Testing Quantum-like Models of Judgment for Question Order Effects
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Other versions of this item:
- Boyer-Kassem, Thomas & Duchêne, Sébastien & Guerci, Eric, 2016. "Testing quantum-like models of judgment for question order effect," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 33-46.
- Thomas Boyer-Kassem & Sébastien Duchêne & Eric Guerci, 2016. "Testing quantum-like models of judgment for question order effect," Post-Print halshs-01289003, HAL.
References listed on IDEAS
- Danilov, V.I. & Lambert-Mogiliansky, A., 2008.
"Measurable systems and behavioral sciences,"
Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 55(3), pages 315-340, May.
- Vladimir Ivanovitch Danilov & Ariane Lambert-Mogiliansky, 2008. "Measurable systems and behavioral sciences," Post-Print halshs-00754291, HAL.
- Vladimir Ivanovitch Danilov & Ariane Lambert-Mogiliansky, 2008. "Measurable systems and behavioral sciences," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-00754291, HAL.
- V. Yukalov & D. Sornette, 2011. "Decision theory with prospect interference and entanglement," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 70(3), pages 283-328, March.
- Aerts, Diederik & Broekaert, Jan & Czachor, Marek & D'Hooghe, Bart, 2011. "A Quantum-Conceptual Explanation of Violations of Expected Utility in Economics," MPRA Paper 41792, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- V. Danilov & A. Lambert-Mogiliansky, 2010.
"Expected utility theory under non-classical uncertainty,"
Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 68(1), pages 25-47, February.
- Vladimir Ivanovitch Danilov & Ariane Lambert-Mogiliansky, 2010. "Expected utility theory under non-classical uncertainty," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-00754482, HAL.
- Vladimir Ivanovitch Danilov & Ariane Lambert-Mogiliansky, 2010. "Expected utility theory under non-classical uncertainty," Post-Print halshs-00754482, HAL.
- Daniel Ellsberg, 1961. "Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 75(4), pages 643-669.
- Jérôme Busemeyer & Ariane Lambert-Mogiliansky & Zheng Wang, 2009. "Empirical Comparison of Markov and Quantum models of decision-making," Post-Print halshs-00754332, HAL.
- Ariane Lambert Mogiliansky & Shmuel Zamir & Herve Zwirn, 2003.
"Type Indeterminacy: A Model of the KT(Kahneman-Tversky)-man,"
Discussion Paper Series
dp343, The Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
- Ariane Lambert-Mogiliansky & Schmuel Zamir & Hervé Zwirn, 2009. "Type indeterminacy - A Model of the KT(Khaneman Tversky)- Man," Post-Print halshs-00754333, HAL.
- Ashtiani, Mehrdad & Azgomi, Mohammad Abdollahi, 2015. "A survey of quantum-like approaches to decision making and cognition," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 49-80.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Thomas Boyer-Kassem & Sébastien Duchêne & Eric Guerci, 2016.
"Quantum-like models cannot account for the conjunction fallacy,"
Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 81(4), pages 479-510, November.
- Thomas Boyer-Kassem & Sébastien Duchêne & Eric Guerci, 2015. "Quantum-like Models Cannot Account for the Conjunction Fallacy," GREDEG Working Papers 2015-41, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
- Thomas Boyer-Kassem & Sébastien Duchêne & Eric Guerci, 2016. "Quantum-like models cannot account for the conjunction fallacy," Post-Print hal-01380684, HAL.
More about this item
Keywords
Order effects; Decision theory; Quantum probability;JEL classification:
- C10 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - General
- C40 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - General
- C44 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Operations Research; Statistical Decision Theory
- D03 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Behavioral Microeconomics: Underlying Principles
NEP fields
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:- NEP-ECM-2015-02-05 (Econometrics)
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gre:wpaper:2015-06. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Patrice Bougette). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/credcfr.html .
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.