IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/e/c/pda3.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Vladimir I. Danilov

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Vladimir Ivanovitch Danilov & Ariane Lambert-Mogiliansky, 2017. "Preparing a (quantum) belief system," PSE Working Papers halshs-01542068, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Danilov, V.I. & Lambert-Mogiliansky, A., 2018. "Targeting in quantum persuasion problem," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 142-149.
    2. Zheng, Xiaojing & Lu, Jinfei & Chen, Yanbin & Cong, Xinrong & Sun, Cuiping, 2021. "Random belief system dynamics in complex networks under time-varying logic constraints," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 566(C).

  2. Vladimir Ivanovitch Danilov & Ariane Lambert-Mogiliansky & Vassili Vergopoulos, 2016. "Dynamic consistency of expected utility under non-classical(quantum) uncertainty," PSE Working Papers halshs-01324046, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Danilov, V.I. & Lambert-Mogiliansky, A., 2018. "Targeting in quantum persuasion problem," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 142-149.
    2. Vladimir Ivanovitch Danilov & Ariane Lambert-Mogiliansky, 2017. "Preparing a (quantum) belief system," PSE Working Papers halshs-01542068, HAL.
    3. Ariane Lambert-Mogiliansky & Adrian Calmettes, 2019. ""Phishing For (quantum-like) Phools" Theory and experimental evidence," Working Papers halshs-02146862, HAL.
    4. Danilov, V., 2016. "Utility Theory of General Lotteries," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 32(4), pages 12-29.
    5. Khrennikova, Polina & Patra, Sudip, 2019. "Asset trading under non-classical ambiguity and heterogeneous beliefs," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 521(C), pages 562-577.

  3. Vladimir Danilov & Gleb Koshevoy & Ernesto Savaglio, 2012. "Orderings of Opportunity Sets," Department of Economics University of Siena 660, Department of Economics, University of Siena.

    Cited by:

    1. Danilov, V., 2015. "Beyond Classical Rationality: Two-Stage Rationalization," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 26(2), pages 12-35.

  4. Vladimir Ivanovitch Danilov & Ariane Lambert-Mogiliansky, 2010. "Expected utility theory under non-classical uncertainty," Post-Print halshs-00754482, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Danilov, V.I. & Lambert-Mogiliansky, A., 2018. "Targeting in quantum persuasion problem," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 142-149.
    2. Vladimir Ivanovitch Danilov & Ariane Lambert-Mogiliansky, 2017. "Preparing a (quantum) belief system," PSE Working Papers halshs-01542068, HAL.
    3. Vladimir Ivanovitch Danilov & Ariane Lambert-Mogiliansky & Vassili Vergopoulos, 2018. "Dynamic consistency of expected utility under non-classical (quantum) uncertainty," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-01885415, HAL.
    4. V. I. Yukalov & D. Sornette, 2012. "Quantum decision making by social agents," Papers 1202.4918, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2015.
    5. Ariane Lambert-Mogiliansky & François Dubois, 2015. "Transparency in Public Life. A Quantum Cognition Perspective," PSE Working Papers halshs-01064980, HAL.
    6. Ismaël Rafaï & Sébastien Duchêne & Eric Guerci & Irina Basieva & Andrei Khrennikov, 2021. "The Triple-Store Experiment: A First Simultaneous Test of Classical and Quantum Probabilities in Choice over Menus," GREDEG Working Papers 2021-16, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    7. Ariane Lambert-Mogiliansky & Adrian Calmettes, 2019. ""Phishing For (quantum-like) Phools" Theory and experimental evidence," Working Papers halshs-02146862, HAL.
    8. Vladimir Ivanovitch Danilov & Ariane Lambert-Mogiliansky & Vassili Vergopoulos, 2018. "Dynamic consistency of expected utility under non-classical (quantum) uncertainty," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01885415, HAL.
    9. Dino Borie, 2013. "Expected utility theory with non-commutative probability theory," Post-Print hal-01341722, HAL.
    10. Thomas Boyer-Kassem & Sébastien Duchêne & Eric Guerci, 2015. "Testing Quantum-like Models of Judgment for Question Order Effects," GREDEG Working Papers 2015-06, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    11. Hammond, Peter J., 2011. "Laboratory Games and Quantum Behaviour: The Normal Form with a Separable State Space," Economic Research Papers 270755, University of Warwick - Department of Economics.
    12. Danilov, V., 2016. "Utility Theory of General Lotteries," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 32(4), pages 12-29.
    13. Haven, Emmanuel & Sozzo, Sandro, 2016. "A generalized probability framework to model economic agents' decisions under uncertainty," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 297-303.
    14. Ariane Lambert-Mogiliansky & Jérôme Busemeyer, 2012. "Quantum Type Indeterminacy in Dynamic Decision-Making: Self-Control through Identity Management," PSE - Labex "OSE-Ouvrir la Science Economique" hal-00813259, HAL.
    15. Thomas Boyer-Kassem & Sébastien Duchêne & Eric Guerci, 2015. "Quantum-like Models Cannot Account for the Conjunction Fallacy," GREDEG Working Papers 2015-41, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    16. Ariane Lambert-Mogiliansky & François Dubois, 2015. "Our (represented) World: A Quantum-Like Object," PSE Working Papers halshs-01152332, HAL.
    17. Haven, Emmanuel & Khrennikova, Polina, 2018. "A quantum-probabilistic paradigm: Non-consequential reasoning and state dependence in investment choice," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 186-197.

