IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/psc506.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Pia Sophia Schober

Personal Details

First Name:Pia
Middle Name:Sophia
Last Name:Schober
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:psc506
http://piaschober.net

Affiliation

(90%) Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Institut für Soziologie (University of Tuebingen, Department of Sociology)

https://www.uni-tuebingen.de/en/faculties/economics-and-social-sciences/subjects/department-of-sociology/department/about-our-department.html
Germany, Tuebingen

(10%) DIW Berlin (Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung)

Berlin, Germany
http://www.diw.de/

: xx49-30-89789-0
xx49-30-89789-200
Mohrenstraße 58, D-10117 Berlin
RePEc:edi:diwbede (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles

Working papers

  1. Pia S. Schober & Gundula Zoch, 2015. "Change in the Gender Division of Domestic Work after Mummy or Daddy Took Leave: An Examination of Alternative Explanations," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 803, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
  2. Pia S. Schober, 2015. "Increasing Father Involvement in Child Care: What Do We Know about Effects on Child Development?," DIW Roundup: Politik im Fokus 79, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
  3. Pia S. Schober & C. Katharina Spieß, 2014. "Local Day-Care Quality and Maternal Employment: Evidence from East and West Germany," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 649, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
  4. Frauke H. Peter & Pia S. Schober & C. Katharina Spieß, 2014. "Early Birds in Day Care: The Social Gradient in Starting Day Care and Children's Non-cognitive Skills," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1438, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
  5. Pia S. Schober, 2014. "Daddy Leave: Does It Change the Gender Division of Domestic Work?," DIW Roundup: Politik im Fokus 46, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
  6. Pia S. Schober & Christian Schmitt, 2013. "Day-Care Expansion and Parental Subjective Well-Being: Evidence from Germany," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 602, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
  7. Pia S. Schober, 2012. "Parental Leave Policies and Child Care Time in Couples after Childbirth," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 434, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
  8. Pia S. Schober, 2011. "Maternal Labor Market Return, Parental Leave Policies, and Gender Inequality in Housework," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 422, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).

