IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/pca1555.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Pol Campos-Mercade

Personal Details

First Name:Pol
Middle Name:
Last Name:Campos-Mercade
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pca1555
[This author has chosen not to make the email address public]
https://sites.google.com/site/polcamposmercade
Terminal Degree:2020 Nationalekonomiska Institutionen; Ekonomihögskolan; Lunds Universitet (from RePEc Genealogy)

Affiliation

(50%) Centre for Economic Behavior and Inequality (CEBI)
Økonomisk Institut
Københavns Universitet

København, Denmark
https://www.econ.ku.dk/cebi/
RePEc:edi:cebkudk (more details at EDIRC)

(50%) Økonomisk Institut
Københavns Universitet

København, Denmark
http://www.econ.ku.dk/
RePEc:edi:okokudk (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles

Working papers

  1. Andersson, Ola & Campos-Mercade, Pol & Meier, Armando N. & Wengström, Erik, 2020. "Anticipation of COVID-19 Vaccines Reduces Social Distancing," Working Papers 2020:29, Lund University, Department of Economics.
  2. Pol Campos-Mercade, 2020. "When are groups less moral than individuals?," CEBI working paper series 20-26, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics. The Center for Economic Behavior and Inequality (CEBI).
  3. Pol Campos-Mercade, 2020. "The Volunteer’s Dilemma explains the Bystander Effect," CEBI working paper series 20-27, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics. The Center for Economic Behavior and Inequality (CEBI).
  4. Pol Campos-Mercade & Armando N. Meier & Florian H. Schneider & Erik Wengström, 2020. "Prosociality predicts health behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic," ECON - Working Papers 346, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.
  5. Andersson, Ola & Campos-Mercade, Pol & Carlsson, Fredrik & Schneider, Florian & Wengström , Erik, 2020. "The Individual Welfare Costs of Stay-At-Home Policies," Working Papers 2020:9, Lund University, Department of Economics.

Articles

  1. Campos-Mercade, Pol & Meier, Armando N. & Schneider, Florian H. & Wengström, Erik, 2021. "Prosociality predicts health behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
  2. Campos-Mercade, Pol, 2021. "The volunteer’s dilemma explains the bystander effect," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 646-661.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

RePEc Biblio mentions

As found on the RePEc Biblio, the curated bibliography of Economics:
  1. Andersson, Ola & Campos-Mercade, Pol & Meier, Armando N. & Wengström, Erik, 2020. "Anticipation of COVID-19 Vaccines Reduces Social Distancing," Working Papers 2020:29, Lund University, Department of Economics.

    Mentioned in:

    1. > Economics of Welfare > Health Economics > Economics of Pandemics > Specific pandemics > Covid-19 > Health > Distancing and Lockdown > Compliance
  2. Andersson, Ola & Campos-Mercade, Pol & Carlsson, Fredrik & Schneider, Florian & Wengström, Erik, 2020. "The Individual Welfare Costs Of Stay-At-Home Policies," Working Papers in Economics 787, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics.

    Mentioned in:

    1. > Economics of Welfare > Health Economics > Economics of Pandemics > Specific pandemics > Covid-19 > Health > Distancing and Lockdown > Effect on well-being

Working papers

  1. Andersson, Ola & Campos-Mercade, Pol & Meier, Armando N. & Wengström, Erik, 2020. "Anticipation of COVID-19 Vaccines Reduces Social Distancing," Working Papers 2020:29, Lund University, Department of Economics.

    Cited by:

    1. Dongwoo Kim & Young Jun Lee, 2021. "Vaccination strategies and transmission of COVID-19: evidence across advanced countries," Papers 2109.06453, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2022.
    2. Nam-gun Kim & Hyeri Jang & Seungkeun Noh & Ju-hee Hong & Jongsoon Jung & Jinho Shin & Yongseung Shin & Jongseong Kim, 2022. "Analyzing the Effect of Social Distancing Policies on Traffic at Sinchon Station, South Korea, during the COVID-19 Pandemic in 2020 and 2021," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-14, July.
    3. Upasak Das & Prasenjit Sarkhel & Sania Ashraf, 2022. "Love Thy Neighbour? Perceived Community Abidance and Private Compliance to COVID-19 Norms in India," South Asia Economic Journal, Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka, vol. 23(1), pages 30-51, March.
    4. Clemens Fuest & Lea Immel & Florian Neumeier & Andreas Peichl, 2021. "Does Expert Information Affect Citizens' Attitudes toward Corona Policies? Evidence from Germany," CESifo Working Paper Series 9024, CESifo.

