IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/c/pmo347.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Bernard Monjardet

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Nathalie Caspard & Bruno Leclerc & Bernard Monjardet, 2012. "Finite Ordered Sets Concepts, Results and Uses," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00800193, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Ulrich Faigle & Michel Grabisch & Andres Jiménez-Losada & Manuel Ordóñez, 2016. "Games on concept lattices: Shapley value and core," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-01379699, HAL.
    2. Olivier Hudry, 2015. "Complexity results for extensions of median orders to different types of remoteness," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 225(1), pages 111-123, February.
    3. Michel Grabisch & Agnieszka Rusinowska, 2015. "Lattices in Social Networks with Influence," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(01), pages 1-18.
    4. Denis Bouyssou & Thierry Marchant & Marc Pirlot, 2020. "A theoretical look at ELECTRE TRI-nB and related sorting models," Papers 2008.09484, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2021.
    5. Salii, Yaroslav, 2019. "Revisiting dynamic programming for precedence-constrained traveling salesman problem and its time-dependent generalization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(1), pages 32-42.
    6. Denis Bouyssou & Thierry Marchant & Marc Pirlot, 2020. "A theoretical look at ELECTRE TRI-nB," Working Papers hal-02898131, HAL.

  2. Bernard Monjardet, 2011. "G. Th. Guilbaud et la théorie du choix social," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 11047, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.

    Cited by:

    1. Philippe Mongin, 2012. "Une source méconnue de la théorie de l'agrégation des jugements," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 63(4), pages 645-657.

  3. Bruno Leclerc & Bernard Monjardet, 2010. "Aggregation and residuation," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00504982, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Chambers, Christopher P. & Miller, Alan D., "undated". "Inefficiency," Working Papers WP2011/14, University of Haifa, Department of Economics, revised 30 Nov 2011.
    2. Chambers, Christopher P. & Miller, Alan D., 2018. "Benchmarking," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 13(2), May.
    3. Miller, Alan D. & Chambers, Christopher P., "undated". "Scholarly Influence," Working Papers WP2013/1, University of Haifa, Department of Economics.

  4. Olivier Hudry & Bernard Monjardet, 2010. "Consensus theories: An oriented survey," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 10057, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.

    Cited by:

    1. Edith Elkind & Piotr Faliszewski & Arkadii Slinko, 2015. "Distance rationalization of voting rules," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 45(2), pages 345-377, September.
    2. Olivier Hudry, 2015. "Complexity results for extensions of median orders to different types of remoteness," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 225(1), pages 111-123, February.
    3. Muhammad Mahajne & Shmuel Nitzan & Oscar Volij, 2013. "LEVEL r CONSENSUS AND STABLE SOCIAL CHOICE," Working Papers 1305, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Department of Economics.

  5. Bernard Monjardet & Jean-Pierre Barthélemy & Olivier Hudry & Bruno Leclerc, 2009. "Metric and latticial medians," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00408174, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Daniel Eckert & Bernard Monjardet, 2009. "Guilbaud's Theorem: an early contribution to judgment aggregation," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 09047, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    2. Irène Charon & Olivier Hudry, 2010. "An updated survey on the linear ordering problem for weighted or unweighted tournaments," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 107-158, March.
    3. Olivier Hudry, 2015. "Complexity results for extensions of median orders to different types of remoteness," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 225(1), pages 111-123, February.
    4. Ernesto Savaglio & Stefano Vannucci, 2022. "Strategy-proof aggregation rules in median semilattices with applications to preference aggregation," Papers 2208.12732, arXiv.org.

  6. Daniel Eckert & Bernard Monjardet, 2009. "Guilbaud's Theorem: an early contribution to judgment aggregation," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 09047, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.

    Cited by:

    1. Philippe Mongin & Franz Dietrich, 2011. "An Interpretive Account of Logical Aggregation Theory," Working Papers hal-00579343, HAL.
    2. Philippe Mongin, 2012. "The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 315-355, September.
    3. Herzberg, Frederik S., 2008. "Judgement aggregation functions and ultraproducts," MPRA Paper 10546, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 10 Sep 2008.

  7. Bernard Monjardet, 2008. ""Mathématique Sociale" and Mathematics. A case study: Condorcet's effect and medians," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00309825, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Nehring, Klaus & Pivato, Marcus, 2018. "The median rule in judgement aggregation," MPRA Paper 84258, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Hudry, Olivier, 2012. "On the computation of median linear orders, of median complete preorders and of median weak orders," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 2-10.

  8. Bernard Monjardet, 2008. "Statement of Precedence and a Comment on IIA Terminology," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-00650945, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Brandt, Felix & Harrenstein, Paul & Seedig, Hans Georg, 2017. "Minimal extending sets in tournaments," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 55-63.
    2. Felix Brandt & Markus Brill & Paul Harrenstein, 2018. "Extending tournament solutions," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 51(2), pages 193-222, August.
    3. Felix Brandt & Markus Brill & Hans Georg Seedig & Warut Suksompong, 2018. "On the structure of stable tournament solutions," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 65(2), pages 483-507, March.
    4. Juan Lleras & Yusufcan Masatlioglu & Daisuke Nakajima & Erkut Ozbay, 2021. "Path-Independent Consideration," Games, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, March.
    5. Felix Brandt, 2015. "Set-monotonicity implies Kelly-strategyproofness," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 45(4), pages 793-804, December.
    6. Felix Brandt & Markus Brill & Hans Georg Seedig & Warut Suksompong, 2020. "On the Structure of Stable Tournament Solutions," Papers 2004.01651, arXiv.org.

