problems with a guaranteed minimum," Working Papers. Serie AD 2012-11, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
  60. Brânzei, R. & Dimitrov, D.A. & Pickl, S. & Tijs, S.H., 2004. "How to cope with division problems under interval uncertainty of claims?," Other publications TiSEM ded4eab4-b710-424b-a2cc-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
  61. Yoichi Kasajima & Rodrigo Velez, 2011. "Reflecting inequality of claims in gains and losses," Economic Theory, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 283-295, February.
  62. Thomson, William, 2003. "Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 249-297, July.
  63. JU, Biung-Ghi & MORENO-TERNERO, Juan D., 2007. "On the equivalence between progressive taxation and inequality reduction," CORE Discussion Papers 2007002, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
  64. HOUGAARD, Jean Leth & MORENO-TERNERO, Juan D. & OSTERDAL, Lars Peter, . "Rationing in the presence of baselines," CORE Discussion Papers RP 2470, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
  65. Gustavo Bergantiños & Luciano Méndez-Naya, 2001. "Additivity in bankruptcy problems and in allocation problems," Spanish Economic Review, Springer, vol. 3(3), pages 223-229.
  66. Habis Helga & Herings P. Jean-Jacques, 2010. "Transferable Utility Games with Uncertainty," Research Memorandum 038, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
  67. Christopher P. Chambers & Juan D. Moreno-Ternero, 2015. "Taxation and Poverty," Working Papers 15.05, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Economics.
  68. Marco Mariotti & Antonio Villar, 2005. "The Nash rationing problem," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 367-377, 09.
  69. William Thomson, 2007. "Two families of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims," RCER Working Papers 535, University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER).
  70. Vito Fragnelli & Stefano Gagliardo & Fabio Gastaldi, 2014. "Integer solutions to bankruptcy problems with non-integer claims," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 892-933, October.
  71. Youngsub Chun & Junghoon Lee, 2007. "On the convergence of the random arrival rule in large claims problems," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 259-273, October.
  72. Carlos González-Alcón & Peter Borm & Ruud Hendrickx, 2007. "A composite run-to-the-bank rule for multi-issue allocation situations," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 65(2), pages 339-352, April.
  73. Diego Dominguez & William Thomson, 2006. "A new solution to the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims," Economic Theory, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 283-307, 06.
  74. Thierry Marchant, 2008. "Scale invariance and similar invariance conditions for bankruptcy problems," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 709-710, December.
  75. Iain McLean (ed.), 0. "Condorcet," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 309.
  76. Volij, Oscar & Dagan, Nir, 1993. "The Bankruptcy Problem: A Cooperative Bargaining Approach," Staff General Research Papers 10571, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
  77. Kristof Bosmans & Luc Lauwers, 2011. "Lorenz comparisons of nine rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer, vol. 40(4), pages 791-807, November.
  78. Groote Schaarsberg, M. & Reijnierse, J.H. & Borm, P.E.M., 2013. "On Solving Liability Problems," Discussion Paper 2013-033, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
  79. Quant, M. & Borm, P.E.M. & Hendrickx, R.L.P. & Zwikker, P., 2004. "Compromise Solutions Based on Bankruptcy," Discussion Paper 2004-33, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
  80. van den Brink, René & Funaki, Yukihiko & van der Laan, Gerard, 2013. "Characterization of the Reverse Talmud bankruptcy rule by Exemption and Exclusion properties," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 228(2), pages 413-417.
  81. Gustavo Bergantiños & Juan Vidal-Puga, 2003. "Additive rules in bankruptcy problems and other related problems," Game Theory and Information 0304001, EconWPA.
  82. MORENO-TERNERO, Juan D., . "Erratum. Bankruptcy rules and coalitional manipulation [IGTR, 9(1), 105-118, 2007]," CORE Discussion Papers RP 2046, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
  83. Hokari, Toru & Thomson, William, 2008. "On properties of division rules lifted by bilateral consistency," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(11), pages 1057-1071, December.
  84. repec:spr:compst:v:73:y:2011:i:1:p:55-73 is not listed on IDEAS
  85. JU, Biung-Ghi & MORENO-TERNERO, Juan, 2014. "Fair allocation of disputed properties," CORE Discussion Papers 2014024, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
  86. Juan D. Moreno-Ternero, 2006. "Proportionality And Non-Manipulability In Bankruptcy Problems," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 8(01), pages 127-139.
