IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/29377.html

Pay, Productivity and Management

Author

Listed:
  • Nicholas Bloom
  • Scott W. Ohlmacher
  • Cristina J. Tello-Trillo
  • Melanie Wallskog

Abstract

Using confidential Census matched employer-employee earnings data we find that employees at more productive firms, and firms with more structured management practices, have substantially higher pay, both on average and across every percentile of the pay distribution. This pay-performance relationship is particularly strong amongst higher paid employees, with a doubling of firm productivity associated with 11% more pay for the highest-paid employee (likely the CEO) compared to 4.7% for the median worker. This pay-performance link holds in public and private firms, although it is almost twice as strong in public firms for the highest-paid employees. Top pay volatility is also strongly related to productivity and structured management, suggesting this performance-pay relationship arises from more aggressive monitoring and incentive practices for top earners.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicholas Bloom & Scott W. Ohlmacher & Cristina J. Tello-Trillo & Melanie Wallskog, 2021. "Pay, Productivity and Management," NBER Working Papers 29377, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:29377
    Note: CF LS PR
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w29377.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Natália P. Monteiro & Odd Rune Straume, 2024. "Management Practices, Pay, and Pay Inequality," Journal of Labor Research, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 254-304, June.
    2. John Haltiwanger & Henry Hyatt & Erika McEntarfer & Matthew Staiger, 2025. "Cyclical Worker Flows: Cleansing vs. Sullying," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 55, January.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • J0 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - General
    • L0 - Industrial Organization - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:29377. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.