  9. Nathalie Caspard & Bruno Leclerc & Bernard Monjardet, 2007. "Ensembles ordonnés finis : concepts, résultats, usages," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00197128, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Irène Charon & Olivier Hudry, 2010. "An updated survey on the linear ordering problem for weighted or unweighted tournaments," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 107-158, March.
    2. Bruno Leclerc & Bernard Monjardet, 2011. "Aggregation and residuation," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 11085, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    3. Miguel Couceiro & Michel Grabisch, 2013. "On the poset of computation rules for nonassociative calculus," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-00787750, HAL.
    4. Olivier Hudry, 2008. "NP-hardness results for the aggregation of linear orders into median orders," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 163(1), pages 63-88, October.

  10. Fuad Aleskerov & Denis Bouyssou & Bernard Monjardet, 2007. "Utility Maximization, Choice and Preference," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00197186, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. J C R Alcantud, 2004. "Maximality with or without binariness: transfer-type characterizations," Microeconomics 0402015, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Podinovski, Vladislav V., 2010. "Set choice problems with incomplete information about the preferences of the decision maker," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 371-379, November.
    3. Bernard Monjardet, 2005. "Modèles ordinaux de préférences," Post-Print halshs-00173791, HAL.
    4. Abrísqueta, Francisco J. & Candeal, Juan C. & Induráin, Esteban & Zudaire, Margarita, 2009. "Scott-Suppes representability of semiorders: Internal conditions," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 245-261, March.
    5. Bernard Monjardet & Vololonirina Raderanirina, 2004. "Lattices of choice functions and consensus problems," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 23(3), pages 349-382, December.
    6. Nuh Aygün Dalkıran & Furkan Yıldız, 2021. "Another Characterization of Expected Scott-Suppes Utility Representation," Bogazici Journal, Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies, Bogazici University, Department of Economics, vol. 35(2), pages 177-193.
    7. F. Aleskerov & I. Frumin & E. Kardanova, 2016. "Heterogeneity of the educational system: an introduction to the problem," Papers 1701.07322, arXiv.org.
    8. Aguiar, Victor H. & Kimya, Mert, 2019. "Adaptive stochastic search," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 74-83.
    9. Domenico Cantone & Alfio Giarlotta & Stephen Watson, 2019. "Congruence relations on a choice space," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 52(2), pages 247-294, February.
    10. Marc-Arthur Diaye & André Lapidus, 2019. "Decision and Time from a Humean Point of View," Post-Print hal-01372527, HAL.
    11. Bernard Monjardet & Jean-Pierre Barthélemy & Olivier Hudry & Bruno Leclerc, 2009. "Metric and latticial medians," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00408174, HAL.
    12. Manzini, Paola & Mariotti, Marco & Tyson, Christopher J., 2011. "Manipulation of Choice Behavior," IZA Discussion Papers 5891, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    13. Schwartz, Thomas, 2014. "Choice functions and bounded rationality," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 14-18.
    14. Somaye Narrei & Majid Ataee-pour, 2021. "Assessment of personal preferences concerning the social impacts of mining with choice experiment method," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 34(1), pages 39-49, April.
    15. Pawel Dziewulski, 2019. "Just-noticeable difference as a behavioural foundation of the critical cost-efficiency index," Working Paper Series 0519, Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School.
    16. Olivier Hudry & Bruno Leclerc & Bernard Monjardet & Jean-Pierre Barthélemy, 2004. "Médianes métriques et latticielles," Post-Print halshs-03322636, HAL.
    17. Giarlotta, Alfio & Greco, Salvatore, 2013. "Necessary and possible preference structures," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 163-172.
    18. Chistyakov, V. & Chumakova, K., 2018. "Restoring Indifference Classes via Ordinal Numbers under the Discrete Leximin and Leximax Preference Orderings," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 39(3), pages 12-31.
    19. Rubchinsky, Alexander, 2010. "Brams-Taylor model of fair division for divisible and indivisible items," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 1-14, July.
    20. Quartieri, Federico, 2022. "A unified view of the existence of maximals," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    21. Juan P. Aguilera & Levent Ülkü, 2017. "On the maximization of menu-dependent interval orders," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 48(2), pages 357-366, February.
    22. Denis Bouyssou & Marc Pirlot, 2021. "Unit representation of semiorders II: The general case," Post-Print hal-03280658, HAL.
    23. Galeazzi, Paolo & Marti, Johannes, 2023. "Choice structures in games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 431-455.
    24. Ondřej Horký, 2011. "Falešná neutralita neoklasické teorie: feministická, antropologická, evoluční a ekologická kritika [The False Neutrality of the Neoclassical Theory: Feminist, Anthropological, Evolutionary and Ecol," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2011(3), pages 329-344.
    25. Quartieri, Federico, 2021. "Existence of maximals via right traces," MPRA Paper 107189, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    26. Jeffrey Carpenter & Justin Garcia & J. Lum, 2011. "Dopamine receptor genes predict risk preferences, time preferences, and related economic choices," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 233-261, June.
    27. Elias Bouacida, 2021. "Identifying Choice Correspondences," Working Papers 327800275, Lancaster University Management School, Economics Department.
