IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/e/pga159.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Bernhard Ganglmair

Personal Details

First Name:Bernhard
Middle Name:
Last Name:Ganglmair
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pga159
https://bganglmair.github.io
ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research L7 1 68161 Mannheim Germany
Twitter: @ganglmair
Terminal Degree:2010 Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre; Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät; Universität Zürich (from RePEc Genealogy)

Affiliation

(47%) Leibniz-Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung (ZEW)

Mannheim, Germany
http://www.zew.de/
RePEc:edi:zemande (more details at EDIRC)

(47%) Abteilung für Volkswirtschaftslehre
Universität Mannheim

Mannheim, Germany
http://www2.vwl.uni-mannheim.de/
RePEc:edi:fvmande (more details at EDIRC)

(6%) Mannheim Centre for Competition and Innovation (MaCCI)

Mannheim, Germany
https://www.macci-mannheim.eu/
RePEc:edi:maccide (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles Chapters Books

Working papers

  1. Ganglmair, Bernhard & Robinson, W. Keith & Seeligson, Michael, 2022. "The rise of process claims: Evidence from a century of U.S. patents," ZEW Discussion Papers 22-011, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
  2. Justus A. Baron & Bernhard Ganglmair & Nicola Persico & Timothy Simcoe & Emanuele Tarantino, 2021. "Representation is Not Sufficient for Selecting Gender Diversity," NBER Working Papers 28649, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  3. Bernhard Ganglmair & Christian Helmers & Brian J. Love, 2020. "The Effect of Patent Litigation Insurance: Theory and Evidence From NPEs," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2020_196, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
  4. Ganglmair, Bernhard & Kann, Alexander & Tsanko, Ilona, 2020. "Markups for consumers," ZEW Discussion Papers 20-079, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
  5. Ganglmair, Bernhard & Holcomb, Alex & Myung, Noah, 2019. "Expectations of reciprocity when competitors share information: Experimental evidence," ZEW Discussion Papers 19-032, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
  6. Ganglmair, Bernhard & Reimers, Imke, 2019. "Visibility of technology and cumulative innovation: Evidence from trade secrets laws," ZEW Discussion Papers 19-035, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
  7. Bernhard Ganglmair & Timothy Simcoe & Emanuele Tarantino, 2018. "Learning When to Quit: An Empirical Model of Experimentation in Standards Development," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2018_041, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
  8. Bernhard Ganglmair & Timothy Simcoe & Emanuele Tarantino, 2018. "Learning When to Quit: An Empirical Model of Experimentation," NBER Working Papers 24358, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  9. Bernhard Ganglmair & Alex Holcomb & Noah Myung, 2018. "Expectations of Reciprocity and Feedback When Competitors Share Information: Experimental Evidence," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2018_040, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
  10. Froeb, Luke M. & Ganglmair, Bernhard & Tschantz, Steven, 2016. "Adversarial decision-making: Choosing between models constructed by interested parties," MPRA Paper 71501, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  11. Ganglmair, Bernhard & Holcomb, Alex & Myung, Noah, 2016. "Cutthroats or comrades: Information sharing among competing fund managers," MPRA Paper 71506, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  12. Bernhard Ganglmair & Emanuele Tarantino, 2011. "Patent Disclosure in Standard Setting," Working Papers 11-15, NET Institute.

Articles

  1. Ganglmair Bernhard & Kann Alexander & Tsanko Ilona, 2021. "Markups for Consumers," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 241(5-6), pages 701-734, November.
  2. Ganglmair, Bernhard & Holcomb, Alex & Myung, Noah, 2020. "Expectations of reciprocity when competitors share information: Experimental evidence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 244-267.
  3. Bernhard Ganglmair, 2018. "Installment Contracts and Material Breach," Supreme Court Economic Review, University of Chicago Press, vol. 26(1), pages 1-46.
  4. Bernhard Ganglmair, 2017. "Efficient Material Breach of Contract," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 33(3), pages 507-540.
  5. Luke M. Froeb & Bernhard Ganglmair & Steven Tschantz, 2016. "Adversarial Decision Making: Choosing between Models Constructed by Interested Parties," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 59(3), pages 527-548.
  6. Bernhard Ganglmair & Emanuele Tarantino, 2014. "Conversation with secrets," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 45(2), pages 273-302, June.
  7. Bernhard Ganglmair & Luke M. Froeb & Gregory J. Werden, 2012. "Patent Hold-Up and Antitrust: How A Well-Intentioned Rule Could Retard Innovation," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(2), pages 249-273, June.