  5. Danilov, Vladimir I. & Koshevoy, Gleb A. & Lang, Christine, 2008. "Equilibria with indivisible goods and package-utilities," Sonderforschungsbereich 504 Publications 08-30, Sonderforschungsbereich 504, Universität Mannheim;Sonderforschungsbereich 504, University of Mannheim.

    Cited by:

    1. Elizabeth Baldwin & Paul Klemperer, 2015. "Understanding Preferences: “Demand Types”, and the Existence of Equilibrium with Indivisibilities," Economics Papers 2015-W10, Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.

  6. Vladimir Ivanovitch Danilov & Ariane Lambert-Mogiliansky, 2008. "Measurable systems and behavioral sciences," Post-Print halshs-00754291, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. V. I. Yukalov & D. Sornette, 2012. "Quantum decision making by social agents," Papers 1202.4918, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2015.
    2. Ariane Lambert-Mogiliansky & François Dubois, 2015. "Transparency in Public Life. A Quantum Cognition Perspective," Working Papers halshs-01064980, HAL.
    3. Ariane Lambert-Mogiliansky & François Dubois, 2015. "Transparency in Public Life. A Quantum Cognition Perspective," PSE Working Papers halshs-01064980, HAL.
    4. Ismaël Rafaï & Sébastien Duchêne & Eric Guerci & Irina Basieva & Andrei Khrennikov, 2021. "The Triple-Store Experiment: A First Simultaneous Test of Classical and Quantum Probabilities in Choice over Menus," GREDEG Working Papers 2021-16, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    5. Vladimir Ivanovitch Danilov & Ariane Lambert-Mogiliansky, 2007. "Non-classical expected utility theory with application to type indeterminacy," PSE Working Papers halshs-00587721, HAL.
    6. Thomas Boyer-Kassem & Sébastien Duchêne & Eric Guerci, 2015. "Testing Quantum-like Models of Judgment for Question Order Effects," GREDEG Working Papers 2015-06, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    7. Vladimir Ivanovitch Danilov & Ariane Lambert-Mogiliansky, 2010. "Expected utility theory under non-classical uncertainty," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-00754482, HAL.
    8. Vladimir Danilov, 2009. "Modelling of Non-Commuting Measurements," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, issue 1-2, pages 10-36.
    9. Ariane Lambert-Mogiliansky, 2010. "Endogenous preferences in games with type indeterminate players," Working Papers halshs-00564895, HAL.
    10. Hammond, Peter J., 2011. "Laboratory Games and Quantum Behaviour: The Normal Form with a Separable State Space," Economic Research Papers 270755, University of Warwick - Department of Economics.
    11. Ariane Lambert-Mogiliansky & Jérôme Busemeyer, 2012. "Quantum Type Indeterminacy in Dynamic Decision-Making: Self-Control through Identity Management," PSE - Labex "OSE-Ouvrir la Science Economique" hal-00813259, HAL.
    12. Ariane Lambert-Mogiliansky, 2010. "Endogenous preferences in games with Type-Indeterminate Players," Post-Print halshs-00754695, HAL.
    13. Ariane Lambert-Mogiliansky, 2010. "Endogenous preferences in games with Type-Indeterminate Players," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-00754695, HAL.
    14. Thomas Boyer-Kassem & Sébastien Duchêne & Eric Guerci, 2015. "Quantum-like Models Cannot Account for the Conjunction Fallacy," GREDEG Working Papers 2015-41, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    15. Jerry Busemeyer & Ariane Lambert-Mogiliansky, 2009. "TI-games I: An exploration of Type Indeterminacy in strategic decision-making," Working Papers halshs-00566780, HAL.
    16. C. Sarris & A. Proto, 2014. "Quantum models for decision making and opinion dynamics the role of the Lie algebras," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 1945-1956, July.
    17. Ariane Lambert-Mogiliansky & François Dubois, 2015. "Our (represented) World: A Quantum-Like Object," PSE Working Papers halshs-01152332, HAL.
    18. Ariane Lambert-Mogiliansky & Ismael Martinez-Martinez, 2014. "Basic Framework for Games with Quantum-like Players," PSE Working Papers hal-01095472, HAL.

  7. V. I. Danilov & A. Lambert-Mogiliansky, 2005. "Non-classical Measurement Theory: a Framework for Behavioral Sciences," Levine's Working Paper Archive 122247000000000899, David K. Levine.

    Cited by:

    1. Houy Nicolas, 2008. "Choice Functions with States of Mind," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 65(1), pages 1-26, August.
    2. Dino Borie, 2013. "Expected utility theory with non-commutative probability theory," Post-Print hal-01341722, HAL.

Articles

  1. V. I. Danilov & A. Lambert-Mogiliansky & V. Vergopoulos, 2018. "Dynamic consistency of expected utility under non-classical (quantum) uncertainty," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 84(4), pages 645-670, June.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  2. V. Danilov & G. Koshevoy & E. Savaglio, 2015. "Hyper-relations, choice functions, and orderings of opportunity sets," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 45(1), pages 51-69, June.

    Cited by:

    1. Matthew Ryan, 2016. "Essentiality and Convexity in the Ranking of Opportunity Sets," Working Papers 2016-01, Auckland University of Technology, Department of Economics.
    2. Matthew Ryan, 2016. "Essentiality and convexity in the ranking of opportunity sets," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 47(4), pages 853-877, December.
    3. Gleb Koshevoy & Ernesto Savaglio, 2017. "Enveloped choice functions and path-independent rationality," Department of Economics University of Siena 765, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    4. Alfio Giarlotta & Angelo Petralia & Stephen Watson, 2022. "Semantics meets attractiveness: Choice by salience," Papers 2204.08798, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2022.

