IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/e/c/pmu186.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Sushama Murty

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Sushama Murty & R. Robert Russell, 2016. "Modeling Emission-Generating Technologies: Reconciliation of Axiomatic and By-Production Approaches," Discussion Papers 1603, University of Exeter, Department of Economics.

    Cited by:

    1. Kassoum Ayouba & Jean-Philippe Boussemart & Raluca Parvulescu, 2023. "Measuring CO2 emission reduction potential using a cost approach," Working Papers 2023-EQM-02, IESEG School of Management.
    2. Sushama Murty & Resham Nagpal, "undated". "Measuring output-based technical efficiency of Indian coal-based thermal power plants: A by-production approach," Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi Discussion Papers 18-07, Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.
    3. Roshdi, Israfil & Hasannasab, Maryam & Margaritis, Dimitris & Rouse, Paul, 2018. "Generalised weak disposability and efficiency measurement in environmental technologies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(3), pages 1000-1012.
    4. Yiran Niu & Jean-Philippe Boussemart & Zhiyang Shen & Michael Vardanyan, 2024. "Performance evaluation using multi-stage production frameworks: assessing the tradeoffs among the economic, environmental, and social well-being," Working Papers 2024-EQM-04, IESEG School of Management.
    5. Aparicio, J. & Kapelko, M. & Zofío, J.L., 2019. "The Measurement of Environmental Economic Inefficiency with Pollution-generating Technologies," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2019-005-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    6. F. Ang & K. H. Dakpo, 2021. "Comment: Performance measurement and joint production of intended and unintended outputs," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 185-188, June.
    7. Jean-Philippe Boussemart & Hervé Leleu & Zhiyang Shen & Vivian Valdmanis, 2020. "Performance analysis for three pillars of sustainability," Post-Print hal-03046676, HAL.
    8. Amer Ait Sidhoum, 2023. "Measuring farm productivity under production uncertainty," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 67(4), pages 672-687, October.
    9. Wang, Miao & Feng, Chao, 2021. "The consequences of industrial restructuring, regional balanced development, and market-oriented reform for China's carbon dioxide emissions: A multi-tier meta-frontier DEA-based decomposition analysi," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    10. Fang, Lei, 2020. "Opening the “black box” of environmental production technology in a nonparametric analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(2), pages 769-780.
    11. Magambo, Isaiah & Dikgang, Johane & Gelo, Dambala & Tregenna, Fiona, 2021. "Environmental and Technical Efficiency in Large Gold Mines in Developing Countries," MPRA Paper 108068, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Førsund, Finn, 2019. "Environmental Performance Measurement: The Rise and Fall of Shephard-inspired Measures," Memorandum 9/2019, Oslo University, Department of Economics.
    13. Juan Aparicio & Jose Manuel Cordero & Carlos Díaz-Caro, 2020. "Efficiency and productivity change of regional tax offices in Spain: an empirical study using Malmquist–Luenberger and Luenberger indices," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 59(3), pages 1403-1434, September.
    14. Lai, Hung-pin & Kumbhakar, Subal C., 2021. "A panel frontier system model with good and bad outputs and endogenous treatment decision," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    15. Juan Aparicio & Magdalena Kapelko & Lidia Ortiz, 2021. "Modelling environmental inefficiency under a quota system," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 1097-1124, June.
    16. Amer Ait Sidhoum, 2023. "Assessing the contribution of farmers’ working conditions to productive efficiency in the presence of uncertainty, a nonparametric approach," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(8), pages 8601-8622, August.
    17. Alexandre Repkine, 2023. "The Estimation of a Polluting By-Production Technology Using Statistical Copulas," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 49-62, August.
    18. Førsund, Finn R, 2017. "Pollution Meets Efficiency: Multi-equation modelling of generation of pollution and related efficiency measures," Memorandum 09/2017, Oslo University, Department of Economics.
    19. Gopalan, Ram & Hachadoorian, Lee & Kimbrough, Steven O. & Murphy, Frederic H., 2024. "Selecting good redistricting plans from a large pool of available plans using the efficient frontier," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    20. Sushama Murty & Resham Nagpal, "undated". "Choice of models for emission-generating technologies and designing technical efficiency improvements," Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi Discussion Papers 19-01, Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.
    21. Magambo, Isaiah Hubert & Dikgang, Johane & Gelo, Dambala & Tregenna, Fiona, 2021. "Dynamic Technical and Environmental Efficiency Performance of Large Gold Mines in Developing Countries," EconStor Preprints 235859, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    22. Harald Dyckhoff & Rainer Souren, 2023. "Are important phenomena of joint production still being neglected by economic theory? A review of recent literature," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 93(6), pages 1015-1053, August.
    23. Sushama Murty & R. Robert Russell, "undated". "Bad Outputs," Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi Discussion Papers 17-06, Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.
    24. Tateishi, Henrique Ryosuke & Bragagnolo, Cassiano & de Faria, Rosane Nunes, 2020. "Economic and environmental efficiencies of greenhouse gases’ emissions under institutional influence," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    25. Aparicio, Juan & Ortiz, Lidia & Santín, Daniel, 2021. "Comparing group performance over time through the Luenberger productivity indicator: An application to school ownership in European countries," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(2), pages 651-672.
    26. Subhash C. Ray & Shilpa Sethia, 2024. "A state-level resource allocation model for emission reduction and efficiency improvement in thermal power plants," Indian Economic Review, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 205-257, October.
    27. Ahmad, Shabbir & Steen, John & Ali, Saleem & Valenta, Rick, 2023. "Carbon-adjusted efficiency and technology gaps in gold mining," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    28. Sushama Murty & R. Robert Russell, 2021. "A commentary on “Performance measurement and joint production of intended and unintended outputs” by Finn Førsund," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 177-184, June.
    29. Moriah Bostian & Rolf Färe & Shawna Grosskopf & Tommy Lundgren, 2022. "Prevention or cure? Optimal abatement mix," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 24(4), pages 503-531, October.
    30. Subhash C. Ray & Shilpa Sethia, 2023. "A State-Level Resource Allocation Model for Emission Reduction and Efficiency Improvement in Thermal Power Plants," Working papers 2023-08, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics.
    31. Finn R. Førsund, 2021. "Performance measurement and joint production of intended and unintended outputs," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 157-175, June.
    32. Sushama Murty & Resham Nagpal, "undated". "Weighted index of graph efficiency improvements for a by-production technology and its application to Indian coal-based thermal power sector," Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi Discussion Papers 18-08, Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.
    33. Amirteimoori, Alireza & Kazemi Matin, Reza & Yadollahi, Amir Hossein, 2024. "Stochastic resource reallocation in two-stage production processes with undesirable outputs: An empirical study on the power industry," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).