  87. Marieke Quant & Peter Borm, 2011. "Random conjugates of bankruptcy rules," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 249-266, February.
  88. Özgür Kıbrıs, 2012. "A revealed preference analysis of solutions to simple allocation problems," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 72(4), pages 509-523, April.
  89. Rodica Branzei & Marco Dall'aglio, 2009. "Allocation rules incorporating interval uncertainty," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Technology, Institute of Organization and Management, vol. 2, pages 19-28.
  90. Ansink, Erik & Weikard, Hans-Peter, 2009. "Contested water rights," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 247-260, June.
  91. MORENO-TERNERO, Juan D. & ROEMER, John E., . "Impartiality, priority, and solidarity in the theory of justice," CORE Discussion Papers RP 1896, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
  92. Atlamaz, Murat & Berden, Caroline & Peters, Hans & Vermeulen, Dries, 2011. "Non-cooperative solutions for estate division problems," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 39-51, September.
  93. Gustavo Bergantiños & Leticia Lorenzo & Silvia Lorenzo-Freire, 2011. "New characterizations of the constrained equal awards rule in multi-issue allocation situations," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 74(3), pages 311-325, December.
  94. Quant, M., 2006. "Interactive behavior in conflict situations," Other publications TiSEM 0c2c6e2b-d7fd-4141-8daa-1, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
  95. M. Hinojosa & A. Mármol & F. Sánchez, 2012. "A consistent talmudic rule for division problems with multiple references," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 661-678, October.
  96. Özgür Kıbrıs, 2013. "On recursive solutions to simple allocation problems," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 75(3), pages 449-463, September.
  97. William Thomson, 2013. "Game-Theoretic Analysis Of Bankruptcy And Taxation Problems: Recent Advances," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(03), pages 1340018-1-1.
  98. repec:spr:compst:v:65:y:2007:i:2:p:339-352 is not listed on IDEAS
  99. Txus Ortells & Juan Santos, 2011. "The pseudo-average rule: bankruptcy, cost allocation and bargaining," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 73(1), pages 55-73, February.
  100. Simon Gächter & Arno Riedl, 2003. "Moral Property Rights in Bargaining with Infeasible Claims," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 03-055/1, Tinbergen Institute.
  101. Orshan, Gooni & Zarzuelo, Jose M., 2000. "The Bilateral Consistent Prekernel for NTU Games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 67-84, July.
  102. Aumann, Robert J. & Maschler, Michael, 1985. "Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 195-213, August.
  103. Kaminski, Marek M., 2006. "Parametric rationing methods," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 115-133, January.
  104. Nash, John, 1950. "The Bargaining Problem," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 18(2), pages 155-162, April.
  105. José Alcalde & José Angel Silva & María del Carmen Marco, 2002. "Bankruptcy Games And The Ibn Ezra'S Proposal," Working Papers. Serie AD 2002-28, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
  106. Yeh, Chun-Hsien, 2004. "Sustainability, exemption, and the constrained equal awards rule: a note," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 103-110, January.
  107. Bergantinos, Gustavo & Vidal-Puga, Juan J., 2006. "Additive rules in discrete allocation problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(3), pages 971-978, August.
  108. Yevgeni Berzak & Michael Fink, 2008. "Manipulating Allocation Justice: How Framing Effects can Increase the Prevalence of the Talmudic Division Principle "Shnaim Ohazin"," Discussion Paper Series dp479, The Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
  109. Hervé Moulin, 2000. "Priority Rules and Other Asymmetric Rationing Methods," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 68(3), pages 643-684, May.
  110. José Alcalde & María Marco & José Silva, 2008. "The minimal overlap rule revisited," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 109-128, June.
  111. Jens Leth Hougaard & Juan D. Moreno-Ternero & Lars Peter Østerdal, 2010. "Baseline Rationing," MSAP Working Paper Series 05_2010, University of Copenhagen, Department of Food and Resource Economics.
  112. Carmen Herrero & Antonio Villar, 2002. "Sustainability in bankruptcy problems," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 261-273, December.
  113. Lorenzo-Freire, Silvia & Alonso-Meijide, Jose M. & Casas-Mendez, Balbina & Hendrickx, Ruud, 2007. "Balanced contributions for TU games with awards and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(2), pages 958-964, October.