  3. Danilov, V., 2015. "Beyond Classical Rationality: Two-Stage Rationalization," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 26(2), pages 12-35.

    Cited by:

    1. Karpov, Aleksandr, 2017. "Price competition and limited attention," Economics Discussion Papers 2017-89, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).

  4. Danilov, V. & Koshevoy, G. & Lang, C., 2013. "Equilibria in Markets with Indivisible Goods," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 18(2), pages 10-34.

    Cited by:

    1. G. A. Koshevoy, 2016. "Stability of rejections and Stable Many-to-Many Matchings," Documents de recherche 16-02, Centre d'Études des Politiques Économiques (EPEE), Université d'Evry Val d'Essonne.
    2. Elizabeth Baldwin & Paul Klemperer, 2015. "Understanding Preferences: “Demand Types”, and the Existence of Equilibrium with Indivisibilities," Economics Papers 2015-W10, Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.
    3. Kazuo Murota, 2016. "Discrete convex analysis: A tool for economics and game theory," The Journal of Mechanism and Institution Design, Society for the Promotion of Mechanism and Institution Design, University of York, vol. 1(1), pages 151-273, December.
    4. Satoru Fujishige & Zaifu Yang, 2002. "Existence of an Equilibrium in a General Competitive Exchange Economy with Indivisible Goods and Money," Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, vol. 3(1), pages 135-147, May.

  5. Danilov, V., 2012. "Outcast Condition in the Choice Theory," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 13(1), pages 34-49.

    Cited by:

    1. G. A. Koshevoy, 2016. "Stability of rejections and Stable Many-to-Many Matchings," Documents de recherche 16-02, Centre d'Études des Politiques Économiques (EPEE), Université d'Evry Val d'Essonne.

  6. V. Danilov & A. Lambert-Mogiliansky, 2010. "Expected utility theory under non-classical uncertainty," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 68(1), pages 25-47, February.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  7. Danilov, V.I. & Lambert-Mogiliansky, A., 2008. "Measurable systems and behavioral sciences," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 55(3), pages 315-340, May.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  8. Danilov, V. & Koshevoy, G., 2006. "A new characterization of the path independent choice functions," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 238-245, March.

    Cited by:

    1. Yang, Yi-You, 2020. "Rationalizable choice functions," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 120-126.
    2. V. Danilov & G. Koshevoy & E. Savaglio, 2015. "Hyper-relations, choice functions, and orderings of opportunity sets," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 45(1), pages 51-69, June.
    3. Matthew Ryan, 2014. "Path independent choice and the ranking of opportunity sets," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 42(1), pages 193-213, January.

  9. Danilov, V. & Koshevoy, G., 2005. "Mathematics of Plott choice functions," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 245-272, May.

    Cited by:

    1. Samson Alva & Battal Dou{g}an, 2021. "Choice and Market Design," Papers 2110.15446, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2021.
    2. Koshevoy, Gleb & Talman, Dolf, 2014. "Solution concepts for games with general coalitional structure," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 19-30.
    3. G. A. Koshevoy, 2016. "Stability of rejections and Stable Many-to-Many Matchings," Documents de recherche 16-02, Centre d'Études des Politiques Économiques (EPEE), Université d'Evry Val d'Essonne.
    4. Christopher Chambers & Alan Miller & M. Bumin Yenmez, 2015. "Closure and Preferences," GSIA Working Papers 2015-E36, Carnegie Mellon University, Tepper School of Business.
    5. Yang, Yi-You, 2020. "Rationalizable choice functions," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 120-126.
    6. V. Danilov & G. Koshevoy & E. Savaglio, 2015. "Hyper-relations, choice functions, and orderings of opportunity sets," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 45(1), pages 51-69, June.
    7. Matthew Ryan, 2010. "Mixture sets on finite domains," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 33(2), pages 139-147, November.
    8. Danilov, V., 2021. "Stable systems of schedule contracts," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 51(3), pages 12-29.
    9. Danilov, V., 2012. "Outcast Condition in the Choice Theory," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 13(1), pages 34-49.
    10. Vladimir I. Danilov, 2024. "Sequential choice functions and stability problems," Papers 2401.00748, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2024.

  10. Danilov, V. I., 2003. "Existence of stable matchings in some three-sided systems," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 145-148, October.

    Cited by:

    1. Enrico Maria Fenoaltea & Izat B. Baybusinov & Jianyang Zhao & Lei Zhou & Yi-Cheng Zhang, 2021. "The Stable Marriage Problem: an Interdisciplinary Review from the Physicist's Perspective," Papers 2103.11458, arXiv.org.
    2. Jorge Arenas & Juan Pablo Torres-Martínez, 2023. "Reconsidering the existence of stable solutions in three-sided matching problems with mixed preferences," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 1-8, March.
    3. Somdeb Lahiri, 2004. "Pair-wise envy free and stable matchings for two-sided systems with techniques," Levine's Working Paper Archive 122247000000000123, David K. Levine.
    4. Eriksson, Kimmo & Sjostrand, Jonas & Strimling, Pontus, 2006. "Three-dimensional stable matching with cyclic preferences," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 77-87, July.
    5. Maximilian Mordig & Riccardo Della Vecchia & Nicol`o Cesa-Bianchi & Bernhard Scholkopf, 2021. "Finding Stable Matchings in PhD Markets with Consistent Preferences and Cooperative Partners," Papers 2102.11834, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2021.
    6. Lahiri, Somdeb, 2008. "Three-sided matchings and separable preferences," MPRA Paper 8660, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Combe, Julien, 2022. "Matching with ownership," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).

