IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/pfr293.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Jana Friedrichsen

Personal Details

First Name:Jana
Middle Name:
Last Name:Friedrichsen
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pfr293

Affiliation

(75%) DIW Berlin (Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung)

Berlin, Germany
http://www.diw.de/

: xx49-30-89789-0
xx49-30-89789-200
Mohrenstraße 58, D-10117 Berlin
RePEc:edi:diwbede (more details at EDIRC)

(25%) Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät
Humboldt-Universität Berlin

Berlin, Germany
http://www.wiwi.hu-berlin.de/

: +49 30 2093-5673
+49 30 2093-5727
Spandauer Str. 1, D-10178 Berlin
RePEc:edi:wfhubde (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles

Working papers

  1. Renaud Foucart & Jana Friedrichsen, 2019. "All-pay competition with captive consumers," Working Papers 277451127, Lancaster University Management School, Economics Department.
  2. Maximilian Andres & Lisa Bruttel & Jana Friedrichsen, 2019. "The Effect of a Leniency Rule on Cartel Formation and Stability: Experiments with Open Communication," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1835, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
  3. Jana Friedrichsen & Tobias König & Tobias Lausen, 2019. "Social Status Concerns and the Political Economy of Publicly Provided Private Goods," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1824, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
  4. Jana Friedrichsen & Tobias König & Renke Schmacker, 2018. "Social Image Concerns and Welfare Take-Up," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1752, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
  5. Friedrichsen, Jana, 2018. "Signals Sell: Product Lines when Consumers Differ Both in Taste for Quality and Image Concern," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 70, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
  6. Engelmann, Dirk & Friedrichsen, Jana & Kübler, Dorothea, 2018. "Fairness in Markets and Market Experiments," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 64, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
  7. Jana Friedrichsen & Dirk Engelmann, 2017. "Who Cares about Social Image?," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1634, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
  8. Jana Friedrichsen, 2017. "Is Socially Responsible Production a Normal Good?," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1644, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
  9. Jana Friedrichsen & Tobias König & Renke Schmacker, 2017. "Welfare Stigma in the Lab: Evidence of Social Signaling," CESifo Working Paper Series 6519, CESifo Group Munich.
  10. Friedrichsen, Jana & König, Tobias & Schmacker, Renke, 2016. "Welfare stigma in the lab: Evidence of social signaling," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Behavior SP II 2016-208, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
  11. Foucart, Renaud & Friedrichsen, Jana, 2016. "Bidding for network size," MPRA Paper 72136, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  12. Friedrichsen, Jana, 2016. "Signals sell: Designing a product line when consumers have social image concerns," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Behavior SP II 2016-202, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
  13. Renaud Foucart & Jana Friedrichsen, 2013. "Bidding for Network Size: Platform Competition when Quality and Network Size are Complements," Economics Series Working Papers 675, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
  14. Friedrichsen, Jana, 2013. "Image concerns and the provision of quality," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Behavior SP II 2013-211, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
  15. Jana Friedrichsen & Dirk Engelmann, 2013. "Who Cares for Social Image? Interactions between Intrinsic Motivation and Social Image Concerns," CESifo Working Paper Series 4514, CESifo Group Munich.
  16. Friedrichsen, Jana & Engelmann, Dirk, 2013. "Who cares for social image? Interactions between intrinsic motivation and social image concerns," Annual Conference 2013 (Duesseldorf): Competition Policy and Regulation in a Global Economic Order 79746, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
  17. Friedrichsen, Jana & Zahn, Philipp, 2012. "Political support in hard times : do people care about national welfare?," Working Papers 12-12, University of Mannheim, Department of Economics.

