IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nea/journl/y2018i39p12-31.html

Restoring Indifference Classes via Ordinal Numbers under the Discrete Leximin and Leximax Preference Orderings

Author

Listed:
  • Chistyakov, V.

    (National Research University Higher School of Economics, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia)

  • Chumakova, K.

    (National Research University Higher School of Economics, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia)

Abstract

The leximin (leximax) preference ordering compares two n-dimensional real vectors as follows: the coordinates of these vectors are first ordered in ascending (descending) order and then the resulting two vectors are compared lexicographically. It is well known that the leximin (leximax) preference ordering on Rn is not representable (by a utility function). In this paper, given two integers n greater than or equal to 1 and m greater than or equal to 2, we consider the set X of all n -dimensional vectors with integer coordinates assuming values between 1 and m. Equipping X with the leximin (leximax) preference ordering induced from Rn, called the threshold (dual threshold) rule, every vector from X (and its indifference class) is canonically assigned a unique ordinal number in such a way that a vector from X is considered more leximin- (leximax-) preferable if it lies in an indifference class with greater ordinal number. We present a rigorous recursive algorithm for the evaluation of multiplicities of the coordinates in a vector from X via the ordinal number of the indifference class with respect to the ordering, to which this vector belongs. The novelty of our algorithm is twofold: first, it exhibits new properties of the classical binomial coefficients in their interplay with the leximin (leximax) preference ordering and, second, it relies on four integer parameters, each one being obtained by a different cyclic procedure. The joint work of these procedures is based on our main theorem concerning some subtle properties of the enumerating preference function, which represents the leximin (leximax) preference ordering on X.

Suggested Citation

  • Chistyakov, V. & Chumakova, K., 2018. "Restoring Indifference Classes via Ordinal Numbers under the Discrete Leximin and Leximax Preference Orderings," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 39(3), pages 12-31.
  • Handle: RePEc:nea:journl:y:2018:i:39:p:12-31
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.econorus.org/repec/journl/2018-39-12-31r.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter C. Fishburn, 1975. "Axioms for Lexicographic Preferences," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 42(3), pages 415-419.
    2. Fuad T. Aleskerov & Vyacheslav V. Chistyakov, 2013. "The Threshold Decision Making Effectuated By The Enumerating Preference Function," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 12(06), pages 1201-1222.
    3. Fuad Aleskerov & Hasan Ersel & Reha Yolalan, 2004. "Multicriterial Ranking Approach For Evaluating Bank Branch Performance," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 3(02), pages 321-335.
    4. d'Aspremont, Claude & Gevers, Louis, 2002. "Social welfare functionals and interpersonal comparability," Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, in: K. J. Arrow & A. K. Sen & K. Suzumura (ed.), Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 10, pages 459-541, Elsevier.
    5. Fuad Aleskerov & Denis Bouyssou & Bernard Monjardet, 2007. "Utility Maximization, Choice and Preference," Springer Books, Springer, edition 0, number 978-3-540-34183-3, January.
    6. Vilkas, Eduardas, 1986. "An axiomatic definition of the leximin," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 2(4), pages 455-463.
    7. Aleskerov, Fuad & Yakuba, Vyacheslav & Yuzbashev, Dmitriy, 2007. "A `threshold aggregation' of three-graded rankings," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 106-110, January.
    8. Fuad Aleskerov & Vyacheslav Chistyakov & Valery Kalyagin, 2010. "Social threshold aggregations," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 35(4), pages 627-646, October.
    9. Aleskerov, Fuad & Chistyakov, Vyacheslav V. & Kalyagin, Valery, 2010. "The threshold aggregation," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 107(2), pages 261-262, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mridu Prabal Goswami & Manipushpak Mitra & Debapriya Sen, 2022. "A Characterization of Lexicographic Preferences," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 19(2), pages 170-187, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. F. Aleskerov & E. Victorova, 2016. "An analysis of potential conflict zones in the arctic region," Papers 1701.07321, arXiv.org.
    2. Macé, Antonin, 2018. "Voting with evaluations: Characterizations of evaluative voting and range voting," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 10-17.
    3. F. Aleskerov & N. Meshcheryakova & S. Shvydun, 2016. "Centrality measures in networks based on nodes attributes, long-range interactions and group influence," Papers 1610.05892, arXiv.org.
    4. Erdamar, Bora & Sanver, M. Remzi & Sato, Shin, 2017. "Evaluationwise strategy-proofness," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 227-238.
    5. Edith Elkind & Piotr Faliszewski & Arkadii Slinko, 2015. "Distance rationalization of voting rules," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 45(2), pages 345-377, September.
    6. Fuad T. Aleskerov & Vladimir V. Pislyakov & Timur V. Vitkup, 2014. "Ranking Journals In Economics, Management And Political Sciences By The Threshold Aggregation Procedure," HSE Working papers WP BRP 73/EC/2014, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    7. Ou-Yang, Kui, 2018. "Equity, hierarchy, and ordinal social choice," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 75-84.
    8. Josep Freixas, 2022. "An Aggregation Rule Based on the Binomial Distribution," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(23), pages 1-14, November.
    9. Karabekyan, D., 2022. "On the stability of results for aggregation procedures," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 57(5), pages 24-37.
    10. Aleskerov, Fuad & Karabekyan, Daniel & Sanver, M. Remzi & Yakuba, Vyacheslav, 2012. "On the manipulability of voting rules: The case of 4 and 5 alternatives," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 67-73.
    11. Fuad Aleskerov & Natalia Meshcheryakova & Alisa Nikitina & Sergey Shvydun, 2016. "Key Borrowers Detection by Long-Range Interactions," HSE Working papers WP BRP 56/FE/2016, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    12. Fuad Aleskerov & Vyacheslav Chistyakov & Valery Kalyagin, 2010. "Social threshold aggregations," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 35(4), pages 627-646, October.
    13. Fuad Aleskerov & Daniel Karabekyan & M. Sanver & Vyacheslav Yakuba, 2011. "An individual manipulability of positional voting rules," SERIEs: Journal of the Spanish Economic Association, Springer;Spanish Economic Association, vol. 2(4), pages 431-446, December.
    14. Petri, Henrik & Voorneveld, Mark, 2016. "Characterizing lexicographic preferences," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 54-61.
    15. repec:fal:wpaper:08004 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Schwartz, Thomas, 2014. "Choice functions and bounded rationality," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 14-18.
    17. Wilson, Duncan T. & Hawe, Glenn I. & Coates, Graham & Crouch, Roger S., 2013. "A multi-objective combinatorial model of casualty processing in major incident response," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(3), pages 643-655.
    18. Juan P. Aguilera & Levent Ülkü, 2017. "On the maximization of menu-dependent interval orders," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 48(2), pages 357-366, February.
    19. Tasnádi, Attila & Puppe, Clemens, 2025. "Violin Virtuosi: Do their Performances Fade over Time?," Corvinus Economics Working Papers (CEWP) 2025/01, Corvinus University of Budapest.
    20. Alcantud, Jose C.R., 2006. "Maximality with or without binariness: Transfer-type characterizations," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 182-191, March.
    21. Antonin Macé, 2017. "Voting with evaluations: characterizations of evaluative voting and range voting," Working Papers halshs-01222200, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C02 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - General - - - Mathematical Economics
    • C81 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Methodology for Collecting, Estimating, and Organizing Microeconomic Data; Data Access
    • D79 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Other
    • E19 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - General Aggregative Models - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nea:journl:y:2018:i:39:p:12-31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alexey Tcharykov (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nearuea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.