IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/e/pzl8.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Ulf Zölitz
(Ulf Zoelitz)

Personal Details

First Name:Ulf
Middle Name:
Last Name:Zölitz
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pzl8
[This author has chosen not to make the email address public]
http://www.econ.uzh.ch/en/people/faculty/zoelitz.html

Affiliation

(95%) Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre
Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät
Universität Zürich

Zürich, Switzerland
http://www.econ.uzh.ch/

+41-1-634 21 37
+41-1-634 49 82
Schönberggasse 1, CH-8001 Zürich
RePEc:edi:seizhch (more details at EDIRC)

(3%) Institute of Labor Economics (IZA)

Bonn, Germany
http://www.iza.org/



P.O. Box 7240, D-53072 Bonn
RePEc:edi:izaaade (more details at EDIRC)

(1%) CESifo

München, Germany
http://www.cesifo-group.de/

+49 (89) 9224-0
+49 (89) 985369
Poschingerstrasse 5, 81679 Munich
RePEc:edi:cesifde (more details at EDIRC)

(1%) Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR)

London, United Kingdom
http://www.cepr.org/

+44 (0)20 7183 8801
+44 (0)20 7183 8820
3rd Floor, 77 Bastwick Street, London EC1V 3PZ
RePEc:edi:cebruuk (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles

Working papers

  1. Ingo E. Isphording & Ulf Zölitz, 2020. "The value of a peer," ECON - Working Papers 342, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.
  2. Giuseppe Sorrenti & Ulf Zölitz & Denis Ribeaud & Manuel Eisner, 2020. "The causal impact of socio-emotional skills training on educational success," ECON - Working Papers 343, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.
  3. Jan Feld & Nicolás Salamanca & Ulf Zölitz, 2019. "Students Are Almost as Effective as Professors in University Teaching," CESifo Working Paper Series 7764, CESifo.
  4. Anne Ardila Brenøe & Ulf Zölitz, 2018. "Exposure to more female peers widens the gender gap in STEM participation," ECON - Working Papers 285, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.
  5. Benjamin Elsner & Ingo E. Isphording & Ulf Zölitz, 2018. "Achievement rank affects performance and major choices in college," ECON - Working Papers 300, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.
  6. Jan Feld & Nicolás Salamanca & Ulf Zölitz, 2018. "Are Professors Worth It? The Value-added and Costs of Tutorial Instructors," CESifo Working Paper Series 7380, CESifo.
  7. Jan Feld & Nicolás Salamanca & Ulf Zölitz, 2018. "Are professors worth it? The value-added and costs of tutorial instructors," ECON - Working Papers 293, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.
  8. Friederike Mengel & Jan Sauermann & Ulf Zölitz, 2018. "Gender Bias in Teaching Evaluations," CESifo Working Paper Series 7269, CESifo.
  9. Jan Feld & Nicolas Salamanca & Ulf Zölitz§, 2017. "Students Are Almost as Effective as Professors in University Teaching," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2017n23, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.
  10. Ulf Zölitz & Jan Feld, 2017. "The effect of peer gender on major choice," ECON - Working Papers 270, Department of Economics - University of Zurich, revised Aug 2018.
  11. Mengel, Friederike & Sauermann, Jan & Zölitz, Ulf, 2017. "Gender Bias in Teaching Evaluations," Working Paper Series 6/2017, Stockholm University, Swedish Institute for Social Research.
  12. Bart H.H. Golsteyn & Arjan Non & Ulf Zölitz, 2017. "The impact of peer personality on academic achievement," ECON - Working Papers 269, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.
  13. Borghans, Lex & Golsteyn, Bart H.H. & Zölitz, Ulf, 2015. "School Quality and the Development of Cognitive Skills between Age Four and Six," IZA Discussion Papers 9200, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
  14. Olivier Marie & Ulf Zölitz, 2015. "'High' Achievers? Cannabis Access and Academic Performance," CESifo Working Paper Series 5304, CESifo.
  15. Marie, Olivier & Zölitz, Ulf, 2015. "'High' Achievers? Cannabis Access and Academic Performance," IZA Discussion Papers 8900, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
  16. Feld, Jan & Zölitz, Ulf, 2015. "Understanding Peer Effects: On the Nature, Estimation and Channels of Peer Effects," IZA Discussion Papers 9448, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
  17. Borghans, Lex & Golsteyn, Bart H.H. & Zölitz, Ulf, 2014. "Parental Preferences for Primary School Characteristics," IZA Discussion Papers 8371, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

Articles

  1. Jan Feld & Ulf Zölitz, 2017. "Understanding Peer Effects: On the Nature, Estimation, and Channels of Peer Effects," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 35(2), pages 387-428.
  2. Olivier Marie & Ulf Zölitz, 2017. "“High” Achievers? Cannabis Access and Academic Performance," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 84(3), pages 1210-1237.
  3. Borghans Lex & Golsteyn Bart H. H. & Zölitz Ulf, 2015. "Parental Preferences for Primary School Characteristics," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 15(1), pages 1-33, January.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Wikipedia or ReplicationWiki mentions

(Only mentions on Wikipedia that link back to a page on a RePEc service)
  1. Olivier Marie & Ulf Zölitz, 2017. "“High” Achievers? Cannabis Access and Academic Performance," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 84(3), pages 1210-1237.

    Mentioned in:

    1. “High” Achievers? Cannabis Access and Academic Performance (REStud 2017) in ReplicationWiki ()

Working papers

  1. Ingo E. Isphording & Ulf Zölitz, 2020. "The value of a peer," ECON - Working Papers 342, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.

    Cited by:

    1. Fischer, Thomas & Rode, Johannes, 2020. "Classroom or pub - Where are persistent peer relationships between university students formed?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 474-493.

  2. Giuseppe Sorrenti & Ulf Zölitz & Denis Ribeaud & Manuel Eisner, 2020. "The causal impact of socio-emotional skills training on educational success," ECON - Working Papers 343, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.