Articles

  1. Jana Friedrichsen & Renke Schmacker, 2019. "Fear of Stigmatization Prevents Individuals from Claiming Benefits," DIW Weekly Report, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 9(26/27), pages 215-220.
  2. Jana Friedrichsen & Erich Wittenberg, 2019. "Es geht den Menschen darum, was andere Leute über sie denken: Interview," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 86(26), pages 462-462.
  3. Jana Friedrichsen & Renke Schmacker, 2019. "Die Angst vor Stigmatisierung hindert Menschen daran, Transferleistungen in Anspruch zu nehmen," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 86(26), pages 455-461.
  4. Friedrichsen, Jana & König, Tobias & Schmacker, Renke, 2018. "Social image concerns and welfare take-up," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 174-192.
  5. Pio Baake & Jana Friedrichsen & Helene Naegele, 2018. "Soziale Nachhaltigkeitssiegel: Versprechen und Realität am Beispiel von Fairtrade-Kaffee," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 85(48), pages 1031-1037.
  6. Jana Friedrichsen & Kornelia Hagen, 2018. "Stupsen und Schubsen (Nudging): Beispiele aus Altersvorsorge, Gesundheit, Ernährung," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 87(2), pages 5-16.
  7. Jana Friedrichsen & Kornelia Hagen & Lilo Wagner, 2018. "Stupsen und Schubsen (Nudging): ein neues verhaltensbasiertes Regulierungskonzept?," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 87(1), pages 5-13.
  8. Pio Baake & Jana Friedrichsen & Helene Naegele, 2018. "Social Sustainability Labels: Promises and Reality in the Example of Fairtrade-Coffee," DIW Weekly Report, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 8(48), pages 485-490.
  9. Friedrichsen, Jana & Engelmann, Dirk, 2018. "Who cares about social image?," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 61-77.
  10. Sofia Amaral-Garcia & Paola Bertoli & Jana Friedrichsen & Veronica Grembi, 2016. "Haftpflichtregelungen auf Krankenhausebene können ärztliches Handeln beeinflussen und Kaiserschnittraten senken," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 83(43), pages 1035-1042.
  11. Jana Friedrichsen, 2016. ""Shopping for a better world" funktioniert nur bedingt," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 83(38), pages 851-856.
  12. Sofia Amaral-Garcia & Paola Bertoli & Jana Friedrichsen & Veronica Grembi, 2016. "Hospital-Level Policy Can Affect Physician Behavior and Reduce C-Section Rates," DIW Economic Bulletin, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 6(43), pages 495-501.
  13. Friedrichsen, Jana & Zahn, Philipp, 2014. "Political support in hard times: Do people care about national welfare?," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 23-37.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Blog mentions

As found by EconAcademics.org, the blog aggregator for Economics research:
  1. Jana Friedrichsen, 2017. "Is Socially Responsible Production a Normal Good?," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1644, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

    Mentioned in:

    1. Who buys social responsibility
      by Nicholas Gruen in Club Troppo on 2017-03-05 18:03:40

Working papers

  1. Jana Friedrichsen & Tobias König & Renke Schmacker, 2018. "Social Image Concerns and Welfare Take-Up," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1752, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Spencer Bastani & Thomas Giebe & Chizheng Miao, 2019. "Ethnicity and tax filing behavior," CESifo Working Paper Series 7576, CESifo Group Munich.
    2. Nguyen, Ha Trong & Le, Huong Thu & Connelly, Luke B., 2019. "Who’s declining the “free lunch”? New evidence from the uptake of public child dental benefits," EconStor Preprints 208378, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.

  2. Friedrichsen, Jana, 2018. "Signals Sell: Product Lines when Consumers Differ Both in Taste for Quality and Image Concern," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 70, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.

    Cited by:

    1. Jana Friedrichsen & Dirk Engelmann, 2017. "Who Cares about Social Image?," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1634, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    2. Dertwinkel-Kalt, Markus & Köster, Mats & Peiseler, Florian, 2018. "Attention-driven demand for bonus contracts," DICE Discussion Papers 304, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    3. Heidhues, Paul & Köszegi, Botond, 2018. "Behavioral Industrial Organization," CEPR Discussion Papers 12988, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    4. Markus Dertwinkel-Kalt & Mats Köster & Florian Peiseler, 2019. "Attention-driven demand for bonus contracts," CESifo Working Paper Series 7539, CESifo Group Munich.
    5. George Deltas & Eleftherios Zacharias, 2018. "Product Proliferation and Pricing in a Market with Positional Effects," Working Papers 242312853, Lancaster University Management School, Economics Department.

  3. Engelmann, Dirk & Friedrichsen, Jana & Kübler, Dorothea, 2018. "Fairness in Markets and Market Experiments," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 64, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.

    Cited by:

    1. Jana Friedrichsen & Dirk Engelmann, 2017. "Who Cares about Social Image?," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1634, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    2. Björn Bartling & Vanessa Valero & Roberto A. Weber, 2018. "Is social responsibility a normal good?," ECON - Working Papers 299, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.