    28. van Hees, Martin & Jitendranath, Akshath & Luttens, Roland Iwan, 2021. "Choice functions and hard choices," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    29. Marek Hudík, 2013. "When x Becomes x': Sameness and the Internal Consistency of Choice," ICER Working Papers 02-2013, ICER - International Centre for Economic Research.
    30. Pawel Dziewulski, 2021. "A comprehensive revealed preference approach to approximate utility maximisation," Working Paper Series 0621, Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School.
    31. Christian Klamler, 2008. "A distance measure for choice functions," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 30(3), pages 419-425, April.
    32. Denis Bouyssou & Thierry Marchant & Marc Pirlot, 2020. "A theoretical look at ELECTRE TRI-nB and related sorting models," Papers 2008.09484, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2021.
    33. Olivier Hudry & Bernard Monjardet, 2010. "Consensus theories: An oriented survey," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 10057, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    34. D. Pennesi, 2016. "When perfectionism becomes willpower," Working Papers wp1050, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    35. Costa, Matheus & Riella, Gil, 2022. "King-chicken choice correspondences," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 113-118.
    36. Stewart, Rush T., 2020. "Weak pseudo-rationalizability," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 23-28.
    37. Paolo Galeazzi & Johannes Marti, 2023. "Choice Structures in Games," Papers 2304.11575, arXiv.org.
    38. Andrea C. Hupman & Jay Simon, 2023. "The Legacy of Peter Fishburn: Foundational Work and Lasting Impact," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 1-15, March.
    39. Kukushkin, Nikolai S., 2008. "Maximizing an interval order on compact subsets of its domain," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 195-206, September.
    40. Salvador Barberà & Geoffroy De Cleppel & Alejandro Neme & Kareen Rozeen, 2020. "Order-k Rationality," Working Papers 4, Red Nacional de Investigadores en Economía (RedNIE).
    41. Denis Bouyssou & Thierry Marchant, 2013. "Multiattribute preference models with reference points," Post-Print hal-02359806, HAL.
    42. Denis Bouyssou & Marc Pirlot, 2015. "A consolidated approach to the axiomatization of outranking relations: a survey and new results," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 229(1), pages 159-212, June.
    43. Juan Lleras & Yusufcan Masatlioglu & Daisuke Nakajima & Erkut Ozbay, 2021. "Path-Independent Consideration," Games, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, March.
    44. Federico Quartieri, 2023. "Undominated Maximals: General Definition and Characterizations," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-19, September.
    45. Michael Ackerman & Sul-Young Choi & Peter Coughlin & Eric Gottlieb & Japheth Wood, 2013. "Elections with partially ordered preferences," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 157(1), pages 145-168, October.
    46. Elias Bouacida, 2021. "Identifying Choice Correspondences," Working Papers halshs-01998001, HAL.
    47. Chambers, Christopher P. & Yenmez, M. Bumin, 2018. "A simple characterization of responsive choice," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 217-221.
    48. A. Estevan, 2020. "Debreu's open gap lemma for semiorders," Papers 2010.04265, arXiv.org.
    49. Salvador Barberà & Geoffroy de Clippel & Alejandro Neme & Kareen Rozen, 2022. "Order-k rationality," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 73(4), pages 1135-1153, June.
    50. Obermeyer Andy & Wieland Bernhard & Evangelinos Christos, 2014. "Die ökonomische Bewertung kleiner Reisezeiteinsparungen / The Economic Valuation of Small Travel Time Savings," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 234(1), pages 44-69, February.
    51. Boris Mirkin & Trevor I. Fenner, 2019. "Distance and Consensus for Preference Relations Corresponding to Ordered Partitions," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 36(2), pages 350-367, July.
    52. Michele Crescenzi, 2023. "Group knowledge and individual introspection," Papers 2305.08729, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2023.
    53. Aleskerov, F., 2013. "Game-Theoretic Modeling: An Attempt of Brief Discussion and a Forecast of Development," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 17(1), pages 181-184.
    54. Salador Barera & Kareen Rozen, 2018. "Good Enough," Working Papers 2018-12, Brown University, Department of Economics.
    55. Traxler, Emilia & Li, Tongzhe, 2020. "Agricultural Best Management Practices, A summary of adoption behaviour," Working Papers 305271, University of Guelph, Institute for the Advanced Study of Food and Agricultural Policy.
    56. Denis Bouyssou & Marc Pirlot, 2021. "Unit representation of semiorders I: Countable sets," Post-Print hal-03280649, HAL.
    57. Bouyssou, Denis & Pirlot, Marc, 2005. "Following the traces:: An introduction to conjoint measurement without transitivity and additivity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 163(2), pages 287-337, June.
    58. Dan Qin, 2021. "A Note on Numerical Representations of Nested System of Strict Partial Orders," Games, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-9, July.
    59. Daniele Pennesi, 2018. "Perfectionism and willpower," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 6(1), pages 101-110, April.
    60. Denis Bouyssou & Thierry Marchant & Marc Pirlot, 2020. "A theoretical look at ELECTRE TRI-nB," Working Papers hal-02898131, HAL.
    61. Michele Lombardi & Marco Mariotti, 2007. "Uncovered Bargaining Solutions," Working Papers 608, Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance.
    62. Alessio Emanuele Biondo & Alfio Giarlotta & Alessandro Pluchino & Andrea Rapisarda, 2016. "Perfect Information vs Random Investigation: Safety Guidelines for a Consumer in the Jungle of Product Differentiation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(1), pages 1-26, January.
    63. , & , & , J., 2013. "Two-stage threshold representations," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 8(3), September.