    Cited by:

    1. Armin Falk & Fabian Kosse & Pia Pinger, 2020. "Mentoring and Schooling Decisions: Causal Evidence," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2020_186, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
    2. Jan Bietenbeck, 2020. "Own Motivation, Peer Motivation, and Educational Success," CESifo Working Paper Series 8696, CESifo.
    3. Sule Alan & Ceren Baysan & Mert Gumren & Elif Kubilay, 2020. "Building Social Cohesion in Ethnically Mixed Schools: An Intervention on Perspective Taking," CESifo Working Paper Series 8754, CESifo.
    4. Eva Berger, 2020. "Self-productivity and Cross-productivity in the Process of Skill Formation," Working Papers 2027, Gutenberg School of Management and Economics, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz.

  3. Jan Feld & Nicolás Salamanca & Ulf Zölitz, 2019. "Students Are Almost as Effective as Professors in University Teaching," CESifo Working Paper Series 7764, CESifo.

    Cited by:

    1. Insler, Michael & McQuoid, Alexander F. & Rahman, Ahmed S. & Smith, Katherine, 2021. "Fear and Loathing in the Classroom: Why Does Teacher Quality Matter?," IZA Discussion Papers 14036, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

  4. Anne Ardila Brenøe & Ulf Zölitz, 2018. "Exposure to more female peers widens the gender gap in STEM participation," ECON - Working Papers 285, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.

    Cited by:

    1. Delaney, Judith & Devereux, Paul J., 2019. "It's Not Just for Boys! Understanding Gender Differences in STEM," IZA Discussion Papers 12176, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Diana Chise & Margherita Fort & Chiara Monfardini, 2020. "Scientifico! like Dad: On the Intergenerational Transmission of STEM Education," FBK-IRVAPP Working Papers 2020-01, Research Institute for the Evaluation of Public Policies (IRVAPP), Bruno Kessler Foundation.
    3. Jan Bietenbeck, 2020. "Own Motivation, Peer Motivation, and Educational Success," CESifo Working Paper Series 8696, CESifo.
    4. Griffith, Amanda L. & Main, Joyce B., 2019. "First impressions in the classroom: How do class characteristics affect student grades and majors?," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 125-137.
    5. Delaney, Judith & Devereux, Paul J., 2020. "Gender Differences in College Applications: Aspiration and Risk Management," CEPR Discussion Papers 15589, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    6. Giulietti, Corrado & Vlassopoulos, Michael & Zenou, Yves, 2020. "Peers, Gender, and Long-Term Depression," CEPR Discussion Papers 14681, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    7. Mcnally, Sandra, 2020. "Gender differences in tertiary education: what explains STEM participation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 108232, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Delaney, Judith M. & Devereux, Paul J., 2019. "Understanding gender differences in STEM: Evidence from college applications✰," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 219-238.
    9. Stoddard, Olga B. & Karpowitz, Christopher F. & Preece, Jessica, 2020. "Strength in Numbers: A Field Experiment in Gender, Influence, and Group Dynamics," IZA Discussion Papers 13741, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    10. Brenøe, Anne Ardila, 2018. "Origins of Gender Norms: Sibling Gender Composition and Women's Choice of Occupation and Partner," IZA Discussion Papers 11692, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    11. Chise, Diana & Fort, Margherita & Monfardini, Chiara, 2019. "Scientifico! like Dad: On the Intergenerational Transmission of STEM Education in Italy," IZA Discussion Papers 12688, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    12. Delaney, Judith & Devereux, Paul J., 2019. "Understanding Gender Differences in STEM: Evidence from College Applications," CEPR Discussion Papers 13558, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.

  5. Benjamin Elsner & Ingo E. Isphording & Ulf Zölitz, 2018. "Achievement rank affects performance and major choices in college," ECON - Working Papers 300, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.

    Cited by:

    1. Denning, Jeffrey T. & Murphy, Richard & Weinhardt, Felix, 2018. "Class Rank and Long-Run Outcomes," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 118, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    2. Goulas, Sofoklis & Griselda, Silvia & Megalokonomou, Rigissa, 2020. "Comparative Advantage and Gender Gap in STEM," IZA Discussion Papers 13313, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. Yu, Han, 2020. "Am I the big fish? The effect of ordinal rank on student academic performance in middle school," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 18-41.
    4. Ribas, Rafael P. & Sampaio, Breno & Trevisan, Giuseppe, 2020. "Short- and long-term effects of class assignment: Evidence from a flagship university in Brazil," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    5. Ingo E. Isphording & Ulf Zölitz, 2020. "The value of a peer," ECON - Working Papers 342, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.
    6. Nicolás de Roux & Evan Riehl, 2019. "Isolating Peer Effects in the Returns to College Selectivity," Documentos CEDE 017413, Universidad de los Andes - CEDE.
    7. Bertoni, Marco & Nistico, Roberto, 2019. "Ordinal Rank and Peer Composition: Two Sides of the Same Coin?," IZA Discussion Papers 12789, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

  6. Jan Feld & Nicolás Salamanca & Ulf Zölitz, 2018. "Are Professors Worth It? The Value-added and Costs of Tutorial Instructors," CESifo Working Paper Series 7380, CESifo.

    Cited by:

    1. Cuffe, Harold E. & Feld, Jan & O’Grady, Trevor, 2019. "Returns to Teaching Repetition - The Effect of Short-Term Teaching Experience on Student Outcomes," IZA Discussion Papers 12676, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Feld, Jan & Salamanca, Nicolás & Zölitz, Ulf, 2019. "Students are Almost as Effective as Professors in University Teaching," IZA Discussion Papers 12491, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. Ingo E. Isphording & Ulf Zölitz, 2020. "The value of a peer," ECON - Working Papers 342, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.
    4. Keng, Shao-Hsun, 2020. "Gender bias and statistical discrimination against female instructors in student evaluations of teaching," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    5. Jan Feld & Nicolás Salamanca & Ulf Zölitz, 2019. "Students Are Almost as Effective as Professors in University Teaching," CESifo Working Paper Series 7764, CESifo.

  7. Jan Feld & Nicolás Salamanca & Ulf Zölitz, 2018. "Are professors worth it? The value-added and costs of tutorial instructors," ECON - Working Papers 293, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.