Chapters

  1. Bernhard Ganglmair & Emanuele Tarantino, 2012. "Patent Disclosure in Standard Setting," NBER Chapters, in: Standards, Patents and Innovations, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

Books

  1. Ganglmair, Bernhard & Hahn, Nadine & Hellwig, Michael & Kann, Alexander & Peters, Bettina & Tsanko, Ilona, 2020. "Price markups, innovation, and productivity: Evidence from Germany," ZEW Expertises, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, volume 8, number 222995.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Bernhard Ganglmair & Christian Helmers & Brian J. Love, 2020. "The Effect of Patent Litigation Insurance: Theory and Evidence From NPEs," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2020_196, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.

    Cited by:

    1. Bernhard Ganglmair & Christian Helmers & Brian J. Love, 2020. "The Effect of Patent Litigation Insurance: Theory and Evidence From NPEs," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2020_196, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
    2. Juranek, Steffen & Otneim, Håkon, 2021. "Using machine learning to predict patent lawsuits," Discussion Papers 2021/6, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science.

  2. Ganglmair, Bernhard & Holcomb, Alex & Myung, Noah, 2019. "Expectations of reciprocity when competitors share information: Experimental evidence," ZEW Discussion Papers 19-032, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Stefani, Silvana & Ausloos, Marcel & González-Concepción, Concepción & Sonubi, Adeyemi & Gil-Fariña, Ma Candelaria & Pestano-Gabino, Celina & Moretto, Enrico, 2021. "Competing or collaborating, with no symmetrical behaviour: Leadership opportunities and winning strategies under stability," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 489-504.

  3. Ganglmair, Bernhard & Reimers, Imke, 2019. "Visibility of technology and cumulative innovation: Evidence from trade secrets laws," ZEW Discussion Papers 19-035, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Rammer, Christian, 2022. "Measuring process innovation output: Results from firm-level panel data," ZEW Discussion Papers 22-002, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    2. Daniel P. Gross, 2019. "The Hidden Costs of Securing Innovation: The Manifold Impacts of Compulsory Invention Secrecy," NBER Working Papers 25545, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Alexander M. Danzer & Carsten Feuerbaum & Fabian Gaessler, 2020. "Labor Supply and Automation Innovation," CESifo Working Paper Series 8410, CESifo.
    4. Gaetan de Rassenfosse & Gabriele Pellegrino & Emilio Raiteri, 2020. "Do Patents Enable Disclosure? Evidence from the Invention Secrecy Act," Working Papers 9, Chair of Innovation and IP Policy.

  4. Bernhard Ganglmair & Timothy Simcoe & Emanuele Tarantino, 2018. "Learning When to Quit: An Empirical Model of Experimentation in Standards Development," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2018_041, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.

    Cited by:

    1. Baron, Justus, 2020. "Counting standard contributions to measure the value of patent portfolios - A tale of apples and oranges," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(3).

  5. Bernhard Ganglmair & Timothy Simcoe & Emanuele Tarantino, 2018. "Learning When to Quit: An Empirical Model of Experimentation," NBER Working Papers 24358, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    Cited by:

    1. Baron, Justus, 2020. "Counting standard contributions to measure the value of patent portfolios - A tale of apples and oranges," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(3).