Articles

  1. Juliane F. Stahl & Pia S. Schober, 2016. "Ausbau der ganztägigen Kindertagesbetreuung kann zur Zufriedenheit von Müttern beitragen," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 83(37), pages 840-847.
  2. Georg F. Camehl & Juliane F. Stahl & Pia S. Schober & C. Katharina Spieß, 2015. "Höhere Qualität und geringere Kosten von Kindertageseinrichtungen – zufriedenere Eltern?," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 82(46), pages 1105-1113.
  3. Georg F. Camehl & Juliane F. Stahl & Pia S. Schober & C. Katharina Spieß, 2015. "Does Better, Cheaper Day Care Make for More Satisfied Parents?," DIW Economic Bulletin, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 5(45/46), pages 604-611.
  4. Pia S. Schober & Gundula Zoch, 2015. "Kürzere Elternzeit von Müttern: gleichmäßigere Aufteilung der Familienarbeit?," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 82(50), pages 1190-1196.
  5. Karl Brenke & Marcel Fratzscher & Markus M. Grabka & Elke Holst & Sebastian Hülle & Stefan Liebig & Maximilian Priem & Anika Rasner & Pia S. Schober & Jürgen Schupp & Juliane F. Stahl & Anna Wieber, 2014. "Die Wiedervereinigung: eine ökonomische Erfolgsgeschichte," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 81(40), pages 935-937.
  6. Karl Brenke & Marcel Fratzscher & Markus M. Grabka & Elke Holst & Sebastian Hülle & Stefan Liebig & Maximilian Priem & Anika Rasner & Pia S. Schober & Jürgen Schupp & Juliane F. Stahl & Anna Wieber, 2014. "Reunification: An Economic Success Story," DIW Economic Bulletin, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 4(11), pages 3-5.
  7. Pia S. Schober & Juliane F. Stahl, 2014. "Childcare Trends in Germany: Increasing Socio-Economic Disparities in East and West," DIW Economic Bulletin, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 4(11), pages 51-58.
  8. Pia Schober, 2014. "Kinderbetreuungspolitik ist auch Bildungspolitik, nicht nur Arbeitsmarktpolitik: Kommentar," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 81(33), pages 780-780.
  9. Pia S. Schober & C. Katharina Spieß, 2014. "Die Kita-Qualität ist für das Erwerbsverhalten von Müttern mit Kleinkindern relevant: Zusammenhang eindeutiger in Ostdeutschland," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 81(21), pages 463-471.
  10. Pia S. Schober & Juliane F. Stahl, 2014. "Trends in der Kinderbetreuung: sozioökonomische Unterschiede verstärken sich in Ost und West," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 81(40), pages 986-994.
  11. Pia S. Schober & Christian Schmitt, 2013. "Ausbau der Kinderbetreuung: Entlastung der Eltern erhöht Zufriedenheit," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 80(50), pages 3-11.
  12. Schober, Pia S., 2013. "Gender Equality and Outsourcing of Domestic Work, Childbearing, and Relationship Stability Among British Couples," EconStor Open Access Articles, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 25-52.
  13. Pia Schober & Jacqueline Scott, 2012. "Maternal employment and gender role attitudes: dissonance among British men and women in the transition to parenthood," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 26(3), pages 514-530, June.
  14. Pia S. Schober & C. Katharina Spieß, 2012. "Frühe Förderung und Betreuung von Kindern: bedeutende Unterschiede bei der Inanspruchnahme besonders in den ersten Lebensjahren," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 79(43), pages 17-28.
  15. Pia S. Schober, 2012. "Social Policies, Labour Markets and Motherhood . Edited by Daniela Del Boca and Cécile Wetzels . 2007 . Cambridge University Press , Cambridge . 336 pp. £65.00," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 79(314), pages 418-419, April.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Pia S. Schober & Gundula Zoch, 2015. "Change in the Gender Division of Domestic Work after Mummy or Daddy Took Leave: An Examination of Alternative Explanations," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 803, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).

    Cited by:

    1. Tamm, Marcus, 2018. "Fathers' Parental Leave-Taking, Childcare Involvement and Mothers' Labor Market Participation," IZA Discussion Papers 11873, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Brindusa Anghel & J. Ignacio Conde-Ruiz & Ignacio Marra de Artíñano, 2019. "Brechas Salariales de Género en España," Hacienda Pública Española, IEF, vol. 229(2), pages 87-119, June.

  2. Pia S. Schober & C. Katharina Spieß, 2014. "Local Day-Care Quality and Maternal Employment: Evidence from East and West Germany," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 649, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).

    Cited by:

    1. Ludovica Gambaro & Jan Marcus & Frauke Peter, 2019. "School entry, afternoon care, and mothers’ labour supply," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 769-803, September.
    2. Boll, Christina & Lagemann, Andreas, 2017. "Public childcare and maternal labour supply: New evidence for Germany," HWWI Research Papers 180, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWI).
    3. Kai-Uwe Müller & Katharina Wrohlich, 2018. "Does Subsidized Care for Toddlers Increase Maternal Labor Supply?: Evidence from a Large-Scale Expansion of Early Childcare," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1747, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    4. Barbara Hofmann & Michaela Kreyenfeld & Arne Uhlendorff, 2017. "Job Displacement and First Birth Over the Business Cycle," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 54(3), pages 933-959, June.
    5. Zierow, Larissa, 2017. "Regulating Child Care Markets. Center-based Care vs. Family Day-Care in Germany," Annual Conference 2017 (Vienna): Alternative Structures for Money and Banking 168052, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    6. Kasrin, Zein & Smolny, Werner, 2019. "Female Labor Market Participation and Socioeconomic Development: Disentangling the U-Shaped Hypothesis," MPRA Paper 95561, University Library of Munich, Germany.

