IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/wdevel/v97y2017icp199-211.html

Agrarian Extractivism in Bolivia

Author

Listed:
  • McKay, Ben M.

Abstract

The expansion of Bolivia's agricultural frontier fueled by the development of a soy complex has become part of the state's three-pronged “neo” extractivist development model based on minerals, hydrocarbons, and soybeans. While Bolivia has a long history of mineral and natural gas extraction, the agricultural sector's highly mechanized and capital-intensive character are relatively new developments. Referred to here as “agrarian extractivism” this paper reveals the very extractive nature of soybean production in Bolivia based on four interlinked dimensions: (1) large volumes of materials extracted destined for export with little or no processing; (2) value-chain concentration and sectoral disarticulation (3) high intensity of environmental degradation; and (4) the deterioration of labor opportunities and/or conditions. It is argued here that “agrarian extractivism” is a politically and analytically useful concept for understanding new dynamics and trajectories of agrarian change as it reveals the very extractive nature of capitalist agriculture, particularly in the context of contemporary land grabbing, flex crops, and the increasingly corporatized agro-food system. Rather than a form of industrial agricultural development which implies value-added processing, sectoral linkages, and employment generation, agrarian extractivism challenges this dominant discourse, revealing the various dimensions of social, economic and environmental exploitation and its negative implications for rural development.

Suggested Citation

  • McKay, Ben M., 2017. "Agrarian Extractivism in Bolivia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 199-211.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:97:y:2017:i:c:p:199-211
    DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.04.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X17301249
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.04.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:wbk:wbpubs:2263 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Toro López Maritza & Van den Broeck Pieter, 2021. "Analysing (In)Justice in the Interplay of Urbanisation and Transport: The Case of Agrarian Extractivism in the Region of Urabá in Colombia," Quaestiones Geographicae, Paradigm, vol. 40(2), pages 35-61, June.
    2. Toumbourou, Tessa D. & Dressler, Wolfram H. & Werner, Tim T., 2022. "Plantations enabling mines: Incremental industrial extraction, social differentiation and livelihood change in East Kalimantan, Indonesia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    3. Seun Bamidele, 2025. "BRICS Revolution: The Global Agrarian Shift Sparked by Emerging Economies," India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs, , vol. 81(1), pages 43-58, March.
    4. Holz, Jana Rebecca & Saave, Anna, 2025. "Extractivist valorization in industrial forestry in the Global North – Elements of an analytical framework and illustration for the cases of Finland and Alberta, Canada," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    5. Johanna Jacobi & Aymara Llanque, 2018. "“When We Stand up, They Have to Negotiate with Us”: Power Relations in and between an Agroindustrial and an Indigenous Food System in Bolivia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-27, November.
    6. Maria Backhouse & Malte Lühmann & Anne Tittor, 2022. "Global Inequalities in the Bioeconomy: Thinking Continuity and Change in View of the Global Soy Complex," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-15, May.
    7. Andres Suarez, 2024. "Understanding the Normalization of Plantation Agriculture: The Case of Hass Avocado in Colombia," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, November.
    8. Mercado, Geovana & Nico Hjortsø, Carsten, 2023. "Explaining the development policy implementation gap: A case of a failed food sovereignty policy in Bolivia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    9. İnan, Canan Emek & Albulut, Koray, 2022. "Linking actors and scales by green grabbing in Bozbük and Kazıklı," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    10. Romero-Goyeneche Oscar Yandy & Ramirez Matias & Osorio-Garcia Ana Milena & Harman Canalle Ursula, 2025. "Sustainability Transitions and Bending the Curve of Biodiversity Collapse in the Amazon Forest," Papers 2507.06663, arXiv.org.
    11. Mark Tilzey, 2019. "Food Democracy as ‘Radical’ Food Sovereignty: Agrarian Democracy and Counter-Hegemonic Resistance to the Neo-Imperial Food Regime," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 202-213.
    12. Anke Schaffartzik, 2018. "Works in Favor of Extraction: Labor in Land-Use Competition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-13, June.
    13. Vorbrugg, Alexander (Форбруг, Александр), 2018. "Not about land, not quite a grab: Dispersed dispossession in rural Russia [Не Только О Земле И О Ее Захватах: Дисперсное Лишение Прав В Сельской России]," Russian Peasant Studies, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 3, pages 19-47.
    14. Jacobi, Johanna & Mukhovi, Stellah & Llanque, Aymara & Augstburger, Horacio & Käser, Fabian & Pozo, Claudia & Ngutu Peter, Mariah & Delgado, José Manuel Freddy & Kiteme, Boniface P. & Rist, Stephan & , 2018. "Operationalizing food system resilience: An indicator-based assessment in agroindustrial, smallholder farming, and agroecological contexts in Bolivia and Kenya," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 433-446.
    15. Mark Tilzey, 2019. "Food Democracy as ‘Radical’ Food Sovereignty: Agrarian Democracy and Counter-Hegemonic Resistance to the Neo-Imperial Food Regime," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 202-213.
    16. Barandiarán, Javiera, 2019. "Lithium and development imaginaries in Chile, Argentina and Bolivia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 381-391.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:97:y:2017:i:c:p:199-211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/worlddev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.