IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/e/phi78.html

Brian Hill

Not to be confused with: Brian C. Hill

Personal Details

First Name:Brian
Middle Name:
Last Name:Hill
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:phi78
http://www.hec.fr/hill

Affiliation

HEC Paris (École des Hautes Études Commerciales)

Jouy-en-Josas, France
http://www.hec.fr/
RePEc:edi:hecpafr (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles

Working papers

  1. Hill , Brian & Bradley , Richard & Helgeson, Casey, 2016. "Climate Change Assessments: Confidence, Probability and Decision," HEC Research Papers Series 1131, HEC Paris.
  2. Hill, Brian, 2015. "Uncertainty Aversion, Multi Utility Representations and State Independence of Utility," HEC Research Papers Series 1079, HEC Paris.
  3. Eric Danan & Thibault Gajdos & Brian Hill & Jean-Marc Tallon, 2014. "Aggregating Tastes, Beliefs, and Attitudes under Uncertainty," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 14063, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
  4. Hill, Brian, 2014. "Confidence as a Source of Deferral," HEC Research Papers Series 1060, HEC Paris.
  5. Hill, Brian & Michalski, Tomasz, 2014. "Risk versus Ambiguity and International Security Design," HEC Research Papers Series 1032, HEC Paris.
  6. Hill , Brian, 2014. "Incomplete Preferences and Confidence," HEC Research Papers Series 1051, HEC Paris.
  7. HILL, Brian, 2013. "Dynamic Consistency and Ambiguity: A Reappraisal," HEC Research Papers Series 983, HEC Paris.
  8. Hill, Brian, 2012. "Unanimity and the aggregation of multiple prior opinions," HEC Research Papers Series 959, HEC Paris.
  9. Hill, Brian, 2011. "Deferral, incomplete preferences and confidence," HEC Research Papers Series 940, HEC Paris.
  10. Brian Hill, 2010. "Belief, Confidence and Decision-making," Post-Print hal-00553979, HAL.
  11. Brian Hill, 2010. "Counterfactuals and Context," Post-Print hal-00554033, HAL.
  12. Hill, Brian, 2010. "Awareness and equilibrium," HEC Research Papers Series 939, HEC Paris.
  13. Brian Hill & Francesca Poggiolesi, 2010. "A Contraction-free and Cut-free Sequent Calculus for Propositional Dynamic Logic," Post-Print hal-00521802, HAL.
  14. Brian Hill, 2010. "Awareness Dynamics," Post-Print hal-00521801, HAL.
  15. Hill, Brian, 2009. "Confidence in preferences," HEC Research Papers Series 919, HEC Paris.
  16. Hill, Brian, 2009. "Confidence and ambiguity," HEC Research Papers Series 914, HEC Paris.
  17. Hans van Ditmarsch & Ondrej Majer & Brian Hill, 2009. "Logic of change, change of logic," Post-Print hal-00463438, HAL.
  18. Brian Hill, 2008. "Towards a “Sophisticated” Model of Belief Dynamics. Part II: Belief Revision," Post-Print hal-00463440, HAL.
  19. Brian Hill, 2008. "Towards a “Sophisticated” Model of Belief Dynamics. Part I: The General Framework," Post-Print hal-00463432, HAL.
  20. Hill, Brian, 2007. "Living without state-independence of utilities," HEC Research Papers Series 874, HEC Paris.
  21. Brian, HILL, 2007. "When is there state independence?," HEC Research Papers Series 883, HEC Paris.
  22. Hill, Brian, 2007. "Three analyses of sour grapes," HEC Research Papers Series 873, HEC Paris.
  23. Brian, HILL, 2007. "Dynamic Awareness," HEC Research Papers Series 881, HEC Paris.
  24. Brian, HILL, 2007. "An additively separable representation in the Savage framework," HEC Research Papers Series 882, HEC Paris.
  25. Hill, Brian, 2007. "The (topo)logic of vagueness," HEC Research Papers Series 867, HEC Paris.
  26. HILL, Brian, 2006. "Towards a "sophisticated" model of belief dynamics," HEC Research Papers Series 868, HEC Paris.