  114. Pulido, M. & Borm, P.E.M. & Hendrickx, R.L.P. & Llorca, N. & Sánchez-Soriano, J., 2008. "Compromise solutions for bankruptcy situations with references," Other publications TiSEM d5052c4d-eda1-4d7e-b3d0-d, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
  115. Kasajima, Yoichi & Velez, Rodrigo A., 2010. "Non-proportional inequality preservation in gains and losses," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(6), pages 1079-1092, November.
  116. Vermeulen A.J. & Schröder M.J.W. & Peters H.J.M., 2013. "Claim games for estate division problems," Research Memorandum 055, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
  117. Rodica Branzei & Sirma Zeynep Alparslan Gok, 2008. "Bankruptcy problems with interval uncertainty," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 3(56), pages 1-10.
  118. Quant, M. & Borm, P.E.M. & Maaten, R., 2005. "A Concede-and-Divide Rule for Bankruptcy Problems," Discussion Paper 2005-20, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
  119. Herrero, Carmen & Villar, Antonio, 2001. "The three musketeers: four classical solutions to bankruptcy problems," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 307-328, November.
  120. Youngsub Chun & William Thomson, 2004. "Convergence under Replication of Rules to Adjudicate Conflicting Claims," RCER Working Papers 512, University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER).
  121. Chun, Youngsub, 1988. "The proportional solution for rights problems," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 231-246, June.
  122. Giménez-Gómez, José-Manuel & Peris, Josep E., 2014. "A proportional approach to claims problems with a guaranteed minimum," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 232(1), pages 109-116.
  123. Tamás Fleiner & Balázs Sziklai, 2012. "The Nucleolus Of The Bankruptcy Problem By Hydraulic Rationing," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(01), pages 1250007-1-1.
  124. Yeh, Chun-Hsien, 2008. "Secured lower bound, composition up, and minimal rights first for bankruptcy problems," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(9-10), pages 925-932, September.
  125. Moulin, Herve & Stong, Richard, 2003. "Filling a multicolor urn: an axiomatic analysis," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 242-269, October.
  126. Hart, Sergiu & Mas-Colell, Andreu, 1989. "Potential, Value, and Consistency," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 57(3), pages 589-614, May.
  127. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:3:y:2003:i:9:p:1-8 is not listed on IDEAS
  128. Chun-Hsien Yeh, 2006. "Protective Properties and the Constrained Equal Awards Rule for Claims Problems: A Note," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 221-230, October.
  129. Stovall, John, 2013. "Asymmetric Parametric Division Rules," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1012, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
  130. Robert Aumann, 2010. "Some non-superadditive games, and their Shapley values, in the Talmud," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 3-10, March.
  131. Chang, Chih & Hu, Cheng-Cheng, 2008. "A non-cooperative interpretation of the f-just rules of bankruptcy problems," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 133-144, May.
  132. Pere Timoner & Josep Maria Izquierdo, 2014. "Rationing problems with payoff thresholds," UB Economics Working Papers 2014/311, Universitat de Barcelona, Facultat d'Economia i Empresa, UB Economics.
  133. HERRERO, Carmen & MARTINEZ, Ricardo, 2006. "Balanced allocation methods for claims problems with indivisibilities," CORE Discussion Papers 2006066, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
  134. Calleja, Pedro & Borm, Peter & Hendrickx, Ruud, 2005. "Multi-issue allocation situations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 164(3), pages 730-747, August.
  135. Diego Dominguez, 2013. "Lower bounds and recursive methods for the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 663-678, March.
  136. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:3:y:2008:i:56:p:1-10 is not listed on IDEAS
  137. Diego Dominguez, 2007. "Lower bounds and recursive methods for the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims," Working Papers 0705, Centro de Investigacion Economica, ITAM.
  138. repec:spr:compst:v:74:y:2011:i:3:p:311-325 is not listed on IDEAS
  139. Pálvölgyi Dénes & Peters Hans & Vermeulen Dries, 2010. "A strategic approach to estate division problems with non-homogenous preferences," Research Memorandum 036, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
  140. Young, H. P., 1988. "Distributive justice in taxation," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 321-335, April.
  141. Toru Hokari & William Thomson, 2003. "Claims problems and weighted generalizations of the Talmud rule," Economic Theory, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 241-261, 03.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:roc:rocher:578. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Richard DiSalvo)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.