  2. Sushama Murty, 2015. "Marginal reforms to facilitate climate change mitigation: An assessment of costs and abilities to abate of different countries," Discussion Papers 1508, University of Exeter, Department of Economics.

    Cited by:

    1. Sushama Murty & R. Robert Russell, "undated". "Modeling emission-generating technologies: Reconciliation of axiomatic and by-production approaches," Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi Discussion Papers 16-01, Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.

  3. Sushama Murty, 2014. "On the environmental Kuznets curve with fossil-fuel induced emission: Theory and some illustrative examples," Discussion Papers 1406, University of Exeter, Department of Economics.

    Cited by:

    1. Sushama Murty, 2014. "Necessary and sufficient conditions for an environmental Kuznets curve with some illustrative examples," Discussion Papers 1407, University of Exeter, Department of Economics.

  4. Sushama Murty, 2014. "Necessary and sufficient conditions for an environmental Kuznets curve with some illustrative examples," Discussion Papers 1407, University of Exeter, Department of Economics.

    Cited by:

    1. Sushama Murty, 2014. "On the environmental Kuznets curve with fossil-fuel induced emission: Theory and some illustrative examples," Discussion Papers 1406, University of Exeter, Department of Economics.

  5. Sushama Murty, 2011. "The Theory of By-Production of Emissions and Capital-Constrained Non-Cooperative Nash Outcomes of a Global Economy," Discussion Papers 1110, University of Exeter, Department of Economics.

    Cited by:

    1. Sushama Murty, 2012. "Microfoundations for the Environmental Kuznets Curve: Invoking By-Production, Normality and Inferiority of Emissions," Discussion Papers 1203, University of Exeter, Department of Economics.

  6. Sushama Murty, 2010. "Constraints on profit income distribution and production efficiency in private ownership economies with Ramsey taxation," Discussion Papers 1010, University of Exeter, Department of Economics.

    Cited by:

    1. Reinhorn, Leslie J., 2013. "Production efficiency and excess supply," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 92-100.

  7. Murty, Sushama & Russell, R. Robert, 2010. "On modeling pollution-generating technologies," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 931, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.

    Cited by:

    1. Wu, Jie & Zhu, Qingyuan & Ji, Xiang & Chu, Junfei & Liang, Liang, 2016. "Two-stage network processes with shared resources and resources recovered from undesirable outputs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(1), pages 182-197.
    2. Moriah Bostian & Rolf Färe & Shawna Grosskopf & Tommy Lundgren & William L. Weber, 2018. "Time substitution for environmental performance: The case of Swedish manufacturing," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 129-152, February.
    3. Kenneth Rødseth & Eirik Romstad, 2014. "Environmental Regulations, Producer Responses, and Secondary Benefits: Carbon Dioxide Reductions Under the Acid Rain Program," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 59(1), pages 111-135, September.
    4. Kenneth Løvold Rødseth, 2017. "Axioms of a Polluting Technology: A Materials Balance Approach," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 67(1), pages 1-22, May.
    5. Serra, Teresa & Chambers, Robert G. & Oude Lansink, Alfons, 2014. "Measuring technical and environmental efficiency in a state-contingent technology," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(2), pages 706-717.
    6. Kenneth Rødseth, 2014. "Efficiency measurement when producers control pollutants: a non-parametric approach," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 42(2), pages 211-223, October.
    7. Behrouz Arabi & Susila Munisamy Doraisamy & Ali Emrouznejad & Alireza Khoshroo, 2017. "Eco-efficiency measurement and material balance principle: an application in power plants Malmquist Luenberger Index," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 255(1), pages 221-239, August.
    8. Førsund, Finn R., 2008. "Good Modelling of Bad Outputs: Pollution and Multiple-Output Production," Memorandum 30/2008, Oslo University, Department of Economics.
    9. Cherchye, Laurens & Rock, Bram De & Walheer, Barnabé, 2015. "Multi-output efficiency with good and bad outputs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(3), pages 872-881.
    10. Tim Coelli & Ludwig Lauwers & Guido Huylenbroeck, 2007. "Environmental efficiency measurement and the materials balance condition," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 3-12, October.
    11. Simar, Léopold & Vanhems, Anne, 2010. "Probabilistic Characterization of Directional Distances and their Robust Versions," TSE Working Papers 10-195, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    12. Theodoros Skevas & Teresa Serra, 2016. "The role of pest pressure in technical and environmental inefficiency analysis of Dutch arable farms: an event-specific data envelopment approach," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 139-153, December.
    13. Sushama Murty, 2014. "On the environmental Kuznets curve with fossil-fuel induced emission: Theory and some illustrative examples," Discussion Papers 1406, University of Exeter, Department of Economics.
    14. Rødseth, Kenneth Løvold, 2013. "A note on input congestion," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 120(3), pages 599-602.
    15. Kumar, Surender, 2006. "Environmentally sensitive productivity growth: A global analysis using Malmquist-Luenberger index," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 280-293, February.
    16. Surender Kumar & Shunsuke Managi, 2014. "Carbon sensitive productivity, climate and institutions," Working Papers SDES-2014-15, Kochi University of Technology, School of Economics and Management, revised Nov 2014.
    17. Dakpo, K & Jeanneaux, Philippe & Latruffee, Laure, 2015. "Empirical comparison of pollution generating technologies in nonparametric modelling: The case of greenhouse gas emissions in French sheep meat farming," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 211557, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    18. Singh, Rajesh & Weninger, Quinn, 2016. "Cap and trade under transactions costs and factor irreversibility," ISU General Staff Papers 201607060700001021, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    19. Theodoros Skevas & Teresa Serra, 2017. "Derivation of netput shadow prices under different levels of pest pressure," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 25-34, August.
    20. Sushama Murty, 2015. "On the properties of an emission-generating technology and its parametric representation," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 60(2), pages 243-282, October.
    21. Lauwers, Ludwig, 2009. "Justifying the incorporation of the materials balance principle into frontier-based eco-efficiency models," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1605-1614, April.
    22. Yanni Yu & Yongrok Choi, 2015. "Measuring Environmental Performance Under Regional Heterogeneity in China: A Metafrontier Efficiency Analysis," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 46(3), pages 375-388, October.
    23. H. Leleu, 2013. "Shadow pricing of undesirable outputs in nonparametric analysis," Post-Print hal-00848044, HAL.
    24. Ke Wang & Shiwei Yu & Mo-Jie Li & Yi-Ming Wei, 2013. "Multi-directional efficiency analysis-based regional industrial environmental performance evaluation of China," CEEP-BIT Working Papers 47, Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research (CEEP), Beijing Institute of Technology.
    25. Aldanondo, Ana M. & Casasnovas, Valero L. & Almansa, M. Carmen, 2016. "Cost-constrained measures of environmental efficiency: a material balance approach," MPRA Paper 72490, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    26. Arnaud Abad & Paola Ravelojaona, 2017. "Exponential environmental productivity index and indicators," Post-Print hal-03025344, HAL.
    27. Sebastián Lozano, 2017. "Technical and environmental efficiency of a two-stage production and abatement system," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 255(1), pages 199-219, August.
    28. Bostian, Moriah & Färe, Rolf & Grosskopf, Shawna & Lundgren, Tommy & Weber, William L., 2016. "Time substitution for environmental performance: The case of Sweden manufacturing," CERE Working Papers 2016:3, CERE - the Center for Environmental and Resource Economics.
    29. Li, Ye & Cui, Qiang, 2017. "Carbon neutral growth from 2020 strategy and airline environmental inefficiency: A Network Range Adjusted Environmental Data Envelopment Analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 13-24.
    30. Benjamin Hampf, 2014. "Separating environmental efficiency into production and abatement efficiency: a nonparametric model with application to US power plants," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 457-473, June.
    31. Dakpo, K Hervé & Latruffe, Laure, 2016. "Agri-environmental subsidies and French suckler cow farms’ technical efficiency accounting for GHGs," Working Papers 245192, Institut National de la recherche Agronomique (INRA), Departement Sciences Sociales, Agriculture et Alimentation, Espace et Environnement (SAE2).
    32. Plesha, Nataliya & Ray, Subhash C. & Nehring, Richard F. & Ball, V. Eldon, 2012. "Incorporating "Bads" and "Goods" in the Measurement of Agricultural Productivity Growth in the U.S," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 124585, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    33. Ke Wang & Yujiao Xian & Chia-Yen Lee & Yi-Ming Wei & Zhimin Huang, 2017. "On selecting directions for directional distance functions in a non-parametric framework: A review," CEEP-BIT Working Papers 99, Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research (CEEP), Beijing Institute of Technology.
    34. Zhang, Ning & Kong, Fanbin & Choi, Yongrok & Zhou, P., 2014. "The effect of size-control policy on unified energy and carbon efficiency for Chinese fossil fuel power plants," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 193-200.
    35. Subhash C. Ray & Kankana Mukherjee & Anand Venkatesh, 2016. "Nonparametric Measures of Efficiency in the Presence of Undesirable Outputs: A By-production Approach with Weak Disposability," Working papers 2016-04, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics.
    36. Empora, Neophyta & Mamuneas, Theofanis P. & Stengos, Thanasis, 2020. "Output and pollution abatement in a U.S. state emission function," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(1), pages 44-65, February.
    37. Murty, Sushama, 2010. "On the theory of a firm : The case of by-production of emissions," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 934, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
    38. Färe, Rolf & Grosskopf, Shawna & Pasurka, Carl A., 2014. "Potential gains from trading bad outputs: The case of U.S. electric power plants," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 99-112.
    39. Ke Wang & Yujiao Xian & Yi-Ming Wei & Zhimin Huang, 2016. "Sources of carbon productivity change: A decomposition and disaggregation analysis based on global Luenberger productivity indicator and endogenous directional distance function," CEEP-BIT Working Papers 91, Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research (CEEP), Beijing Institute of Technology.
    40. Sushama Murty, 2012. "On the properties of an emission-generating technology and its parametric representation," Discussion Papers 1202, University of Exeter, Department of Economics.