  11. Bernard Monjardet, 2006. "Condorcet domains and distributive lattices," Cahiers de la Maison des Sciences Economiques b06072, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1).

    Cited by:

    1. Puppe, Clemens, 2017. "The Single-Peaked Domain Revisited: A Simple Global Characterization," VfS Annual Conference 2017 (Vienna): Alternative Structures for Money and Banking 168068, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    2. Alexander Karpov & Arkadii Slinko, 2023. "Constructing large peak-pit Condorcet domains," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 94(1), pages 97-120, January.
    3. Li, Guanhao, 2023. "A classification of peak-pit maximal Condorcet domains," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 42-57.
    4. Slinko, Arkadii, 2019. "Condorcet domains satisfying Arrow’s single-peakedness," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 166-175.

  12. Bernard Monjardet, 2006. "Acyclic domains of linear orders: a survey," Cahiers de la Maison des Sciences Economiques b06083, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1).

    Cited by:

    1. Chatterji, Shurojit & Zeng, Huaxia, 2018. "On random social choice functions with the tops-only property," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 413-435.
    2. Liu, Peng, 2020. "Random assignments on sequentially dichotomous domains," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 565-584.
    3. Liu, Peng & Zeng, Huaxia, 2019. "Random assignments on preference domains with a tier structure," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 176-194.
    4. Roy, Souvik & Sadhukhan, Soumyarup, 2021. "A unified characterization of the randomized strategy-proof rules," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    5. Puppe, Clemens, 2017. "The Single-Peaked Domain Revisited: A Simple Global Characterization," VfS Annual Conference 2017 (Vienna): Alternative Structures for Money and Banking 168068, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    6. Chatterji, Shurojit & Zeng, Huaxia, 2023. "A taxonomy of non-dictatorial unidimensional domains," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 228-269.
    7. Alexander Karpov & Arkadii Slinko, 2023. "Constructing large peak-pit Condorcet domains," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 94(1), pages 97-120, January.
    8. Gilbert Laffond & Jean Lainé, 2014. "Triple-consistent social choice and the majority rule," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 22(2), pages 784-799, July.
    9. Chatterji, Shurojit & Zeng, Huaxia, 2019. "Random mechanism design on multidimensional domains," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 25-105.
    10. Li, Guanhao, 2023. "A classification of peak-pit maximal Condorcet domains," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 42-57.
    11. Bernard Monjardet, 2006. "Condorcet domains and distributive lattices," Cahiers de la Maison des Sciences Economiques b06072, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1).
    12. Ping Zhan, 2019. "A simple construction of complete single-peaked domains by recursive tiling," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 90(3), pages 477-488, December.
    13. Saari, Donald G., 2014. "Unifying voting theory from Nakamura’s to Greenberg’s theorems," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 1-11.
    14. Shurojit Chatterji & Souvik Roy & Soumyarup Sadhukhan & Arunava Sen & Huaxia Zeng, 2021. "Probabilistic Fixed Ballot Rules and Hybrid Domains," Papers 2105.10677, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2022.
    15. Olivier Hudry & Bernard Monjardet, 2010. "Consensus theories: An oriented survey," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 10057, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    16. Bredereck, Robert & Chen, Jiehua & Woeginger, Gerhard J., 2016. "Are there any nicely structured preference profiles nearby?," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 61-73.
    17. Chatterji, Shurojit & Roy, Souvik & Sadhukhan, Soumyarup & Sen, Arunava & Zeng, Huaxia, 2022. "Probabilistic fixed ballot rules and hybrid domains," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    18. Bernard Monjardet, 2008. ""Mathématique Sociale" and Mathematics. A case study: Condorcet's effect and medians," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00309825, HAL.
    19. Clemens Puppe & Arkadii Slinko, 2019. "Condorcet domains, median graphs and the single-crossing property," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 67(1), pages 285-318, February.
    20. Li, Guanhao & Puppe, Clemens & Slinko, Arkadii, 2021. "Towards a classification of maximal peak-pit Condorcet domains," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 191-202.
    21. Shurojit Chatterji & Huaxia Zeng, 2022. "A Taxonomy of Non-dictatorial Unidimensional Domains," Papers 2201.00496, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2022.
    22. Alexander Karpov, 2019. "On the Number of Group-Separable Preference Profiles," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 501-517, June.
    23. Slinko, Arkadii, 2019. "Condorcet domains satisfying Arrow’s single-peakedness," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 166-175.
    24. Li, Guanhao & Puppe, Clemens & Slinko, Arkadii, 2020. "Towards a classification of maximal peak-pit Condorcet domains," Working Paper Series in Economics 144, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Department of Economics and Management.

  13. Bernard Monjardet, 2005. "Social choice theory and the "Centre de Mathématique Sociale". Some historical notes," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00198573, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Bernard Monjardet, 2007. "Some order dualities in logic, games and choices," Post-Print halshs-00202326, HAL.
    2. Daniel Eckert & Bernard Monjardet, 2010. "Guilbaud's 1952 theorem on the logical problem of aggregation," Post-Print hal-00642163, HAL.
    3. Philippe Mongin, 2012. "Une source méconnue de la théorie de l'agrégation des jugements," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 63(4), pages 645-657.
    4. Eisermann, Michael, 2006. "Arrovian juntas," MPRA Paper 81, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 03 Oct 2006.

  14. Olivier Hudry & Bruno Leclerc & Bernard Monjardet & Jean-Pierre Barthélemy, 2004. "Médianes métriques et latticielles," Cahiers de la Maison des Sciences Economiques b04044, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1).

    Cited by:

    1. Bernard Monjardet, 2008. ""Mathématique Sociale" and Mathematics. A case study: Condorcet's effect and medians," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00309825, HAL.