  6. Froeb, Luke M. & Ganglmair, Bernhard & Tschantz, Steven, 2016. "Adversarial decision-making: Choosing between models constructed by interested parties," MPRA Paper 71501, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Cited by:

    1. Bar, Talia & Kalinowski, Jesse, 2019. "Patent validity and the timing of settlements," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    2. Yves Oytana & Nathalie Chappe, 2018. "Expert opinion in a tort litigation game," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 67-107, August.
    3. Guerra Alice & Luppi Barbara & Parisi Francesco, 2019. "Standards of Proof and Civil Litigation: A Game-Theoretic Analysis," The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 19(1), pages 1-19, January.

  7. Bernhard Ganglmair & Emanuele Tarantino, 2011. "Patent Disclosure in Standard Setting," Working Papers 11-15, NET Institute.

    Cited by:

    1. Baron, Justus & Ménière, Yann & Pohlmann, Tim, 2014. "Standards, consortia, and innovation," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 22-35.
    2. Bernhard Ganglmair & Emanuele Tarantino, 2014. "Conversation with secrets," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 45(2), pages 273-302, June.
    3. Justus Baron & Yann Ménière & Tim Pohlmann, 2012. "Joint innovation in ICT standards: How consortia drive the volume of patent filings," Working Papers hal-00707291, HAL.

Articles

  1. Ganglmair, Bernhard & Holcomb, Alex & Myung, Noah, 2020. "Expectations of reciprocity when competitors share information: Experimental evidence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 244-267.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  2. Bernhard Ganglmair, 2018. "Installment Contracts and Material Breach," Supreme Court Economic Review, University of Chicago Press, vol. 26(1), pages 1-46.

    Cited by:

    1. Bernhard Ganglmair, 2008. "Breakup of Repeat Transaction Contracts, Specific Investment, and Efficient Rent-Seeking," JEPS Working Papers 08-001, JEPS.

  3. Bernhard Ganglmair, 2017. "Efficient Material Breach of Contract," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 33(3), pages 507-540.

    Cited by:

    1. Alessandro De Chiara, 2018. "Courts' Decisions, Cooperative Investments, and Incomplete Contracts," CEU Working Papers 2018_5, Department of Economics, Central European University.

  4. Luke M. Froeb & Bernhard Ganglmair & Steven Tschantz, 2016. "Adversarial Decision Making: Choosing between Models Constructed by Interested Parties," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 59(3), pages 527-548.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  5. Bernhard Ganglmair & Emanuele Tarantino, 2014. "Conversation with secrets," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 45(2), pages 273-302, June.

    Cited by:

    1. Pierre Larouche & Florian Schuett, 2019. "Repeated interaction in standard setting," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(3), pages 488-509, June.
    2. Bernhard Ganglmair & Timothy Simcoe & Emanuele Tarantino, 2018. "Learning When to Quit: An Empirical Model of Experimentation," NBER Working Papers 24358, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Ganglmair, Bernhard & Holcomb, Alex & Myung, Noah, 2016. "Cutthroats or comrades: Information sharing among competing fund managers," MPRA Paper 71506, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Balzer, Benjamin & Schneider, Johannes, 2021. "Persuading to participate: Coordination on a standard," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    5. Ganglmair, Bernhard & Holcomb, Alex & Myung, Noah, 2019. "Expectations of reciprocity when competitors share information: Experimental evidence," ZEW Discussion Papers 19-032, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    6. Kang, Byeongwoo & Bekkers, Rudi, 2015. "Just-in-time patents and the development of standards," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(10), pages 1948-1961.
    7. Ehud Lehrer & Dimitry Shaiderman, 2022. "Markovian Persuasion with Stochastic Revelations," Papers 2204.08659, arXiv.org, revised May 2022.
    8. Samano, Mario & Santugini, Marc, 2020. "Long-run market configurations in a dynamic quality-ladder model with externalities," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    9. Honryo, Takakazu, 2018. "Dynamic persuasion," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 36-58.
    10. Wioletta Dziuda & Ronen Gradwohl, 2015. "Achieving Cooperation under Privacy Concerns," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 7(3), pages 142-173, August.
    11. Ehud Lehrer & Dimitry Shaiderman, 2021. "Markovian Persuasion," Papers 2111.14365, arXiv.org.
    12. Justus Baron & Jorge Contreras & Martin Husovec & Pierre Larouche, 2019. "Making the Rules: The Governance of Standard Development Organizations and their Policies on Intellectual Property Rights," JRC Research Reports JRC115004, Joint Research Centre (Seville site).
    13. Justus Baron & Tim Pohlmann, 2018. "Mapping standards to patents using declarations of standard‐essential patents," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(3), pages 504-534, September.