    41. Managi, Shunsuke & Kumar, Surender, 2009. "Trade-induced technological change: Analyzing economic and environmental outcomes," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 721-732, May.
    42. Ke Wang & Yi-Ming Wei & Zhimin Huang, 2017. "Environmental efficiency and abatement efficiency measurements of China¡¯s thermal power industry: A data envelopment analysis based materials balance approach," CEEP-BIT Working Papers 108, Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research (CEEP), Beijing Institute of Technology.
    43. Puggioni, Daniela & Stefanou, Spiro E., 2016. "The Value of Being Socially Responsible. A DEA Approach for Analyzing Efficiency and Recovering Shadow Prices of CSR Activities," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235723, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    44. Sushama Murty, 2016. "Measuring unilateral and multilateral gains from tackling current economic inefficiencies in CO2 reductions: Theory and evidence," Discussion Papers 1604, University of Exeter, Department of Economics.
    45. Ke Wang & Xian Zhang & Xueying Yu & Yi-Ming Wei & Bin Wang, 2016. "Emissions trading and abatement cost savings: An estimation of China's thermal power industry," CEEP-BIT Working Papers 95, Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research (CEEP), Beijing Institute of Technology.
    46. Murty, Sushama, 2006. "Externalities and Fundamental Nonconvexities: A Reconciliation of Approaches to General Equilibrium Externality Modeling and Implications for Decentralization," Economic Research Papers 269649, University of Warwick - Department of Economics.
    47. Kenneth Løvold Rødseth, 2017. "Environmental regulations and allocative efficiency: application to coal-to-gas substitution in the U.S. electricity sector," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 129-142, April.
    48. Emir Malikov & Raushan Bokusheva & Subal C. Kumbhakar, 2018. "A hedonic-output-index-based approach to modeling polluting technologies," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 287-308, February.
    49. Davutyan, Nurhan & Bilsel, Murat & Tarcan, Menderes, 2012. "Risk-Adjusted Mortality, varieties of congestion and patient satisfaction in Turkish provincial general hospitals," MPRA Paper 37437, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    50. Färe, Rolf & Grosskopf, Shawna & Pasurka, Carl, 2016. "Technical change and pollution abatement costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(2), pages 715-724.
    51. Zhang, Shanshan & Lundgren, Tommy & Zhou, Wenchao, 2016. "Energy efficiency in Swedish industry," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 42-51.
    52. Neophyta Empora & Theofanis Mamuneas, 2011. "The Effect of Emissions on U.S. State Total Factor Productivity Growth," Review of Economic Analysis, Digital Initiatives at the University of Waterloo Library, vol. 3(2), pages 149-172, October.
    53. Emir Malikov & Subal C. Kumbhakar & Efthymios G. Tsionas, 2015. "Bayesian Approach to Disentangling Technical and Environmental Productivity," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-23, June.
    54. Hampf, Benjamin, 2011. "Separating environmental efficiency into production and abatement efficiency: A nonparametric model with application to U.S. power plants," Darmstadt Discussion Papers in Economics 204, Darmstadt University of Technology, Department of Law and Economics.
    55. Sushama Murty & R. Robert Russell, "undated". "Modeling emission-generating technologies: Reconciliation of axiomatic and by-production approaches," Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi Discussion Papers 16-01, Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.
    56. Dakpo, K Hervé, 2016. "On modeling pollution-generating technologies: a new formulation of the by-production approach," Working Papers 245191, Institut National de la recherche Agronomique (INRA), Departement Sciences Sociales, Agriculture et Alimentation, Espace et Environnement (SAE2).
    57. Pantelis Kalaitzidakis & Theofanis P. Mamuneas & Thanasis Stengos, 2018. "Greenhouse Emissions and Productivity Growth," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-14, July.
    58. Andersen, Torben M. & Bhattacharya, Joydeep & Liu, Pan, 2020. "Resolving intergenerational conflict over the environment under the Pareto criterion," ISU General Staff Papers 202003010800001070, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    59. Zhou, P. & Sun, Z.R. & Zhou, D.Q., 2014. "Optimal path for controlling CO2 emissions in China: A perspective of efficiency analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 99-110.
    60. Neophyta Empora, 2017. "Air pollution spillovers and U.S. state productivity growth," University of Cyprus Working Papers in Economics 06-2017, University of Cyprus Department of Economics.
    61. Surender Kumar, 2007. "Measurement of Environmental Efficiency and Productivity: A Cross Country Analysis," Working Papers id:1004, eSocialSciences.
    62. Subhash C. Ray, 2014. "Data Envelopment Analysis: An Overview," Working papers 2014-33, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics.
    63. Mehta, Yashree & Reichenbach, Marion & Brümmer, Bernhard & Schlecht, Eva, 2025. "Estimating environmental efficiency in dairy production using by-production technology," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    64. Kumar, Surender & Gupta, Sreekant, 2004. "Resource use efficiency of US electricity generating plants during the SO2 trading regime: A distance function approach," Working Papers 04/17, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy.
    65. Hampf, Benjamin, 2015. "Estimating the materials balance condition: A stochastic frontier approach," Darmstadt Discussion Papers in Economics 226, Darmstadt University of Technology, Department of Law and Economics.
    66. Robert G. Chambers & Teresa Serra, 2018. "The social dimension of firm performance: a data envelopment approach," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 189-206, February.
    67. K Hervé Dakpo, 2016. "On modeling pollution-generating technologies: a new formulation of the by-production approach," Working Papers SMART 16-06, INRAE UMR SMART.
    68. Sushama Murty, 2012. "Microfoundations for the Environmental Kuznets Curve: Invoking By-Production, Normality and Inferiority of Emissions," Discussion Papers 1203, University of Exeter, Department of Economics.
    69. Dakpo, Hervé K & Jeanneaux, Philippe & Latruffe, Laure, 2014. "Inclusion of undesirable outputs in production technology modeling: The case of greenhouse gas emissions in French meat sheep farming," Working Papers 207806, Institut National de la recherche Agronomique (INRA), Departement Sciences Sociales, Agriculture et Alimentation, Espace et Environnement (SAE2).
    70. Ke Wang & Yi-Ming Wei, 2014. "China's regional industrial energy efficiency and carbon emissions abatement costs," CEEP-BIT Working Papers 64, Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research (CEEP), Beijing Institute of Technology.
    71. Rødseth, Kenneth Løvold, 2013. "Capturing the least costly way of reducing pollution: A shadow price approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 16-24.
    72. Färe, Rolf & Grosskopf, Shawna & Pasurka,, Carl A., 2013. "Tradable permits and unrealized gains from trade," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 416-424.
    73. Subhash C. Ray & Kankana Mukherjee & Anand Venkatesh, 2018. "Nonparametric measures of efficiency in the presence of undesirable outputs: a by-production approach," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 31-65, February.
    74. Du, Kerui & Lu, Huang & Yu, Kun, 2014. "Sources of the potential CO2 emission reduction in China: A nonparametric metafrontier approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 491-501.
    75. Walter Briec & Kristiaan Kerstens & Ignace Van De Woestyne, 2016. "Congestion in production correspondences," Post-Print hal-01533536, HAL.
    76. Zuoxiang Zhao, 2017. "Measurement of production efficiency and environmental efficiency in China’s province-level: a by-production approach," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 19(4), pages 735-759, October.
    77. Yin, Pengzhen & Sun, Jiasen & Chu, Junfei & Liang, Liang, 2016. "Evaluating the environmental efficiency of a two-stage system with undesired outputs by a DEA approach: An interest preference perspectiveAuthor-Name: Wu, Jie," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(3), pages 1047-1062.
    78. Hampf, Benjamin & Rødseth, Kenneth Løvold, 2014. "Carbon dioxide emission standards for US power plants: An efficiency analysis perspective," Darmstadt Discussion Papers in Economics 219, Darmstadt University of Technology, Department of Law and Economics.
    79. Juana AZNAR-MARQUEZ & Jose-Ramon RUIZ-TAMARIT, 2012. "Sufficient and Necessary Conditions for Non-Catastrophic Growth," LIDAM Discussion Papers IRES 2012027, Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES).
    80. Bokusheva, Raushan & Kumbhakar, Subal C., 2014. "A Distance Function Model with Good and Bad Outputs," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 182765, European Association of Agricultural Economists.