  15. Bernard Monjardet & Raderanirina Vololonirina, 2004. "Lattices of choice functions and consensus problems," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00203346, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Bernard Monjardet & Jean-Pierre Barthélemy & Olivier Hudry & Bruno Leclerc, 2009. "Metric and latticial medians," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00408174, HAL.
    2. Danilov, V. & Koshevoy, G., 2005. "Mathematics of Plott choice functions," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 245-272, May.
    3. Ernesto Savaglio & Stefano Vannucci, 2021. "Strategy-Proof Aggregation Rules in Median Semilattices with Applications to Preference Aggregation," Department of Economics University of Siena 867, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    4. Olivier Hudry & Bruno Leclerc & Bernard Monjardet & Jean-Pierre Barthélemy, 2004. "Médianes métriques et latticielles," Post-Print halshs-03322636, HAL.
    5. Vladimir Danilov & Gleb Koshevoy & Ernesto Savaglio, 2012. "Orderings of Opportunity Sets," Department of Economics University of Siena 660, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    6. Olivier Hudry & Bernard Monjardet, 2010. "Consensus theories: An oriented survey," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 10057, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    7. Monjardet, Bernard, 2003. "The presence of lattice theory in discrete problems of mathematical social sciences. Why," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 103-144, October.
    8. Danilov, V., 2012. "Outcast Condition in the Choice Theory," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 13(1), pages 34-49.
    9. Ernesto Savaglio & Stefano Vannucci, 2022. "Strategy-proof aggregation rules in median semilattices with applications to preference aggregation," Papers 2208.12732, arXiv.org.

  16. Bernard Monjardet, 2004. "Some order dualities in logic, games and choices," Cahiers de la Maison des Sciences Economiques b04018, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1).

    Cited by:

    1. Michele Crescenzi, 2023. "Group knowledge and individual introspection," Papers 2305.08729, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2023.

  17. Monjardet, B. & Raderanirina, V., 2000. "The Duality Between the Anti-Exchange Closure Operators and the Path Independent Choice Operators on a Finite Set," Papiers d'Economie Mathématique et Applications 2000.121, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1).

    Cited by:

    1. Gabriela Bordalo & Nathalie Caspard & Bernard Monjardet, 2009. "Going down in (semi)lattices of finite Moore families and convex geometries," Post-Print halshs-00308785, HAL.
    2. Bernard Monjardet & Vololonirina Raderanirina, 2004. "Lattices of choice functions and consensus problems," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 23(3), pages 349-382, December.
    3. Bernard Monjardet, 2007. "Some order dualities in logic, games and choices," Post-Print halshs-00202326, HAL.
    4. Danilov, V. & Koshevoy, G., 2005. "Mathematics of Plott choice functions," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 245-272, May.
    5. Matthew Ryan, 2010. "Mixture sets on finite domains," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 33(2), pages 139-147, November.
    6. Monjardet, Bernard, 2003. "The presence of lattice theory in discrete problems of mathematical social sciences. Why," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 103-144, October.
    7. Danilov, V. & Koshevoy, G., 2006. "A new characterization of the path independent choice functions," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 238-245, March.

  18. Caspard, N. & Monjardet, B., 2000. "The Lattice of Closure Systems, Closure Operators and Implicational Systems on a Finite Set : A Survey," Papiers d'Economie Mathématique et Applications 2000.120, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1).

    Cited by:

    1. Gabriela Bordalo & Nathalie Caspard & Bernard Monjardet, 2009. "Going down in (semi)lattices of finite Moore families and convex geometries," Post-Print halshs-00308785, HAL.
    2. V. Danilov & G. Koshevoy & E. Savaglio, 2015. "Hyper-relations, choice functions, and orderings of opportunity sets," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 45(1), pages 51-69, June.
    3. Monjardet, B. & Raderanirina, V., 2000. "The Duality Between the Anti-Exchange Closure Operators and the Path Independent Choice Operators on a Finite Set," Papiers d'Economie Mathématique et Applications 2000.121, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1).
    4. Bernard Monjardet, 2007. "Some order dualities in logic, games and choices," Post-Print halshs-00202326, HAL.
    5. Vladimir Danilov & Gleb Koshevoy & Ernesto Savaglio, 2012. "Orderings of Opportunity Sets," Department of Economics University of Siena 660, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    6. Monjardet, Bernard, 2003. "The presence of lattice theory in discrete problems of mathematical social sciences. Why," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 103-144, October.
    7. Jean Diatta, 2009. "On critical sets of a finite Moore family," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 3(3), pages 291-304, December.

  19. Hausser Bordelo, G. & Monjardet, B., 1999. "The Lattice of Strict Completions of a Poset," Papiers d'Economie Mathématique et Applications 1999.15, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1).

    Cited by:

    1. Gabriela Bordalo & Nathalie Caspard & Bernard Monjardet, 2009. "Going down in (semi)lattices of finite Moore families and convex geometries," Post-Print halshs-00308785, HAL.

  20. Pierre Batteau & Jean-Marie Blin & Bernard Monjardet, 1981. "Stability of Aggregation Procedures, Ultrafilters, and Simple Games," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-01796298, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Susumu Cato, 2022. "Stable preference aggregation with infinite population," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 59(2), pages 287-304, August.
    2. Salvador Barberà, 2010. "Strategy-proof social choice," Working Papers 420, Barcelona School of Economics.
    3. Salvador Barberà, 2003. "A Theorem on Preference Aggregation," Working Papers 166, Barcelona School of Economics.
    4. Davide Grossi, 2021. "Lecture Notes on Voting Theory," Papers 2105.00216, arXiv.org.
    5. Susumu Cato, 2013. "Quasi-decisiveness, quasi-ultrafilter, and social quasi-orderings," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 41(1), pages 169-202, June.
    6. Lauwers, Luc & Van Liedekerke, Luc, 1995. "Ultraproducts and aggregation," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 217-237.

Articles

  1. Monjardet, B., 2008. "Statement of precedence and a comment on IIA terminology," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 736-738, March.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  2. Bernard Monjardet, 2007. "Some Order Dualities In Logic, Games And Choices," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 9(01), pages 1-12.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  3. Bernard Monjardet, 2005. "Social choice theory and the “Centre de Mathématique Sociale”: some historical notes," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 25(2), pages 433-456, December.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  4. Bernard Monjardet & Vololonirina Raderanirina, 2004. "Lattices of choice functions and consensus problems," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 23(3), pages 349-382, December.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  5. Monjardet, Bernard, 2003. "The presence of lattice theory in discrete problems of mathematical social sciences. Why," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 103-144, October.

