IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/endeec/v25y2020i1p44-65_4.html

Output and pollution abatement in a U.S. state emission function

Author

Listed:
  • Empora, Neophyta
  • Mamuneas, Theofanis P.
  • Stengos, Thanasis

Abstract

Using U.S. state-level data for the period 1973–1994, this study models the relationship between emissions, output and pollution abatement by defining an emissions function, in a manner that is consistent with the residual (emissions) generation mechanism and firms' optimizing behavior. It thus accounts for factors that were previously unaccounted for or addressed only individually. Applications using this comprehensive setting can offer more informed insights for policy-making, something that is particularly useful for developing countries that face the environmental degradation that comes together with the benefits of economic growth. Using nonparametric econometric techniques as well as threshold regression, the empirical results show that there is a positive nonlinear relationship between emissions and output, rejecting an inverted-U type of relationship between the two (the Environmental Kuznets Curve, or EKC). In the absence of abatement the relationship turns around, verifying the arguments in the literature that abatement is one of the driving forces for an EKC to emerge.

Suggested Citation

  • Empora, Neophyta & Mamuneas, Theofanis P. & Stengos, Thanasis, 2020. "Output and pollution abatement in a U.S. state emission function," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(1), pages 44-65, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:endeec:v:25:y:2020:i:1:p:44-65_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1355770X19000172/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tao Song, 2024. "Pollution reduction by rationalization hypothesis and water pollution in China," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Usman, Muhammad & Khalid, Khaizran & Mehdi, Muhammad Abuzar, 2021. "What determines environmental deficit in Asia? Embossing the role of renewable and non-renewable energy utilization," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 1165-1176.
    3. Joshua Dzankar Zoaka & Daberechi Chikezie Ekwueme & Hasan Güngör & Andrew Adewale Alola, 2022. "Will financial development and clean energy utilization rejuvenate the environment in BRICS economies?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2156-2170, July.
    4. Fatouros, Nikos & Stengos, Thanasis, 2023. "Nuclear Energy, Economic Growth, and the Environment: Optimal policies in a model with endogenous technical change and environmental constraints," The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, Elsevier, vol. 28(C).
    5. Nikos Rigas & Konstantinos Elias Kounetas, 2024. "The impact of CO2 emissions and climate on economic growth and productivity: International evidence," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 719-740, May.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • Q50 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - General
    • Q52 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Pollution Control Adoption and Costs; Distributional Effects; Employment Effects
    • Q53 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Air Pollution; Water Pollution; Noise; Hazardous Waste; Solid Waste; Recycling

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:endeec:v:25:y:2020:i:1:p:44-65_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ede .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.