IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/pfr293.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Jana Friedrichsen

Personal Details

First Name:Jana
Middle Name:
Last Name:Friedrichsen
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pfr293
Twitter: @friedr_j

Affiliation

(50%) Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät
Humboldt-Universität Berlin

Berlin, Germany
http://www.wiwi.hu-berlin.de/
RePEc:edi:wfhubde (more details at EDIRC)

(25%) DIW Berlin (Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung)

Berlin, Germany
http://www.diw.de/
RePEc:edi:diwbede (more details at EDIRC)

(25%) Abteilung "Ökonomik des Wandels"
Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB)

Berlin, Germany
http://www.wzb.eu/de/forschung/markt-und-entscheidung/oekonomik-des-wandels
RePEc:edi:owwzbde (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles

Working papers

  1. Andres, Maximilian & Bruttel, Lisa & Friedrichsen, Jana, 2021. "How do sanctions work? The choice between cartel formation and tacit collusion," VfS Annual Conference 2021 (Virtual Conference): Climate Economics 242372, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
  2. Gyula Seres & Anna Balleyer & Nicola Cerutti & Jana Friedrichsen & Müge Süer, 2021. "Face Mask Use and Physical Distancing before and after Mandatory Masking: No Evidence on Risk Compensation in Public Waiting Lines," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1971, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
  3. Maximilian Andres & Lisa Bruttel & Jana Friedrichsen, 2021. "The Leniency Rule Revisited: Experiments on Cartel Formation with Open Communication," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1926, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
  4. Jana Friedrichsen & Manja Gärtner, 2020. "Why Are We Eating so Much Meat?," DIW Roundup: Politik im Fokus 137, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
  5. Maximilian Andres & Lisa Bruttel & Jana Friedrichsen, 2020. "Choosing between explicit cartel formation and tacit collusion – An experiment," CEPA Discussion Papers 19, Center for Economic Policy Analysis.
  6. Jana Friedrichsen & Manja Gärtner, 2020. "Warum essen wir so viel Fleisch?," DIW Roundup: Politik im Fokus 137, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
  7. Jana Friedrichsen & Katharina Momsen & Stefano Piasenti, 2020. "Ignorance, Intention and Stochastic Outcomes," Working Papers 2020-31, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, University of Innsbruck.
  8. Seres, Gyula & Balleyer, Anna Helen & Cerutti, Nicola & Danilov, Anastasia & Friedrichsen, Jana & Liu, Yiming & Süer, Müge, 2020. "Face Masks Increase Compliance with Physical Distancing Recommendations during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 253, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
  9. Seres, Gyula & Balleyer, Anna & Cerutti, Nicola & Friedrichsen, Jana & Süer, Müge, 2020. "Face mask use and physical distancing before and after mandatory masking: Evidence from public waiting lines," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Economics of Change SP II 2020-305, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
  10. Renaud Foucart & Jana Friedrichsen, 2019. "All-pay competition with captive consumers," Working Papers 277451127, Lancaster University Management School, Economics Department.
  11. Maximilian Andres & Lisa Bruttel & Jana Friedrichsen, 2019. "The Effect of a Leniency Rule on Cartel Formation and Stability: Experiments with Open Communication," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1835, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
  12. Jana Friedrichsen & Tobias König & Tobias Lausen, 2019. "Social Status Concerns and the Political Economy of Publicly Provided Private Goods," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1824, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
  13. Friedrichsen, Jana, 2018. "Signals Sell: Product Lines when Consumers Differ Both in Taste for Quality and Image Concern," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 70, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
  14. Engelmann, Dirk & Friedrichsen, Jana & Kübler, Dorothea, 2018. "Fairness in Markets and Market Experiments," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 64, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
  15. Jana Friedrichsen & Tobias König & Renke Schmacker, 2018. "Social Image Concerns and Welfare Take-Up," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1752, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
  16. Jana Friedrichsen & Dirk Engelmann, 2017. "Who Cares about Social Image?," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1634, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
  17. Jana Friedrichsen, 2017. "Is Socially Responsible Production a Normal Good?," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1644, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
  18. Foucart, Renaud & Friedrichsen, Jana, 2016. "Bidding for network size," MPRA Paper 72136, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  19. Friedrichsen, Jana & König, Tobias & Schmacker, Renke, 2016. "Welfare stigma in the lab: Evidence of social signaling," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Behavior SP II 2016-208, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
  20. Friedrichsen, Jana, 2016. "Signals sell: Designing a product line when consumers have social image concerns," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Behavior SP II 2016-202, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
  21. Friedrichsen, Jana, 2013. "Image concerns and the provision of quality," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Behavior SP II 2013-211, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
  22. Jana Friedrichsen & Dirk Engelmann, 2013. "Who Cares for Social Image? Interactions between Intrinsic Motivation and Social Image Concerns," CESifo Working Paper Series 4514, CESifo.
  23. Renaud Foucart & Jana Friedrichsen, 2013. "Bidding for Network Size: Platform Competition when Quality and Network Size are Complements," Economics Series Working Papers 675, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
  24. Friedrichsen, Jana & Zahn, Philipp, 2012. "Political support in hard times : do people care about national welfare?," Working Papers 12-12, University of Mannheim, Department of Economics.