  8. Murty, Sushama, 2010. "On the theory of a firm : The case of by-production of emissions," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 934, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.

    Cited by:

    1. Seufert, Juergen Heinz & Arjomandi, Amir & Dakpo, K. Hervé, 2017. "Evaluating airline operational performance: A Luenberger-Hicks-Moorsteen productivity indicator," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 52-68.
    2. Zhiqiang Zhu & Xuechi Zhang & Mengqing Xue & Yaoyao Song, 2023. "Eco-Efficiency and Its Evolutionary Change under Regulatory Constraints: A Case Study of Chinese Transportation Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, April.
    3. Stefanou Spiro E. & Puggioni Daniela, 2018. "The Value of Being Socially Responsible. A Primal-Dual Approach," Working Papers 2018-12, Banco de México.
    4. D’Inverno, Giovanna & Carosi, Laura & Romano, Giulia & Guerrini, Andrea, 2018. "Water pollution in wastewater treatment plants: An efficiency analysis with undesirable output," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(1), pages 24-34.
    5. Amir Arjomandi & K Hervé Dakpo & Juergen Heinz Seufert, 2018. "Have Asian airlines caught up with European Airlines? A by-production efficiency analysis [Analyse comparée de l’Eco-performance des compagnies aériennes asiatiques et européennes]," Post-Print hal-02628232, HAL.
    6. Silva, Elvira & Magalhães, Manuela, 2023. "Environmental efficiency, irreversibility and the shadow price of emissions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(2), pages 955-967.
    7. Puggioni, Daniela & Stefanou, Spiro E., 2016. "The Value of Being Socially Responsible. A DEA Approach for Analyzing Efficiency and Recovering Shadow Prices of CSR Activities," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235723, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    8. Dakpo, K Hervé, 2016. "On modeling pollution-generating technologies: a new formulation of the by-production approach," Working Papers 245191, Institut National de la recherche Agronomique (INRA), Departement Sciences Sociales, Agriculture et Alimentation, Espace et Environnement (SAE2).
    9. Jeanneaux, Philippe & Latruffe, Laure, 2016. "Modelling pollution-generating technologies in performance benchmarking: Recent developments, limits and future prospects in the nonparametric frameworkAuthor-Name: Dakpo, K. Hervé," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(2), pages 347-359.
    10. K Hervé Dakpo, 2016. "On modeling pollution-generating technologies: a new formulation of the by-production approach," Working Papers SMART 16-06, INRAE UMR SMART.

  9. Blackorby, Charles & Murty, Sushama, 2009. "Constraints on Income Distribution and Production Efficiency In Economies with Ramsey Taxation," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 908, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.

    Cited by:

    1. Murty, Sushama, 2009. "Topology of utility possibility frontiers of economies with Ramsey taxation," Economic Research Papers 271288, University of Warwick - Department of Economics.
    2. Sushama Murty, 2013. "Production efficiency and constraints on profit taxation and profit distribution in economies with Ramsey taxation," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 41(3), pages 579-604, September.
    3. Stéphane Gauthier & Guy Laroque, 2019. "Production efficiency and profit taxation," SciencePo Working papers Main halshs-01884350, HAL.

  10. Murty, Sushama, 2009. "Topology of utility possibility frontiers of economies with Ramsey taxation," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 912, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.

    Cited by:

    1. Jean-François Mertens & Anna Rubinchik, 2017. "Discounting and welfare evaluation of policies," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 19(5), pages 903-920, October.

  11. Blackorby, Charles & Murty, Sushama, 2007. "Unit Versus Ad Valorem Taxes : The Private Ownership of Monopoly In General Equilibrium," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 797, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.

    Cited by:

    1. Sophia Delipalla, 2009. "Commodity Tax Structure And Informal Activity," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(3), pages 283-294, July.
    2. Charles Blackorby & Sushama Murty, 2013. "Unit Versus Ad Valorem Taxes: The Private Ownership of Monopoly in General Equilibrium," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 15(4), pages 547-579, August.
    3. Hiroshi Aiura & Hikaru Ogawa, 2016. "Indirect Taxes in the Cross-border Shopping Model: A Monopolistic Competition Approach," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-1014, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
    4. Kuang-Cheng Andy Wang & Ping-Yao Chou & Wen-Jung Liang, 2022. "Commodity taxes and rent extraction," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 135(3), pages 285-297, April.
    5. de Rus, Ginés & Socorro, M. Pilar, 2022. "Subsidies in air transport markets: The economic consequences of choosing the wrong mechanism," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    6. Valido, Jorge & Pilar Socorro, M. & Hernández, Aday & Betancor, Ofelia, 2014. "Air transport subsidies for resident passengers when carriers have market power," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 388-399.
    7. Christos Kotsogiannis & Konstantinos Serfes, 2014. "The Comparison of ad Valorem and Specific Taxation under Uncertainty," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 16(1), pages 48-68, February.
    8. Olena SOKOLOVSKA & Dmytro SOKOLOVSKYI, 2016. "Modeling Of Consumption Taxes For Different Market Framework: The Case Of Ukraine," ECONOMIC COMPUTATION AND ECONOMIC CYBERNETICS STUDIES AND RESEARCH, Faculty of Economic Cybernetics, Statistics and Informatics, vol. 50(4), pages 75-92.
    9. Kazuki Hiraga, 2019. "Unit versus ad valorem tax comparisons in a simple New Keynesian dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 9(4), pages 459-466, December.
    10. Plewka, Jörg, 2007. "Fiscal Discrimination Between Consumer Groups: Tax Burden Distribution Under Price Discrimination," Ruhr Economic Papers 19, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    11. Laszlo Goerke, 2011. "Commodity Tax Structure under Uncertainty in a Perfectly Competitive Market," CESifo Working Paper Series 3339, CESifo.
    12. McCalman, Phillip, 2023. "Robust trade policy to offset foreign market power," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    13. Hong Hwang & Chao-Cheng Mai & Ya-Po Yang, 2015. "Specific vs Ad Valorem Strategic Export Subsidies with Taxation Distortion," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(4), pages 820-828, November.
    14. Shiou-Yen Chu & Tsaur-Chin Wu, 2023. "Ad valorem versus unit taxes on capital in a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 30(6), pages 1435-1456, December.
    15. Henrik Vetter, 2017. "Commodity taxes and welfare under endogenous market conduct," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 122(2), pages 137-154, October.
    16. Kojun Hamada & Takao Ohkawa & Makoto Okamura, 2022. "Optimal taxation in a free‐entry Cournot oligopoly: The average cost function approach," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(2), pages 1166-1192, May.

  12. Murty, Sushama, 2006. "Externalities and Fundamental Nonconvexities : A Reconciliation of Approaches to General Equilibrium Externality Modelling and Implications for Decentralization," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 756, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.

