IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/e/pga159.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Bernhard Ganglmair

Personal Details

First Name:Bernhard
Middle Name:
Last Name:Ganglmair
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pga159
http://sites.google.com/site/bganglmair
ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research L7 1 68161 Mannheim Germany
Twitter: @ganglmair
Terminal Degree:2010 Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre; Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät; Universität Zürich (from RePEc Genealogy)

Affiliation

(80%) Leibniz-Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung (ZEW)

Mannheim, Germany
http://www.zew.de/

+49/621/1235-01
+49/621/1235-224
L 7,1; D - 68161 Mannheim
RePEc:edi:zemande (more details at EDIRC)

(20%) Abteilung für Volkswirtschaftslehre
Universität Mannheim

Mannheim, Germany
http://www2.vwl.uni-mannheim.de/

+49 621 181 1776
+49 621 181 1774
68131 Mannheim
RePEc:edi:fvmande (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles Chapters

Working papers

  1. Bernhard Ganglmair & Imke Reimers, 2019. "Visibility of Technology and Cumulative Innovation: Evidence from Trade Secrets Laws," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2019_119, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
  2. Ganglmair, Bernhard & Holcomb, Alex & Myung, Noah, 2019. "Expectations of reciprocity when competitors share information: Experimental evidence," ZEW Discussion Papers 19-032, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
  3. Bernhard Ganglmair & Timothy Simcoe & Emanuele Tarantino, 2018. "Learning When to Quit: An Empirical Model of Experimentation in Standards Development," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2018_041, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
  4. Bernhard Ganglmair & Timothy Simcoe & Emanuele Tarantino, 2018. "Learning When to Quit: An Empirical Model of Experimentation," NBER Working Papers 24358, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  5. Bernhard Ganglmair & Alex Holcomb & Noah Myung, 2018. "Expectations of Reciprocity and Feedback when Competitors Share Information: Experimental Evidence," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2018_040, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
  6. Froeb, Luke M. & Ganglmair, Bernhard & Tschantz, Steven, 2016. "Adversarial decision-making: Choosing between models constructed by interested parties," MPRA Paper 71501, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  7. Ganglmair, Bernhard & Holcomb, Alex & Myung, Noah, 2016. "Cutthroats or comrades: Information sharing among competing fund managers," MPRA Paper 71506, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  8. Bernhard Ganglmair & Emanuele Tarantino, 2011. "Patent Disclosure in Standard Setting," Working Papers 11-15, NET Institute.

Articles

  1. Ganglmair, Bernhard & Holcomb, Alex & Myung, Noah, 2020. "Expectations of reciprocity when competitors share information: Experimental evidence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 244-267.
  2. Bernhard Ganglmair, 2018. "Installment Contracts and Material Breach," Supreme Court Economic Review, University of Chicago Press, vol. 26(1), pages 1-46.
  3. Bernhard Ganglmair, 2017. "Efficient Material Breach of Contract," Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 33(3), pages 507-540.
  4. Luke M. Froeb & Bernhard Ganglmair & Steven Tschantz, 2016. "Adversarial Decision Making: Choosing between Models Constructed by Interested Parties," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 59(3), pages 527-548.
  5. Bernhard Ganglmair & Emanuele Tarantino, 2014. "Conversation with secrets," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 45(2), pages 273-302, June.
  6. Bernhard Ganglmair & Luke M. Froeb & Gregory J. Werden, 2012. "Patent Hold-Up and Antitrust: How A Well-Intentioned Rule Could Retard Innovation," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(2), pages 249-273, June.

Chapters

  1. Bernhard Ganglmair & Emanuele Tarantino, 2012. "Patent Disclosure in Standard Setting," NBER Chapters, in: Standards, Patents and Innovations, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Bernhard Ganglmair & Imke Reimers, 2019. "Visibility of Technology and Cumulative Innovation: Evidence from Trade Secrets Laws," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2019_119, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.

    Cited by:

    1. Daniel P. Gross, 2019. "The Consequences of Invention Secrecy: Evidence from the USPTO Patent Secrecy Program in World War II," NBER Working Papers 25545, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

  2. Bernhard Ganglmair & Timothy Simcoe & Emanuele Tarantino, 2018. "Learning When to Quit: An Empirical Model of Experimentation in Standards Development," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2018_041, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.

    Cited by:

    1. Baron, Justus, 2020. "Counting standard contributions to measure the value of patent portfolios - A tale of apples and oranges," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(3).