Articles

  1. Seres, Gyula & Balleyer, Anna Helen & Cerutti, Nicola & Danilov, Anastasia & Friedrichsen, Jana & Liu, Yiming & Süer, Müge, 2021. "Face masks increase compliance with physical distancing recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 139-158.
  2. Friedrichsen, Jana & König, Tobias & Lausen, Tobias, 2021. "Social Status Concerns and the Political Economy of Publicly Provided Private Goods," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 220-246.
  3. Foucart, Renaud & Friedrichsen, Jana, 2021. "All-pay competition with captive consumers," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
  4. Seres, Gyula & Balleyer, Anna & Cerutti, Nicola & Friedrichsen, Jana & Süer, Müge, 2021. "Face mask use and physical distancing before and after mandatory masking: No evidence on risk compensation in public waiting lines," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 765-781.
  5. Andres, Maximilian & Bruttel, Lisa & Friedrichsen, Jana, 2021. "The leniency rule revisited: Experiments on cartel formation with open communication," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
  6. Jana Friedrichsen & Renke Schmacker, 2019. "Die Angst vor Stigmatisierung hindert Menschen daran, Transferleistungen in Anspruch zu nehmen," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 86(26), pages 455-461.
  7. Jana Friedrichsen & Renke Schmacker, 2019. "Fear of Stigmatization Prevents Individuals from Claiming Benefits," DIW Weekly Report, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 9(26/27), pages 215-220.
  8. Jana Friedrichsen & Erich Wittenberg, 2019. "Es geht den Menschen darum, was andere Leute über sie denken: Interview," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 86(26), pages 462-462.
  9. Friedrichsen, Jana & König, Tobias & Schmacker, Renke, 2018. "Social image concerns and welfare take-up," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 174-192.
  10. Jana Friedrichsen & Kornelia Hagen, 2018. "Stupsen und Schubsen (Nudging): Beispiele aus Altersvorsorge, Gesundheit, Ernährung," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 87(2), pages 5-16.
  11. Jana Friedrichsen & Kornelia Hagen & Lilo Wagner, 2018. "Stupsen und Schubsen (Nudging): ein neues verhaltensbasiertes Regulierungskonzept?," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 87(1), pages 5-13.
  12. Pio Baake & Jana Friedrichsen & Helene Naegele, 2018. "Soziale Nachhaltigkeitssiegel: Versprechen und Realität am Beispiel von Fairtrade-Kaffee," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 85(48), pages 1031-1037.
  13. Pio Baake & Jana Friedrichsen & Helene Naegele, 2018. "Social Sustainability Labels: Promises and Reality in the Example of Fairtrade-Coffee," DIW Weekly Report, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 8(48), pages 485-490.
  14. Friedrichsen, Jana & Engelmann, Dirk, 2018. "Who cares about social image?," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 61-77.
  15. Jana Friedrichsen, 2016. ""Shopping for a better world" funktioniert nur bedingt," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 83(38), pages 851-856.
  16. Sofia Amaral-Garcia & Paola Bertoli & Jana Friedrichsen & Veronica Grembi, 2016. "Hospital-Level Policy Can Affect Physician Behavior and Reduce C-Section Rates," DIW Economic Bulletin, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 6(43), pages 495-501.
  17. Sofia Amaral-Garcia & Paola Bertoli & Jana Friedrichsen & Veronica Grembi, 2016. "Haftpflichtregelungen auf Krankenhausebene können ärztliches Handeln beeinflussen und Kaiserschnittraten senken," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 83(43), pages 1035-1042.
  18. Friedrichsen, Jana & Zahn, Philipp, 2014. "Political support in hard times: Do people care about national welfare?," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 23-37.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Blog mentions