  11. Danilov, Vladimir & Koshevoy, Gleb & Murota, Kazuo, 2001. "Discrete convexity and equilibria in economies with indivisible goods and money," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 251-273, May.

    Cited by:

    1. Alexander Teytelboym & Shengwu Li & Scott Duke Kominers & Mohammad Akbarpour & Piotr Dworczak, 2021. "Discovering Auctions: Contributions of Paul Milgrom and Robert Wilson," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 123(3), pages 709-750, July.
    2. Ma, Jinpeng & Nie, Fusheng, 2003. "Walrasian equilibrium in an exchange economy with indivisibilities," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 159-192, October.
    3. Alessandra Casella & Aniol Llorente-Saguer & Thomas R. Palfrey, 2010. "Competitive Equilibrium in Markets for Votes," NBER Working Papers 16315, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Klemperer, Paul & Baldwin, Elizabeth & Goldberg, Paul & Lock, Edwin, 2020. "Solving Strong-Substitutes Product-Mix Auctions," CEPR Discussion Papers 14976, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    5. Yokote, Koji, 2016. "Core and competitive equilibria: An approach from discrete convex analysis," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 1-13.
    6. Itai Sher & Kyoo il Kim, 2012. "Identification of Demand Models of Multiple Purchases," Working Papers 2012-2, University of Minnesota, Department of Economics.
    7. Koshevoy, Gleb A. & Talman, Dolf, 2006. "Competitive equilibria in economies with multiple indivisible and multiple divisible commodities," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 216-226, April.
    8. Chao Huang, 2021. "Stable matching: an integer programming approach," Papers 2103.03418, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2022.
    9. Simon Finster, 2023. "Selling Multiple Complements with Packaging Costs," Papers 2306.14247, arXiv.org.
    10. Elina Robeva & Bernd Sturmfels & Ngoc Tran & Caroline Uhler, 2021. "Maximum likelihood estimation for totally positive log‐concave densities," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 48(3), pages 817-844, September.
    11. Xiaojing Xu & Jinpeng Ma & Xiaoping Xie, 2019. "Price Convergence under a Probabilistic Double Auction," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 54(3), pages 1113-1155, October.
    12. Marie-Charlotte Brandenburg & Christian Haase & Ngoc Mai Tran, 2021. "Competitive equilibrium always exists for combinatorial auctions with graphical pricing schemes," Papers 2107.08813, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2021.
    13. Danilov, Vladimir I. & Koshevoy, Gleb A. & Lang, Christine, 2008. "Equilibria with indivisible goods and package-utilities," Papers 08-30, Sonderforschungsbreich 504.
    14. Ngoc Mai Tran & Josephine Yu, 2015. "Product-Mix Auctions and Tropical Geometry," Papers 1505.05737, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2017.
    15. Elizabeth Baldwin & Omer Edhan & Ravi Jagadeesan & Paul Klemperer & Alexander Teytelboym, 2020. "The Equilibrium Existence Duality: Equilibrium with Indivisibilities & Income Effects," Papers 2006.16939, arXiv.org.
    16. Koshevoy, G.A. & Talman, A.J.J., 2006. "Competitive Equilibria in Economies with Multiple Divisible and Indivisible Commodities and No Money," Discussion Paper 2006-51, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    17. Khan, M. Ali & Sagara, Nobusumi, 2016. "Relaxed large economies with infinite-dimensional commodity spaces: The existence of Walrasian equilibria," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 95-107.
    18. Huang, Chao, 2023. "Stable matching: an integer programming approach," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 18(1), January.
    19. Elizabeth Baldwin & Paul Klemperer, 2015. "Understanding Preferences: “Demand Types”, and the Existence of Equilibrium with Indivisibilities," Economics Papers 2015-W10, Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.
    20. Xin Chen & Menglong Li, 2021. "Discrete Convex Analysis and Its Applications in Operations: A Survey," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(6), pages 1904-1926, June.
    21. Chao Huang, 2022. "Firm-worker hypergraphs," Papers 2211.06887, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2023.
    22. Cheng Guo & Merve Bodur & Joshua A. Taylor, 2021. "Copositive Duality for Discrete Markets and Games," Papers 2101.05379, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2021.
    23. Chao Huang, 2022. "Two-sided matching with firms' complementary preferences," Papers 2205.05599, arXiv.org, revised May 2022.
    24. I. Kuntsevich, 2015. "Geometry Of Economics: Volumetric Distribution Analysis Of Economic Continuity And Stability," Review of Business and Economics Studies // Review of Business and Economics Studies, Финансовый Университет // Financial University, vol. 3(4), pages 88-92.
    25. Candogan, Ozan & Epitropou, Markos & Vohra, Rakesh V., 2016. "Competitive Equilibrium and Trading Networks: A Network Flow Approach," Economics Series 323, Institute for Advanced Studies.
    26. Ozan Candogan & Markos Epitropou & Rakesh V. Vohra, 2021. "Competitive Equilibrium and Trading Networks: A Network Flow Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 69(1), pages 114-147, January.
    27. Kazuo Murota, 2016. "Discrete convex analysis: A tool for economics and game theory," The Journal of Mechanism and Institution Design, Society for the Promotion of Mechanism and Institution Design, University of York, vol. 1(1), pages 151-273, December.
    28. Yan-An Hwang & Mau-Hsiang Shih, 2007. "Equilibrium in a Market Game," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 31(2), pages 387-392, May.
    29. Inoue, Tomoki, 2008. "Indivisible commodities and the nonemptiness of the weak core," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 96-111, January.
    30. Iimura, Takuya, 2003. "A discrete fixed point theorem and its applications," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(7), pages 725-742, September.
    31. Nicholas C. Bedard & Jacob K. Goeree, 2023. "Tropical Analysis: With an Application to Indivisible Goods," Papers 2308.04593, arXiv.org.
    32. Sanghak Lee & Greg M. Allenby, 2014. "Modeling Indivisible Demand," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 364-381, May.
    33. Chao Huang, 2021. "Unidirectional substitutes and complements," Papers 2108.12572, arXiv.org.
    34. Herings, P.J.J. & Zhan, Yang, 2022. "Competitive Equilibria in Incomplete Markets with Risk Loving Preferences," Other publications TiSEM a8d79048-2351-4e73-97ce-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.

