IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/16002.html

Representation is Not Sufficient for Selecting Gender Diversity

Author

Listed:
  • Baron, Justus
  • Ganglmair, Bernhard
  • Persico, Nicola
  • Simcoe, Timothy S.
  • Tarantino, Emanuele

Abstract

One strategy for promoting female leaders in science and technology professions is to appoint more women to the committees that select leaders. Unfortunately, evidence from other settings, such as committees for selecting judges or professors, suggests this approach does not work. We use a natural experiment to test the idea that organizational norms supporting gender diversity are necessary for representation on “selectorates†to promote gender diversity among leaders in science and technology. Our empirical setting is the standard-setting organization that develops key protocols for Internet hardware and software. We find that when more women are randomly selected for the committee that appoints the organization’s leaders, the committee appoints more female leaders, but only after a set of interventions meant to increase members’ awareness of the benefits of gender diversity.

Suggested Citation

  • Baron, Justus & Ganglmair, Bernhard & Persico, Nicola & Simcoe, Timothy S. & Tarantino, Emanuele, 2021. "Representation is Not Sufficient for Selecting Gender Diversity," CEPR Discussion Papers 16002, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:16002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/publications/DP16002
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Lingfu Kong & Muhammad Usman & Weili Yue & Fakhra Yasmin & Marcela Sokolova, 2024. "Leadher: role of women leadership in shaping corporate innovation," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.
    3. Vernika Agarwal & Shefali Srivastava & Ashish Dwivedi & Sanjoy Kumar Paul & Anchal Patil, 2026. "Investigating Factors for an Inclusive Workforce for Women in the Logistics and Supply Chain Industry," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(1), pages 321-344, January.
    4. Evelina Gavrilova-Zoutman & Steffen Juranek, 2025. "The Role of Reviewer Characteristics on the Diversity of Successful Applicants," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(5), pages 1726-1744, September.
    5. Pierre Deschamps, 2024. "Gender Quotas in Hiring Committees: A Boon or a Bane for Women?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(11), pages 7486-7505, November.
    6. Adams, Renée B. & Xu, Jing, 2026. "Sex, science, and society," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(2).
    7. Baron, Justus & Kanevskaia, Olia, 2023. "Wearing multiple hats—The role of working group chairs’ affiliation in standards development," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(9).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • D72 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
    • J16 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
    • L86 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Information and Internet Services; Computer Software
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:16002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CEPR (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cepr.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.