As found by EconAcademics.org, the blog aggregator for Economics research:
  1. Jana Friedrichsen, 2017. "Is Socially Responsible Production a Normal Good?," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1644, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

    Mentioned in:

    1. Who buys social responsibility
      by Nicholas Gruen in Club Troppo on 2017-03-05 18:03:40

Working papers

  1. Gyula Seres & Anna Balleyer & Nicola Cerutti & Jana Friedrichsen & Müge Süer, 2021. "Face Mask Use and Physical Distancing before and after Mandatory Masking: No Evidence on Risk Compensation in Public Waiting Lines," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1971, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Seres, Gyula & Balleyer, Anna Helen & Cerutti, Nicola & Danilov, Anastasia & Friedrichsen, Jana & Liu, Yiming & Süer, Müge, 2020. "Face Masks Increase Compliance with Physical Distancing Recommendations during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 253, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.

  2. Maximilian Andres & Lisa Bruttel & Jana Friedrichsen, 2021. "The Leniency Rule Revisited: Experiments on Cartel Formation with Open Communication," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1926, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Justus Haucap & Christina Heldman & Holger A. Rau, 2022. "Gender and Collusion," CESifo Working Paper Series 9614, CESifo.

  3. Maximilian Andres & Lisa Bruttel & Jana Friedrichsen, 2020. "Choosing between explicit cartel formation and tacit collusion – An experiment," CEPA Discussion Papers 19, Center for Economic Policy Analysis.

    Cited by:

    1. Comeig, Irene & Klaser, Klaudijo & Pinar, Lucía D., 2022. "The paradox of (Inter)net neutrality: An experiment on ex-ante antitrust regulation✰," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    2. Maximilian Andres & Lisa Bruttel & Jana Friedrichsen, 2021. "The Leniency Rule Revisited: Experiments on Cartel Formation with Open Communication," CEPA Discussion Papers 24, Center for Economic Policy Analysis.

  4. Jana Friedrichsen & Manja Gärtner, 2020. "Warum essen wir so viel Fleisch?," DIW Roundup: Politik im Fokus 137, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Roosen, Jutta & Staudigel, Matthias & Rahbauer, Sebastian, 2022. "Demand elasticities for fresh meat and welfare effects of meat taxes in Germany," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).

  5. Jana Friedrichsen & Katharina Momsen & Stefano Piasenti, 2020. "Ignorance, Intention and Stochastic Outcomes," Working Papers 2020-31, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, University of Innsbruck.

    Cited by:

    1. Claire Rimbaud & Alice Soldà, 2021. "Avoiding the Cost of your Conscience: Belief Dependent Preferences and Information Acquisition," Working Papers 2114, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Étienne (GATE Lyon St-Étienne), Université de Lyon.

  6. Seres, Gyula & Balleyer, Anna Helen & Cerutti, Nicola & Danilov, Anastasia & Friedrichsen, Jana & Liu, Yiming & Süer, Müge, 2020. "Face Masks Increase Compliance with Physical Distancing Recommendations during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 253, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.

    Cited by:

    1. Roxanne Kovacs & Maurice Dunaiski & Janne Tukiainen, 2020. "Compulsory face mask policies do not affect community mobility in Germany," Discussion Papers 136, Aboa Centre for Economics.
    2. Gyula Seres & Anna Balleyer & Nicola Cerutti & Jana Friedrichsen & Müge Süer, 2021. "Face Mask Use and Physical Distancing before and after Mandatory Masking: No Evidence on Risk Compensation in Public Waiting Lines," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1971, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

  7. Seres, Gyula & Balleyer, Anna & Cerutti, Nicola & Friedrichsen, Jana & Süer, Müge, 2020. "Face mask use and physical distancing before and after mandatory masking: Evidence from public waiting lines," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Economics of Change SP II 2020-305, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.

    Cited by:

    1. Alexander Karaivanov & Hitoshi Shigeoka & Shih En Lu & Cong Chen & Stephanie Pamplona, 2020. "Face Masks, Public Policies and Slowing the Spread of COVID-19: Evidence from Canada," Discussion Papers dp20-09, Department of Economics, Simon Fraser University.
    2. Victor Chernozhukov & Hiroyuki Kasaha & Paul Schrimpf, 2020. "Causal Impact of Masks, Policies, Behavior on Early Covid-19 Pandemic in the U.S," Papers 2005.14168, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2020.
    3. Reinhold Kosfeld & Timo Mitze & Johannes Rode & Klaus Wälde, 2021. "The Covid‐19 containment effects of public health measures: A spatial difference‐in‐differences approach," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(4), pages 799-825, September.