  4. Jana Friedrichsen & Dirk Engelmann, 2017. "Who Cares about Social Image?," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1634, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Sheheryar Banuri & Katarina Dankova & Philip Keefer, 2017. "It's not all fun and games: Feedback, task motivation, and effort," Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Science (CBESS) 17-10, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
    2. Holm, Hakan J. & Samahita, Margaret, 2018. "Curating social image: Experimental evidence on the value of actions and selfies," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 83-104.
    3. Friedrichsen, Jana & König, Tobias & Schmacker, Renke, 2018. "Social image concerns and welfare take-up," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Behavior SP II 2016-208r, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    4. Jana Friedrichsen & Tobias König & Renke Schmacker, 2017. "Welfare Stigma in the Lab: Evidence of Social Signaling," CESifo Working Paper Series 6519, CESifo Group Munich.
    5. Boyer, Pierre C. & Dwenger, Nadja & Rincke, Johannes, 2016. "Do norms on contribution behavior affect intrinsic motivation? Field-experimental evidence from Germany," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 140-153.
    6. Banuri, Sheheryar & Keefer, Philip & Walque, Damien de, 2019. "Love the Job... or the Patient?: Task vs. Mission-Based Motivations in Health Care," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 63, Inter-American Development Bank.
    7. Pierre C. Boyer & Nadja Dwenger & Johannes Rincke, 2016. "Do Norms on Contribution Behavior Affect Intrinsic Motivation? Field-Experimental Evidence from Germany," CESifo Working Paper Series 5998, CESifo Group Munich.
    8. Sheheryar Banuri & Philip Keefer & Damien de Walque, 2017. "Love the job... or the patient? Task vs. mission-based motiviations in healthcare," Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Science (CBESS) 17-09, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
    9. Engelmann, Dirk & Friedrichsen, Jana & Kübler, Dorothea, 2018. "Fairness in markets and market experiments," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Behavior SP II 2018-203, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    10. Pierre C. Boyer & Nadja Dwenger & Johannes Rincke, 2014. "Do Taxes Crowd Out Intrinsic Motivation? Field-Experimental Evidence from Germany," Working Papers tax-mpg-rps-2014-23, Max Planck Institute for Tax Law and Public Finance.
    11. Alistair Munro & Marieta Valente, 2008. "Green goods: are they good or bad news for the environment? Evidence from a laboratory experiment on impure public goods," NIMA Working Papers 37, Núcleo de Investigação em Microeconomia Aplicada (NIMA), Universidade do Minho, revised Dec 2011.
    12. Pio Baake & Helene Naegele, 2017. "Competition between For-Profit and Industry Labels: The Case of Social Labels in the Coffee Market," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1686, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    13. Friedrichsen, Jana & König, Tobias & Schmacker, Renke, 2016. "Welfare stigma in the lab: Evidence of social signaling," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Behavior SP II 2016-208, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    14. Friedrichsen, Jana, 2018. "Signals Sell: Product Lines when Consumers Differ Both in Taste for Quality and Image Concern," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 70, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    15. Helene Naegele, 2019. "Where Does the Fairtrade Money Go? How Much Consumers Pay Extra for Fairtrade Coffee and How This Value Is Split along the Value Chain," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1783, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

  5. Jana Friedrichsen, 2017. "Is Socially Responsible Production a Normal Good?," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1644, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Björn Bartling & Vanessa Valero & Roberto A. Weber, 2018. "Is social responsibility a normal good?," ECON - Working Papers 299, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.
    2. Fehr, Dietmar & Rau, Hannes & Trautmann, Stefan T. & Xu, Yilong, 2018. "Inequality, Fairness and Social Capital," Working Papers 0650, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.

  6. Friedrichsen, Jana, 2016. "Signals sell: Designing a product line when consumers have social image concerns," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Behavior SP II 2016-202, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.

    Cited by:

    1. Jana Friedrichsen & Dirk Engelmann, 2017. "Who Cares about Social Image?," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1634, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

  7. Friedrichsen, Jana, 2013. "Image concerns and the provision of quality," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Behavior SP II 2013-211, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.

    Cited by:

    1. Jana Friedrichsen & Dirk Engelmann, 2013. "Who Cares for Social Image? Interactions between Intrinsic Motivation and Social Image Concerns," CESifo Working Paper Series 4514, CESifo Group Munich.
    2. Friedrichsen, Jana, 2014. "Image Concerns and the Provision of Quality," Annual Conference 2014 (Hamburg): Evidence-based Economic Policy 100365, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    3. Friedrichsen, Jana & Engelmann, Dirk, 2013. "Who cares for social image? Interactions between intrinsic motivation and social image concerns," Annual Conference 2013 (Duesseldorf): Competition Policy and Regulation in a Global Economic Order 79746, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.