    Cited by:

    1. Cuffe, Harold E. & Feld, Jan & O’Grady, Trevor, 2019. "Returns to Teaching Repetition - The Effect of Short-Term Teaching Experience on Student Outcomes," IZA Discussion Papers 12676, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Feld, Jan & Salamanca, Nicolás & Zölitz, Ulf, 2019. "Students are Almost as Effective as Professors in University Teaching," IZA Discussion Papers 12491, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. Ingo E. Isphording & Ulf Zölitz, 2020. "The value of a peer," ECON - Working Papers 342, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.
    4. Keng, Shao-Hsun, 2020. "Gender bias and statistical discrimination against female instructors in student evaluations of teaching," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    5. Jan Feld & Nicolás Salamanca & Ulf Zölitz, 2019. "Students Are Almost as Effective as Professors in University Teaching," CESifo Working Paper Series 7764, CESifo.

  8. Friederike Mengel & Jan Sauermann & Ulf Zölitz, 2018. "Gender Bias in Teaching Evaluations," CESifo Working Paper Series 7269, CESifo.

    Cited by:

    1. Alexander Cappelen & Ranveig Falch & Bertil Tungodden, 2019. "The Boy Crisis: Experimental Evidence on the Acceptance of Males Falling Behind," Working Papers 2019-014, Human Capital and Economic Opportunity Working Group.
    2. Buurman, Margaretha & Delfgaauw, Josse & Dur, Robert & Zoutenbier, Robin, 2020. "When do teachers respond to student feedback? Evidence from a field experiment," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    3. Moritz Drechsel-Grau & Felix Holub, 2020. "Gender Gaps and the Role of Bosses," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2020_237, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
    4. Y Fan & L J Shepherd & E Slavich & D Waters & M Stone & R Abel & E L Johnston, 2019. "Gender and cultural bias in student evaluations: Why representation matters," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-16, February.
    5. Kerstin Grosch, Kerstin & Müller, Stephan & Rau, Holger A. & Zhurakhovska, Lilia, 2020. "Selection into Leadership and Dishonest Behavior of Leaders: A Gender Experiment," IHS Working Paper Series 19, Institute for Advanced Studies.
    6. Ductor, L & Goyal, S. & Prummer, A., 2018. "Gender & Collaboration," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1820, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    7. Priyanka Chakraborty & Danila Serra, 2018. "Gender differences in top leadership roles: Does aversion to worker backlash matter?," Departmental Working Papers 1807, Southern Methodist University, Department of Economics.
    8. Laura Hospido & Carlos Sanz, 2019. "Gender gaps in the evaluation of research: evidence from submissions to economics conferences (Updated March 2020)," Working Papers 1918, Banco de España;Working Papers Homepage, revised Mar 2020.
    9. Friederike Mengel & Jan Sauermann & Ulf Zölitz, 2019. "Gender Bias in Teaching Evaluations," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 17(2), pages 535-566.
    10. Veronika Grimm & Holger A Rau & Simeon Schächtele, 2020. "Gender differences in multi-employee gift exchange with self-reported contributions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-19, September.
    11. Bohren, Aislinn & Imas, Alex & Rosenberg, Michael, 2018. "The Dynamics of Discrimination: Theory and Evidence," CEPR Discussion Papers 13113, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    12. Bukstein, Daniel & Gandelman, Néstor, 2019. "Glass ceilings in research: Evidence from a national program in Uruguay," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(6), pages 1550-1563.
    13. Andreas Kuhn & Stefan C. Wolter, 2018. "The Strength of Gender Norms and Gender-Stereotypical Occupational Aspirations Among Adolescents," Economics of Education Working Paper Series 0151, University of Zurich, Department of Business Administration (IBW).
    14. Hospido, Laura & Sanz, Carlos, 2019. "Gender Gaps in the Evaluation of Research: Evidence from Submissions to Economics Conferences," IZA Discussion Papers 12494, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    15. Valentina A. Paredes & M. Daniele Paserman & Francisco Pino, 2020. "Does Economics Make You Sexist?," NBER Working Papers 27070, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Jeff Frank, 2020. "The Persistence of the Gender Pay Gap in British Universities," Fiscal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(4), pages 883-903, December.
    17. Mumford, Karen A. & Sechel, Cristina, 2019. "Pay and Job Rank Amongst Academic Economists in the UK: Is Gender Relevant?," IZA Discussion Papers 12397, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    18. Kerstin Grosch & Stephan Müller & Holger A. Rau & Lilia Zhurakhovska, 2020. "Selection into Leadership and Dishonest Behavior of Leaders: A Gender Experiment," CESifo Working Paper Series 8514, CESifo.
    19. Suzanne Bijkerk & Silvia Dominguez-Martinez & Jurjen Kamphorst & Otto Swank, 2018. "Labor Market Quotas," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 18-036/VII, Tinbergen Institute.
    20. Nigel Burnell & Irina Cojuharenco & Zahra Murad, 2020. "He Taught, She Taught: The effect of teaching style, academic credentials, bias awareness and academic discipline on gender bias in teaching evaluations," Working Papers in Economics & Finance 2020-05, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth Business School, Economics and Finance Subject Group.
    21. Margaretha Buurman & Josse (J.) Delfgaauw & Robert (A.J.) Dur & Robin Zoutenbier, 2018. "The Effects of Student Feedback to teachers: Evidence from a Field Experiment," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 18-042/VII, Tinbergen Institute.
    22. BenYishay, Ariel & Jones, Maria & Kondylis, Florence & Mobarak, Ahmed Mushfiq, 2020. "Gender gaps in technology diffusion," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    23. Abel, Martin & Buchman, Daniel, 2020. "The Effect of Manager Gender and Performance Feedback: Experimental Evidence from India," IZA Discussion Papers 13871, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    24. Kosec, Katrina & Mo, Cecilia Hyunjung & Schmidt, Emily & Song, Jie, 2021. "Perceptions of relative deprivation and women’s empowerment," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    25. Rocco Macchiavello & Andreas Menzel & Atonu Rabbani & Christopher Woodruff, 2020. "Challenges of Change: An Experiment Promoting Women to Managerial Roles in the Bangladeshi Garment Sector," NBER Working Papers 27606, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    26. Valerie K. Bostwick & Bruce A. Weinberg, 2018. "Nevertheless She Persisted? Gender Peer Effects in Doctoral STEM Programs," NBER Working Papers 25028, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    27. Keng, Shao-Hsun, 2020. "Gender bias and statistical discrimination against female instructors in student evaluations of teaching," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    28. Radchenko, Natalia, 2020. "Biases in Student Evaluations of Teaching: An American Case Study," IZA Discussion Papers 13603, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    29. Dakota Murray & Clara Boothby & Huimeng Zhao & Vanessa Minik & Nicolas Bérubé & Vincent Larivière & Cassidy R Sugimoto, 2020. "Exploring the personal and professional factors associated with student evaluations of tenure-track faculty," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-21, June.
    30. Arnaud Philippe, 2020. "Gender Disparities in Sentencing," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 87(348), pages 1037-1077, October.
    31. Friederike Mengel & Jan Sauermann & Ulf Zölitz, 2018. "Gender Bias in Teaching Evaluations," CESifo Working Paper Series 7269, CESifo.

