IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v389y2025ics0306261925000819.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy in turmoil: Industry resilience to uncertainty during the global energy crisis

Author

Listed:
  • Szczygielski, Jan Jakub
  • Charteris, Ailie
  • Obojska, Lidia
  • Brzeszczyński, Janusz

Abstract

We investigate the resilience of global industry groups to energy price uncertainty (ENPU) during the global energy crisis. Diversified financials reflect the greatest return response, being vulnerable to investment delays and discretionary spending, whereas industry groups producing necessities are most resilient. Volatility triggering is highest for automobiles & components due to ambiguous risk-return prospects requiring greater investor learning whereas the food & staples retailing group is most resilient. Differences in ranked return and volatility responses point towards distinct transmission channels. We expound a measure, the ‘Overall Impact of Uncertainty’ (OIU), that considers both effects jointly and reflects a dominant effect. According to the OIU, the most and least impacted groups are automobiles & components and food & staples retailing, respectively. Energy prices have a relatively weak impact relative to ENPU, suggesting that ENPU reflects a broader transmission channel, encompassing other forms of uncertainty.

Suggested Citation

  • Szczygielski, Jan Jakub & Charteris, Ailie & Obojska, Lidia & Brzeszczyński, Janusz, 2025. "Energy in turmoil: Industry resilience to uncertainty during the global energy crisis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 389(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:389:y:2025:i:c:s0306261925000819
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125351
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925000819
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125351?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:389:y:2025:i:c:s0306261925000819. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.