    repec:hal:pseose:hal-01241819 is not listed on IDEAS

Articles

  1. Hill, Brian, 2016. "Incomplete preferences and confidence," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 83-103.
  2. Eric Danan & Thibault Gajdos & Brian Hill & Jean-Marc Tallon, 2016. "Robust Social Decisions," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(9), pages 2407-2425, September.
  3. Mikaël Cozic & Brian Hill, 2015. "Representation theorems and the semantics of decision-theoretic concepts," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 292-311, September.
  4. Hill, Brian, 2013. "Confidence and decision," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 675-692.
  5. Brian Hill, 2012. "Confidence in preferences," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 39(2), pages 273-302, July.
  6. Hill, Brian, 2010. "An additively separable representation in the Savage framework," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 145(5), pages 2044-2054, September.
  7. Hill, Brian, 2009. "When is there state independence?," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 144(3), pages 1119-1134, May.
  8. Brian Hill, 2009. "Living without state-independence of utilities," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 67(4), pages 405-432, October.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Hill , Brian & Bradley , Richard & Helgeson, Casey, 2016. "Climate Change Assessments: Confidence, Probability and Decision," HEC Research Papers Series 1131, HEC Paris.

    Cited by:

    1. Casey Helgeson & Richard Bradley & Brian Hill, 2018. "Combining probability with qualitative degree-of-certainty metrics in assessment," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 149(3), pages 517-525, August.
    2. Borgonovo, E. & Cappelli, V. & Maccheroni, F. & Marinacci, M., 2018. "Risk analysis and decision theory: A bridge," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(1), pages 280-293.
    3. Loïc Berger & Massimo Marinacci, 2020. "Model Uncertainty in Climate Change Economics: A Review and Proposed Framework for Future Research," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 77(3), pages 475-501, November.
    4. Loic Berger & Massimo Marinacci, 2017. "Model Uncertainty in Climate Change Economics," Working Papers 616, IGIER (Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research), Bocconi University.

  2. Eric Danan & Thibault Gajdos & Brian Hill & Jean-Marc Tallon, 2014. "Aggregating Tastes, Beliefs, and Attitudes under Uncertainty," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 14063, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.

    Cited by:

    1. McCarthy, David & Mikkola, Kalle & Thomas, Teruji, 2016. "Utilitarianism with and without expected utility," MPRA Paper 72578, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Panagiotis Andrikopoulos & Nick Webber, 2019. "Understanding time-inconsistent heterogeneous preferences in economics and finance: a practice theory approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 282(1), pages 3-26, November.
    3. Mongin, Philippe & Pivato, Marcus, 2016. "Social preference under twofold uncertainty," MPRA Paper 71776, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Marc Fleurbaey & Stéphane Zuber, 2014. "Fair management of social risk," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 14016r, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne, revised Sep 2015.
    5. Antoine Billot & Vassili Vergopoulos, 2016. "Aggregation of Paretian preferences for independent individual uncertainties," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 47(4), pages 973-984, December.

  3. Hill, Brian, 2014. "Confidence as a Source of Deferral," HEC Research Papers Series 1060, HEC Paris.

    Cited by:

    1. Hill, Brian, 2016. "Incomplete preferences and confidence," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 83-103.

  4. Hill, Brian & Michalski, Tomasz, 2014. "Risk versus Ambiguity and International Security Design," HEC Research Papers Series 1032, HEC Paris.

    Cited by:

    1. Marcus Miller & Dania Thomas, 2013. "Eurozone sovereign debt restructuring: keeping the vultures at bay," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 29(4), pages 745-763, WINTER.

  5. Hill , Brian, 2014. "Incomplete Preferences and Confidence," HEC Research Papers Series 1051, HEC Paris.

    Cited by:

    1. Pierre Bardier & Bach Dong-Xuan & Van-Quy Nguyen, 2024. "Hoping for the best while preparing for the worst in the face of uncertainty: a new type of incomplete preferences," Papers 2406.11166, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2025.
    2. Florian Mudekereza, 2025. "Robust Aggregation of Preferences," Papers 2504.07401, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2026.
    3. Hill, Brian, 2022. "Updating confidence in beliefs," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    4. Edi Karni, 2024. "Irresolute choice behavior," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 20(1), pages 70-87, March.
    5. Costa-Gomes, Miguel & Cueva, Carlos & Gerasimou, Georgios, 2014. "Choice, Deferral and Consistency," SIRE Discussion Papers 2015-17, Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE).
    6. Minardi, Stefania & Savochkin, Andrei, 2015. "Preferences with grades of indecisiveness," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 300-331.
    7. Pierre Bardier & Bach Dong-Xuan & Van-Quy Nguyen, 2025. "Hoping for the best while preparing for the worst in the face of uncertainty: a new type of incomplete preferences," PSE Working Papers halshs-04615290, HAL.
    8. Echenique, Federico & Miyashita, Masaki & Nakamura, Yuta & Pomatto, Luciano & Vinson, Jamie, 2022. "Twofold multiprior preferences and failures of contingent reasoning," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).