  9. Jan Feld & Nicolas Salamanca & Ulf Zölitz§, 2017. "Students Are Almost as Effective as Professors in University Teaching," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2017n23, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.

    Cited by:

    1. Insler, Michael & McQuoid, Alexander F. & Rahman, Ahmed S. & Smith, Katherine, 2021. "Fear and Loathing in the Classroom: Why Does Teacher Quality Matter?," IZA Discussion Papers 14036, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

  10. Ulf Zölitz & Jan Feld, 2017. "The effect of peer gender on major choice," ECON - Working Papers 270, Department of Economics - University of Zurich, revised Aug 2018.

    Cited by:

    1. Fischer, Thomas & Rode, Johannes, 2020. "Classroom or pub - Where are persistent peer relationships between university students formed?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 474-493.
    2. Brenøe, Anne & Zölitz, Ulf, 2019. "Exposure to More Female Peers Widens the Gender Gap in STEM Participation," CEPR Discussion Papers 13966, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    3. Feld, Jan & Salamanca, Nicolás & Zölitz, Ulf, 2018. "Are professors worth it? The value-added and costs of tutorial instructors," Working Paper Series 7955, Victoria University of Wellington, School of Economics and Finance.
    4. Marco Bertoni & Giorgio Brunello & Lorenzo Cappellari, 2018. "Parents, Siblings and Schoolmates. The Effects of Family-School Interactions on Educational Achievement and Long-term Labor Market Outcomes," DISCE - Working Papers del Dipartimento di Economia e Finanza def064, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimenti e Istituti di Scienze Economiche (DISCE).
    5. Feld, Jan & Salamanca, Nicolás & Zölitz, Ulf, 2019. "Students are Almost as Effective as Professors in University Teaching," IZA Discussion Papers 12491, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    6. Mouganie, Pierre & Wang, Yaojing, 2019. "High-Performing Peers and Female STEM Choices in School," IZA Discussion Papers 12455, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    7. Damiano Pregaldini & Uschi Backes-Gellner & Gerald Eisenkopf, 2018. "Girls' preferences for STEM and the effects of classroom gender composition: new evidence from a natural experiment," Economics of Education Working Paper Series 0152, University of Zurich, Department of Business Administration (IBW), revised Jul 2020.
    8. Jan Feld & Nicolás Salamanca & Ulf Zölitz, 2018. "Are Professors Worth It? The Value-added and Costs of Tutorial Instructors," CESifo Working Paper Series 7380, CESifo.
    9. Friederike Mengel & Jan Sauermann & Ulf Zölitz, 2019. "Gender Bias in Teaching Evaluations," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 17(2), pages 535-566.
    10. Benjamin Elsner & Ingo E. Isphording & Ulf Zölitz, 2018. "Achievement rank affects performance and major choices in college," ECON - Working Papers 300, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.
    11. Griffith, Amanda L. & Main, Joyce B., 2019. "First impressions in the classroom: How do class characteristics affect student grades and majors?," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 125-137.
    12. Agurto Adrianzén, Marcos & Fiestas Chevez, Hugo & Nuñez Morales, Wenceslao & Quevedo, Valeria & Vegas Chiyón, Susana, 2019. "Study-group diversity and early college academic outcomes: Experimental evidence from a higher education inclusion program in Peru," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 131-146.
    13. Arnold, Ivo J.M., 2020. "Gender and major choice within economics: Evidence from Europe," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).
    14. Jan Feld & Nicolás Salamanca & Ulf Zölitz, 2019. "Students Are Almost as Effective as Professors in University Teaching," CESifo Working Paper Series 7764, CESifo.
    15. Kevin Boudreau & Nilam Kaushik, 2020. "The Gender Gap in Tech & Competitive Work Environments? Field Experimental Evidence from an Internet-of-Things Product Development Platform," NBER Working Papers 27154, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Brenøe, Anne Ardila, 2018. "Origins of Gender Norms: Sibling Gender Composition and Women's Choice of Occupation and Partner," IZA Discussion Papers 11692, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    17. Friederike Mengel & Jan Sauermann & Ulf Zölitz, 2018. "Gender Bias in Teaching Evaluations," CESifo Working Paper Series 7269, CESifo.