  3. Frauke H. Peter & Pia S. Schober & C. Katharina Spieß, 2014. "Early Birds in Day Care: The Social Gradient in Starting Day Care and Children's Non-cognitive Skills," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1438, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Peter Frauke H. & Spiess C. Katharina, 2016. "Family Instability and Locus of Control in Adolescence," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 16(3), pages 1439-1471, September.
    2. Malte Sandner & Stephan L. Thomsen, 2018. "The Effects of Universal Public Childcare Provision on Cases of Child Neglect and Abuse," Working Papers 2018-051, Human Capital and Economic Opportunity Working Group.
    3. Daniela Del Boca & Enrica Maria Martino & Chiara Pronzato, 2017. "Early Childcare and Child Non-Cognitive Outcomes," CHILD Working Papers Series 58 JEL Classification: J1, Centre for Household, Income, Labour and Demographic Economics (CHILD) - CCA.
    4. Camehl, Georg & Hahlweg, Kurt & Spieß, C. Katharina, 2018. "The Effects of a Parenting Program on Maternal Well-Being: Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trial," Annual Conference 2018 (Freiburg, Breisgau): Digital Economy 181583, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    5. Maximilian Bach & Josefine Koebe & Frauke H. Peter, 2019. "Long Run Effects of Universal Childcare on Personality Traits," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1815, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

  4. Pia S. Schober, 2014. "Daddy Leave: Does It Change the Gender Division of Domestic Work?," DIW Roundup: Politik im Fokus 46, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Pia S. Schober, 2015. "Increasing Father Involvement in Child Care: What Do We Know about Effects on Child Development?," DIW Roundup: Politik im Fokus 79, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    2. Johannes Geyer & Alexandra Krause, 2016. "Veränderungen der Erwerbsanreize durch das Elterngeld Plus für Mütter und Väter," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1592, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

  5. Pia S. Schober & Christian Schmitt, 2013. "Day-Care Expansion and Parental Subjective Well-Being: Evidence from Germany," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 602, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).

    Cited by:

    1. Verena Lauber & Johanna Storck, 2016. "Helping with the Kids? How Family-Friendly Workplaces Affect Parental Well-Being and Behavior," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 883, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    2. Verena Lauber & Johanna Storck, 2016. "Helping with the Kids? How Family-Friendly Workplaces Affect Parental Well-Being and Behavior," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1630, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    3. MarieConnolly & CatherineHaeck, 2015. "Are Childcare Subsidies Good for Parental Well-being? Empirical Evidence from Three Countries," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 13(01), pages 09-15, April.
    4. Anna Matysiak & Dorota Wêziak-Bia³owolska, 2013. "Country-Specific Conditions for Work and Family Reconciliation: An Attempt at Quantification," Working Papers 67, Institute of Statistics and Demography, Warsaw School of Economics.
    5. Kai Hong & Kacie Dragan & Sherry Glied, 2017. "Seeing and Hearing: The Impacts of New York City’s Universal Prekindergarten Program on the Health of Low-Income Children," NBER Working Papers 23297, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

  6. Pia S. Schober, 2012. "Parental Leave Policies and Child Care Time in Couples after Childbirth," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 434, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).

    Cited by:

    1. Christina Boll & Julian Leppin & Nora Reich, 2014. "Paternal childcare and parental leave policies: evidence from industrialized countries," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 129-158, March.
    2. Tyrowicz, Joanna & van der Velde, Lucas & van Staveren, Irene, 2018. "Identifying Age Penalty in Women's Wages: New Method and Evidence from Germany 1984-2014," IZA Discussion Papers 11295, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. Joanna Tyrowicz & Lucas van der Velde & Irene van Staveren, 2015. "Differences in the Estimates of Gender Wage Gap Over The Life Cycle," Working Papers 2015-29, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.