    Cited by:

    1. Bernard Monjardet, 2007. "Some order dualities in logic, games and choices," Post-Print halshs-00202326, HAL.
    2. Thierry Denœux & Marie-Hélène Masson, 2012. "Evidential reasoning in large partially ordered sets," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 195(1), pages 135-161, May.
    3. Ulrich Faigle & Michel Grabisch & Andres Jiménez-Losada & Manuel Ordóñez, 2016. "Games on concept lattices: Shapley value and core," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-01379699, HAL.
    4. Michel Grabisch & Agnieszka Rusinowska, 2015. "Lattices in Social Networks with Influence," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(01), pages 1-18.
    5. John Martin, 2014. "Spatial processes and Galois/concept lattices," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 961-981, March.
    6. John Levi Martin, 2016. "The dimensionality of discrete factor analyses," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 50(6), pages 2451-2467, November.

  6. Monjardet, Bernard & Raderanirina, Vololonirina, 2001. "The duality between the anti-exchange closure operators and the path independent choice operators on a finite set," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 131-150, March.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  7. B. Monjardet, 1997. "Concordance between two linear orders: The Spearman and Kendall coefficients revisited," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 14(2), pages 269-295, September.

    Cited by:

    1. Gilbert Laffond & Jean Lainé & M. Remzi Sanver, 2020. "Metrizable preferences over preferences," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 55(1), pages 177-191, June.
    2. Olivier Hudry & Bernard Monjardet, 2010. "Consensus theories: An oriented survey," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 10057, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.

  8. Monjardet, B., 1990. "Arrowian characterizations of latticial federation consensus functions," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 51-71, August.

    Cited by:

    1. McMorris, F.R. & Powers, Robert C., 2009. "Consensus rules based on decisive families: The case of hierarchies," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 57(3), pages 333-338, May.
    2. Stefano Vannucci, 2017. "Symmetric Consequence Relations and Strategy-Proof Judgment Aggregation," Department of Economics University of Siena 754, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    3. Bernard Monjardet & Vololonirina Raderanirina, 2004. "Lattices of choice functions and consensus problems," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 23(3), pages 349-382, December.
    4. Stefano Vannucci, 2007. "Virtuous Circles and Contested Identities: on Collective Identification Procedures with Independent Qualified Certification," Department of Economics University of Siena 501, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    5. Bruno Leclerc & Bernard Monjardet, 2011. "Aggregation and residuation," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 11085, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    6. Ernesto Savaglio & Stefano Vannucci, 2014. "Strategy-proofness and single-peackedness in bounded distributive lattices," Papers 1406.5120, arXiv.org.
    7. Ernesto Savaglio & Stefano Vannucci, 2021. "Strategy-Proof Aggregation Rules in Median Semilattices with Applications to Preference Aggregation," Department of Economics University of Siena 867, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    8. Ernesto Savaglio & Stefano Vannucci, 2019. "Strategy-proof aggregation rules and single peakedness in bounded distributive lattices," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 52(2), pages 295-327, February.
    9. Olivier Hudry & Bruno Leclerc & Bernard Monjardet & Jean-Pierre Barthélemy, 2004. "Médianes métriques et latticielles," Post-Print halshs-03322636, HAL.
    10. Fred McMorris & Robert Powers, 2008. "A Characterization of Majority Rule for Hierarchies," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 25(2), pages 153-158, November.
    11. Alain Guénoche, 2011. "Consensus of partitions : a constructive approach," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 5(3), pages 215-229, October.
    12. Olivier Hudry & Bernard Monjardet, 2010. "Consensus theories: An oriented survey," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 10057, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    13. Stefano Vannucci, 2008. "The Libertarian Identification Rule in Finite Atomistic Lattices," Department of Economics University of Siena 526, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    14. Bruno Leclerc & Bernard Monjardet, 2010. "Aggregation et residuation," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 10058, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    15. McMorris, F. R. & Powers, R. C., 2004. "Consensus functions on tree quasi-orders that satisfy an independence condition," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 183-192, September.
    16. Miller, Alan D., 2013. "Community standards," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 148(6), pages 2696-2705.
    17. Ernesto Savaglio & Stefano Vannucci, 2012. "Strategy-proofness and unimodality in bounded distributive lattices," Department of Economics University of Siena 642, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    18. Stefano Vannucci, 2019. "Majority judgment and strategy-proofness: a characterization," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 48(3), pages 863-886, September.
    19. McMorris, F.R. & Powers, R.C., 2013. "Majority decision on median semilattices," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 48-51.
    20. Ernesto Savaglio & Stefano Vannucci, 2022. "Strategy-proof aggregation rules in median semilattices with applications to preference aggregation," Papers 2208.12732, arXiv.org.
    21. Stefano Vannucci, 2016. "Majority Judgment and Strategy-Proofness," Department of Economics University of Siena 730, Department of Economics, University of Siena.

  9. Jean-Pierre Barthélemy & Bruno Leclerc & Bernard Monjardet, 1986. "On the use of ordered sets in problems of comparison and consensus of classifications," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 3(2), pages 187-224, September.