  11. Mengel, Friederike & Sauermann, Jan & Zölitz, Ulf, 2017. "Gender Bias in Teaching Evaluations," Working Paper Series 6/2017, Stockholm University, Swedish Institute for Social Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Alexander Cappelen & Ranveig Falch & Bertil Tungodden, 2019. "The Boy Crisis: Experimental Evidence on the Acceptance of Males Falling Behind," Working Papers 2019-014, Human Capital and Economic Opportunity Working Group.
    2. Buurman, Margaretha & Delfgaauw, Josse & Dur, Robert & Zoutenbier, Robin, 2020. "When do teachers respond to student feedback? Evidence from a field experiment," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    3. Moritz Drechsel-Grau & Felix Holub, 2020. "Gender Gaps and the Role of Bosses," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2020_237, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
    4. Y Fan & L J Shepherd & E Slavich & D Waters & M Stone & R Abel & E L Johnston, 2019. "Gender and cultural bias in student evaluations: Why representation matters," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-16, February.
    5. Kerstin Grosch, Kerstin & Müller, Stephan & Rau, Holger A. & Zhurakhovska, Lilia, 2020. "Selection into Leadership and Dishonest Behavior of Leaders: A Gender Experiment," IHS Working Paper Series 19, Institute for Advanced Studies.
    6. Ductor, L & Goyal, S. & Prummer, A., 2018. "Gender & Collaboration," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1820, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    7. Priyanka Chakraborty & Danila Serra, 2018. "Gender differences in top leadership roles: Does aversion to worker backlash matter?," Departmental Working Papers 1807, Southern Methodist University, Department of Economics.
    8. Laura Hospido & Carlos Sanz, 2019. "Gender gaps in the evaluation of research: evidence from submissions to economics conferences (Updated March 2020)," Working Papers 1918, Banco de España;Working Papers Homepage, revised Mar 2020.
    9. Friederike Mengel & Jan Sauermann & Ulf Zölitz, 2019. "Gender Bias in Teaching Evaluations," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 17(2), pages 535-566.
    10. Veronika Grimm & Holger A Rau & Simeon Schächtele, 2020. "Gender differences in multi-employee gift exchange with self-reported contributions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-19, September.
    11. Bohren, Aislinn & Imas, Alex & Rosenberg, Michael, 2018. "The Dynamics of Discrimination: Theory and Evidence," CEPR Discussion Papers 13113, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    12. Bukstein, Daniel & Gandelman, Néstor, 2019. "Glass ceilings in research: Evidence from a national program in Uruguay," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(6), pages 1550-1563.
    13. Andreas Kuhn & Stefan C. Wolter, 2018. "The Strength of Gender Norms and Gender-Stereotypical Occupational Aspirations Among Adolescents," Economics of Education Working Paper Series 0151, University of Zurich, Department of Business Administration (IBW).
    14. Hospido, Laura & Sanz, Carlos, 2019. "Gender Gaps in the Evaluation of Research: Evidence from Submissions to Economics Conferences," IZA Discussion Papers 12494, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    15. Valentina A. Paredes & M. Daniele Paserman & Francisco Pino, 2020. "Does Economics Make You Sexist?," NBER Working Papers 27070, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Jeff Frank, 2020. "The Persistence of the Gender Pay Gap in British Universities," Fiscal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(4), pages 883-903, December.
    17. Mumford, Karen A. & Sechel, Cristina, 2019. "Pay and Job Rank Amongst Academic Economists in the UK: Is Gender Relevant?," IZA Discussion Papers 12397, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    18. Kerstin Grosch & Stephan Müller & Holger A. Rau & Lilia Zhurakhovska, 2020. "Selection into Leadership and Dishonest Behavior of Leaders: A Gender Experiment," CESifo Working Paper Series 8514, CESifo.
    19. Suzanne Bijkerk & Silvia Dominguez-Martinez & Jurjen Kamphorst & Otto Swank, 2018. "Labor Market Quotas," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 18-036/VII, Tinbergen Institute.
    20. Nigel Burnell & Irina Cojuharenco & Zahra Murad, 2020. "He Taught, She Taught: The effect of teaching style, academic credentials, bias awareness and academic discipline on gender bias in teaching evaluations," Working Papers in Economics & Finance 2020-05, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth Business School, Economics and Finance Subject Group.
    21. Margaretha Buurman & Josse (J.) Delfgaauw & Robert (A.J.) Dur & Robin Zoutenbier, 2018. "The Effects of Student Feedback to teachers: Evidence from a Field Experiment," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 18-042/VII, Tinbergen Institute.
    22. BenYishay, Ariel & Jones, Maria & Kondylis, Florence & Mobarak, Ahmed Mushfiq, 2020. "Gender gaps in technology diffusion," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    23. Abel, Martin & Buchman, Daniel, 2020. "The Effect of Manager Gender and Performance Feedback: Experimental Evidence from India," IZA Discussion Papers 13871, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    24. Kosec, Katrina & Mo, Cecilia Hyunjung & Schmidt, Emily & Song, Jie, 2021. "Perceptions of relative deprivation and women’s empowerment," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    25. Rocco Macchiavello & Andreas Menzel & Atonu Rabbani & Christopher Woodruff, 2020. "Challenges of Change: An Experiment Promoting Women to Managerial Roles in the Bangladeshi Garment Sector," NBER Working Papers 27606, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    26. Valerie K. Bostwick & Bruce A. Weinberg, 2018. "Nevertheless She Persisted? Gender Peer Effects in Doctoral STEM Programs," NBER Working Papers 25028, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    27. Keng, Shao-Hsun, 2020. "Gender bias and statistical discrimination against female instructors in student evaluations of teaching," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    28. Radchenko, Natalia, 2020. "Biases in Student Evaluations of Teaching: An American Case Study," IZA Discussion Papers 13603, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    29. Dakota Murray & Clara Boothby & Huimeng Zhao & Vanessa Minik & Nicolas Bérubé & Vincent Larivière & Cassidy R Sugimoto, 2020. "Exploring the personal and professional factors associated with student evaluations of tenure-track faculty," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-21, June.
    30. Arnaud Philippe, 2020. "Gender Disparities in Sentencing," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 87(348), pages 1037-1077, October.
    31. Friederike Mengel & Jan Sauermann & Ulf Zölitz, 2018. "Gender Bias in Teaching Evaluations," CESifo Working Paper Series 7269, CESifo.

  12. Bart H.H. Golsteyn & Arjan Non & Ulf Zölitz, 2017. "The impact of peer personality on academic achievement," ECON - Working Papers 269, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.

    Cited by:

    1. James J. Heckman & Tomas Jagelka & Tim Kautz, 2019. "Some Contributions of Economics to the Study of Personality," Working Papers 2019-069, Human Capital and Economic Opportunity Working Group.
    2. Agurto Adrianzén, Marcos & Fiestas Chevez, Hugo & Nuñez Morales, Wenceslao & Quevedo, Valeria & Vegas Chiyón, Susana, 2019. "Study-group diversity and early college academic outcomes: Experimental evidence from a higher education inclusion program in Peru," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 131-146.

