IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finana/v91y2024ics1057521923004805.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The asymmetric volatility spillover across Shanghai, Hong Kong and the U.S. stock markets: A regime weighted measure and its forecast inference

Author

Listed:
  • Sheng, Lin Wen
  • Uddin, Gazi Salah
  • Sen, Ding
  • Hao, Zhu Shi

Abstract

Based upon generalized spillover index method under Markov switching vector auto-regression (MS-VAR) framework, this paper aims at a regime dependent measure of the volatility spillover asymmetry across Shanghai, Hong Kong and the U.S. stock markets. For that, we apply a regime weighted measure of spillover and its asymmetry. The empirical results show that there existed evident negative asymmetric effect of spillover across the three markets, and it was regime dependent and time-varying: it got intensified under high volatility regime and turned out stronger after the Program of Shanghai-Hong Kong stock connect. The regime weighted measure of spillover asymmetry is found to be reliable; it could be explained appropriately with the economic policy uncertainty and investors' fear in the U.S., extreme shocks like crash of Shanghai stock market and COVID-19 as well as the capital flow through the Program. From in-sample evidence and out-of-sample forecast of Shanghai stock market, we infer that traditional forecast models could be improved if regime dependent spillover and its asymmetry are considered as additional factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Sheng, Lin Wen & Uddin, Gazi Salah & Sen, Ding & Hao, Zhu Shi, 2024. "The asymmetric volatility spillover across Shanghai, Hong Kong and the U.S. stock markets: A regime weighted measure and its forecast inference," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:91:y:2024:i:c:s1057521923004805
    DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102964
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521923004805
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102964?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:91:y:2024:i:c:s1057521923004805. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620166 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.