IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bon/boncrc/crctr224_2024_119v3.html

Visibility of Technology and Cumulative Innovation: Evidence From Trade Secrets Laws

Author

Listed:
  • Bernhard Ganglmair

  • Imke Reimers

Abstract

Innovation depends on the incentives to create new ideas as well as access to existing ones. Access, in turn, depends on an initial invention's inherent visibility as well as the inventor's decision to disclose it, for example through patenting. Compared to product innovations, process innovations tend to be less visible, making secrecy as an intellectual property strategy relatively more attractive; and stronger trade secrets protection laws could hamper their disclosure even further. Using exogenous variation in the level of trade secrets protection from the Uniform Trade Secrets Act, we show that stronger protection has a disproportionately negative effect on patenting of processes. We show in simulations that these changes in disclosure can have large implications for follow-on innovation and welfare.

Suggested Citation

  • Bernhard Ganglmair & Imke Reimers, 2021. "Visibility of Technology and Cumulative Innovation: Evidence From Trade Secrets Laws," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2024_119v3, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany, revised Sep 2024.
    • Handle: RePEc:bon:boncrc:crctr224_2024_119v3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.crctr224.de/research/discussion-papers/archive/dp119
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rammer, Christian, 2022. "Measuring process innovation output: Results from firm-level panel data," ZEW Discussion Papers 22-002, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    2. de Rassenfosse, Gaétan & Pellegrino, Gabriele & Raiteri, Emilio, 2024. "Do patents enable disclosure? Evidence from the invention secrecy act," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    3. Danzer, Alexander M. & Feuerbaum, Carsten & Gaessler, Fabian, 2024. "Labor supply and automation innovation: Evidence from an allocation policy," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    4. Daniel P. Gross, 2023. "The Hidden Costs of Securing Innovation: The Manifold Impacts of Compulsory Invention Secrecy," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(4), pages 2318-2338, April.
    5. Danzer, Alexander M. & Feuerbaum, Carsten & Gaessler, Fabian, 2020. "Labor Supply and Automation Innovation," IZA Discussion Papers 13429, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D80 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - General
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • O34 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bon:boncrc:crctr224_2024_119v3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CRC Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.crctr224.de .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.