  6. Bernhard Ganglmair & Luke M. Froeb & Gregory J. Werden, 2012. "Patent Hold-Up and Antitrust: How A Well-Intentioned Rule Could Retard Innovation," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(2), pages 249-273, June.

    Cited by:

    1. Jay Pil Choi, 2014. "FRAND Royalties and Injunctions for Standard Essential Patents," CESifo Working Paper Series 5012, CESifo.
    2. Pierre Larouche & Florian Schuett, 2019. "Repeated interaction in standard setting," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(3), pages 488-509, June.
    3. Schmitz, Patrick W, 2012. "Incomplete contracts and optimal ownership of public goods," CEPR Discussion Papers 9141, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    4. Alexander Galetovic & Stephen Haber & Ross Levine, 2015. "An Empirical Examination Of Patent Holdup," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 11(3), pages 549-578.
    5. Layne-Farrar, Anne & Llobet, Gerard, 2014. "Moving beyond simple examples: Assessing the incremental value rule within standards," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 57-69.
    6. Martimort, D. & Poudou, J.-C. & Sand-Zantman, W., 2006. "Contracting for an Innovation under Bilateral Asymmetric Information," Cahiers du LASER (LASER Working Papers) 2006.19, LASER (Laboratoire de Science Economique de Richter), Faculty of Economics, University of Montpellier 1.
    7. Bernhard Ganglmair & Emanuele Tarantino, 2014. "Conversation with secrets," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 45(2), pages 273-302, June.
    8. Anne Layne-Farrar & Gerard Llobet, 2012. "Payments and Participation: The Incentives to Join Cooperative Standard Setting Efforts," Working Papers wp2012_1203, CEMFI.
    9. Vilen Lipatov & Gregor Langus & Damien Neven, 2013. "Standard Essential Patents: who is really holding up (and when)?," IHEID Working Papers 04-2013, Economics Section, The Graduate Institute of International Studies.
    10. Bernhard Ganglmair & Emanuele Tarantino, 2011. "Patent Disclosure in Standard Setting," Working Papers 11-15, NET Institute.
    11. Schmitz, Patrick W., 2013. "Bargaining position, bargaining power, and the property rights approach," MPRA Paper 44953, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Sim, Kyoungbo, 2020. "Injunctions and Hold-up under Weak Patent Protection," KDI Journal of Economic Policy, Korea Development Institute (KDI), vol. 42(2), pages 1-30.
    13. Wipusanawan, Chayanin, 2020. "Standard-Essential Patents and Incentives for Innovation," Discussion Paper 2020-025, Tilburg University, Tilburg Law and Economic Center.
    14. Boone, Jan & Schuett, Florian & Tarantino, E., 2019. "Price Commitments in Standard Setting under Asymmetric Information," Other publications TiSEM b39207f5-f27a-451d-9e2e-d, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    15. Baron, Justus, 2020. "Counting standard contributions to measure the value of patent portfolios - A tale of apples and oranges," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(3).
    16. Wipusanawan, Chayanin, 2020. "Standard-Essential Patents and Incentives for Innovation," Other publications TiSEM 9ea6a894-ac05-413d-8c2d-0, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    17. Wipusanawan, Chayanin, 2020. "Standard-Essential Patents and Incentives for Innovation," Other publications TiSEM 5bbcc50b-2497-43a4-bba6-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    18. Horn, Henrik, 2020. "International Jurisdiction over Standard-Essential Patents," Working Paper Series 1314, Research Institute of Industrial Economics, revised 04 May 2021.
    19. Jeon, Haejun & Nishihara, Michi, 2018. "Optimal patent policy in the presence of vertical separation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(2), pages 682-697.
    20. Wipusanawan, Chayanin, 2020. "Standard-Essential Patents and Incentives for Innovation," Discussion Paper 2020-034, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    21. Justus Baron & Jorge Contreras & Martin Husovec & Pierre Larouche, 2019. "Making the Rules: The Governance of Standard Development Organizations and their Policies on Intellectual Property Rights," JRC Research Reports JRC115004, Joint Research Centre (Seville site).
    22. Justus Baron & Tim Pohlmann, 2018. "Mapping standards to patents using declarations of standard‐essential patents," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(3), pages 504-534, September.
    23. Reisinger, Markus & Tarantino, Emanuele, 2016. "Patent Pools in Input Markets," CEPR Discussion Papers 11512, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.