  12. Danilov, Vladimir I. & Koshevoy, Gleb A. & Sotskov, Alexandr I., 1997. "Equilibrium analysis of an economy with innovations," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 195-228, March.

    Cited by:

    1. Pieter H.M. RUYS, 2014. "Architecture of an Economy with Social Enterprises: the Relational Capacity Approach," CIRIEC Working Papers 1413, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
    2. Sanchez-Carrera Edgar J. & Travaglini Giuseppe & Ille Sebastian, 2021. "Macrodynamic Modeling of Innovation Equilibria and Traps," The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, De Gruyter, vol. 21(2), pages 659-694, June.
    3. Soloviev, Vladimir, 2009. "Экономико-Математическое Моделирование Рынка Программного Обеспечения: Монография. — М.: Вега-Инфо, 2009. — 176 С [Economic and mathematical modelling of software market]," MPRA Paper 28974, University Library of Munich, Germany.

  13. Danilov, Vladimir I., 1994. "The structure of non-manipulable social choice rules on a tree," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 123-131, April.

    Cited by:

    1. Stefano Vannucci, 2017. "Tree-Wise Single Peaked Domains," Department of Economics University of Siena 770, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    2. Chatterji, Shurojit & Sen, Arunava & Zeng, Huaxia, 2016. "A characterization of single-peaked preferences via random social choice functions," Economics and Statistics Working Papers 11-2016, Singapore Management University, School of Economics.
    3. Stefano Vannucci, 2022. "Agenda manipulation-proofness, stalemates, and redundant elicitation in preference aggregation. Exposing the bright side of Arrow's theorem," Papers 2210.03200, arXiv.org.
    4. Lars Ehlers, 2022. "Three public goods and lexicographic preferences: replacement principle," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 26(3), pages 367-384, September.
    5. Vannucci, Stefano, 2016. "Weakly unimodal domains, anti-exchange properties, and coalitional strategy-proofness of aggregation rules," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 56-67.
    6. Masashi Umezawa, 2012. "The replacement principle for the provision of multiple public goods on tree networks," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 38(2), pages 211-235, February.
    7. Sarvesh Bandhu & Bishwajyoti Mondal & Anup Pramanik, 2021. "Strategy-proofness of the unanimity with status-quo rule over restricted domains," Working Papers 2021-02, Shiv Nadar University, Department of Economics.
    8. Madhuparna Karmokar & Souvik Roy & Ton Storcken, 2021. "Necessary and sufficient conditions for pairwise majority decisions on path-connected domains," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 91(3), pages 313-336, October.
    9. Sidartha Gordon, 2015. "Unanimity in attribute-based preference domains," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 44(1), pages 13-29, January.
    10. Itai Feigenbaum & Jay Sethuraman & Chun Ye, 2017. "Approximately Optimal Mechanisms for Strategyproof Facility Location: Minimizing L p Norm of Costs," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 42(2), pages 434-447, May.
    11. Alcalde-Unzu, Jorge & Vorsatz, Marc, 2018. "Strategy-proof location of public facilities," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 21-48.
    12. Ernesto Savaglio & Stefano Vannucci, 2014. "Strategy-proofness and single-peackedness in bounded distributive lattices," Papers 1406.5120, arXiv.org.
    13. Ernesto Savaglio & Stefano Vannucci, 2021. "Strategy-Proof Aggregation Rules in Median Semilattices with Applications to Preference Aggregation," Department of Economics University of Siena 867, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    14. Ernesto Savaglio & Stefano Vannucci, 2019. "Strategy-proof aggregation rules and single peakedness in bounded distributive lattices," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 52(2), pages 295-327, February.
    15. Stefano Vannucci, 2013. "On two-valued nonsovereign strategy-proof voting rules," Department of Economics University of Siena 672, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    16. Ehlers, Lars, 2001. "Independence axioms for the provision of multiple public goods as options," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 239-250, March.
    17. Stefano Vannucci, 2015. "Network geometry and the scope of the median voter theorem," Department of Economics University of Siena 704, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    18. Agustín G Bonifacio & Jordi Massó, 2019. "On Strategy-Proofness and Semilattice Single-Peakedness," Working Papers 1087, Barcelona School of Economics.
    19. Shurojit Chatterji & Remzi Sanver & Arunava Sen, 2010. "On Domains That Admit Well-behaved Strategy-proof Social Choice Functions," Working Papers 07-2010, Singapore Management University, School of Economics.
    20. James Schummer & Rakesh V. Vohra, 1999. "Strategy-proof Location on a Network," Discussion Papers 1253, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
    21. Dominik Peters & Lan Yu & Hau Chan & Edith Elkind, 2022. "Preferences Single-Peaked on a Tree: Multiwinner Elections and Structural Results," Post-Print hal-03834509, HAL.
    22. Jordi Massó & Shurojit Chatterji, 2015. "On Strategy-proofness and the Salience of Single-peakedness," UFAE and IAE Working Papers 952.15, Unitat de Fonaments de l'Anàlisi Econòmica (UAB) and Institut d'Anàlisi Econòmica (CSIC).
    23. Vannucci, Stefano, 2020. "Single peaked domains with tree-shaped spectra," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 74-80.
    24. Ernesto Savaglio & Stefano Vannucci, 2012. "Strategy-proofness and unimodality in bounded distributive lattices," Department of Economics University of Siena 642, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    25. Stefano Vannucci, 2019. "Majority judgment and strategy-proofness: a characterization," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 48(3), pages 863-886, September.
    26. Ernesto Savaglio & Stefano Vannucci, 2022. "Strategy-proof aggregation rules in median semilattices with applications to preference aggregation," Papers 2208.12732, arXiv.org.
    27. Sidartha Gordon, 2014. "Unanimity in Attribute-Based Preference Domains," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-01061994, HAL.
    28. Hans Peters & Souvik Roy & Soumyarup Sadhukhan, 2021. "Unanimous and Strategy-Proof Probabilistic Rules for Single-Peaked Preference Profiles on Graphs," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 811-833, May.
    29. Stefano vannucci, 2012. "Unimodality and equivalence of simple and coalitional strategy-proofness in convex idempotent interval spaces," Department of Economics University of Siena 668, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    30. Sidartha Gordon, 2014. "Unanimity in Attribute-Based Preference Domains," SciencePo Working papers hal-01061994, HAL.
    31. Bettina Klaus, 2001. "Target Rules for Public Choice Economies on Tree Networks and in Euclidean Spaces," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 13-29, August.
    32. Stefano Vannucci, 2016. "Majority Judgment and Strategy-Proofness," Department of Economics University of Siena 730, Department of Economics, University of Siena.