  6. HILL, Brian, 2013. "Dynamic Consistency and Ambiguity: A Reappraisal," HEC Research Papers Series 983, HEC Paris.

    Cited by:

    1. Federica Ceron & Vassili Vergopoulos, 2020. "Recursive objective and subjective multiple priors," Post-Print halshs-02900497, HAL.
    2. Riedel, Frank & Tallon, Jean-Marc & Vergopoulos, Vassili, 2017. "Dynamically consistent preferences under imprecise probabilistic information," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 573, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    3. Federica Ceron & Vassili Vergopoulos, 2020. "Recursive objective and subjective multiple priors," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-02900497, HAL.
    4. Federica Ceron & Vassili Vergopoulos, 2020. "Recursive objective and subjective multiple priors," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 20008, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    5. Federica Ceron & Vassili Vergopoulos, 2020. "Recursive objective and subjective multiple priors," Working Papers halshs-02563318, HAL.
    6. Federica Ceron & Vassili Vergopoulos, 2020. "Recursive objective and subjective multiple priors," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-02563318, HAL.

  7. Hill, Brian, 2012. "Unanimity and the aggregation of multiple prior opinions," HEC Research Papers Series 959, HEC Paris.

    Cited by:

    1. Eric Danan & Thibault Gajdos & Brian Hill & Jean-Marc Tallon, 2014. "Aggregating Tastes, Beliefs, and Attitudes under Uncertainty," Post-Print halshs-01099032, HAL.

  8. Brian Hill, 2010. "Awareness Dynamics," Post-Print hal-00521801, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Edi Karni & Marie-Louise Vierø, 2012. ""Reverse Bayesianism": A Choice-Based Theory of Growing Awareness," Economics Working Paper Archive 591, The Johns Hopkins University,Department of Economics.
    2. Schipper, Burkhard C, 2011. "Preference-Based Unawareness," MPRA Paper 30221, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Karni, Edi & Vierø, Marie-Louise, 2017. "Awareness of unawareness: A theory of decision making in the face of ignorance," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 301-328.
    4. Gaia Belardinelli & Rasmus K. Rendsvig, 2021. "Awareness Logic: Kripke Lattices as a Middle Ground between Syntactic and Semantic Models," Papers 2106.12868, arXiv.org.
    5. Pintér, Miklós & Udvari, Zsolt, 2011. "Generalized type spaces," MPRA Paper 34107, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Gaia Belardinelli & Rasmus K. Rendsvig, 2020. "Awareness Logic: A Kripke-based Rendition of the Heifetz-Meier-Schipper Model," Papers 2012.12982, arXiv.org.
    7. Burkhard Schipper, 2011. "Preference-Dependent Unawareness," Working Papers 269, University of California, Davis, Department of Economics.
    8. Dietrich, Franz, 2016. "Savage's Theorem Under Changing Awareness," MPRA Paper 71306, University Library of Munich, Germany.

  9. Hill, Brian, 2009. "Confidence in preferences," HEC Research Papers Series 919, HEC Paris.

    Cited by:

    1. Hill, Brian, 2009. "Confidence in preferences," HEC Research Papers Series 919, HEC Paris.
    2. Hill, Brian, 2016. "Incomplete preferences and confidence," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 83-103.
    3. Jesper Armouti-Hansen & Christopher Kops, 2018. "This or that? Sequential rationalization of indecisive choice behavior," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 84(4), pages 507-524, June.

  10. Hill, Brian, 2009. "Confidence and ambiguity," HEC Research Papers Series 914, HEC Paris.

    Cited by:

    1. Hill, Brian, 2009. "Confidence in preferences," HEC Research Papers Series 919, HEC Paris.

  11. Brian, HILL, 2007. "When is there state independence?," HEC Research Papers Series 883, HEC Paris.

    Cited by:

    1. Jean Baccelli, 2015. "Do Bets Reveal Beliefs?," Post-Print hal-01462293, HAL.
    2. Hill, Brian, 2010. "An additively separable representation in the Savage framework," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 145(5), pages 2044-2054, September.
    3. Jean Baccelli, 2019. "The Problem of State-Dependent Utility: A Reappraisal," Post-Print hal-02172207, HAL.