    Cited by:

    1. Sushama Murty & R. Robert Russell & Steven B. Levkoff, 2011. "On modeling pollution-generating technologies," Discussion Papers 1101, University of Exeter, Department of Economics.
    2. Kenneth Rødseth, 2014. "Efficiency measurement when producers control pollutants: a non-parametric approach," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 42(2), pages 211-223, October.
    3. Monique Florenzano, 2010. "Government and the provision of public goods: from equilibrium models to mechanism design," Post-Print halshs-00531464, HAL.
    4. Abad, Arnaud & Briec, Walter, 2019. "On the axiomatic of pollution-generating technologies: Non-parametric production analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(1), pages 377-390.
    5. Monique Florenzano, 2009. "Walras-Lindahl-Wicksell: What equilibrium concept for public goods provision ? I - The convex case," Post-Print halshs-00367867, HAL.
    6. Sushama Murty, 2015. "On the properties of an emission-generating technology and its parametric representation," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 60(2), pages 243-282, October.
    7. Monique Florenzano, 2009. "From equilibrium models to mechanism design: On the place and the role of government in the public goods provision analysis in the second part of the twentieth century," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00367859, HAL.
    8. Arnaud Abad & Paola Ravelojaona, 2017. "Exponential environmental productivity index and indicators," Post-Print hal-03025344, HAL.
    9. Murty, Sushama & Robert Russell, R. & Levkoff, Steven B., 2012. "On modeling pollution-generating technologies," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 117-135.
    10. Murty, Sushama, 2010. "On the theory of a firm : The case of by-production of emissions," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 934, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
    11. Sushama Murty, 2012. "On the properties of an emission-generating technology and its parametric representation," Discussion Papers 1202, University of Exeter, Department of Economics.
    12. Juan Aparicio & Magdalena Kapelko & Lidia Ortiz, 2021. "Modelling environmental inefficiency under a quota system," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 1097-1124, June.
    13. Sushama Murty & R. Robert Russell, "undated". "Bad Outputs," Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi Discussion Papers 17-06, Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.
    14. Sushama Murty & R. Robert Russell, "undated". "Modeling emission-generating technologies: Reconciliation of axiomatic and by-production approaches," Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi Discussion Papers 16-01, Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.
    15. Dakpo, K Hervé, 2016. "On modeling pollution-generating technologies: a new formulation of the by-production approach," Working Papers 245191, Institut National de la recherche Agronomique (INRA), Departement Sciences Sociales, Agriculture et Alimentation, Espace et Environnement (SAE2).
    16. Jeanneaux, Philippe & Latruffe, Laure, 2016. "Modelling pollution-generating technologies in performance benchmarking: Recent developments, limits and future prospects in the nonparametric frameworkAuthor-Name: Dakpo, K. Hervé," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(2), pages 347-359.
    17. Michail Tsagris & Vangelis Tzouvelekas, 2022. "Nitrate leaching and efficiency measurement in intensive farming systems: A parametric by‐production technology approach," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 53(4), pages 633-647, July.
    18. Monique Florenzano, 2009. "Walras-Lindahl-Wicksell: What equilibrium concept for public goods provision," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00531434, HAL.
    19. Harald Dyckhoff, 2023. "Proper modelling of industrial production systems with unintended outputs: a different perspective," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 173-188, April.
    20. K Hervé Dakpo, 2016. "On modeling pollution-generating technologies: a new formulation of the by-production approach," Working Papers SMART 16-06, INRAE UMR SMART.
    21. Sushama Murty, 2012. "Microfoundations for the Environmental Kuznets Curve: Invoking By-Production, Normality and Inferiority of Emissions," Discussion Papers 1203, University of Exeter, Department of Economics.
    22. Dakpo, Hervé K & Jeanneaux, Philippe & Latruffe, Laure, 2014. "Inclusion of undesirable outputs in production technology modeling: The case of greenhouse gas emissions in French meat sheep farming," Working Papers 207806, Institut National de la recherche Agronomique (INRA), Departement Sciences Sociales, Agriculture et Alimentation, Espace et Environnement (SAE2).
    23. Bai, Ge & Shen, Zhiyang & Šermukšnytė-Alešiūnienė, Kristina & Štreimikienė, Dalia & Li, Tianxiang, 2024. "Energy structure and green productivity dynamics: Investigation from OECD Countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).

  13. Blackorby, Charles & Murty, Sushama, 2006. "Unit Versus Ad Valorem Taxes : Monopoly In General Equilibrium," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 761, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.

    Cited by:

    1. Philipp J.H. Schröder & Allan Sørensen, 2010. "Ad valorem versus unit taxes: Monopolistic competition, heterogeneous firms, and intra-industry reallocations," Economics Working Papers 2010-10, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    2. Laszlo Goerke & Frederik Herzberg & Thorsten Upmann, 2012. "Failure of Ad Valorem and Specific Tax Equivalence under Uncertainty," IAAEU Discussion Papers 201205, Institute of Labour Law and Industrial Relations in the European Union (IAAEU).
    3. Clément Carbonnier, 2011. "Shifting on prices of per unit and ad valorem consumption taxes," Working Papers halshs-00872477, HAL.
    4. Sophia Delipalla, 2009. "Commodity Tax Structure And Informal Activity," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(3), pages 283-294, July.
    5. Charles Blackorby & Sushama Murty, 2013. "Unit Versus Ad Valorem Taxes: The Private Ownership of Monopoly in General Equilibrium," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 15(4), pages 547-579, August.
    6. Lapan, Harvey E. & Hennessy, David A., 2009. "Unit vs. ad valorem taxes in multi-product Cournot oligopoly," ISU General Staff Papers 200908130700001087, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    7. Hiroshi Aiura & Hikaru Ogawa, 2016. "Indirect Taxes in the Cross-border Shopping Model: A Monopolistic Competition Approach," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-1014, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
    8. de Rus, Ginés & Socorro, M. Pilar, 2022. "Subsidies in air transport markets: The economic consequences of choosing the wrong mechanism," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    9. Valido, Jorge & Pilar Socorro, M. & Hernández, Aday & Betancor, Ofelia, 2014. "Air transport subsidies for resident passengers when carriers have market power," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 388-399.
    10. Laszlo Goerke, 2012. "The Optimal Structure of Commodity Taxation in a Monopoly with Tax Avoidance or Evasion," Public Finance Review, , vol. 40(4), pages 519-536, July.
    11. Christos Kotsogiannis & Konstantinos Serfes, 2014. "The Comparison of ad Valorem and Specific Taxation under Uncertainty," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 16(1), pages 48-68, February.
    12. Olena SOKOLOVSKA & Dmytro SOKOLOVSKYI, 2016. "Modeling Of Consumption Taxes For Different Market Framework: The Case Of Ukraine," ECONOMIC COMPUTATION AND ECONOMIC CYBERNETICS STUDIES AND RESEARCH, Faculty of Economic Cybernetics, Statistics and Informatics, vol. 50(4), pages 75-92.
    13. Carbonnier Clément, 2013. "Pass-through of Per Unit and ad Valorem Consumption Taxes: Evidence from Alcoholic Beverages in France," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 13(2), pages 837-863, September.
    14. Kazuki Hiraga, 2019. "Unit versus ad valorem tax comparisons in a simple New Keynesian dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 9(4), pages 459-466, December.
    15. Plewka, Jörg, 2007. "Fiscal Discrimination Between Consumer Groups: Tax Burden Distribution Under Price Discrimination," Ruhr Economic Papers 19, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    16. Aiura, Hiroshi & Ogawa, Hikaru, 2013. "Unit tax versus ad valorem tax: A tax competition model with cross-border shopping," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 30-38.
    17. Laszlo Goerke, 2011. "Commodity Tax Structure under Uncertainty in a Perfectly Competitive Market," CESifo Working Paper Series 3339, CESifo.
    18. Blackorby, Charles & Murty, Sushama, 2006. "Unit Versus Ad Valorem Taxes: Monopoly In General Equilibrium," Economic Research Papers 269731, University of Warwick - Department of Economics.
    19. McCalman, Phillip, 2023. "Robust trade policy to offset foreign market power," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    20. Ramón Torregrosa, 2008. "Macroeconomic effects of an indirect tax substitution," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 94(3), pages 199-221, September.
    21. Francisco Galera & Isabel Rodríguez-Tejedo & Juan C. Molero, 2012. "Technology Choice and Unit vs Ad Valorem Tax," Faculty Working Papers 18/12, School of Economics and Business Administration, University of Navarra.
    22. Clément Carbonnier, 2011. "Shifting on prices of per unit and ad valorem consumption taxes, estimation on prices of alcoholic beverages in France," THEMA Working Papers 2011-20, THEMA (THéorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), Université de Cergy-Pontoise.
    23. Collie, David R., 2015. "Taxation under Oligopoly in a General Equilibrium Setting," Cardiff Economics Working Papers E2015/15, Cardiff University, Cardiff Business School, Economics Section.
    24. Ueng, K.L. Glen & Huang, Che-Chiang & Hu, Jin-Li, 2017. "Specific Versus Ad Valorem Taxation With Tax Evasion In Imperfectly Competitive Markets," Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, Hitotsubashi University, vol. 58(2), pages 107-119, December.
    25. Alan Krause, 2007. "A Tax Reform Analysis of the Laffer Argument," Discussion Papers 07/10, Department of Economics, University of York.
    26. Henrik Vetter, 2017. "Commodity taxes and welfare under endogenous market conduct," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 122(2), pages 137-154, October.
    27. Kojun Hamada & Takao Ohkawa & Makoto Okamura, 2022. "Optimal taxation in a free‐entry Cournot oligopoly: The average cost function approach," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(2), pages 1166-1192, May.
    28. X. Wang & Jingang Zhao, 2009. "On the efficiency of indirect taxes in differentiated oligopolies with asymmetric costs," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 96(3), pages 223-239, April.

  14. Sushama Murty & Resham Nagpal, "undated". "Measuring marginal abatement costs in the Indian thermal power sector: A by-production approach," Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi Discussion Papers 19-06, Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.

    Cited by:

    1. Sushama Murty & R. Robert Russell, 2021. "A commentary on “Performance measurement and joint production of intended and unintended outputs” by Finn Førsund," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 177-184, June.

  15. Sushama Murty & Resham Nagpal, "undated". "Measuring output-based technical efficiency of Indian coal-based thermal power plants: A by-production approach," Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi Discussion Papers 18-07, Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.

    Cited by:

    1. Førsund, Finn, 2019. "Environmental Performance Measurement: The Rise and Fall of Shephard-inspired Measures," Memorandum 9/2019, Oslo University, Department of Economics.
    2. Sushama Murty & Resham Nagpal, "undated". "Choice of models for emission-generating technologies and designing technical efficiency improvements," Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi Discussion Papers 19-01, Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.
    3. Sushama Murty & Resham Nagpal, "undated". "Measuring marginal abatement costs in the Indian thermal power sector: A by-production approach," Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi Discussion Papers 19-06, Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.
    4. Sushama Murty & R. Robert Russell, 2021. "A commentary on “Performance measurement and joint production of intended and unintended outputs” by Finn Førsund," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 177-184, June.
    5. Finn R. Førsund, 2021. "Performance measurement and joint production of intended and unintended outputs," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 157-175, June.
    6. Sushama Murty & Resham Nagpal, "undated". "Weighted index of graph efficiency improvements for a by-production technology and its application to Indian coal-based thermal power sector," Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi Discussion Papers 18-08, Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.

  16. Sushama Murty, "undated". "Some results from the theory of optimal taxation and their relevance for increasing progressiveness of Indian tax structure," Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi Discussion Papers 19-03, Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.

    Cited by:

    1. Mukherjee, Sacchidananda, 2023. "Distributional Impact of Indian GST," Working Papers 23/403, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy.
    2. Genifera Claudia Bănică & Mariana Luminiţa Coman (Linţă), 2020. "Analysis of the Role of Direct Taxes Administered by the National Agency for Fiscal Administration in the Formation of Public Financial Funds in Romania," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 852-858, August.

Articles

  1. Sushama Murty, 2019. "Some results from the theory of optimal taxation and their relevance for increasing the progressiveness of Indian tax structure," Indian Economic Review, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 19-50, June.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  2. Sushama Murty & R. Robert Russell, 2018. "Modeling emission-generating technologies: reconciliation of axiomatic and by-production approaches," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 7-30, February.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  3. Sushama Murty, 2015. "On the properties of an emission-generating technology and its parametric representation," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 60(2), pages 243-282, October.