  2. Pol Campos-Mercade, 2020. "When are groups less moral than individuals?," CEBI working paper series 20-26, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics. The Center for Economic Behavior and Inequality (CEBI).

    Cited by:

    1. Campos-Mercade, Pol, 2021. "The volunteer’s dilemma explains the bystander effect," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 646-661.

  3. Pol Campos-Mercade, 2020. "The Volunteer’s Dilemma explains the Bystander Effect," CEBI working paper series 20-27, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics. The Center for Economic Behavior and Inequality (CEBI).

    Cited by:

    1. Pol Campos-Mercade, 2020. "When are groups less moral than individuals?," CEBI working paper series 20-26, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics. The Center for Economic Behavior and Inequality (CEBI).
    2. Gans, Joshua S. & Landry, Peter, 2022. "I’m not sure what to think about them: Confronting naive present bias in a dynamic threshold public goods game," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 195-204.
    3. Ay?e Gül Mermer & Sander Onderstal & Joep Sonnemans, 2022. "Can Communication Mitigate Strategic Delays in Investment Timing?," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 22-065/I, Tinbergen Institute.
    4. Yixuan Shi, 2022. "Dynamic Volunteer’s Dilemma with Procrastinators," Working Papers tax-mpg-rps-2022-17, Max Planck Institute for Tax Law and Public Finance.
    5. Campos-Mercade, Pol, 2022. "When are groups less moral than individuals?," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 20-36.
    6. Hillenbrand, Adrian & Werner, Tobias & Winter, Fabian, 2022. "Willingness to volunteer among remote workers is insensitive to the team size," ZEW Discussion Papers 22-050, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.

  4. Pol Campos-Mercade & Armando N. Meier & Florian H. Schneider & Erik Wengström, 2020. "Prosociality predicts health behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic," ECON - Working Papers 346, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.

    Cited by:

    1. Collier, Trevor & Cotten, Stephen & Roush, Justin, 2022. "Using pandemic behavior to test the external validity of laboratory measurements of risk aversion and guilt," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    2. Gianluca Grimalda & Fabrice Murtin & David Pipke & Louis Putterman & Matthias Sutter, 2022. "The Politicized Pandemic: Ideological Polarization and the Behavioral Response to COVID-19," ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 138, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
    3. Duquette, Nicolas, 2020. "Heard immunity: effective persuasion for a future COVID-19 vaccine," SocArXiv jwvsp, Center for Open Science.
    4. Brodeur, Abel & Gray, David & Islam, Anik & Bhuiyan, Suraiya Jabeen, 2020. "A Literature Review of the Economics of COVID-19," GLO Discussion Paper Series 601, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    5. Shin KINOSHITA & Masayuki SATO & Takanori IDA, 2022. "Bayesian Probability Revision and Infection Prevention Behavior in Japan : A Quantitative Analysis of the First Wave of COVID-19," Discussion papers e-22-004, Graduate School of Economics , Kyoto University.
    6. Adena, Maja & Harke, Julian, 2022. "COVID-19 and pro-sociality: How do donors respond to local pandemic severity, increased salience, and media coverage?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 25(3), pages 824-844.
    7. Rebecca Albrecht & Jana B. Jarecki & Dominik S. Meier & Jörg Rieskamp, 2021. "Risk preferences and risk perception affect the acceptance of digital contact tracing," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-9, December.
    8. Cucciniello, Maria & Pin, Paolo & Imre, Blanka & Porumbescu, Gregory A. & Melegaro, Alessia, 2022. "Altruism and vaccination intentions: Evidence from behavioral experiments," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    9. Zéphirin Nganmeni & Roland Pongou & Bertrand Tchantcho & Jean-Baptiste Tondji, 2022. "Vaccine and Inclusion," Working Papers 2202E Classification-C62,, University of Ottawa, Department of Economics.
    10. Ketki Sheth & Greg C. Wright, 2020. "The usual suspects: do risk tolerance, altruism, and health predict the response to COVID-19?," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 1041-1052, December.
    11. Abel, Martin & Brown, Willa, 2020. "Prosocial Behavior in the Time of COVID-19: The Effect of Private and Public Role Models," IZA Discussion Papers 13207, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    12. Laura Alfaro & Ester Faia & Nora Lamersdorf & Farzad Saidi, 2022. "Health Externalities and Policy: The Role of Social Preferences," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(9), pages 6751-6761, September.
    13. Miqdad Asaria & Joan Costa-i-Font & Frank Cowell, 2021. "How Does Exposure to Covid-19 Influence Health and Income Inequality Aversion?," CESifo Working Paper Series 9250, CESifo.
    14. Sanchayan Banerjee & Matteo M. Galizzi & Rafael Hortala-Vallve, 2021. "Trusting the Trust Game: An External Validity Analysis with a UK Representative Sample," Games, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, September.
    15. Andrew E. Clark & Conchita D’ambrosio & Ilke Onur & Rong Zhu, 2022. "COVID-19 compliance behaviors of older people: The role of cognitive and non-cognitive skills," Post-Print halshs-03467169, HAL.
    16. Rehse, Dominik & Tremöhlen, Felix, 2022. "Fostering participation in digital contact tracing," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    17. Lohmann, Paul M. & Gsottbauer, Elisabeth & You, Jing & Kontoleon, Andreas, 2023. "Anti-social behaviour and economic decision-making: panel experimental evidence in the wake of COVID-19," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 117702, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. Falco, Paolo & Zaccagni, Sarah, 2020. "Promoting social distancing in a pandemic: Beyond the good intentions," OSF Preprints a2nys, Center for Open Science.
    19. Daniela Costa & Nuno Fernandes & Joana Arantes & José Keating, 2022. "A dual-process approach to prosocial behavior under COVID-19 uncertainty," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-18, March.
    20. Besley, Tim & Dray, Sacha, 2022. "The Political Economy of Lockdown: Does Free Media Matter?," CEPR Discussion Papers 17143, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    21. Ennio Bilancini & Leonardo Boncinelli & Valerio Capraro & Roberto Di Paolo, 2020. "The effect of norm-based messages on reading and understanding COVID-19 pandemic response governmental rules," Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy, Society for the Advancement of Behavioral Economics (SABE), vol. 4(S), pages 45-55, June.
    22. Phalippou, Ludovic & Wu, Betty, 2023. "The association between the proportion of Brexiters and COVID-19 death rates in England," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    23. Georgia Michailidou & Hande Erkut, 2022. "Lie O'Clock: Experimental Evidence on Intertemporal Lying Preferences," Working Papers 20220076, New York University Abu Dhabi, Department of Social Science, revised Apr 2022.
    24. Lata Gangadharan & Tarun Jain & Pushkar Maitra & Joe Vecci, 2022. "Lab-in-the-field experiments: perspectives from research on gender," The Japanese Economic Review, Springer, vol. 73(1), pages 31-59, January.
    25. Étienne Dagorn & Martina Dattilo & Matthieu Pourieux, 2022. "Preferences matter! Political Responses to the COVID-19 and Population’s Preferences," Economics Working Paper Archive (University of Rennes 1 & University of Caen) 2022-01, Center for Research in Economics and Management (CREM), University of Rennes 1, University of Caen and CNRS.
    26. Chowdhury, Shyamal & Schildberg-Hörisch, Hannah & Schneider, Sebastian O. & Sutter, Matthias, 2022. "Information Provision over the Phone Saves Lives: An RCT to Contain COVID-19 in Rural Bangladesh at the Pandemic's Onset," IZA Discussion Papers 15768, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    27. Bietenbeck, Jan & Sunde, Uwe & Thiemann, Petra, 2023. "Recession Experiences During Early Adulthood Shape Prosocial Attitudes Later in Life," Working Papers 2023:9, Lund University, Department of Economics.
    28. Ola Andersson & Pol Campos‐Mercade & Fredrik Carlsson & Florian H. Schneider & Erik Wengström, 2022. "The impact of stay‐at‐home policies on individual welfare," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 124(2), pages 340-362, April.
    29. Hernando Santamaría-García & Miguel Burgaleta & Agustina Legaz & Daniel Flichtentrei & Mateo Córdoba-Delgado & Juliana Molina-Paredes & Juliana Linares-Puerta & Juan Montealegre-Gómez & Sandra Castelb, 2022. "The price of prosociality in pandemic times," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, December.