  8. Maximilian Andres & Lisa Bruttel & Jana Friedrichsen, 2019. "The Effect of a Leniency Rule on Cartel Formation and Stability: Experiments with Open Communication," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1835, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Maximilian Andres & Lisa Bruttel & Jana Friedrichsen, 2020. "Choosing between explicit cartel formation and tacit collusion – An experiment," CEPA Discussion Papers 19, Center for Economic Policy Analysis.
    2. Bodnar, Olivia & Fremerey, Melinda & Normann, Hans-Theo & Schad, Jannika Leonie, 2021. "The effects of private damage claims on cartel activity: Experimental evidence," DICE Discussion Papers 315, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    3. Andres, Maximilian & Bruttel, Lisa & Friedrichsen, Jana, 2021. "How do sanctions work? The choice between cartel formation and tacit collusion," VfS Annual Conference 2021 (Virtual Conference): Climate Economics 242372, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.

  9. Jana Friedrichsen & Tobias König & Tobias Lausen, 2019. "Social Status Concerns and the Political Economy of Publicly Provided Private Goods," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1824, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Gorbunov, Vladimir, 2021. "Market demand: a holistic theory and its verification," MPRA Paper 109154, University Library of Munich, Germany.

  10. Friedrichsen, Jana, 2018. "Signals Sell: Product Lines when Consumers Differ Both in Taste for Quality and Image Concern," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 70, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.

    Cited by:

    1. Engelmann, Dirk & Friedrichsen, Jana, 2018. "Who Cares About Social Image?," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 61, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    2. Dertwinkel-Kalt, Markus & Köster, Mats & Peiseler, Florian, 2018. "Attention-driven demand for bonus contracts," DICE Discussion Papers 304, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    3. Sebald, Alexander & Vikander, Nick, 2019. "Optimal firm behavior with consumer social image concerns and asymmetric information," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 311-330.
    4. George Deltas & Eleftherios Zacharias, 2018. "Product Proliferation and Pricing in a Market with Positional Effects," Working Papers 242312853, Lancaster University Management School, Economics Department.
    5. Oliver Bos & Martin Pollrich, 2020. "Optimal Auctions With Signaling Bidders," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2020_158, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
    6. Florian H. Schneider, 2020. "Signaling moral values through consumption," ECON - Working Papers 367, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.
    7. Heidhues, Paul & Köszegi, Botond, 2018. "Behavioral Industrial Organization," CEPR Discussion Papers 12988, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.

  11. Engelmann, Dirk & Friedrichsen, Jana & Kübler, Dorothea, 2018. "Fairness in Markets and Market Experiments," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 64, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.

    Cited by:

    1. Engelmann, Dirk & Friedrichsen, Jana, 2018. "Who Cares About Social Image?," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 61, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    2. Björn Bartling & Vanessa Valero & Roberto A. Weber, 2018. "Is Social Responsibility a Normal Good?," CESifo Working Paper Series 7263, CESifo.
    3. Björn Bartling & Vanessa Valero & Roberto A. Weber & Lan Yao, 2020. "Public discourse and socially responsible market behavior," ECON - Working Papers 359, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.
    4. Riehm, Tobias & Fugger, Nicolas & Gillen, Philippe & Gretschko, Vitali & Werner, Peter, 2021. "Social norms and market behavior: Evidence from a large population sample," ZEW Discussion Papers 21-017, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.