  13. Borghans, Lex & Golsteyn, Bart H.H. & Zölitz, Ulf, 2015. "School Quality and the Development of Cognitive Skills between Age Four and Six," IZA Discussion Papers 9200, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    Cited by:

    1. Deepmala Yadav & Suma Singh, 2020. "Status of Women Education in India," Shanlax International Journal of Economics, Shanlax International Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 28-35, December.
    2. Borghans, By Lex & Diris, Ron & Smits, Wendy & de Vries, Jannes, 2020. "Should we sort it out later? The effect of tracking age on long-run outcomes," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).

  14. Olivier Marie & Ulf Zölitz, 2015. "'High' Achievers? Cannabis Access and Academic Performance," CESifo Working Paper Series 5304, CESifo.

    Cited by:

    1. Williams, Jenny & Pacula, Rosalie Liccardo & Smart, Rosanna, 2019. "De Facto or De Jure? Ethnic Differences in Quit Responses to Legal Protections of Medical Marijuana Dispensaries," IZA Discussion Papers 12114, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Parey, Matthias & Rasul, Imran, 2017. "Measuring the Market Size for Cannabis: A New Approach Using Forensic Economics," CEPR Discussion Papers 12161, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    3. Carrieri, V.; & Madio, L.; & Principe, F.;, 2018. "Light cannabis and organized crime. Evidence from (unintended) liberalization in Italy," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 18/15, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    4. Benjamin Hansen & Keaton Miller & Caroline Weber, 2017. "Federalism, Partial Prohibition, and Cross-Border Sales: Evidence from Recreational Marijuana," NBER Working Papers 23762, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Kalbfuß, Jörg & Odermatt, Reto & Stutzer, Alois, 2018. "Medical marijuana laws and mental health in the United States," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 88697, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Chu, Luke Yu-Wei & Gershenson, Seth, 2016. "High times: The effect of medical marijuana laws on student time use," Working Paper Series 5046, Victoria University of Wellington, School of Economics and Finance.

  15. Marie, Olivier & Zölitz, Ulf, 2015. "'High' Achievers? Cannabis Access and Academic Performance," IZA Discussion Papers 8900, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    Cited by:

    1. Williams, Jenny & Pacula, Rosalie Liccardo & Smart, Rosanna, 2019. "De Facto or De Jure? Ethnic Differences in Quit Responses to Legal Protections of Medical Marijuana Dispensaries," IZA Discussion Papers 12114, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Parey, Matthias & Rasul, Imran, 2017. "Measuring the Market Size for Cannabis: A New Approach Using Forensic Economics," CEPR Discussion Papers 12161, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    3. Carrieri, V.; & Madio, L.; & Principe, F.;, 2018. "Light cannabis and organized crime. Evidence from (unintended) liberalization in Italy," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 18/15, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    4. Benjamin Hansen & Keaton Miller & Caroline Weber, 2017. "Federalism, Partial Prohibition, and Cross-Border Sales: Evidence from Recreational Marijuana," NBER Working Papers 23762, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Kalbfuß, Jörg & Odermatt, Reto & Stutzer, Alois, 2018. "Medical marijuana laws and mental health in the United States," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 88697, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Chu, Luke Yu-Wei & Gershenson, Seth, 2016. "High times: The effect of medical marijuana laws on student time use," Working Paper Series 5046, Victoria University of Wellington, School of Economics and Finance.

  16. Feld, Jan & Zölitz, Ulf, 2015. "Understanding Peer Effects: On the Nature, Estimation and Channels of Peer Effects," IZA Discussion Papers 9448, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    Cited by:

    1. Olivier Marie & Ulf Zölitz, 2015. "'High' Achievers? Cannabis Access and Academic Performance," CESifo Working Paper Series 5304, CESifo.
    2. Elsner, Benjamin & Isphording, Ingo, 2015. "Big Fishes in Small Ponds: Ability Rank and Human Capital Investment," VfS Annual Conference 2015 (Muenster): Economic Development - Theory and Policy 112928, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    3. Paul Frijters & Asadul Islam & Debayan Pakrashi, 2016. "Can we select the right peers in Indian Education? Evidence from Kolkata," Monash Economics Working Papers 39-16, Monash University, Department of Economics.
    4. Fischer, Thomas & Rode, Johannes, 2020. "Classroom or pub - Where are persistent peer relationships between university students formed?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 474-493.
    5. Chevalier, Arnaud & Isphording, Ingo E. & Lisauskaite, Elena, 2019. "Peer Diversity, College Performance and Educational Choices," IZA Discussion Papers 12202, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    6. Elsner, Benjamin & Isphording, Ingo E., 2015. "A Big Fish in a Small Pond: Ability Rank and Human Capital Investment," IZA Discussion Papers 9121, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    7. Brenøe, Anne & Zölitz, Ulf, 2019. "Exposure to More Female Peers Widens the Gender Gap in STEM Participation," CEPR Discussion Papers 13966, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    8. Feld, Jan & Sauermann, Jan & De Grip, Andries, 2015. "Estimating the Relationship between Skill and Overconfidence," Working Papers in Economics 627, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics.
    9. Feld, Jan & Salamanca, Nicolás & Zölitz, Ulf, 2018. "Are professors worth it? The value-added and costs of tutorial instructors," Working Paper Series 7955, Victoria University of Wellington, School of Economics and Finance.
    10. Yann Bramoullé & Habiba Djebbari & Bernard Fortin, 2020. "Peer Effects in Networks: A Survey," Post-Print hal-03072119, HAL.
    11. Barrios-Fernandez, Andres, 2019. "Should I stay of should I go? Neighbors' effects on university enrollment," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 103426, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Kimbrough, Erik O. & McGee, Andrew & Shigeoka, Hitoshi, 2017. "How Do Peers Impact Learning? An Experimental Investigation of Peer-To-Peer Teaching and Ability Tracking," IZA Discussion Papers 10783, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    13. Zölitz, Ulf & Feld, Jan, 2020. "The Effect of Peer Gender on Major Choice in Business School," IZA Discussion Papers 13396, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    14. Camila F. S. Campos & Shaun Hargreaves Heap & Fernanda Leite Lopez de Leon, 2017. "The political influence of peer groups: experimental evidence in the classroom," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 69(4), pages 963-985.
    15. Shqiponja Telhaj, 2018. "Do social interactions in the classroom improve academic attainment?," IZA World of Labor, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), pages 440-440, June.
    16. Ali Palali & Roel van Elk & Jonneke Bolhaar & Iryna Rud, 2017. "Are good researchers also good teachers? The relationship between research quality and teaching quality," CPB Discussion Paper 347.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    17. Feld, Jan & Salamanca, Nicolás & Zölitz, Ulf, 2019. "Students are Almost as Effective as Professors in University Teaching," IZA Discussion Papers 12491, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    18. Michael Insler & Jimmy Karam, 2016. "Do Sports Crowd Out Books? The Impact of Intercollegiate Athletic Participation on Grades," Departmental Working Papers 50, United States Naval Academy Department of Economics.
    19. Jan Feld & Nicolás Salamanca & Ulf Zölitz, 2018. "Are Professors Worth It? The Value-added and Costs of Tutorial Instructors," CESifo Working Paper Series 7380, CESifo.
    20. Bernhard C. Dannemann, 2020. "Peer Effects in Secondary Education: Evidence from the 2015 Trends in Mathematics and Science Study Based on Homophily," Working Papers V-428-20, University of Oldenburg, Department of Economics, revised Feb 2020.
    21. Friederike Mengel & Jan Sauermann & Ulf Zölitz, 2019. "Gender Bias in Teaching Evaluations," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 17(2), pages 535-566.
    22. Luca Paolo Merlino & Max Friedrich Steinhardt & Liam Wren-Lewis, 2019. "More than just friends? School peers and adult interracial relationships," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-02087855, HAL.
    23. Dasgupta, Utteeyo & Mani, Subha & Sharma, Smriti & Singhal, Saurabh, 2017. "Cognitive, Socioemotional and Behavioral Returns to College Quality," IZA Discussion Papers 10701, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    24. Bart H.H. Golsteyn & Arjan Non & Ulf Zölitz, 2017. "The impact of peer personality on academic achievement," ECON - Working Papers 269, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.
    25. Hahn, Youjin & Hassani Mahmooei, Behrooz & Islam, Asadul & Patacchini, Eleonora & Zenou, Yves, 2016. "Do Friends Improve Female Education? The Case of Bangladesh," CEPR Discussion Papers 11615, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    26. Wu, Jia & Wei, Xiangdong & Zhang, Hongliang & Zhou, Xiang, 2019. "Elite schools, magnet classes, and academic performances: Regression-discontinuity evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 143-167.
    27. Olivier Marie & Ulf Zölitz, 2017. "“High” Achievers? Cannabis Access and Academic Performance," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 84(3), pages 1210-1237.
    28. Auestad, May Linn, 2018. "The effect of low-achieving peers," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 178-214.
    29. Nirav Mehta & Ralph Stinebrickner & Todd Stinebrickner, 2018. "Time-Use and Academic Peer Effects in College," University of Western Ontario, Centre for Human Capital and Productivity (CHCP) Working Papers 20184, University of Western Ontario, Centre for Human Capital and Productivity (CHCP).
    30. Benjamin Elsner & Ingo E. Isphording & Ulf Zölitz, 2018. "Achievement rank affects performance and major choices in college," ECON - Working Papers 300, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.
    31. Palali, Ali & van Elk, Roel & Bolhaar, Jonneke & Rud, Iryna, 2018. "Are good researchers also good teachers? The relationship between research quality and teaching quality," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 40-49.
    32. Caterina Calsamiglia & Annalisa Loviglio, 2016. "Grading On A Curve: When Having Good Peers Is Not Good," Working Papers 2016-020, Human Capital and Economic Opportunity Working Group.
    33. Thiemann, Petra, 2017. "The Persistent Effects of Short-Term Peer Groups in Higher Education," IZA Discussion Papers 11024, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    34. Jan Bietenbeck, 2020. "Own Motivation, Peer Motivation, and Educational Success," CESifo Working Paper Series 8696, CESifo.
    35. Griffith, Amanda L. & Main, Joyce B., 2019. "First impressions in the classroom: How do class characteristics affect student grades and majors?," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 125-137.
    36. Ben Weidmann & David J. Deming, 2020. "Team Players: How Social Skills Improve Group Performance," NBER Working Papers 27071, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    37. Hugo Reis & Paulo Guimarães & Pedro Portugal & Ana Rute Cardoso, 2018. "The returns to schooling unveiled," Working Papers w201805, Banco de Portugal, Economics and Research Department.
    38. Frijters, Paul & Islam, Asad & Pakrashi, Debayan, 2019. "Heterogeneity in peer effects in random dormitory assignment in a developing country," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 100870, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    39. Saia, Alessandro, 2018. "Random interactions in the Chamber: Legislators' behavior and political distance," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 225-240.
    40. Marco Bertoni & Giorgio Brunello & Lorenzo Cappellari, 2020. "Who benefits from privileged peers? Evidence from siblings in schools," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(7), pages 893-916, November.
    41. Wang, Haining & Cheng, Zhiming & Smyth, Russell, 2017. "Do Migrant Students Affect Local Students' Academic Achievements in Urban China?," GLO Discussion Paper Series 130, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    42. Getik, Demid & Meier, Armando N., 2020. "Peer Gender and Mental Health," Working papers 2020/15, Faculty of Business and Economics - University of Basel.
    43. Ribas, Rafael P. & Sampaio, Breno & Trevisan, Giuseppe, 2020. "Short- and long-term effects of class assignment: Evidence from a flagship university in Brazil," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    44. Adriana D. Kugler & Catherine H. Tinsley & Olga Ukhaneva, 2017. "Choice of Majors: Are Women Really Different from Men?," NBER Working Papers 23735, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    45. Agurto Adrianzén, Marcos & Fiestas Chevez, Hugo & Nuñez Morales, Wenceslao & Quevedo, Valeria & Vegas Chiyón, Susana, 2019. "Study-group diversity and early college academic outcomes: Experimental evidence from a higher education inclusion program in Peru," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 131-146.
    46. Hill, Andrew J., 2017. "The positive influence of female college students on their male peers," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 151-160.
    47. Ingo E. Isphording & Ulf Zölitz, 2020. "The value of a peer," ECON - Working Papers 342, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.
    48. Lusher, Lester & Yasenov, Vasil, 2016. "Gender Performance Gaps: Quasi-Experimental Evidence on the Role of Gender Differences in Sleep Cycles," IZA Discussion Papers 10012, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    49. Bin Huang & Rong Zhu, 2020. "Peer effects of low-ability students in the classroom: evidence from China’s middle schools," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 33(4), pages 1343-1380, October.
    50. Fang, Guanfu & Wan, Shan, 2020. "Peer effects among graduate students: Evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    51. Kiessling, Lukas & Radbruch, Jonas & Schaube, Sebastian, 2018. "The Impact of Self-Selection on Performance," IZA Discussion Papers 11365, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    52. Bertoni, Marco & Nistico, Roberto, 2019. "Ordinal Rank and Peer Composition: Two Sides of the Same Coin?," IZA Discussion Papers 12789, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    53. Arendt, Jacob Nielsen & Greve, Jane & Bergqvist, Mikkel, 2019. "Is it good to be LATE? The impact of a preparatory program on upper secondary schooling," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 38-52.
    54. Hikaru Kawarazaki & Minhaj Mahmud & Yasuyuki Sawada & Mai Seki, 2020. "Haste Makes No Waste: Peer Effects of a Speed Competition on Math Score," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-1151, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
    55. Dasgupta, Utteeyo & Mani, Subha & Sharma, Smriti & Singhal, Saurabh, 2020. "Effects of Peers and Rank on Cognition, Preferences, and Personality," GLO Discussion Paper Series 591, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    56. Jan Feld & Nicolás Salamanca & Ulf Zölitz, 2019. "Students Are Almost as Effective as Professors in University Teaching," CESifo Working Paper Series 7764, CESifo.
    57. de Gendre, Alexandra & Salamanca, Nicolás, 2020. "On the Mechanisms of Ability Peer Effects," IZA Discussion Papers 13938, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    58. Friederike Mengel & Jan Sauermann & Ulf Zölitz, 2018. "Gender Bias in Teaching Evaluations," CESifo Working Paper Series 7269, CESifo.

