IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/pbu404.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Catherine D. Buffington

Personal Details

First Name:Catherine
Middle Name:D.
Last Name:Buffington
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pbu404
301-763-1838

Affiliation

Census Bureau
Department of Commerce
Government of the United States

Washington, District of Columbia (United States)
http://www.census.gov/

: 301-457-4100
301-457-4714

RePEc:edi:cengvus (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles

Working papers

  1. Catherine Buffington & Andrew Hennessy & Scott Ohlmacher, 2018. "The Management and Organizational Practices Survey (MOPS): Collection and Processing," Working Papers 18-51, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
  2. Catherine Buffington & Javier Miranda & Robert Seamans, 2018. "Development of Survey Questions on Robotics Expenditures and Use in U.S. Manufacturing Establishments," Working Papers 18-44, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
  3. Catherine Buffington & Lucia Foster & Ron Jarmin & Scott Ohlmacher, 2016. "The Management and Organizational Practices Survey (MOPS): An Overview," Working Papers 16-28, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
  4. Catherine Buffington & Kenny Herrell & Scott Ohlmacher, 2016. "The Management and Organizational Practices Survey (MOPS): Cognitive Testing," Working Papers 16-53, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.

Articles

  1. Buffington, Catherine & Foster, Lucia & Jarmin, Ron & Ohlmacher, Scott & Ohlmacher, Scott, 2017. "The management and organizational practices survey (MOPS): An overview1," Journal of Economic and Social Measurement, IOS Press, issue 1, pages 1-26.
  2. Catherine Buffington & Benjamin Cerf & Christina Jones & Bruce A. Weinberg, 2016. "STEM Training and Early Career Outcomes of Female and Male Graduate Students: Evidence from UMETRICS Data Linked to the 2010 Census," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(5), pages 333-338, May.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Catherine Buffington & Andrew Hennessy & Scott Ohlmacher, 2018. "The Management and Organizational Practices Survey (MOPS): Collection and Processing," Working Papers 18-51, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.

    Cited by:

    1. MORIKAWA Masayuki, 2019. "Firms' Subjective Uncertainty and Forecast Errors," Discussion papers 19055, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).

  2. Catherine Buffington & Lucia Foster & Ron Jarmin & Scott Ohlmacher, 2016. "The Management and Organizational Practices Survey (MOPS): An Overview," Working Papers 16-28, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.

    Cited by:

    1. Enghin Atalay & Ali Hortaçsu & Mary Jialin Li & Chad Syverson, 2019. "How Wide Is the Firm Border?," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 134(4), pages 1845-1882.
    2. Nicholas Bloom & Erik Brynjolfsson & Lucia Foster & Ron S. Jarmin & Megha Patnaik & Itay Saporta-Eksten & John Van Reenen, 2017. "What Drives Differences in Management?," NBER Working Papers 23300, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Catherine Buffington & Kenny Herrell & Scott Ohlmacher, 2016. "The Management and Organizational Practices Survey (MOPS): Cognitive Testing," Working Papers 16-53, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    4. Bloom, Nicholas & Brynjolfsson, Erik & Foster, Lucia & Jarmin, Ron & Patnaik, Megha & Saporta-Eksten, Itay & Van Reenen, John, 2017. "What drives differences in management practices?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 83600, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Nathan Goldschlag & Elisabeth Perlman, 2017. "Business Dynamic Statistics of Innovative Firms," Working Papers 17-72, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.

  3. Catherine Buffington & Kenny Herrell & Scott Ohlmacher, 2016. "The Management and Organizational Practices Survey (MOPS): Cognitive Testing," Working Papers 16-53, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.

    Cited by:

    1. Nicholas Bloom & Erik Brynjolfsson & Lucia Foster & Ron S. Jarmin & Megha Patnaik & Itay Saporta-Eksten & John Van Reenen, 2017. "What Drives Differences in Management?," NBER Working Papers 23300, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Catherine Buffington & Andrew Hennessy & Scott Ohlmacher, 2018. "The Management and Organizational Practices Survey (MOPS): Collection and Processing," Working Papers 18-51, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    3. Bloom, Nicholas & Brynjolfsson, Erik & Foster, Lucia & Jarmin, Ron & Patnaik, Megha & Saporta-Eksten, Itay & Van Reenen, John, 2017. "What drives differences in management practices?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 83600, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

Articles

  1. Buffington, Catherine & Foster, Lucia & Jarmin, Ron & Ohlmacher, Scott & Ohlmacher, Scott, 2017. "The management and organizational practices survey (MOPS): An overview1," Journal of Economic and Social Measurement, IOS Press, issue 1, pages 1-26.

    Cited by:

    1. Catherine Buffington & Andrew Hennessy & Scott Ohlmacher, 2018. "The Management and Organizational Practices Survey (MOPS): Collection and Processing," Working Papers 18-51, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    2. Bloom, Nicholas & Brynjolfsson, Erik & Foster, Lucia & Jarmin, Ron & Patnaik, Megha & Saporta-Eksten, Itay & Van Reenen, John, 2017. "What drives differences in management practices?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 83600, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Emek Basker & Randy A. Becker & Lucia Foster & T. Kirk White & Alice Zawacki, 2019. "Addressing Data Gaps: Four New Lines of Inquiry in the 2017 Economic Census," Working Papers 19-28, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.

  2. Catherine Buffington & Benjamin Cerf & Christina Jones & Bruce A. Weinberg, 2016. "STEM Training and Early Career Outcomes of Female and Male Graduate Students: Evidence from UMETRICS Data Linked to the 2010 Census," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(5), pages 333-338, May.

    Cited by:

    1. Graddy-Reed, Alexandra & Lanahan, Lauren & Eyer, Jonathan, 2019. "Gender discrepancies in publication productivity of high-performing life science graduate students," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(9), pages 1-1.
    2. Shulamit Kahn & Donna Ginther, 2017. "Women and STEM," NBER Working Papers 23525, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Chang, Wan-Ying & Cheng, Wei & Lane, Julia & Weinberg, Bruce, 2019. "Federal funding of doctoral recipients: What can be learned from linked data," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(6), pages 1487-1492.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Catherine D. Buffington should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.