Experimental Evidence on the Relationship between Perceived Ambiguity and Likelihood Insensitivity
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Other versions of this item:
- Henkel, Luca, 2024. "Experimental evidence on the relationship between perceived ambiguity and likelihood insensitivity," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 312-338.
- Luca Henkel, 2023. "Experimental Evidence on the Relationship Between Perceived Ambiguity and Likelihood Insensitivity," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2023_440, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- is not listed on IDEAS
- Gianna Lotito & Anna Maffioletti & Michele Santoni, 2024.
"Testing source influence on ambiguity reaction: Preference and insensitivity,"
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 69(3), pages 349-411, December.
- Lotito Gianna & Maffioletti Anna & Santoni Michele, 2023. "Testing Source Influence on Ambiguity Reaction: Preference and Insensitivity," Working papers 083, Department of Economics, Social Studies, Applied Mathematics and Statistics (Dipartimento di Scienze Economico-Sociali e Matematico-Statistiche), University of Torino.
- Aurélien Baillon & Han Bleichrodt & Chen Li & Peter P. Wakker, 2025.
"Source Theory: A Tractable and Positive Ambiguity Theory,"
Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(10), pages 8767-8782, October.
- Aurélien Baillon & Han Bleichrodt & Chen Li & Peter P. Wakker, 2025. "Source Theory : A Tractable and Positive Ambiguity Theory," Post-Print hal-04964898, HAL.
More about this item
Keywords
; ; ; ;JEL classification:
- D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
- D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
- D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making
- C91 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Laboratory, Individual Behavior
NEP fields
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:- NEP-CBE-2022-04-04 (Cognitive and Behavioural Economics)
- NEP-EXP-2022-04-04 (Experimental Economics)
- NEP-ORE-2022-04-04 (Operations Research)
- NEP-UPT-2022-04-04 (Utility Models and Prospect Theory)
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajk:ajkdps:151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ECONtribute Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.econtribute.de .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.
Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ajk/ajkdps/151.html