  7. Pia S. Schober, 2011. "Maternal Labor Market Return, Parental Leave Policies, and Gender Inequality in Housework," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 422, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).

    Cited by:

    1. Geyer, Johannes & Haan, Peter & Spieß, C. Katharina & Wrohlich, Katharina, 2013. "Das Elterngeld und seine Wirkungen auf das Haushaltseinkommen junger Familien und die Erwerbstätigkeit von Müttern," EconStor Open Access Articles, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 193-211.
    2. Pia S. Schober, 2012. "Parental Leave Policies and Child Care Time in Couples after Childbirth," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 434, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).

Articles

  1. Georg F. Camehl & Juliane F. Stahl & Pia S. Schober & C. Katharina Spieß, 2015. "Höhere Qualität und geringere Kosten von Kindertageseinrichtungen – zufriedenere Eltern?," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 82(46), pages 1105-1113.

    Cited by:

    1. Bartels, Charlotte & Stockhausen, Maximilian, 2016. "Children's opportunities in Germany: An application using multidimensional measures," Discussion Papers 2016/1, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
    2. Georg F. Camehl & Pia S. Schober & C. Katharina Spieß, 2017. "Information Asymmetries between Parents and Educators in German Childcare Institutions," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 939, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).

  2. Georg F. Camehl & Juliane F. Stahl & Pia S. Schober & C. Katharina Spieß, 2015. "Does Better, Cheaper Day Care Make for More Satisfied Parents?," DIW Economic Bulletin, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 5(45/46), pages 604-611.

    Cited by:

    1. Huebener, Mathias & Pape, Astrid & Spiess, C. Katharina, 2019. "Parental Labour Supply Responses to the Abolition of Day Care Fees," IZA Discussion Papers 12780, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Camehl, Georg F. & Schober, Pia S. & Spiess, C. Katharina, 2018. "Information asymmetries between parents and educators in German childcare institutions," EconStor Open Access Articles, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 1-23.

  3. Pia S. Schober & Juliane F. Stahl, 2014. "Childcare Trends in Germany: Increasing Socio-Economic Disparities in East and West," DIW Economic Bulletin, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 4(11), pages 51-58.

    Cited by:

    1. Pia S. Schober & Gundula Zoch, 2015. "Change in the Gender Division of Domestic Work after Mummy or Daddy Took Leave: An Examination of Alternative Explanations," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 803, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).

  4. Pia S. Schober & C. Katharina Spieß, 2014. "Die Kita-Qualität ist für das Erwerbsverhalten von Müttern mit Kleinkindern relevant: Zusammenhang eindeutiger in Ostdeutschland," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 81(21), pages 463-471.

    Cited by:

    1. Bachmann, Ronald & Felder, Rahel & Tamm, Marcus, 2018. "Labour Market Participation and Atypical Employment over the Life Cycle: A Cohort Analysis for Germany," IZA Discussion Papers 12010, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Juliane F. Stahl, 2015. "Wer nutzt welche Qualität? Zusammenhänge zwischen sozioökonomischer Herkunft und Kita-Qualität," DIW Roundup: Politik im Fokus 73, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

  5. Pia S. Schober & Juliane F. Stahl, 2014. "Trends in der Kinderbetreuung: sozioökonomische Unterschiede verstärken sich in Ost und West," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 81(40), pages 986-994.