  12. Hill, Brian, 2007. "Three analyses of sour grapes," HEC Research Papers Series 873, HEC Paris.

    Cited by:

    1. Schnellenbach, Jan, 2012. "Nudges and norms: On the political economy of soft paternalism," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 266-277.
    2. Hill, Brian, 2007. "Living without state-independence of utilities," HEC Research Papers Series 874, HEC Paris.
    3. Fabien Vinckier & Lionel Rigoux & Irma T Kurniawan & Chen Hu & Sacha Bourgeois-Gironde & Jean Daunizeau & Mathias Pessiglione, 2019. "Sour grapes and sweet victories: How actions shape preferences," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-24, January.

  13. Brian, HILL, 2007. "Dynamic Awareness," HEC Research Papers Series 881, HEC Paris.

    Cited by:

    1. Brian Hill, 2009. "Living without state-independence of utilities," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 67(4), pages 405-432, October.

  14. Brian, HILL, 2007. "An additively separable representation in the Savage framework," HEC Research Papers Series 882, HEC Paris.

    Cited by:

    1. Ganguli, Jayant & Heifetz, Aviad & Lee, Byung Soo, 2016. "Universal interactive preferences," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 237-260.
    2. Edi Karni, 2009. "A Theory of Bayesian Decision Making," Economics Working Paper Archive 550, The Johns Hopkins University,Department of Economics.

  15. HILL, Brian, 2006. "Towards a "sophisticated" model of belief dynamics," HEC Research Papers Series 868, HEC Paris.

    Cited by:

    1. Brian, HILL, 2007. "Dynamic Awareness," HEC Research Papers Series 881, HEC Paris.
    2. Hill, Brian, 2007. "Living without state-independence of utilities," HEC Research Papers Series 874, HEC Paris.

Articles

  1. Hill, Brian, 2016. "Incomplete preferences and confidence," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 83-103.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  2. Eric Danan & Thibault Gajdos & Brian Hill & Jean-Marc Tallon, 2016. "Robust Social Decisions," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(9), pages 2407-2425, September.

    Cited by:

    1. McCarthy, David & Mikkola, Kalle & Thomas, Teruji, 2016. "Utilitarianism with and without expected utility," MPRA Paper 72578, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Takashi Hayashi & Michele Lombardi, 2019. "Fair social decision under uncertainty and belief disagreements," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 67(4), pages 775-816, June.
    3. Panagiotis Andrikopoulos & Nick Webber, 2019. "Understanding time-inconsistent heterogeneous preferences in economics and finance: a practice theory approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 282(1), pages 3-26, November.
    4. Antoine Billot & Xiangyu Qu, 2024. "Deliberative democracy and utilitarianism," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 63(3), pages 603-617, November.
    5. Gerasimou, Georgios, 2018. "On the indifference relation in Bewley preferences," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 24-26.
    6. Florian Mudekereza, 2025. "Robust Aggregation of Preferences," Papers 2504.07401, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2026.
    7. Giuseppe Lopomo & Luca Rigotti & Chris Shannon, 2021. "Uncertainty in Mechanism Design," Papers 2108.12633, arXiv.org.
    8. Carsten Krabbe Nielsen, 2018. "Rational overconfidence and social security: subjective beliefs, objective welfare," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 65(2), pages 179-229, March.
    9. Wang, Weijia, 2019. "A Pareto Criterion on Systemic Risk," MPRA Paper 93699, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Federica Ceron & Vassili Vergopoulos, 2017. "Aggregation of Bayesian preferences: Unanimity vs Monotonicity," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 17028, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    11. Federica Ceron & Vassili Vergopoulos, 2017. "Aggregation of Bayesian preferences: Unanimity vs Monotonicity," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01539444, HAL.
    12. Philippe Mongin & Marcus Pivato, 2020. "Social preference under twofold uncertainty," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 70(3), pages 633-663, October.
    13. Weijia Wang & Shaoan Huang, 2021. "Risk sharing and financial stability: a welfare analysis," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 16(1), pages 211-228, January.
    14. Dietrich, Franz, 2021. "Fully Bayesian aggregation," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    15. Fleurbaey, Marc & Zuber, Stéphane, 2017. "Fair management of social risk," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 666-706.
    16. Berens, Stefan & Chochua, Lasha, 2017. "The impartial observer under uncertainty," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 576, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    17. Lorenzo Bastianello & Jos'e Heleno Faro & Ana Santos, 2020. "Dynamically Consistent Objective and Subjective Rationality," Papers 2004.12347, arXiv.org.
    18. Kaname Miyagishima, 2022. "Efficiency, equity, and social rationality under uncertainty," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 73(1), pages 237-255, February.
    19. Stergios Athanasoglou & Valentina Bosetti & Laurent Drouet, 2017. "A Simple Framework for Climate-Change Policy under Model Uncertainty," Working Papers 2017.13, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    20. Federica Ceron & Vassili Vergopoulos, 2017. "Aggregation of Bayesian preferences: Unanimity vs Monotonicity," Post-Print halshs-01539444, HAL.
    21. Chen Li, 2022. "Preference Aggregation with a Robust Pareto Criterion," KIER Working Papers 1086, Kyoto University, Institute of Economic Research.
    22. Takashi Hayashi & Michele Lombardi, 2016. "Social decision under uncertainty and responsibility for beliefs," Working Papers 2016_19, Business School - Economics, University of Glasgow.
    23. Stanca, Lorenzo, 2021. "Smooth aggregation of Bayesian experts," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    24. Hayashi, Takashi, 2024. "Belief aggregation, updating and dynamic collective choice," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    25. Tommi Ekholm & Erin Baker, 2022. "Multiple Beliefs, Dominance and Dynamic Consistency," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(1), pages 529-540, January.
    26. Federica Ceron & Vassili Vergopoulos, 2019. "Aggregation of Bayesian preferences: unanimity vs monotonicity," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 52(3), pages 419-451, March.
    27. Luigi Alberto Franzoni, 2022. "Efficient liability law when parties genuinely disagree," Working Papers wp1176, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    28. Itzhak Gilboa & Larry Samuelson, 2022. "No-betting Pareto under ambiguity," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 92(3), pages 625-645, April.
    29. Antoine Billot & Vassili Vergopoulos, 2016. "Aggregation of Paretian preferences for independent individual uncertainties," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 47(4), pages 973-984, December.
    30. Zuber, Stéphane, 2016. "Harsanyi’s theorem without the sure-thing principle: On the consistent aggregation of Monotonic Bernoullian and Archimedean preferences," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 78-83.
    31. Hill, Brian, 2016. "Incomplete preferences and confidence," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 83-103.
    32. Baker, Erin & Bosetti, Valentina & Salo, Ahti, 2020. "Robust portfolio decision analysis: An application to the energy research and development portfolio problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(3), pages 1107-1120.
    33. Pivato, Marcus, 2022. "Bayesian social aggregation with accumulating evidence," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    34. Horan, Sean & Manzini, Paola & Mariotti, Marco, 2022. "When is coarseness not a curse? Comparative statics of the coarse random utility model," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    35. Miyagishima, Kaname, 2019. "Fair criteria for social decisions under uncertainty," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 77-87.
    36. Ghirardato, Paolo & Pennesi, Daniele, 2020. "A general theory of subjective mixtures," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).

  3. Mikaël Cozic & Brian Hill, 2015. "Representation theorems and the semantics of decision-theoretic concepts," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 292-311, September.

    Cited by:

    1. Itzhak Gilboa & Andrew Postlewaite & Larry Samuelson & David Schmeidler, 2019. "What are axiomatizations good for?," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 86(3), pages 339-359, May.
    2. Roberto Fumagalli, 2021. "Rationality, preference satisfaction and anomalous intentions: why rational choice theory is not self-defeating," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 91(3), pages 337-356, October.
    3. Aurélien Baillon & Zhenxing Huang & Asli Selim & Peter P. Wakker, 2018. "Measuring Ambiguity Attitudes for All (Natural) Events," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 86(5), pages 1839-1858, September.
    4. Fumagalli, Roberto, 2021. "Rationality, preference satisfaction and anomalous intentions: why rational choice theory is not self-defeating," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 112446, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Moscati, Ivan, 2021. "On the recent philosophy of decision theory," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 115039, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Abdellaoui, Mohammed & Wakker, Peter P., 2020. "Savage for dummies and experts," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).