    Cited by:

    1. Abad, Arnaud & Briec, Walter, 2019. "On the axiomatic of pollution-generating technologies: Non-parametric production analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(1), pages 377-390.
    2. Sushama Murty & Resham Nagpal, "undated". "Measuring output-based technical efficiency of Indian coal-based thermal power plants: A by-production approach," Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi Discussion Papers 18-07, Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.
    3. Roshdi, Israfil & Hasannasab, Maryam & Margaritis, Dimitris & Rouse, Paul, 2018. "Generalised weak disposability and efficiency measurement in environmental technologies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(3), pages 1000-1012.
    4. Finn R. Førsund, 2018. "Multi-equation modelling of desirable and undesirable outputs satisfying the materials balance," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 67-99, February.
    5. Yiran Niu & Jean-Philippe Boussemart & Zhiyang Shen & Michael Vardanyan, 2024. "Performance evaluation using multi-stage production frameworks: assessing the tradeoffs among the economic, environmental, and social well-being," Working Papers 2024-EQM-04, IESEG School of Management.
    6. Amir Arjomandi & K Hervé Dakpo & Juergen Heinz Seufert, 2018. "Have Asian airlines caught up with European Airlines? A by-production efficiency analysis [Analyse comparée de l’Eco-performance des compagnies aériennes asiatiques et européennes]," Post-Print hal-02628232, HAL.
    7. Dakpo, K Hervé & Latruffe, Laure, 2016. "Agri-environmental subsidies and French suckler cow farms’ technical efficiency accounting for GHGs," Working Papers 245192, Institut National de la recherche Agronomique (INRA), Departement Sciences Sociales, Agriculture et Alimentation, Espace et Environnement (SAE2).
    8. Alexandre Repkine, 2023. "The Estimation of a Polluting By-Production Technology Using Statistical Copulas," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 49-62, August.
    9. Førsund, Finn R, 2017. "Pollution Meets Efficiency: Multi-equation modelling of generation of pollution and related efficiency measures," Memorandum 09/2017, Oslo University, Department of Economics.
    10. Sushama Murty, 2016. "Measuring unilateral and multilateral gains from tackling current economic inefficiencies in CO2 reductions: Theory and evidence," Discussion Papers 1604, University of Exeter, Department of Economics.
    11. Sushama Murty & Resham Nagpal, "undated". "Choice of models for emission-generating technologies and designing technical efficiency improvements," Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi Discussion Papers 19-01, Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.
    12. Sushama Murty & R. Robert Russell, "undated". "Bad Outputs," Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi Discussion Papers 17-06, Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.
    13. Sushama Murty & Resham Nagpal, "undated". "Measuring marginal abatement costs in the Indian thermal power sector: A by-production approach," Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi Discussion Papers 19-06, Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.
    14. Sushama Murty & R. Robert Russell, "undated". "Modeling emission-generating technologies: Reconciliation of axiomatic and by-production approaches," Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi Discussion Papers 16-01, Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.
    15. Dakpo, K Hervé, 2016. "On modeling pollution-generating technologies: a new formulation of the by-production approach," Working Papers 245191, Institut National de la recherche Agronomique (INRA), Departement Sciences Sociales, Agriculture et Alimentation, Espace et Environnement (SAE2).
    16. Subhash C. Ray & Shilpa Sethia, 2024. "A state-level resource allocation model for emission reduction and efficiency improvement in thermal power plants," Indian Economic Review, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 205-257, October.
    17. Sushama Murty & R. Robert Russell, 2021. "A commentary on “Performance measurement and joint production of intended and unintended outputs” by Finn Førsund," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 177-184, June.
    18. Subhash C. Ray & Shilpa Sethia, 2023. "A State-Level Resource Allocation Model for Emission Reduction and Efficiency Improvement in Thermal Power Plants," Working papers 2023-08, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics.
    19. Finn R. Førsund, 2021. "Performance measurement and joint production of intended and unintended outputs," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 157-175, June.
    20. K Hervé Dakpo, 2016. "On modeling pollution-generating technologies: a new formulation of the by-production approach," Working Papers SMART 16-06, INRAE UMR SMART.
    21. Zuoxiang Zhao, 2017. "Measurement of production efficiency and environmental efficiency in China’s province-level: a by-production approach," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 19(4), pages 735-759, October.
    22. Sushama Murty & Resham Nagpal, "undated". "Weighted index of graph efficiency improvements for a by-production technology and its application to Indian coal-based thermal power sector," Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi Discussion Papers 18-08, Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.

  4. Charles Blackorby & Sushama Murty, 2013. "Unit Versus Ad Valorem Taxes: The Private Ownership of Monopoly in General Equilibrium," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 15(4), pages 547-579, August.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  5. Sushama Murty, 2013. "Production efficiency and constraints on profit taxation and profit distribution in economies with Ramsey taxation," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 41(3), pages 579-604, September.

    Cited by:

    1. Sushama Murty, "undated". "Some results from the theory of optimal taxation and their relevance for increasing progressiveness of Indian tax structure," Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi Discussion Papers 19-03, Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.
    2. Robin Boadway, 2017. "Second-Best Theory: Ageing well at Sixty," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(2), pages 249-270, May.
    3. Stéphane Gauthier & Guy Laroque, 2019. "Production efficiency and profit taxation," SciencePo Working papers Main halshs-01884350, HAL.
    4. Sushama Murty, "undated". "Lessons from optimal taxation theory for the GST and beyond," Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi Discussion Papers 17-07, Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.

  6. Murty, Sushama, 2010. "Externalities and fundamental nonconvexities: A reconciliation of approaches to general equilibrium externality modeling and implications for decentralization," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 145(1), pages 331-353, January.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  7. Blackorby, Charles & Murty, Sushama, 2007. "Unit versus ad valorem taxes: Monopoly in general equilibrium," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(3-4), pages 817-822, April.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  8. Sushama Murty & R. Robert Russell, 2005. "Externality Policy Reform: A General Equilibrium Analysis," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 7(1), pages 117-150, February.

    Cited by:

    1. Sushama Murty & R. Robert Russell & Steven B. Levkoff, 2011. "On modeling pollution-generating technologies," Discussion Papers 1101, University of Exeter, Department of Economics.
    2. Alan Krause, 2004. "The Dynamic Process of Tax Reform," Econometric Society 2004 Australasian Meetings 119, Econometric Society.
    3. Sushama Murty, 2016. "Measuring unilateral and multilateral gains from tackling current economic inefficiencies in CO2 reductions: Theory and evidence," Discussion Papers 1604, University of Exeter, Department of Economics.
    4. Alan Krause, 2014. "Piecewise Linear Income Tax Reforms," Discussion Papers 14/25, Department of Economics, University of York.
    5. Alan Krause, 2009. "A general equilibrium analysis of the Laffer argument," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 33(4), pages 601-615, November.
    6. Alan Krause, 2007. "A Tax Reform Analysis of the Laffer Argument," Discussion Papers 07/10, Department of Economics, University of York.
    7. Alan Krause, 2012. "Nonlinear Income Tax Reforms," Discussion Papers 12/03, Department of Economics, University of York.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.