  14. Danilov, Vladimir I. & Koshevoy, Gleb A. & Sotskov, Aleksandr I., 1994. "Equilibrium in a market of intellectual goods," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 133-144, April.

    Cited by:

    1. Danilov, Vladimir I. & Koshevoy, Gleb A. & Sotskov, Alexandr I., 1997. "Equilibrium analysis of an economy with innovations," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 195-228, March.
    2. Soloviev, Vladimir, 2009. "Экономико-Математическое Моделирование Рынка Программного Обеспечения: Монография. — М.: Вега-Инфо, 2009. — 176 С [Economic and mathematical modelling of software market]," MPRA Paper 28974, University Library of Munich, Germany.

  15. Danilov, V. I. & Sotskov, A. I., 1993. "On strongly consistent social choice functions," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 327-346.

    Cited by:

    1. Jain, Satish, 2020. "The Strong Consistency of Neutral and Monotonic Binary Social Decision Rules," MPRA Paper 109657, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Stefano Vannucci, 2006. "On Concept Lattices of Efficiently Solvable Voting Protocols," Department of Economics University of Siena 489, Department of Economics, University of Siena.

  16. Danilov, Vladimir, 1992. "Implementation via Nash Equilibria," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 60(1), pages 43-56, January.

    Cited by:

    1. Dirk Bergemann & Stephen Morris, 2009. "Rationalizable Implementation," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 1697, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    2. Pablo Amorós, 2009. "Picking the Winners," Working Papers 2009-2, Universidad de Málaga, Department of Economic Theory, Málaga Economic Theory Research Center.
    3. Claudio Mezzetti & Ludovic Renou, 2009. "Implementation in Mixed Nash Equilibrium," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 902, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
    4. Murat R. Sertel & Remzi Sanver, 2001. "Strong Equilibrium Outcomes of Voting Games are the Generalized Condorcet Winners," Working Papers 0107, Department of Economics, Bilkent University.
    5. Umut Keskin & M. Remzi Sanver & H. Berkay Tosunlu, 2021. "Recovering non-monotonicity problems of voting rules," Post-Print hal-03250759, HAL.
    6. Doghmi, Ahmed & Ziad, Abderrahmane, 2015. "Nash implementation in private good economies with single-plateaued preferences and in matching problems," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 32-39.
    7. Shinotsuka, Tomoichi & Takamiya, Koji, 2003. "The weak core of simple games with ordinal preferences: implementation in Nash equilibrium," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 379-389, August.
    8. Ahmed Doghmi & Abderrahmane Ziad, 2013. "Nash Implementation in Private Good Economies with Single-Plateaued Preferences," Economics Working Paper Archive (University of Rennes 1 & University of Caen) 201311, Center for Research in Economics and Management (CREM), University of Rennes 1, University of Caen and CNRS.
    9. Kara, Tarik & Sonmez, Tayfun, 1996. "Nash Implementation of Matching Rules," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 425-439, February.
    10. Jackson Matthew O. & Palfrey Thomas R. & Srivastava Sanjay, 1994. "Undominated Nash Implementation in Bounded Mechanisms," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 6(3), pages 474-501, May.
    11. Lombardi, Michele & Yoshihara, Naoki & 吉原, 直毅 & ヨシハラ, ナオキ, 2011. "Partially-honest Nash implementation: Characterization results," Discussion Paper Series 555, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    12. Yamato, Takehiko, 1999. "Nash implementation and double implementation: equivalence theorems1," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 215-238, March.
    13. R Jain & V Korpela & M Lombardi, 2022. "Two-Player Rationalizable Implementation," Working Papers 202228, University of Liverpool, Department of Economics.
    14. Olivier Bochet, 2007. "Nash Implementation with Lottery Mechanisms," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 28(1), pages 111-125, January.
    15. Korpela, Ville, 2010. "Nash implementation theory -- A note on full characterizations," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 108(3), pages 283-285, September.
    16. Pablo Amorós, 2015. "Subgame perfect implementation of the deserving winner of a competition with natural mechanisms," Working Papers 2015-04, Universidad de Málaga, Department of Economic Theory, Málaga Economic Theory Research Center.
    17. Guoqiang Tian, 1999. "Bayesian implementation in exchange economies with state dependent preferences and feasible sets," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 16(1), pages 99-119.
    18. Diss, Mostapha & Doghmi, Ahmed & Tlidi, Abdelmonaim, 2016. "Strategy proofness and unanimity in many-to-one matching markets," MPRA Paper 75927, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 08 Dec 2016.
    19. Jinpeng Ma, 1998. "Stable Matchings and the Small Core in Nash Equilibrium in the College Admissions Problem," Discussion Papers 1247, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
    20. Korpela, Ville & Lombardi, Michele & Vartiainen, Hannu, 2019. "Do Coalitions Matter in Designing Institutions?," MPRA Paper 91474, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    21. Xiong, Siyang, 2021. "Designing referenda: An economist's pessimistic perspective," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    22. William Thomson, 2010. "Implementation of solutions to the problem of fair division when preferences are single-peaked," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, March.
    23. Ahmed Doghmi & Abderrahmane Ziad, 2008. "Nash implementation in exchange economies with single-peaked preferences," Post-Print halshs-00337149, HAL.
    24. Dawen Meng & Guoqiang Tian & Zhe Yang, 2017. "Two-agent collusion-proof implementation with correlation and arbitrage," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 21(3), pages 177-229, September.
    25. İpek Özkal-Sanver & M. Sanver, 2006. "Nash implementation via hyperfunctions," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 26(3), pages 607-623, June.
    26. Saijo, Tatsuyoshi & Tatamitani, Yoshikatsu & Yamato, Takehiko, 1996. "Toward Natural Implementation," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 37(4), pages 949-980, November.
    27. Lombardi, Michele & Yoshihara, Naoki & 吉原, 直毅 & ヨシハラ, ナオキ, 2011. "A Full Characterization of Nash Implementation with Strategy Space Reduction," Discussion Paper Series a548, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    28. Mohammad Rasouli & Demosthenis Teneketzis, 2021. "Economizing the Uneconomic: Markets for Reliable, Sustainable, and Price Efficient Electricity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-38, April.
    29. Claus-Jochen Haake & Walter Trockel, 2010. "On Maskin monotonicity of solution based social choice rules," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 14(1), pages 17-25, March.
    30. Zhou, Lin, 2008. "Nash implementation in pure public good economies," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 99(3), pages 470-473, June.
    31. Eyal Winter & Bezalel Peleg, 2002. "original papers : Constitutional implementation," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 7(2), pages 187-204.
    32. Matteo Triossi & María Haydée Fonseca-Mairena, 2019. "Incentives and implementation in marriage markets with externalities," Documentos de Trabajo 345, Centro de Economía Aplicada, Universidad de Chile.
    33. Rene Saran & Norovsambuu Tumennasan, 2011. "Whose Opinion Counts? Political Processes and the Implementation Problem," Economics Working Papers 2011-06, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    34. Oswald, James I. & Oswald, Andrew J. & Ashraf-Ball, Hezlin, 2009. "Hydrogen Transport and the Spatial Requirements of Renewable Energy," Economic Research Papers 271297, University of Warwick - Department of Economics.
    35. Eric Maskin & Tomas Sjostrom, 2001. "Implementation Theory," Economics Working Papers 0006, Institute for Advanced Study, School of Social Science.
    36. Bertrand Tchantcho & Lawrence Diffo Lambo, 2008. "A characterization of social choice correspondences that implement the core of simple games," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 37(3), pages 533-542, December.
    37. Michele Lombardi, 2012. "Nash implementation via simple stochastic mechanisms: strategy space reduction," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 16(4), pages 297-309, December.
    38. Bilge Yilmaz & Murat R. Sertel, 1999. "The majoritarian compromise is majoritarian-optimal and subgame-perfect implementable," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 16(4), pages 615-627.
    39. Matthew O. Jackson, 2001. "A crash course in implementation theory," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 18(4), pages 655-708.
    40. Doghmi Ahmed, 2016. "On Nash Implementability in Allotment Economies under Domain Restrictions with Indifference," The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 16(2), pages 767-795, June.
    41. Ascensión Andina Díaz & José A. García-Martínez, 2015. "A theory of media self-silence," Working Papers 2015-05, Universidad de Málaga, Department of Economic Theory, Málaga Economic Theory Research Center.
    42. Doghmi Ahmed, 2013. "Nash Implementation in Private Good Economies when Preferences are Single-Dipped with Best Indifferent Allocations," Mathematical Economics Letters, De Gruyter, vol. 1(1), pages 35-42, October.
    43. Sonmez, T., 1995. "Implementation in Generalized Matching Problems," Papers 95-03, Michigan - Center for Research on Economic & Social Theory.
    44. Bezalel Peleg & Ariel D. Procaccia, 2007. "Implementation by Mediated Equilibrium," Discussion Paper Series dp463, The Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
    45. Corchón, Luis C., 2008. "The theory of implementation : what did we learn?," UC3M Working papers. Economics we081207, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía.
    46. Ahmed Doghmi & Abderrahmane ZIAD, 2012. "On Partial Honesty Nash Implementation," Economics Working Paper Archive (University of Rennes 1 & University of Caen) 201201, Center for Research in Economics and Management (CREM), University of Rennes 1, University of Caen and CNRS.
    47. Kumano, Taro, 2017. "Nash implementation of constrained efficient stable matchings under weak priorities," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 230-240.
    48. Meng, Dawen & Tian, Guoqiang, 2014. "Collusion-Proof Mechanism Design in Two-Agent Nonlinear Pricing Environments," MPRA Paper 57931, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    49. Amorós, Pablo, 2019. "Choosing the winner of a competition using natural mechanisms: Conditions based on the jury," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 26-38.
    50. Korpela, Ville, 2013. "A simple sufficient condition for strong implementation," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 148(5), pages 2183-2193.
    51. Iwase, Yusuke & Tsuruta, Shoya & Yoshimura, Akina, 2022. "Nash implementation on the basis of general priorities," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 368-379.
    52. Pablo Amorós, 2014. "Conditions on the jury for the natural implementation of the deserving winner of a contest," Working Papers 2014-01, Universidad de Málaga, Department of Economic Theory, Málaga Economic Theory Research Center.
    53. Sang-Chul Suh, 1996. "An algorithm for checking strong Nash implementability," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 109-122.
    54. M. Sanver & William Zwicker, 2009. "One-way monotonicity as a form of strategy-proofness," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 38(4), pages 553-574, November.
    55. Doğan, Battal, 2017. "Eliciting the socially optimal allocation from responsible agents," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 103-110.
    56. Ehlers, Lars, 2004. "Monotonic and implementable solutions in generalized matching problems," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 114(2), pages 358-369, February.
    57. Ahmed Doghmi & Abderrahmane Ziad, 2008. "Reexamination of Maskin's Theorem on Nash implementability," Post-Print halshs-00337154, HAL.
    58. Koray, Semih & Yildiz, Kemal, 2018. "Implementation via rights structures," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 479-502.
    59. Ziad, Abderrahmane, 1997. "On the necessary and sufficient conditions for Nash implementation," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 209-213, October.
    60. Ahmed Doghmi, 2013. "Nash Implementation in an Allocation Problem with Single-Dipped Preferences," Games, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-12, January.
    61. Klaus Nehring & Massimiliano Marcellino, 2003. "Monotonicity Implies Strategy-Proofness For Correspondences," Working Papers 193, University of California, Davis, Department of Economics.
    62. Benoit, Jean-Pierre & Ok, Efe A., 2006. "Maskin's Theorem with limited veto power," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 331-339, May.
    63. Suh, Sang-Chul, 2001. "An algorithm for verifying double implementability in Nash and strong Nash equilibria," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 103-110, January.
    64. Saran, Rene & Tumennasan, Norovsambuu, 2013. "Whose opinion counts? Implementation by sortition," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 72-84.
    65. Benoît, Jean-Pierre & Ok, Efe A., 2008. "Nash implementation without no-veto power," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 51-67, September.
    66. Ziad, Abderrahmane, 1998. "A new necessary condition for Nash implementation," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 381-387, May.
    67. Stefanescu, Anton & Ferrara, Massimiliano, 2006. "Implementation of voting operators," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 315-324, June.
    68. Suh, Sang-Chul, 1996. "Implementation with coalition formation: A complete characterization," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 409-428.
    69. Ismail Saglam, 2007. "A Unified Theory of Implementation," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 4(20), pages 1-10.