  4. Hill, Brian, 2013. "Confidence and decision," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 675-692.

    Cited by:

    1. Brian Hill, 2012. "Confidence in preferences," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 39(2), pages 273-302, July.
    2. Hill, Brian, 2012. "Unanimity and the aggregation of multiple prior opinions," HEC Research Papers Series 959, HEC Paris.
    3. Jingyi Xue, 2020. "Preferences with changing ambiguity aversion," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 69(1), pages 1-60, February.
    4. Brian Hill, 2022. "Updating confidence in beliefs," Post-Print hal-03503986, HAL.
    5. Hill, Brian, 2022. "Updating confidence in beliefs," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    6. Henkel, Luca, 2024. "Experimental evidence on the relationship between perceived ambiguity and likelihood insensitivity," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 312-338.
    7. Fairley, Kim & Weitzel, Utz, 2017. "Ambiguity and risk measures in the lab and students’ real-life borrowing behavior," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 85-98.
    8. Casey Helgeson & Richard Bradley & Brian Hill, 2018. "Combining probability with qualitative degree-of-certainty metrics in assessment," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 149(3), pages 517-525, August.
    9. Borgonovo, E. & Cappelli, V. & Maccheroni, F. & Marinacci, M., 2018. "Risk analysis and decision theory: A bridge," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(1), pages 280-293.
    10. Brian Hill, 2021. "Decision under Uncertainty," Post-Print hal-03504015, HAL.
    11. Margherita Harris, 2025. "The IPCC uncertainty framework: what some decision makers want (and why they shouldn’t)," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 178(5), pages 1-13, May.
    12. Hill, Brian, 2023. "Beyond uncertainty aversion," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 196-222.
    13. Loïc Berger & Massimo Marinacci, 2020. "Model Uncertainty in Climate Change Economics: A Review and Proposed Framework for Future Research," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 77(3), pages 475-501, November.
    14. Bradley, Richard, 2025. "Catastrophe insurance decision making when the science is uncertain," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 122339, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Richard Bradley & Casey Helgeson & Brian Hill, 2025. "Navigating confidence–precision trade-offs in assessment," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 178(5), pages 1-6, May.
    16. Hill, Brian, 2016. "Incomplete preferences and confidence," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 83-103.
    17. Loic Berger & Massimo Marinacci, 2017. "Model Uncertainty in Climate Change Economics," Working Papers 616, IGIER (Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research), Bocconi University.
    18. Xiaoyu Cheng, 2019. "Relative Maximum Likelihood Updating of Ambiguous Beliefs," Papers 1911.02678, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2021.
    19. Brian Hill, 2023. "Beyond Uncertainty Aversion," Post-Print hal-02428398, HAL.

  5. Brian Hill, 2012. "Confidence in preferences," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 39(2), pages 273-302, July.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  6. Hill, Brian, 2010. "An additively separable representation in the Savage framework," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 145(5), pages 2044-2054, September.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  7. Hill, Brian, 2009. "When is there state independence?," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 144(3), pages 1119-1134, May.
    See citations under working paper version above.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 19 papers announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-UPT: Utility Models and Prospect Theory (14) 2007-12-01 2007-12-01 2008-03-08 2008-03-08 2009-09-26 2010-01-10 2013-11-09 2014-09-05 2014-11-22 2015-02-11 2015-02-16 2015-06-05 2015-06-05 2016-11-27. Author is listed
  2. NEP-MIC: Microeconomics (9) 2013-11-09 2014-09-05 2014-11-22 2015-02-11 2015-02-11 2015-02-16 2015-06-05 2015-06-05 2016-11-27. Author is listed
  3. NEP-HPE: History and Philosophy of Economics (6) 2007-04-28 2007-12-01 2008-03-08 2010-01-10 2010-10-23 2016-11-27. Author is listed
  4. NEP-CDM: Collective Decision-Making (4) 2008-03-08 2010-01-10 2013-11-09 2016-06-25
  5. NEP-CBE: Cognitive and Behavioural Economics (2) 2007-04-28 2009-09-26
  6. NEP-DCM: Discrete Choice Models (1) 2010-01-10
  7. NEP-ENE: Energy Economics (1) 2016-06-25
  8. NEP-ENV: Environmental Economics (1) 2016-06-25
  9. NEP-EVO: Evolutionary Economics (1) 2010-10-23
  10. NEP-KNM: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Economy (1) 2008-03-08
  11. NEP-NET: Network Economics (1) 2016-06-25

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Brian Hill should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.