    30. Andersson, Ola & Campos-Mercade, Pol & Meier, Armando N. & Wengström, Erik, 2020. "Anticipation of COVID-19 Vaccines Reduces Social Distancing," Working Papers 2020:29, Lund University, Department of Economics.
    31. Hamza Umer, 2023. "Stability of pro-sociality and trust amid the Covid-19: panel data from the Netherlands," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 50(1), pages 255-287, February.
    32. Sylvie Borau & Hélène Couprie & Astrid Hopfensitz, 2022. "The prosociality of married people: evidence from a large multinational sample," Working Papers hal-03698131, HAL.
    33. Fabrice Etilé & Pierre-Yves Geoffard, 2020. "Anxiety increases the willingness to be exposed to covid-19 risk among young adults in France," PSE Working Papers hal-03005718, HAL.
    34. William F. Vásquez & Jennifer M. Trudeau, 2022. "Willingness to give amid pandemics: a contingent valuation of anticipated nongovernmental immunization programs," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 53-68, March.
    35. SeEun Jung & Sang-Hyun Kim, 2020. "Managing the Public Health Risks in the Time of COVID-19," Working papers 2020rwp-181, Yonsei University, Yonsei Economics Research Institute.
    36. Schunk, Daniel & Wagner, Valentin, 2021. "What determines the willingness to sanction violations of newly introduced social norms: Personality traits or economic preferences? evidence from the COVID-19 crisis," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    37. Daniel Schunk & Valentin Wagner, 2020. "What Determines the Enforcement of Newly Introduced Social Norms: Personality Traits or Economic Preferences? Evidence from the COVID-19 Crisis," Working Papers 2024, Gutenberg School of Management and Economics, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz.
    38. Gutierrez, Emilio & Rubli, Adrian & Tavares, Tiago, 2022. "Information and behavioral responses during a pandemic: Evidence from delays in Covid-19 death reports," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    39. Valerio Capraro & Hélène Barcelo, 2020. "The effect of messaging and gender on intentions to wear a face covering to slow down COVID-19 transmission," Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy, Society for the Advancement of Behavioral Economics (SABE), vol. 4(S2), pages 45-55, December.
    40. Blanco, Esther & Baier, Alexandra & Holzmeister, Felix & Jaber-Lopez, Tarek & Struwe, Natalie, 2022. "Substitution of social sustainability concerns under the Covid-19 pandemic," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    41. M A J van Hulsen & K I M Rohde & N J A van Exel, 2022. "Consideration of others and consideration of future consequences predict cooperation in an acute social dilemma: an application to COVID-19," Oxford Open Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 1, pages 1-11.
    42. Müller, Stephan & Rau, Holger A., 2021. "Economic preferences and compliance in the social stress test of the COVID-19 crisis," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    43. Fang, Ximeng & Freyer, Timo & Ho, Chui-Yee & Chen, Zihua & Goette, Lorenz, 2022. "Prosociality predicts individual behavior and collective outcomes in the COVID-19 pandemic," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    44. Islam, Marco, 2021. "Motivated Risk Assessments," Working Papers 2021:12, Lund University, Department of Economics, revised 26 Jul 2022.
    45. Shusaku Sasaki & Hirofumi Kurokawa & Fumio Ohtake, 2021. "Effective but fragile? Responses to repeated nudge-based messages for preventing the spread of COVID-19 infection," The Japanese Economic Review, Springer, vol. 72(3), pages 371-408, July.
    46. Hamza Umer, 2023. "A selected literature review of the effect of Covid-19 on preferences," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 9(1), pages 147-156, June.
    47. Casoria, Fortuna & Galeotti, Fabio & Villeval, Marie Claire, 2023. "Trust and Social Preferences in Times of Acute Health Crisis," IZA Discussion Papers 15929, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    48. Paolo Nicola Barbieri & Beatrice Bonini, 2021. "Political orientation and adherence to social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 38(2), pages 483-504, July.
    49. Abel, Martin & Byker, Tanya & Carpenter, Jeffrey P., 2020. "Socially Optimal Mistakes? Debiasing COVID-19 Mortality Risk Perceptions and Prosocial Behavior," IZA Discussion Papers 13560, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    50. Christina Gravert & Kai Barron & Mette Trier Damgaard & Lisa Norrgren, 2020. "Time Preferences and Medication Adherence: A Field Experiment with Pregnant Women in South Africa," CEBI working paper series 20-29, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics. The Center for Economic Behavior and Inequality (CEBI).
    51. Fallucchi, Francesco & Görges, Luise & Machado, Joël & Pieters, Arne & Suhrcke, Marc, 2021. "How to make universal, voluntary testing for COVID-19 work? A behavioural economics perspective," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(8), pages 972-980.
    52. Angerer, Silvia & Glätzle-Rützler, Daniela & Lergetporer, Philipp & Rittmannsberger, Thomas, 2023. "How does the vaccine approval procedure affect COVID-19 vaccination intentions?," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    53. Umer, Hamza, 2022. "Does pro-sociality or trust better predict staying home behavior during the Covid-19?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    54. Attema, Arthur E. & Galizzi, Matteo M. & Groß, Mona & Hennig-Schmidt, Heike & Karay, Yassin & L’Haridon, Olivier & Wiesen, Daniel, 2023. "The formation of physician altruism," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    55. Andersson, Ola & Campos-Mercade, Pol & Meier, Armando N. & Wengström, Erik, 2021. "Anticipation of COVID-19 vaccines reduces willingness to socially distance," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    56. Rehse, Dominik & Tremöhlen, Felix, 2020. "Fostering participation in digital public health interventions: The case of digital contact tracing," ZEW Discussion Papers 20-076, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    57. Fabrice Etilé & Pierre-Yves Geoffard, 2020. "Anxiety Increases the Willingness the Willingness to Be Exposed to Covid-19 Risk among Young Adults in France," Working Papers halshs-03066539, HAL.
    58. Shachat, Jason & Walker, Matthew J. & Wei, Lijia, 2021. "How the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic impacted pro-social behaviour and individual preferences: Experimental evidence from China," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 480-494.
    59. Kai Barron & Mette Trier Damgaard & Christina Gravert & Lisa Norrgren, 2022. "Time Preferences and Medication Adherence: Evidence from Pregnant Women in South Africa," CESifo Working Paper Series 9988, CESifo.