  3. Bernhard Ganglmair & Timothy Simcoe & Emanuele Tarantino, 2018. "Learning When to Quit: An Empirical Model of Experimentation," NBER Working Papers 24358, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    Cited by:

    1. Baron, Justus, 2020. "Counting standard contributions to measure the value of patent portfolios - A tale of apples and oranges," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(3).

  4. Froeb, Luke M. & Ganglmair, Bernhard & Tschantz, Steven, 2016. "Adversarial decision-making: Choosing between models constructed by interested parties," MPRA Paper 71501, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Cited by:

    1. Bar, Talia & Kalinowski, Jesse, 2019. "Patent validity and the timing of settlements," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    2. Guerra Alice & Luppi Barbara & Parisi Francesco, 2019. "Standards of Proof and Civil Litigation: A Game-Theoretic Analysis," The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 19(1), pages 1-19, January.
    3. Yves Oytana & Nathalie Chappe, 2018. "Expert opinion in a tort litigation game," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 67-107, August.

  5. Bernhard Ganglmair & Emanuele Tarantino, 2011. "Patent Disclosure in Standard Setting," Working Papers 11-15, NET Institute.

    Cited by:

    1. Bernhard Ganglmair & Emanuele Tarantino, 2014. "Conversation with secrets," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 45(2), pages 273-302, June.
    2. Baron, Justus & Ménière, Yann & Pohlmann, Tim, 2014. "Standards, consortia, and innovation," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 22-35.
    3. Justus Baron & Yann Ménière & Tim Pohlmann, 2012. "Joint innovation in ICT standards: How consortia drive the volume of patent filings," Working Papers hal-00707291, HAL.

Articles

  1. Bernhard Ganglmair, 2018. "Installment Contracts and Material Breach," Supreme Court Economic Review, University of Chicago Press, vol. 26(1), pages 1-46.

    Cited by:

    1. Bernhard Ganglmair, 2008. "Breakup of Repeat Transaction Contracts, Specific Investment, and Efficient Rent-Seeking," JEPS Working Papers 08-001, JEPS.

  2. Bernhard Ganglmair, 2017. "Efficient Material Breach of Contract," Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 33(3), pages 507-540.

    Cited by:

    1. Alessandro De Chiara, 2018. "Courts' Decisions, Cooperative Investments, and Incomplete Contracts," CEU Working Papers 2018_5, Department of Economics, Central European University.

  3. Luke M. Froeb & Bernhard Ganglmair & Steven Tschantz, 2016. "Adversarial Decision Making: Choosing between Models Constructed by Interested Parties," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 59(3), pages 527-548.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  4. Bernhard Ganglmair & Emanuele Tarantino, 2014. "Conversation with secrets," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 45(2), pages 273-302, June.

    Cited by:

    1. Bernhard Ganglmair & Timothy Simcoe & Emanuele Tarantino, 2018. "Learning When to Quit: An Empirical Model of Experimentation," NBER Working Papers 24358, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Ganglmair, Bernhard & Holcomb, Alex & Myung, Noah, 2016. "Cutthroats or comrades: Information sharing among competing fund managers," MPRA Paper 71506, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Ganglmair, Bernhard & Holcomb, Alex & Myung, Noah, 2019. "Expectations of reciprocity when competitors share information: Experimental evidence," ZEW Discussion Papers 19-032, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    4. Wioletta Dziuda & Ronen Gradwohl, 2013. "Achieving Cooperation under Privacy Concerns," Discussion Papers 1572, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
    5. Justus Baron & Jorge Contreras & Martin Husovec & Pierre Larouche, 2019. "Making the Rules: The Governance of Standard Development Organizations and their Policies on Intellectual Property Rights," JRC Working Papers JRC115004, Joint Research Centre (Seville site).
    6. Kang, Byeongwoo & Bekkers, Rudi, 2015. "Just-in-time patents and the development of standards," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(10), pages 1948-1961.
    7. Honryo, Takakazu, 2018. "Dynamic persuasion," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 36-58.

  5. Bernhard Ganglmair & Luke M. Froeb & Gregory J. Werden, 2012. "Patent Hold-Up and Antitrust: How A Well-Intentioned Rule Could Retard Innovation," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(2), pages 249-273, June.