  12. Jana Friedrichsen & Tobias König & Renke Schmacker, 2018. "Social Image Concerns and Welfare Take-Up," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1752, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Jia, Z. Tingting & McMahon, Matthew J., 2020. "Being watched in an investment game setting: Behavioral changes when making risky decisions," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    2. Jan Marcus & Thomas Siedler & Nicolas R. Ziebarth, 2021. "The Long-Run Effects of Sports Club Vouchers for Primary School Children," NBER Working Papers 28819, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Delis, Manthos & Galariotis, Emilios & Monne, Jerome, 2021. "Financial vulnerability and seeking expert advice: Evidence from a survey experiment," MPRA Paper 107095, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Nguyen, Ha Trong & Le, Huong Thu & Connelly, Luke B., 2020. "Who’s declining the “free lunch”? New evidence from the uptake of public child dental benefits," GLO Discussion Paper Series 501, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    5. Feld, Lars P. & Schmidt, Christoph M. & Schnabel, Isabel & Truger, Achim & Wieland, Volker, 2019. "Den Strukturwandel meistern. Jahresgutachten 2019/20," Annual Economic Reports / Jahresgutachten, German Council of Economic Experts / Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der gesamtwirtschaftlichen Entwicklung, volume 127, number 201920.
    6. Wolf, Tobias, 2020. "Welfare while working: How does the life satisfaction approach help to explain job search behavior?," Discussion Papers 2020/14, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
    7. Spencer Bastani & Thomas Giebe & Chizheng Miao, 2019. "Ethnicity and tax filing behavior," CESifo Working Paper Series 7576, CESifo.

  13. Jana Friedrichsen & Dirk Engelmann, 2017. "Who Cares about Social Image?," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1634, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Sheheryar Banuri & Katarina Dankova & Philip Keefer, 2017. "It's not all fun and games: Feedback, task motivation, and effort," Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Science (CBESS) 17-10, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
    2. Petrishcheva, Vasilisa & Riener, Gerhard & Schildberg-Hörisch, Hannah, 2020. "Loss aversion in social image concerns," VfS Annual Conference 2020 (Virtual Conference): Gender Economics 224581, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    3. Rincke, Johannes & Boyer, Pierre & Dwenger, Nadja, 2015. "Do Taxes Crowd Out Intrinsic Motivation? Field-Experimental Evidence from Germany," VfS Annual Conference 2015 (Muenster): Economic Development - Theory and Policy 112951, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    4. Jia, Z. Tingting & McMahon, Matthew J., 2020. "Being watched in an investment game setting: Behavioral changes when making risky decisions," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    5. Ferdinand von Siemens, 2019. "I Care What You Think: Social Image Concerns and the Strategic Revelation of Past Pro-Social Behavior," CESifo Working Paper Series 7497, CESifo.
    6. Alistair Munro & Marieta Valente, 2008. "Green goods: are they good or bad news for the environment? Evidence from a laboratory experiment on impure public goods," NIMA Working Papers 37, Núcleo de Investigação em Microeconomia Aplicada (NIMA), Universidade do Minho, revised Dec 2011.
    7. Holm, Hakan J. & Samahita, Margaret, 2018. "Curating social image: Experimental evidence on the value of actions and selfies," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 83-104.
    8. Pio Baake & Helene Naegele, 2017. "Competition between For-Profit and Industry Labels: The Case of Social Labels in the Coffee Market," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1686, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    9. Friedrichsen, Jana & König, Tobias & Schmacker, Renke, 2018. "Social image concerns and welfare take-up," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Behavior SP II 2016-208r, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    10. Jana Friedrichsen & Tobias König & Renke Schmacker, 2017. "Welfare Stigma in the Lab: Evidence of Social Signaling," CESifo Working Paper Series 6519, CESifo.
    11. Banuri,Sheheryar & Keefer,Philip E. & De Walque,Damien B. C. M., 2018. "Love the job... or the patient ? task vs. mission-based motivations in health care," Policy Research Working Paper Series 8338, The World Bank.
    12. Bazoche, Pascale & Guinet, Nicolas & Poret, Sylvaine & Teyssier, Sabrina, 2021. "Does the provision of information increase the substitution of animal proteins with plant-based proteins? An experimental investigation into consumer choices," Working Papers 313663, Institut National de la recherche Agronomique (INRA), Departement Sciences Sociales, Agriculture et Alimentation, Espace et Environnement (SAE2).
    13. Boyer, Pierre C. & Dwenger, Nadja & Rincke, Johannes, 2016. "Do norms on contribution behavior affect intrinsic motivation? Field-experimental evidence from Germany," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 140-153.
    14. Pascale Bazoche & Nicolas Guinet & Sylvaine Poret & Sabrina Teyssier, 2021. "Does the provision of information increase the substitution of animal proteins with plant-based proteins? An experimental investigation into consumer choices [L’apport d’informations augmente-t-il ," Working Papers hal-03350356, HAL.
    15. Margherita Del Prete & Antonella Samoggia, 2020. "Chocolate Consumption and Purchasing Behaviour Review: Research Issues and Insights for Future Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-18, July.
    16. Naegele, Helene, 2020. "Where does the Fair Trade money go? How much consumers pay extra for Fair Trade coffee and how this value is split along the value chain," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    17. Florian H. Schneider, 2020. "Signaling moral values through consumption," ECON - Working Papers 367, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.
    18. Jannis Engel & Nora Szech, 2020. "A little good is good enough: Ethical consumption, cheap excuses, and moral self-licensing," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, January.
    19. Jasmin Droege, 2022. "The Handmade Effect: A Model of Conscious Shopping in an Industrialised Economy," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 60(2), pages 263-292, March.
    20. Blacklow, Paul & Sibly, Hugh & Corman, Amy Beth, 2021. "Do we prefer praise from acquaintances or strangers? An experiment on esteem seeking in one-shot versus repeated interactions," Working Papers 2021-08, University of Tasmania, Tasmanian School of Business and Economics.
    21. Friedrichsen, Jana, 2018. "Signals Sell: Product Lines when Consumers Differ Both in Taste for Quality and Image Concern," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 70, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    22. Engelmann, Dirk & Friedrichsen, Jana & Kübler, Dorothea, 2018. "Fairness in markets and market experiments," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Behavior SP II 2018-203, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    23. Blacklow, Paul & Corman, Amy Beth & Sibly, Hugh, 2021. "The Demand and Supply of Esteem: An experimental analysis," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    24. Jonathan Levy, 2021. "Mutual monitoring, approval motivation and fostering cooperation in teams," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 7(1), pages 74-87, September.
    25. Helene Naegele, 2019. "Where Does the Fairtrade Money Go? How Much Consumers Pay Extra for Fairtrade Coffee and How This Value Is Split along the Value Chain," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1783, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