  8. Jana Friedrichsen & Dirk Engelmann, 2013. "Who Cares for Social Image? Interactions between Intrinsic Motivation and Social Image Concerns," CESifo Working Paper Series 4514, CESifo Group Munich.

    Cited by:

    1. Jannis Engel & Nora Szech, 2017. "A Little Good is Good Enough: Ethical Consumption, Cheap Excuses, and Moral Self-Licensing," Working Papers 2017-025, Human Capital and Economic Opportunity Working Group.
    2. Jannis Engel & Nora Szech, 2017. "A Little Good is Good Enough: Ethical Consumption, Cheap Excuses, and Moral Self-Licensing," CESifo Working Paper Series 6434, CESifo Group Munich.
    3. Rainer Michael Rilke, 2017. "On the duty to give (and not to take): An experiment on moralistic punishment," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 87(9), pages 1129-1150, December.
    4. Antonio Filippin & Carlo V. Fiorio & Eliana Viviano, 2013. "The effect of tax enforcement on tax morale," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 937, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    5. Friedrichsen, Jana, 2014. "Image Concerns and the Provision of Quality," Annual Conference 2014 (Hamburg): Evidence-based Economic Policy 100365, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    6. Marieta Valente, 2015. "Ethical Differentiation and Consumption in an Incentivized Market Experiment," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 47(1), pages 51-69, August.
    7. Goytom Abraha Kahsay & Laura Mørch Andersen & Lars Gårn Hansen, 2014. "Price reactions when consumers are concerned about pro-social reputation," IFRO Working Paper 2014/09, University of Copenhagen, Department of Food and Resource Economics.
    8. Engel, Jannis & Szech, Nora, 2017. "A little good is good enough: Ethical consumption, cheap excuses, and moral self-licensing," Working Paper Series in Economics 102, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Department of Economics and Business Engineering.
    9. Engel, Jannis & Szech, Nora, 2017. "A little good is good enough: Ethical consumption, cheap excuses, and moral self-licensing," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Economics of Change SP II 2017-301, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    10. Friedrichsen, Jana, 2016. "Signals sell: Designing a product line when consumers have social image concerns," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Behavior SP II 2016-202, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.

  9. Friedrichsen, Jana & Engelmann, Dirk, 2013. "Who cares for social image? Interactions between intrinsic motivation and social image concerns," Annual Conference 2013 (Duesseldorf): Competition Policy and Regulation in a Global Economic Order 79746, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.

    Cited by:

    1. Jannis Engel & Nora Szech, 2017. "A Little Good is Good Enough: Ethical Consumption, Cheap Excuses, and Moral Self-Licensing," Working Papers 2017-025, Human Capital and Economic Opportunity Working Group.
    2. Jannis Engel & Nora Szech, 2017. "A Little Good is Good Enough: Ethical Consumption, Cheap Excuses, and Moral Self-Licensing," CESifo Working Paper Series 6434, CESifo Group Munich.
    3. Rainer Michael Rilke, 2017. "On the duty to give (and not to take): An experiment on moralistic punishment," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 87(9), pages 1129-1150, December.
    4. Antonio Filippin & Carlo V. Fiorio & Eliana Viviano, 2013. "The effect of tax enforcement on tax morale," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 937, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    5. Friedrichsen, Jana, 2014. "Image Concerns and the Provision of Quality," Annual Conference 2014 (Hamburg): Evidence-based Economic Policy 100365, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    6. Marieta Valente, 2015. "Ethical Differentiation and Consumption in an Incentivized Market Experiment," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 47(1), pages 51-69, August.
    7. Goytom Abraha Kahsay & Laura Mørch Andersen & Lars Gårn Hansen, 2014. "Price reactions when consumers are concerned about pro-social reputation," IFRO Working Paper 2014/09, University of Copenhagen, Department of Food and Resource Economics.
    8. Engel, Jannis & Szech, Nora, 2017. "A little good is good enough: Ethical consumption, cheap excuses, and moral self-licensing," Working Paper Series in Economics 102, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Department of Economics and Business Engineering.
    9. Engel, Jannis & Szech, Nora, 2017. "A little good is good enough: Ethical consumption, cheap excuses, and moral self-licensing," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Economics of Change SP II 2017-301, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    10. Friedrichsen, Jana, 2016. "Signals sell: Designing a product line when consumers have social image concerns," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Behavior SP II 2016-202, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.