    Cited by:

    1. Boll, Christina & Lagemann, Andreas, 2018. "Das Erwerbsverhalten von Eltern mit Migrationshintergrund: SOEP-basierte Befunde und deren Implikationen für Hamburg," HWWI Policy Papers 112, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWI).
    2. Jirjahn, Uwe & Struewing, Cornelia, 2019. "Out-of-Partnership Births in East and West Germany," GLO Discussion Paper Series 337, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    3. Stockhausen, Maximilian, 2016. "The Impact of Private and Public Childcare Provision on the Distribution of Children's Incomes in Germany," Annual Conference 2016 (Augsburg): Demographic Change 145638, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    4. Bönke, Timm & Harnack, Astrid & Wetter, Miriam, 2019. "Wer gewinnt? Wer verliert? Die Entwicklung auf dem deutschen Arbeitsmarkt seit den frühen Jahren der Bundesrepublik bis heute," Discussion Papers 2019/4, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
    5. Stockhausen, Maximilian, 2017. "The distribution of economic resources to children in Germany," Discussion Papers 2017/7, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
    6. Thomas Cornelissen & Christian Dustmann & Anna Christina Raute & Uta Schönberg, 2018. "Who Benefits from Universal Child Care? Estimating Marginal Returns to Early Child Care Attendanc," CESifo Working Paper Series 7162, CESifo Group Munich.
    7. Christina Boll & Andreas Lagemann, 2018. "Does Culture Trump Money? Employment and Childcare Use of Migrant and Non-Migrant Mothers of Pre-School Children in Germany," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 1015, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    8. Cornelißen, Thomas & Dustmann, Christian & Raute, Anna & Schönberg, Uta, 2018. "Who benefits from universal child care? Estimating marginal returns to early child care attendance," Ruhr Economic Papers 757, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    9. Boll, Christina & Lagemann, Andreas, 2018. "Does Culture Trump Money? Erwerbsverhalten und Kitanutzung von Müttern mit und ohne Migrationshintergrund in Deutschland," HWWI Research Papers 188, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWI).
    10. Bartels, Charlotte & Stockhausen, Maximilian, 2016. "Children's opportunities in Germany: An application using multidimensional measures," Discussion Papers 2016/1, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
    11. Juliane F. Stahl, 2015. "Wer nutzt welche Qualität? Zusammenhänge zwischen sozioökonomischer Herkunft und Kita-Qualität," DIW Roundup: Politik im Fokus 73, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    12. Uwe Jirjahn, Cornelia Struewing, 2018. "Single Motherhood in East and West Germany: What Can Explain the Differences?," European Journal of Comparative Economics, Cattaneo University (LIUC), vol. 15(2), pages 197-229, December.

  6. Schober, Pia S., 2013. "Gender Equality and Outsourcing of Domestic Work, Childbearing, and Relationship Stability Among British Couples," EconStor Open Access Articles, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 25-52.

    Cited by:

    1. Liat Raz-Yurovich, 2016. "Outsourcing of Housework and the Transition to a Second Birth in Germany," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 35(3), pages 401-417, June.
    2. Muzhi Zhou & Man Yee Kan, 2019. "A new family equilibrium? Changing dynamics between the gender division of labor and fertility in Great Britain, 1991–2017," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 40(50), pages 1455-1500.
    3. Liat Raz-Yurovich, 2012. "Normative and allocation role strain: role incompatibility, outsourcing, and the transition to a second birth in Eastern and Western Germany," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2012-024, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    4. Katherine Twamley & Charlotte Faircloth, 2015. "Introduction to Special Section Gender, Intimacy, Equality: (Un)comfortable Bedfellows?," Sociological Research Online, Sociological Research Online, vol. 20(4), pages 1-2.
    5. Hudde, Ansgar, 2016. "Fertility Is Low When There Is No Societal Agreement on a Specific Gender Role Model," EconStor Preprints 142175, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    6. Pia S. Schober & Gundula Zoch, 2015. "Change in the Gender Division of Domestic Work after Mummy or Daddy Took Leave: An Examination of Alternative Explanations," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 803, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).

  7. Pia Schober & Jacqueline Scott, 2012. "Maternal employment and gender role attitudes: dissonance among British men and women in the transition to parenthood," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 26(3), pages 514-530, June.