  14. Jana Friedrichsen, 2017. "Is Socially Responsible Production a Normal Good?," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1644, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Stehr, Frauke & Werner, Peter, 2021. "Making Up for Harming Others — An Experiment on Voluntary Compensation Behavior," VfS Annual Conference 2021 (Virtual Conference): Climate Economics 242396, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    2. Fehr, Dietmar & Rau, Hannes & Trautmann, Stefan T. & Xu, Yilong, 2020. "Inequality, fairness and social capital," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    3. Björn Bartling & Vanessa Valero & Roberto A. Weber, 2018. "Is Social Responsibility a Normal Good?," CESifo Working Paper Series 7263, CESifo.

  15. Friedrichsen, Jana & König, Tobias & Schmacker, Renke, 2016. "Welfare stigma in the lab: Evidence of social signaling," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Behavior SP II 2016-208, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.

    Cited by:

    1. Cameron, Anna & Tedds, Lindsay M., 2021. "Gender-Based Violence, Economic Security, and the Potential of Basic Income: A Discussion Paper," MPRA Paper 107478, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Tedds, Lindsay M. & Crisan, I. Daria & Petit, Gillian, 2020. "Basic Income in Canada: Principles and Design Features," MPRA Paper 105911, University Library of Munich, Germany.

  16. Friedrichsen, Jana, 2016. "Signals sell: Designing a product line when consumers have social image concerns," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Behavior SP II 2016-202, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.

    Cited by:

    1. Engelmann, Dirk & Friedrichsen, Jana, 2018. "Who Cares About Social Image?," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 61, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    2. Ronen Gradwohl & Rann Smorodinsky, 2021. "Privacy, Patience, and Protection," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 759-784, December.

  17. Friedrichsen, Jana, 2013. "Image concerns and the provision of quality," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Behavior SP II 2013-211, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.

    Cited by:

    1. Friedrichsen, Jana, 2014. "Image Concerns and the Provision of Quality," VfS Annual Conference 2014 (Hamburg): Evidence-based Economic Policy 100365, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    2. Friedrichsen, Jana & Engelmann, Dirk, 2013. "Who cares for social image? Interactions between intrinsic motivation and social image concerns," VfS Annual Conference 2013 (Duesseldorf): Competition Policy and Regulation in a Global Economic Order 79746, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.

  18. Jana Friedrichsen & Dirk Engelmann, 2013. "Who Cares for Social Image? Interactions between Intrinsic Motivation and Social Image Concerns," CESifo Working Paper Series 4514, CESifo.