    Cited by:

    1. Stephen Hirtle, 1987. "On the classification of recall strings using lattice-theoretic measures," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 4(2), pages 227-242, September.
    2. Akinori Okada & Hans-Hermann Bock & F. Murtagh & F. Rohlf & Wei-Chien Chang & Shizuhiko Nishisato & Robert Sokal & Carolyn Anderson & Frank Critchley & Frank Critchley & Robert Golden, 1989. "Book reviews," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 6(1), pages 121-161, December.
    3. Mishra, Debasis & Roy, Souvik, 2012. "Strategy-proof partitioning," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 76(1), pages 285-300.
    4. Nicolas, Houy, 2007. ""I want to be a J!": Liberalism in group identification problems," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 59-70, July.
    5. Dimitrov, Dinko & Puppe, Clemens, 2009. "Non-bossy Social Classification," Sustainable Development Papers 55328, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    6. Jean-Pierre Barthélemy, 1988. "Thresholded consensus for n-trees," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 5(2), pages 229-236, September.
    7. Dinko Dimitrov & Thierry Marchant & Debasis Mishra, 2012. "Separability and aggregation of equivalence relations," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 51(1), pages 191-212, September.
    8. A. Penttinen & W. Krzanowski & J. Kettenring & F. Rohlf & William Day & B. Weir & John Kececioglu & N. Ohsumi & Peter Willett, 1993. "Book reviews," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 10(1), pages 125-156, January.
    9. Olivier Hudry & Bernard Monjardet, 2010. "Consensus theories: An oriented survey," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 10057, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    10. Federico Fioravanti & Fernando Tohmé, 2020. "Asking Infinite Voters ‘Who is a J?’: Group Identification Problems in ℕ$\mathbb {N}$," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 37(1), pages 58-65, April.
    11. Miller, Alan D., 2013. "Community standards," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 148(6), pages 2696-2705.
    12. A. Gordon & M. Vichi, 2001. "Fuzzy partition models for fitting a set of partitions," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 66(2), pages 229-247, June.
    13. Gildas Brossier, 1990. "Piecewise hierarchical clustering," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 7(2), pages 197-216, September.
    14. McMorris, F.R. & Powers, R.C., 2013. "Majority decision on median semilattices," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 48-51.
    15. Olivier Hudry, 2008. "NP-hardness results for the aggregation of linear orders into median orders," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 163(1), pages 63-88, October.
    16. Boris Mirkin & Trevor I. Fenner, 2019. "Distance and Consensus for Preference Relations Corresponding to Ordered Partitions," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 36(2), pages 350-367, July.
    17. David Banks & Kathleen Carley, 1994. "Metric inference for social networks," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 11(1), pages 121-149, March.
    18. Christopher Chambers & Alan Miller, 2011. "Rules for aggregating information," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 36(1), pages 75-82, January.
    19. J. Barthélemy, 1988. "Comments on “aggregation of equivalence relations” by P. C. Fishburn and A. Rubinstein," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 5(1), pages 85-87, March.

  10. Batteau, Pierre & Blin, Jean-Marie & Monjardet, Bernard, 1981. "Stability of Aggregation Procedures, Ultrafilters, and Simple Games," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 49(2), pages 527-534, March.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  11. Pierre Barthelemy, Jean & Monjardet, Bernard, 1981. "The median procedure in cluster analysis and social choice theory," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 1(3), pages 235-267, May.

    Cited by:

    1. Marcus Pivato, 2013. "Voting rules as statistical estimators," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 40(2), pages 581-630, February.
    2. Dewan F. Wahid & Elkafi Hassini, 2022. "A Literature Review on Correlation Clustering: Cross-disciplinary Taxonomy with Bibliometric Analysis," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 3(3), pages 1-42, September.
    3. Saul Amorim & Jean-Pierre Barthélemy & Celso Ribeiro, 1992. "Clustering and clique partitioning: Simulated annealing and tabu search approaches," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 9(1), pages 17-41, January.
    4. Bernard Monjardet & Vololonirina Raderanirina, 2004. "Lattices of choice functions and consensus problems," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 23(3), pages 349-382, December.
    5. Amodio, S. & D’Ambrosio, A. & Siciliano, R., 2016. "Accurate algorithms for identifying the median ranking when dealing with weak and partial rankings under the Kemeny axiomatic approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(2), pages 667-676.
    6. Irène Charon & Olivier Hudry, 2010. "An updated survey on the linear ordering problem for weighted or unweighted tournaments," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 107-158, March.
    7. Nehring, Klaus & Puppe, Clemens, 2019. "Resource allocation by frugal majority rule," Working Paper Series in Economics 131, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Department of Economics and Management.
    8. Jean-Pierre Barthélemy, 1988. "Thresholded consensus for n-trees," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 5(2), pages 229-236, September.
    9. Nehring, Klaus & Pivato, Marcus, 2018. "The median rule in judgement aggregation," MPRA Paper 84258, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Houy, Nicolas & Zwicker, William S., 2014. "The geometry of voting power: Weighted voting and hyper-ellipsoids," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 7-16.
    11. Hannu Salonen, 2012. "Aggregating And Updating Information," Discussion Papers 73, Aboa Centre for Economics.
    12. Olivier Hudry, 2015. "Complexity results for extensions of median orders to different types of remoteness," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 225(1), pages 111-123, February.
    13. Balakrishnan, K. & Changat, M. & Mulder, H.M., 2006. "The plurality strategy on graphs," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2006-35, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    14. Kari Chopra & William A. Wallace, 2000. "Modeling Relationships among Multiple Graphical Structures," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 6(4), pages 361-379, December.
    15. Bernard Monjardet & Jean-Pierre Barthélemy & Olivier Hudry & Bruno Leclerc, 2009. "Metric and latticial medians," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00408174, HAL.
    16. Bernard Monjardet, 2011. "G. Th. Guilbaud et la théorie du choix social," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 11047, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    17. Pivato, Marcus, 2017. "Epistemic democracy with correlated voters," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 51-69.
    18. Ernesto Savaglio & Stefano Vannucci, 2021. "Strategy-Proof Aggregation Rules in Median Semilattices with Applications to Preference Aggregation," Department of Economics University of Siena 867, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    19. Balakrishnan, K. & Changat, M. & Mulder, H.M., 2007. "Median computation in graphs using consensus strategies," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2007-34, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    20. Olivier Hudry & Bruno Leclerc & Bernard Monjardet & Jean-Pierre Barthélemy, 2004. "Médianes métriques et latticielles," Post-Print halshs-03322636, HAL.
    21. Nehring, Klaus & Pivato, Marcus & Puppe, Clemens, 2013. "Unanimity overruled: Majority voting and the burden of history," Working Paper Series in Economics 50, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Department of Economics and Management.
    22. Balakrishnan, K. & Changat, M. & Mulder, H.M. & Subhamathi, A.R., 2011. "Consensus Strategies for Signed Profiles on Graphs," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI2011-34, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    23. Dean Neumann & Victor Norton, 1986. "On lattice consensus methods," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 3(2), pages 225-255, September.
    24. Hudry, Olivier, 2009. "A survey on the complexity of tournament solutions," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 57(3), pages 292-303, May.
    25. B. Monjardet, 1997. "Concordance between two linear orders: The Spearman and Kendall coefficients revisited," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 14(2), pages 269-295, September.
    26. Alain Guénoche, 2011. "Consensus of partitions : a constructive approach," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 5(3), pages 215-229, October.
    27. Bernard Monjardet, 2006. "Condorcet domains and distributive lattices," Cahiers de la Maison des Sciences Economiques b06072, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1).
    28. Olivier Hudry & Bernard Monjardet, 2010. "Consensus theories: An oriented survey," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 10057, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    29. McMorris, F.R. & Mulder, H.M. & Ortega, O., 2010. "Axiomatic Characterization of the Mean Function on Trees," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2010-07, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    30. Monjardet, Bernard, 2003. "The presence of lattice theory in discrete problems of mathematical social sciences. Why," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 103-144, October.
    31. Katherine Baldiga & Jerry Green, 2013. "Assent-maximizing social choice," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 40(2), pages 439-460, February.
    32. Hudry, Olivier, 2012. "On the computation of median linear orders, of median complete preorders and of median weak orders," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 2-10.
    33. Bernard Monjardet, 2008. ""Mathématique Sociale" and Mathematics. A case study: Condorcet's effect and medians," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00309825, HAL.
    34. Nehring, Klaus & Pivato, Marcus & Puppe, Clemens, 2013. "The Condorcet set: Majority voting over interconnected propositions," Working Paper Series in Economics 51, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Department of Economics and Management.
    35. Adolfo R. Escobedo & Romena Yasmin, 2023. "Derivations of large classes of facet defining inequalities of the weak order polytope using ranking structures," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 1-45, October.
    36. Nehring, Klaus & Pivato, Marcus, 2019. "Majority rule in the absence of a majority," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 213-257.
    37. Charon, Irene & Germa, Anne & Hudry, Olivier, 1996. "Random generation of tournaments and asymmetric graphs with given out-degrees," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(2), pages 411-419, December.
    38. Nehring, Klaus & Puppe, Clemens, 2022. "Condorcet solutions in frugal models of budget allocation," Working Paper Series in Economics 156, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Department of Economics and Management.
    39. Ernesto Savaglio & Stefano Vannucci, 2022. "Strategy-proof aggregation rules in median semilattices with applications to preference aggregation," Papers 2208.12732, arXiv.org.
    40. Nehring, Klaus & Pivato, Marcus & Puppe, Clemens, 2011. "Condorcet admissibility: Indeterminacy and path-dependence under majority voting on interconnected decisions," MPRA Paper 32434, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    41. Olivier Hudry, 2008. "NP-hardness results for the aggregation of linear orders into median orders," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 163(1), pages 63-88, October.
    42. Vichi, Maurizio, 1998. "Principal classifications analysis: a method for generating consensus dendrograms and its application to three-way data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 311-331, May.
    43. David Banks & Kathleen Carley, 1994. "Metric inference for social networks," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 11(1), pages 121-149, March.
    44. McMorris, F.R. & Novick, B. & Mulder, H.M. & Powers, R.C., 2015. "An ABC-Problem for Location and Consensus Functions on Graphs," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2015-16, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    45. Hudry, Olivier, 2010. "On the complexity of Slater's problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(1), pages 216-221, May.
    46. McMorris, F.R. & Mulder, H.M. & Novick, B. & Powers, R.C., 2014. "Five axioms for location functions on median graphs," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2014-10, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    47. Cervone, Davide P. & Dai, Ronghua & Gnoutcheff, Daniel & Lanterman, Grant & Mackenzie, Andrew & Morse, Ari & Srivastava, Nikhil & Zwicker, William S., 2012. "Voting with rubber bands, weights, and strings," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 11-27.

Chapters

  1. Bernard Monjardet, 2009. "Acyclic Domains of Linear Orders: A Survey," Studies in Choice and Welfare, in: Steven J. Brams & William V. Gehrlein & Fred S. Roberts (ed.), The Mathematics of Preference, Choice and Order, pages 139-160, Springer.
    See citations under working paper version above.Sorry, no citations of chapters recorded.

Books

  1. Fuad Aleskerov & Denis Bouyssou & Bernard Monjardet, 2007. "Utility Maximization, Choice and Preference," Springer Books, Springer, edition 0, number 978-3-540-34183-3, September.
    See citations under working paper version above.Sorry, no citations of books recorded.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.