IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecosys/v49y2025i3s0939362525000056.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What could have been? A synthetic control evaluation of the effect of the Economic and Monetary Union on the net external wealth of periphery member states

Author

Listed:
  • Alcobia, João
  • Sobreira, Nuno
  • Cabral, Ricardo

Abstract

This study investigates whether the Euro Area periphery member states would have been wealthier in 2010 had they not participated in the Economic and Monetary Union, as implied by the optimum currency area literature and the 1977 MacDougall report prepared for the European Commission. Using a synthetic control method, we found that by 2010, periphery member states' net international investment positions would show an improvement of, on weighted average, 41 % of GDP, which is equivalent to a combined 2.1 trillion of 2010 euros. The econometric results are robust to standard synthetic control method sensitivity tests. Finally, we discuss why the Economic and Monetary Union may have led to such a severe deterioration in the net external wealth position of the periphery member states.

Suggested Citation

  • Alcobia, João & Sobreira, Nuno & Cabral, Ricardo, 2025. "What could have been? A synthetic control evaluation of the effect of the Economic and Monetary Union on the net external wealth of periphery member states," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 49(3).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecosys:v:49:y:2025:i:3:s0939362525000056
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecosys.2025.101293
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939362525000056
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecosys.2025.101293?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C01 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - General - - - Econometrics
    • E02 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - General - - - Institutions and the Macroeconomy
    • F15 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Economic Integration
    • F45 - International Economics - - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance - - - Macroeconomic Issues of Monetary Unions
    • P16 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Capitalist Economies - - - Capitalist Institutions; Welfare State

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecosys:v:49:y:2025:i:3:s0939362525000056. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/osteide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.