    Cited by:

    1. Jannis Engel & Nora Szech, 2017. "A Little Good is Good Enough: Ethical Consumption, Cheap Excuses, and Moral Self-Licensing," Working Papers 2017-025, Human Capital and Economic Opportunity Working Group.
    2. Antonio Filippin & Carlo V. Fiorio & Eliana Viviano, 2013. "The effect of tax enforcement on tax morale," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 937, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    3. Friedrichsen, Jana, 2014. "Image Concerns and the Provision of Quality," VfS Annual Conference 2014 (Hamburg): Evidence-based Economic Policy 100365, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    4. Marieta Valente, 2015. "Ethical Differentiation and Consumption in an Incentivized Market Experiment," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 47(1), pages 51-69, August.
    5. Jannis Engel & Nora Szech, 2017. "A Little Good is Good Enough: Ethical Consumption, Cheap Excuses, and Moral Self-Licensing," CESifo Working Paper Series 6434, CESifo.
    6. Goytom Abraha Kahsay & Laura Mørch Andersen & Lars Gårn Hansen, 2014. "Price reactions when consumers are concerned about pro-social reputation," IFRO Working Paper 2014/09, University of Copenhagen, Department of Food and Resource Economics.
    7. Rainer Michael Rilke, 2017. "On the duty to give (and not to take): An experiment on moralistic punishment," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 87(9), pages 1129-1150, December.
    8. Engel, Jannis & Szech, Nora, 2017. "A little good is good enough: Ethical consumption, cheap excuses, and moral self-licensing," Working Paper Series in Economics 102, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Department of Economics and Management.
    9. Engel, Jannis & Szech, Nora, 2017. "A little good is good enough: Ethical consumption, cheap excuses, and moral self-licensing," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Economics of Change SP II 2017-301, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    10. Friedrichsen, Jana, 2016. "Signals sell: Designing a product line when consumers have social image concerns," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Behavior SP II 2016-202, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.

  19. Friedrichsen, Jana & Zahn, Philipp, 2012. "Political support in hard times : do people care about national welfare?," Working Papers 12-12, University of Mannheim, Department of Economics.

    Cited by:

    1. Dominik Schraff & Frank Schimmelfennig, 2019. "Eurozone bailouts and national democracy: Detachment or resilience?," European Union Politics, , vol. 20(3), pages 361-383, September.
    2. Georgia Kaplanoglou & Vassilis T. Rapanos & Ioanna C. Bardakas, 2015. "Does Fairness Matter for the Success of Fiscal Consolidation?," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(2), pages 197-219, May.
    3. Selim Jurgen Ergun & M. Fernanda Rivas & Máximo Rossi, 2019. "Satisfaction with democracy in Latin America: Do the characteristics of the political system matter?," Revista Desarrollo y Sociedad, Universidad de los Andes - CEDE, vol. 83(9), pages 353-383, July.
    4. Gebhard Kirchgässner, 2016. "Voting and Popularity," CREMA Working Paper Series 2016-08, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    5. Gustavo Gouvêa Maciel & Luís de Sousa, 2018. "Legal Corruption and Dissatisfaction with Democracy in the European Union," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 140(2), pages 653-674, November.
    6. Guido Merzoni & Federico Trombetta, 2016. "The cost of doing the right thing. A model of populism with rent-seeking politicians and the economic crisis," DISEIS - Quaderni del Dipartimento di Economia internazionale, delle istituzioni e dello sviluppo dis1602, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimento di Economia internazionale, delle istituzioni e dello sviluppo (DISEIS).
    7. Agnello, Luca & Castro, Vitor & Jalles, João Tovar & Sousa, Ricardo M., 2015. "What determines the likelihood of structural reforms?," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 129-145.

Articles

  1. Seres, Gyula & Balleyer, Anna Helen & Cerutti, Nicola & Danilov, Anastasia & Friedrichsen, Jana & Liu, Yiming & Süer, Müge, 2021. "Face masks increase compliance with physical distancing recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 139-158.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  2. Friedrichsen, Jana & König, Tobias & Lausen, Tobias, 2021. "Social Status Concerns and the Political Economy of Publicly Provided Private Goods," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 220-246.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  3. Seres, Gyula & Balleyer, Anna & Cerutti, Nicola & Friedrichsen, Jana & Süer, Müge, 2021. "Face mask use and physical distancing before and after mandatory masking: No evidence on risk compensation in public waiting lines," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 765-781.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  4. Andres, Maximilian & Bruttel, Lisa & Friedrichsen, Jana, 2021. "The leniency rule revisited: Experiments on cartel formation with open communication," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  5. Friedrichsen, Jana & König, Tobias & Schmacker, Renke, 2018. "Social image concerns and welfare take-up," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 174-192.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  6. Pio Baake & Jana Friedrichsen & Helene Naegele, 2018. "Soziale Nachhaltigkeitssiegel: Versprechen und Realität am Beispiel von Fairtrade-Kaffee," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 85(48), pages 1031-1037.