    Cited by:

    1. Pia S. Schober & C. Katharina Spieß, 2014. "Local Day-Care Quality and Maternal Employment: Evidence from East and West Germany," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 649, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    2. Sergi Vidal & Philipp M. Lersch, 2019. "Changes in gender role attitudes following couples' residential relocations," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 40(39), pages 1111-1152.
    3. Mireia Borrell-Porta & Joan Costa-Font & Julia Philipp, 2019. "The ‘mighty girl’ effect: does parenting daughters alter attitudes towards gender norms?," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 71(1), pages 25-46.
    4. Simonetta Longhi & Alita Nandi & Mark Bryan & Sara Connolly & Cigdem Gedikli, 2018. "Unhappiness in unemployment – is it the same for everyone?," Working Papers 2018007, The University of Sheffield, Department of Economics.
    5. Platt, Lucinda & Polavieja, Javier, 2016. "Saying and doing gender: intergenerational transmission of attitudes towards the sexual division of labour," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 67302, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Renzo Carriero & Lorenzo Todesco, 2018. "Housework division and gender ideology: When do attitudes really matter?," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 39(39), pages 1039-1064.
    7. Pia S. Schober & Gundula Zoch, 2015. "Change in the Gender Division of Domestic Work after Mummy or Daddy Took Leave: An Examination of Alternative Explanations," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 803, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).

  8. Pia S. Schober & C. Katharina Spieß, 2012. "Frühe Förderung und Betreuung von Kindern: bedeutende Unterschiede bei der Inanspruchnahme besonders in den ersten Lebensjahren," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 79(43), pages 17-28.

    Cited by:

    1. Boll, Christina & Lagemann, Andreas, 2018. "Das Erwerbsverhalten von Eltern mit Migrationshintergrund: SOEP-basierte Befunde und deren Implikationen für Hamburg," HWWI Policy Papers 112, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWI).
    2. Christina Boll & Andreas Lagemann, 2018. "Does Culture Trump Money? Employment and Childcare Use of Migrant and Non-Migrant Mothers of Pre-School Children in Germany," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 1015, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    3. Bonin, Holger & Fichtl, Anita & Rainer, Helmut & Spieß, C. Katharina & Stichnoth, Holger & Wrohlich, Katharina, 2013. "Zentrale Resultate der Gesamtevaluation familienbezogener Leistungen," Munich Reprints in Economics 20203, University of Munich, Department of Economics.
    4. Boll, Christina & Lagemann, Andreas, 2018. "Does Culture Trump Money? Erwerbsverhalten und Kitanutzung von Müttern mit und ohne Migrationshintergrund in Deutschland," HWWI Research Papers 188, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWI).
    5. Juliane F. Stahl, 2015. "Wer nutzt welche Qualität? Zusammenhänge zwischen sozioökonomischer Herkunft und Kita-Qualität," DIW Roundup: Politik im Fokus 73, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    6. Holger Bonin & Anita Fichtl & Helmut Rainer & C. Katharina Spieß & Holger Stichnoth & Katharina Wrohlich, 2013. "Lehren für die Familienpolitik – Zentrale Resultate der Gesamtevaluation familienbezogener Leistungen," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 66(18), pages 22-30, October.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 7 papers announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-EUR: Microeconomic European Issues (5) 2012-01-18 2012-03-21 2013-11-16 2015-01-31 2015-11-21. Author is listed
  2. NEP-DEM: Demographic Economics (4) 2012-01-18 2012-03-21 2015-10-04 2015-11-21. Author is listed
  3. NEP-LAB: Labour Economics (3) 2012-01-18 2012-03-21 2014-07-05. Author is listed
  4. NEP-EDU: Education (1) 2015-01-31
  5. NEP-HAP: Economics of Happiness (1) 2013-11-16
  6. NEP-HME: Heterodox Microeconomics (1) 2012-01-18
  7. NEP-LTV: Unemployment, Inequality & Poverty (1) 2013-11-16

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Pia Sophia Schober should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.