    Cited by:

    1. Pierre Larouche & Florian Schuett, 2019. "Repeated interaction in standard setting," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(3), pages 488-509, June.
    2. Schmitz, Patrick W, 2012. "Incomplete contracts and optimal ownership of public goods," CEPR Discussion Papers 9141, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    3. Alexander Galetovic & Stephen Haber & Ross Levine, 2015. "An Empirical Examination Of Patent Holdup," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 11(3), pages 549-578.
    4. Martimort, D. & Poudou, J.-C. & Sand-Zantman, W., 2006. "Contracting for an Innovation under Bilateral Asymmetric Information," Cahiers du LASER (LASER Working Papers) 2006.19, LASER (Laboratoire de Science Economique de Richter), Faculty of Economics, University of Montpellier 1.
    5. Bernhard Ganglmair & Emanuele Tarantino, 2014. "Conversation with secrets," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 45(2), pages 273-302, June.
    6. Anne Layne-Farrar & Gerard Llobet, 2012. "Payments and Participation: The Incentives to Join Cooperative Standard Setting Efforts," Working Papers wp2012_1203, CEMFI.
    7. Vilen Lipatov & Gregor Langus & Damien Neven, 2013. "Standard Essential Patents: who is really holding up (and when)?," IHEID Working Papers 04-2013, Economics Section, The Graduate Institute of International Studies.
    8. Bernhard Ganglmair & Emanuele Tarantino, 2011. "Patent Disclosure in Standard Setting," Working Papers 11-15, NET Institute.
    9. Schmitz, Patrick W., 2013. "Bargaining position, bargaining power, and the property rights approach," MPRA Paper 44953, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Horn, Henrik, 2020. "International Jurisdiction over Standard-Essential Patents," Working Paper Series 1314, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    11. Jeon, Haejun & Nishihara, Michi, 2018. "Optimal patent policy in the presence of vertical separation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(2), pages 682-697.
    12. Justus Baron & Jorge Contreras & Martin Husovec & Pierre Larouche, 2019. "Making the Rules: The Governance of Standard Development Organizations and their Policies on Intellectual Property Rights," JRC Working Papers JRC115004, Joint Research Centre (Seville site).
    13. Boone, Jan & Schuett, Florian & Tarantino, E., 2019. "Price Commitments in Standard Setting under Asymmetric Information," Discussion Paper 2019-004, Tilburg University, Tilburg Law and Economic Center.
    14. Reisinger, Markus & Tarantino, Emanuele, 2016. "Patent Pools in Input Markets," CEPR Discussion Papers 11512, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    15. Jay Pil Choi, 2014. "FRAND Royalties and Injunctions for Standard Essential Patents," CESifo Working Paper Series 5012, CESifo.
    16. Layne-Farrar, Anne & Llobet, Gerard, 2014. "Moving beyond simple examples: Assessing the incremental value rule within standards," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 57-69.
    17. Baron, Justus, 2020. "Counting standard contributions to measure the value of patent portfolios - A tale of apples and oranges," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(3).

Chapters

  1. Bernhard Ganglmair & Emanuele Tarantino, 2012. "Patent Disclosure in Standard Setting," NBER Chapters, in: Standards, Patents and Innovations, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    See citations under working paper version above.Sorry, no citations of chapters recorded.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

List Editorship

This author manages the following RePEc Biblio topics, reading lists or publication compilations:
  1. RePEc Biblio > Law and Economics

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 10 papers announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-GTH: Game Theory (4) 2016-06-14 2016-06-14 2019-01-28 2019-09-09. Author is listed
  2. NEP-EXP: Experimental Economics (3) 2016-06-14 2019-01-28 2019-09-09. Author is listed
  3. NEP-INO: Innovation (3) 2011-11-28 2012-04-23 2019-09-16. Author is listed
  4. NEP-IPR: Intellectual Property Rights (3) 2011-11-28 2012-04-23 2019-09-16. Author is listed
  5. NEP-COM: Industrial Competition (2) 2011-11-28 2012-04-23
  6. NEP-CTA: Contract Theory & Applications (2) 2011-11-28 2012-04-23
  7. NEP-IND: Industrial Organization (2) 2011-11-28 2012-04-23
  8. NEP-PPM: Project, Program & Portfolio Management (2) 2018-03-19 2018-03-26
  9. NEP-TID: Technology & Industrial Dynamics (2) 2012-04-23 2019-09-16
  10. NEP-DCM: Discrete Choice Models (1) 2019-01-28
  11. NEP-FMK: Financial Markets (1) 2016-06-14
  12. NEP-ICT: Information & Communication Technologies (1) 2018-03-26
  13. NEP-LAW: Law & Economics (1) 2016-06-14
  14. NEP-MIC: Microeconomics (1) 2016-06-14
  15. NEP-SBM: Small Business Management (1) 2019-09-16

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Bernhard Ganglmair should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.