Chapters

  1. Bernhard Ganglmair & Emanuele Tarantino, 2012. "Patent Disclosure in Standard Setting," NBER Chapters, in: Standards, Patents and Innovations, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    See citations under working paper version above.Sorry, no citations of chapters recorded.

Books

  1. Ganglmair, Bernhard & Hahn, Nadine & Hellwig, Michael & Kann, Alexander & Peters, Bettina & Tsanko, Ilona, 2020. "Price markups, innovation, and productivity: Evidence from Germany," ZEW Expertises, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, volume 8, number 222995.

    Cited by:

    1. Alexander S. Kritikos & Alexander Schiersch & Caroline Stiel, 2021. "The Productivity Puzzle in Business Services," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1960, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    2. Bernhard Ganglmair & Alexander Kann & Ilona Tsanko, 2021. "Markups for Consumers," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2021_282, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
    3. David Benček & Lorela Ceni-Hulek & Achim Wambach & John Weche, 2020. "Wettbewerb in Zeiten der Pandemie [Competition in Times of a Pandemic]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 100(11), pages 876-884, November.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

List Editorship

This author manages the following RePEc Biblio topics, reading lists or publication compilations:
  1. RePEc Biblio > Law and Economics

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 19 papers announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-IPR: Intellectual Property Rights (7) 2011-11-28 2012-04-23 2019-09-16 2020-08-10 2020-09-21 2021-05-17 2022-05-16. Author is listed
  2. NEP-GTH: Game Theory (4) 2016-06-14 2016-06-14 2019-01-28 2019-09-09
  3. NEP-IND: Industrial Organization (4) 2011-11-28 2012-04-23 2021-01-25 2021-04-19
  4. NEP-INO: Innovation (4) 2011-11-28 2012-04-23 2019-09-16 2022-05-16
  5. NEP-LAW: Law & Economics (4) 2016-06-14 2020-08-10 2020-09-21 2021-01-25
  6. NEP-TID: Technology & Industrial Dynamics (4) 2012-04-23 2019-09-16 2021-05-17 2022-05-16
  7. NEP-EXP: Experimental Economics (3) 2016-06-14 2019-01-28 2019-09-09
  8. NEP-SBM: Small Business Management (3) 2019-09-16 2021-05-17 2022-05-16
  9. NEP-COM: Industrial Competition (2) 2011-11-28 2012-04-23
  10. NEP-CTA: Contract Theory & Applications (2) 2011-11-28 2012-04-23
  11. NEP-PPM: Project, Program & Portfolio Management (2) 2018-03-19 2018-03-26
  12. NEP-DCM: Discrete Choice Models (1) 2019-01-28
  13. NEP-FMK: Financial Markets (1) 2016-06-14
  14. NEP-GEN: Gender (1) 2021-04-12
  15. NEP-HIS: Business, Economic & Financial History (1) 2022-05-16
  16. NEP-ICT: Information & Communication Technologies (1) 2018-03-26
  17. NEP-ISF: Islamic Finance (1) 2021-09-20
  18. NEP-LAB: Labour Economics (1) 2021-04-12
  19. NEP-MIC: Microeconomics (1) 2016-06-14

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Bernhard Ganglmair should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.