  17. Danilov, V. I. & Sotskov, A. I., 1990. "A generalized economic equilibrium," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 341-356.

    Cited by:

    1. Florig, Michael, 2001. "Hierarchic competitive equilibria," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 515-546, July.
    2. Mertens, J. F., 2003. "The limit-price mechanism," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(5-6), pages 433-528, July.
    3. Grilo, Isabel & Mertens, Jean-François, 2009. "Cournot equilibrium without apology: Existence and the Cournot inverse demand function," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 142-175, January.
    4. W D A Bryant, 2009. "General Equilibrium:Theory and Evidence," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number 6875, January.
    5. Konovalov, Alexander & Marakulin, Valeri, 2006. "Equilibria without the survival assumption," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 198-215, April.
    6. Giraud, Gael, 2003. "Strategic market games: an introduction," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(5-6), pages 355-375, July.
    7. Dubey, Pradeep & Geanakoplos, John, 2003. "From Nash to Walras via Shapley-Shubik," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(5-6), pages 391-400, July.
    8. Michael Florig & Jorge Rivera, 2017. "Walrasian equilibrium as limit of competitive equilibria without divisible goods," Working Papers wp451, University of Chile, Department of Economics.
    9. Konovalov, A. & Marakulin, V., 2001. "Equilibria Without the Survival Assumption : A Non-Standard Analysis Approach," Other publications TiSEM 2f659b7a-b0d1-4e86-ba44-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    10. Florig, Michael & Rivera, Jorge, 2019. "Walrasian equilibrium as limit of competitive equilibria without divisible goods," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 1-8.
    11. Florig, Michael, 1998. "A note on different concepts of generalized equilibria," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 245-254, April.
    12. Konovalov, A. & Marakulin, V., 2002. "Generalized equilibrium in an economy without the survival assumption," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2002-49, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    13. Paul Oslington, 2012. "General Equilibrium: Theory and Evidence," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 88(282), pages 446-448, September.

  18. Danilov, Vladimir I., 1987. "Aggregation of dichotomic preferences," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 49-58, February.

    Cited by:

    1. Fuad Aleskerov, 2005. "The history of social choice in Russia and the Soviet Union," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 25(2), pages 419-431, December.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.