    Cited by:

    1. Hellwig, Robert & Atasoy, Ayse Tugba & Madlener, Reinhard, 2020. "The Impact of Social Preferences and Information on the Willingness to Pay for Fairtrade Products," FCN Working Papers 6/2020, E.ON Energy Research Center, Future Energy Consumer Needs and Behavior (FCN).

  7. Friedrichsen, Jana & Engelmann, Dirk, 2018. "Who cares about social image?," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 61-77.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  8. Friedrichsen, Jana & Zahn, Philipp, 2014. "Political support in hard times: Do people care about national welfare?," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 23-37.
    See citations under working paper version above.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 33 papers announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-EXP: Experimental Economics (20) 2014-02-02 2017-01-01 2017-02-05 2017-03-05 2017-11-05 2018-01-22 2018-02-05 2018-04-30 2018-08-13 2018-08-20 2018-08-27 2019-10-21 2019-12-16 2020-08-10 2020-08-17 2020-11-30 2021-01-25 2021-03-01 2021-05-03 2021-09-20. Author is listed
  2. NEP-COM: Industrial Competition (12) 2013-11-02 2014-02-02 2015-02-16 2016-03-29 2016-06-25 2018-02-19 2019-10-21 2019-12-16 2020-08-17 2021-01-25 2021-03-01 2021-11-08. Author is listed
  3. NEP-LAW: Law & Economics (5) 2019-12-16 2020-08-17 2021-01-25 2021-03-01 2021-11-08. Author is listed
  4. NEP-MKT: Marketing (5) 2014-02-02 2015-02-16 2016-03-29 2017-03-05 2018-02-19. Author is listed
  5. NEP-DCM: Discrete Choice Models (4) 2017-02-05 2018-02-05 2018-04-30 2021-11-08
  6. NEP-MIC: Microeconomics (4) 2013-11-02 2018-02-19 2019-10-21 2019-10-28
  7. NEP-POL: Positive Political Economics (4) 2011-06-04 2012-07-23 2014-02-02 2019-10-28
  8. NEP-BEC: Business Economics (3) 2016-06-25 2021-01-25 2021-03-01
  9. NEP-GTH: Game Theory (3) 2018-02-05 2019-10-21 2020-11-30
  10. NEP-HPE: History & Philosophy of Economics (3) 2018-02-05 2018-04-30 2020-11-30
  11. NEP-IND: Industrial Organization (3) 2018-02-19 2021-01-25 2021-03-01
  12. NEP-SOC: Social Norms & Social Capital (3) 2014-02-02 2017-02-05 2018-01-22
  13. NEP-CBE: Cognitive & Behavioural Economics (2) 2014-02-02 2021-05-03
  14. NEP-EUR: Microeconomic European Issues (2) 2012-07-23 2021-09-20
  15. NEP-HEA: Health Economics (2) 2020-08-10 2021-05-03
  16. NEP-NET: Network Economics (2) 2013-11-02 2016-06-25
  17. NEP-ORE: Operations Research (2) 2020-11-30 2021-11-08
  18. NEP-BIG: Big Data (1) 2020-08-17
  19. NEP-CDM: Collective Decision-Making (1) 2019-10-28
  20. NEP-CMP: Computational Economics (1) 2020-08-17
  21. NEP-CTA: Contract Theory & Applications (1) 2016-03-29
  22. NEP-FDG: Financial Development & Growth (1) 2011-06-04
  23. NEP-GER: German Papers (1) 2020-03-16
  24. NEP-HAP: Economics of Happiness (1) 2011-06-04
  25. NEP-ISF: Islamic Finance (1) 2021-09-20
  26. NEP-PBE: Public Economics (1) 2017-01-01
  27. NEP-REG: Regulation (1) 2021-11-08
  28. NEP-URE: Urban & Real Estate Economics (1) 2017-11-05

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Jana Friedrichsen should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.