  17. Borghans, Lex & Golsteyn, Bart H.H. & Zölitz, Ulf, 2014. "Parental Preferences for Primary School Characteristics," IZA Discussion Papers 8371, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    Cited by:

    1. Thomas Wouters & Zoltan Hermann & Carla Haelermans, 2018. "Demand for secondary school characteristics - Evidence from school choice data in Hungary," Budapest Working Papers on the Labour Market 1803, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    2. Nienke Ruijs & Hessel Oosterbeek, 2019. "School Choice in Amsterdam: Which Schools are Chosen When School Choice is Free?," Education Finance and Policy, MIT Press, vol. 14(1), pages 1-30, Winter.
    3. Bjerre-Nielsen, Andreas & Gandil, Mikkel H., 2020. "Attendance Boundary Policies and the Limits to Combating School Segregation," SocArXiv 3g2u6, Center for Open Science.

Articles

  1. Jan Feld & Ulf Zölitz, 2017. "Understanding Peer Effects: On the Nature, Estimation, and Channels of Peer Effects," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 35(2), pages 387-428.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  2. Olivier Marie & Ulf Zölitz, 2017. "“High” Achievers? Cannabis Access and Academic Performance," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 84(3), pages 1210-1237.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  3. Borghans Lex & Golsteyn Bart H. H. & Zölitz Ulf, 2015. "Parental Preferences for Primary School Characteristics," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 15(1), pages 1-33, January.
    See citations under working paper version above.Sorry, no citations of articles recorded.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 28 papers announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-URE: Urban & Real Estate Economics (14) 2014-06-22 2014-08-28 2015-08-19 2016-03-10 2016-03-29 2017-11-19 2017-11-19 2018-05-07 2018-10-08 2019-09-23 2019-09-30 2019-10-21 2020-03-16 2020-03-16. Author is listed
  2. NEP-EDU: Education (13) 2014-06-22 2014-08-28 2015-03-22 2015-05-09 2015-08-19 2017-11-19 2017-11-19 2018-05-07 2018-08-13 2018-10-08 2019-01-07 2019-08-26 2020-03-16. Author is listed
  3. NEP-HRM: Human Capital & Human Resource Management (9) 2016-03-10 2017-11-19 2017-11-19 2018-08-13 2018-10-08 2019-01-07 2019-01-28 2019-08-26 2020-03-16. Author is listed
  4. NEP-LMA: Labor Markets - Supply, Demand, & Wages (9) 2015-08-19 2017-10-01 2017-11-19 2018-05-07 2018-08-13 2019-01-28 2019-08-26 2019-08-26 2019-09-23. Author is listed
  5. NEP-EUR: Microeconomic European Issues (6) 2015-04-11 2017-11-19 2018-05-07 2019-09-23 2019-09-30 2019-10-21. Author is listed
  6. NEP-SOG: Sociology of Economics (6) 2015-04-11 2018-05-28 2019-01-07 2019-01-28 2019-08-12 2019-08-26. Author is listed
  7. NEP-GEN: Gender (3) 2017-10-01 2017-11-19 2018-05-07
  8. NEP-HME: Heterodox Microeconomics (3) 2017-10-01 2018-05-07 2019-09-23
  9. NEP-LAW: Law & Economics (3) 2015-03-22 2015-04-11 2016-11-27
  10. NEP-NET: Network Economics (2) 2017-11-19 2020-03-16
  11. NEP-SOC: Social Norms & Social Capital (2) 2016-03-10 2016-03-29
  12. NEP-CBE: Cognitive & Behavioural Economics (1) 2017-11-19
  13. NEP-ECM: Econometrics (1) 2016-03-29
  14. NEP-NEU: Neuroeconomics (1) 2015-08-19

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Ulf Zölitz
(Ulf Zoelitz) should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.