  5. Andersson, Ola & Campos-Mercade, Pol & Carlsson, Fredrik & Schneider, Florian & Wengström , Erik, 2020. "The Individual Welfare Costs of Stay-At-Home Policies," Working Papers 2020:9, Lund University, Department of Economics.

    Cited by:

    1. Hakan Yilmazkuday, 2021. "Welfare costs of COVID‐19: Evidence from US counties," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(4), pages 826-848, September.
    2. Andersson, Ola & Campos-Mercade, Pol & Meier, Armando N. & Wengström, Erik, 2020. "Anticipation of COVID-19 Vaccines Reduces Social Distancing," Working Papers 2020:29, Lund University, Department of Economics.
    3. Hakan Yilmazkuday, 2021. "Welfare Costs of Travel Reductions within the U.S. due to COVID-19," Working Papers 2114, Florida International University, Department of Economics.
    4. Miguel Casares & Paul Gomme & Hashmat Khan, 2020. "COVID-19 Pandemic and Economic Scenarios For Ontario," Carleton Economic Papers 20-15, Carleton University, Department of Economics, revised 05 Feb 2021.

Articles

  1. Campos-Mercade, Pol & Meier, Armando N. & Schneider, Florian H. & Wengström, Erik, 2021. "Prosociality predicts health behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    See citations under working paper version above.
  2. Campos-Mercade, Pol, 2021. "The volunteer’s dilemma explains the bystander effect," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 646-661.
    See citations under working paper version above.Sorry, no citations of articles recorded.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 7 papers announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-EXP: Experimental Economics (4) 2020-11-30 2020-12-07 2021-01-18 2021-01-25. Author is listed
  2. NEP-CBE: Cognitive & Behavioural Economics (2) 2020-05-25 2020-11-30. Author is listed
  3. NEP-CDM: Collective Decision-Making (2) 2020-11-30 2020-12-07. Author is listed
  4. NEP-DCM: Discrete Choice Models (2) 2020-06-08 2020-06-08. Author is listed
  5. NEP-HEA: Health Economics (2) 2020-05-25 2021-01-18. Author is listed
  6. NEP-GTH: Game Theory (1) 2020-12-07

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Pol Campos-Mercade should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.