  10. Friedrichsen, Jana & Zahn, Philipp, 2012. "Political support in hard times : do people care about national welfare?," Working Papers 12-12, University of Mannheim, Department of Economics.

    Cited by:

    1. Georgia Kaplanoglou & Vassilis T. Rapanos & Ioanna C. Bardakas, 2015. "Does Fairness Matter for the Success of Fiscal Consolidation?," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(2), pages 197-219, May.
    2. Kirchgässner, Gebhard, 2016. "Voting and Popularity," Economics Working Paper Series 1618, University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science.
    3. Guido Merzoni & Federico Trombetta, 2016. "The cost of doing the right thing. A model of populism with rent-seeking politicians and the economic crisis," DISEIS - Quaderni del Dipartimento di Economia internazionale, delle istituzioni e dello sviluppo dis1602, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimento di Economia internazionale, delle istituzioni e dello sviluppo (DISEIS).
    4. Agnello, Luca & Castro, Vitor & Jalles, João Tovar & Sousa, Ricardo M., 2015. "What determines the likelihood of structural reforms?," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 129-145.
    5. Gebhard Kirchgässner, 2016. "Voting and Popularity," CESifo Working Paper Series 6182, CESifo Group Munich.
    6. Gustavo Gouvêa Maciel & Luís de Sousa, 2018. "Legal Corruption and Dissatisfaction with Democracy in the European Union," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 140(2), pages 653-674, November.

Articles

  1. Friedrichsen, Jana & König, Tobias & Schmacker, Renke, 2018. "Social image concerns and welfare take-up," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 174-192.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  2. Friedrichsen, Jana & Engelmann, Dirk, 2018. "Who cares about social image?," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 61-77.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  3. Friedrichsen, Jana & Zahn, Philipp, 2014. "Political support in hard times: Do people care about national welfare?," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 23-37.
    See citations under working paper version above.Sorry, no citations of articles recorded.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 23 papers announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-EXP: Experimental Economics (13) 2014-02-02 2017-01-01 2017-02-05 2017-03-05 2017-11-05 2018-01-22 2018-02-05 2018-04-30 2018-08-13 2018-08-20 2018-08-27 2019-10-21 2019-12-16. Author is listed
  2. NEP-COM: Industrial Competition (8) 2013-11-02 2014-02-02 2015-02-16 2016-03-29 2016-06-25 2018-02-19 2019-10-21 2019-12-16. Author is listed
  3. NEP-MKT: Marketing (5) 2014-02-02 2015-02-16 2016-03-29 2017-03-05 2018-02-19. Author is listed
  4. NEP-MIC: Microeconomics (4) 2013-11-02 2018-02-19 2019-10-21 2019-10-28
  5. NEP-POL: Positive Political Economics (4) 2011-06-04 2012-07-23 2014-02-02 2019-10-28
  6. NEP-DCM: Discrete Choice Models (3) 2017-02-05 2018-02-05 2018-04-30
  7. NEP-SOC: Social Norms & Social Capital (3) 2014-02-02 2017-02-05 2018-01-22
  8. NEP-GTH: Game Theory (2) 2018-02-05 2019-10-21
  9. NEP-HPE: History & Philosophy of Economics (2) 2018-02-05 2018-04-30
  10. NEP-NET: Network Economics (2) 2013-11-02 2016-06-25
  11. NEP-BEC: Business Economics (1) 2016-06-25
  12. NEP-CBE: Cognitive & Behavioural Economics (1) 2014-02-02
  13. NEP-CDM: Collective Decision-Making (1) 2019-10-28
  14. NEP-CTA: Contract Theory & Applications (1) 2016-03-29
  15. NEP-EUR: Microeconomic European Issues (1) 2012-07-23
  16. NEP-FDG: Financial Development & Growth (1) 2011-06-04
  17. NEP-HAP: Economics of Happiness (1) 2011-06-04
  18. NEP-IND: Industrial Organization (1) 2018-02-19
  19. NEP-LAW: Law & Economics (1) 2019-12-16
  20. NEP-PBE: Public Economics (1) 2017-01-01
  21. NEP-URE: Urban & Real Estate Economics (1) 2017-11-05

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Jana Friedrichsen should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.