IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/udt/wpgobi/wp_gob_2026_04.html

The Motherhood Training Penalty

Author

Listed:
  • Xiao Ma

  • Alejandro Nakab

  • Camila Navajas-Ahumada

  • Daniela Vidart

Abstract

Women experience slower wage growth than men over their lifetimes, a gap often attributed to the “motherhood wage penalty,” as childbearing reduces earnings. This paper links this penalty to differences in human capital using a pseudo-event study of first childbirth in Europe to document a “motherhood training penalty.” Before parenthood, full-time male and female workers exhibit similar on-the-job training trends, but their trajectories diverge afterward. In the first 1–3 years of parenthood, women are 17%–21% less likely to train, compared to a 1%–5% decline for men. Additional evidence suggests this gap reflects employers’ lower willingness to finance training for mothers, and that it is larger in countries with higher childcare costs and weaker government support for training.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiao Ma & Alejandro Nakab & Camila Navajas-Ahumada & Daniela Vidart, 2026. "The Motherhood Training Penalty," School of Government Working Papers wp_gob_2026_04, Universidad Torcuato Di Tella.
  • Handle: RePEc:udt:wpgobi:wp_gob_2026_04
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repositorio.utdt.edu/handle/20.500.13098/14257
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity
    • J16 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
    • M53 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Personnel Economics - - - Training

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:udt:wpgobi:wp_gob_2026_04. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Fiorela Navarro Duymovich (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/geutdar.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.