IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/indqtr/v81y2025i1p43-58.html

BRICS Revolution: The Global Agrarian Shift Sparked by Emerging Economies

Author

Listed:
  • Seun Bamidele

Abstract

The rise of BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) has significantly shifted the global economic and geopolitical landscape, profoundly impacting agriculture. As these emerging economies grow in power, they are reshaping global agrarian systems through substantial changes in production, trade and policy. This article explores how BRICS nations are influencing global agriculture by investing in agrarian technologies, altering trade patterns and reconfiguring supply chains. It also examines their approaches to food security and sustainability challenges, highlighting how their evolving agricultural strategies are affecting global market dynamics. The article investigates the economic impacts of BRICS on global agriculture, focusing on how these nations’ economic activities influence agricultural markets and systems. It also analyses how technological advancements and innovations within BRICS countries are transforming agricultural practices and productivity. Additionally, the piece looks at shifts in agricultural trade flows involving BRICS nations and their strategies for addressing food security and self-sufficiency. The implications of BRICS’ agricultural practices on environmental sustainability and resource management are considered, along with the socio-economic impacts on rural communities. Finally, it evaluates how the policy and regulatory frameworks adopted by BRICS nations affect the broader global agricultural landscape. By examining these trends, the article provides valuable insights into the opportunities and challenges presented by the BRICS revolution for global food systems, emphasising the need for adaptive strategies in agricultural policies and practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Seun Bamidele, 2025. "BRICS Revolution: The Global Agrarian Shift Sparked by Emerging Economies," India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs, , vol. 81(1), pages 43-58, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:indqtr:v:81:y:2025:i:1:p:43-58
    DOI: 10.1177/09749284241307937
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09749284241307937
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09749284241307937?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Deepak Nayyar, 2016. "BRICS, developing countries and global governance," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(4), pages 575-591, April.
    2. Cooper, Andrew F., 2016. "The BRICS: A Very Short Introduction," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198723394.
    3. Cornel Ban & Mark Blyth, 2013. "The BRICs and the Washington Consensus: An introduction," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 241-255, April.
    4. McKay, Ben M., 2017. "Agrarian Extractivism in Bolivia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 199-211.
    5. Ruth Hall, 2011. "Land grabbing in Southern Africa: the many faces of the investor rush," Review of African Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(128), pages 193-214, June.
    6. Matthew Louis Bishop & Peg Murray-Evans, 2020. "Five Little B(R)ICS: Huffing and Puffing, but not Blowing Your House in," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(5), pages 691-702, July.
    7. Ian Scoones & Lídia Cabral & Henry Tugendhat, 2013. "New Development Encounters: China and Brazil in African Agriculture," IDS Bulletin, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 44(4), pages 1-19, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tana Johnson & Johannes Urpelainen, 2020. "The more things change, the more they stay the same: Developing countries’ unity at the nexus of trade and environmental policy," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 445-473, April.
    2. Liao, Chuan & Jung, Suhyun & Brown, Daniel G. & Agrawal, Arun, 2024. "Does land tenure change accelerate deforestation? A matching-based four-country comparison," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    3. Toumbourou, Tessa D. & Dressler, Wolfram H. & Werner, Tim T., 2022. "Plantations enabling mines: Incremental industrial extraction, social differentiation and livelihood change in East Kalimantan, Indonesia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    4. Livia Marchetti & Valentina Cattivelli & Claudia Cocozza & Fabio Salbitano & Marco Marchetti, 2020. "Beyond Sustainability in Food Systems: Perspectives from Agroecology and Social Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-24, September.
    5. Lay, Jann & Nolte, Kerstin & Sipangule, Kacana, 2021. "Large-scale farms in Zambia: Locational patterns and spillovers to smallholder agriculture," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    6. Koen Dekeyser, 2019. "Land Investments, Food Systems Change and Democracy in Kenya and Mozambique," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 178-189.
    7. Holz, Jana Rebecca & Saave, Anna, 2025. "Extractivist valorization in industrial forestry in the Global North – Elements of an analytical framework and illustration for the cases of Finland and Alberta, Canada," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    8. Johanna Jacobi & Aymara Llanque, 2018. "“When We Stand up, They Have to Negotiate with Us”: Power Relations in and between an Agroindustrial and an Indigenous Food System in Bolivia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-27, November.
    9. Baumgartner, Philipp & von Braun, Joachim & Abebaw, Degnet & Müller, Marc, 2015. "Impacts of Large-scale Land Investments on Income, Prices, and Employment: Empirical Analyses in Ethiopia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 175-190.
    10. Bas Hooijmaaijers, 2021. "The BRICS Countries’ Bilateral Economic Relations, 2009 to 2019: Between Rhetoric and Reality," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, October.
    11. Graham von Maltitz, 2017. "Options for suitable biofuel farming: Experience from Southern Africa," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2017-100, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    12. Maria Backhouse & Malte Lühmann & Anne Tittor, 2022. "Global Inequalities in the Bioeconomy: Thinking Continuity and Change in View of the Global Soy Complex," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-15, May.
    13. Gregory T. Chin, 2024. "Introduction – The evolution of New Development Bank (NDB): A decade plus in the making," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(2), pages 368-382, May.
    14. Peter Howard-Jones & Jens Hölscher, 2020. "The Influence Of The Washington Consensus Programme On The Transitional Economies Of Eastern Europe – A Firm-Level Analysis," Economic Annals, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Belgrade, vol. 65(226), pages 9-44, July – Se.
    15. Nolte, Kerstin & Voget-Kleschin, Lieske, 2014. "Consultation in Large-Scale Land Acquisitions: An Evaluation of Three Cases in Mali," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 654-668.
    16. Herrmann, Raoul T., 2017. "Large-Scale Agricultural Investments and Smallholder Welfare: A Comparison of Wage Labor and Outgrower Channels in Tanzania," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 294-310.
    17. William G. Martin & Ravi Arvind Palat, 2014. "Asian Land Acquisitions in Africa: Beyond the ‘New Bandung’ or a ‘New Colonialism’?," Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, Centre for Agrarian Research and Education for South, vol. 3(1), pages 125-150, April.
    18. Bulfone, Fabio, 2020. "The political economy of industrial policy in the European Union," MPIfG Discussion Paper 20/12, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    19. Gasparatos, A. & von Maltitz, G.P. & Johnson, F.X. & Lee, L. & Mathai, M. & Puppim de Oliveira, J.A. & Willis, K.J., 2015. "Biofuels in sub-Sahara Africa: Drivers, impacts and priority policy areas," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 879-901.
    20. Sreeram Chaulia, 2021. "In Spite of the Spite: An Indian View of China and India in BRICS," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(4), pages 519-523, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:indqtr:v:81:y:2025:i:1:p:43-58. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.