IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/wzbmtn/327855.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preise absprechen: Die Rolle der Kommunikation bei Kartellen und ihrer Verfolgung

Author

Listed:
  • Friedrichsen, Jana

Abstract

Das amerikanische Zuckerkartell ist ein reales, wenn auch historisches Beispiel: Die wichtigsten Player stimmten sich ab, der Zuckerpreis lag höher, als er im freien Wettbewerb gewesen wäre, die Kosten trugen die Verbraucherinnen und Verbraucher. Solche Absprachen sind heutzutage gesetzeswidrig, aber nicht immer leicht zu erkennen. Mit Laborexperimenten lässt sich den Tricks und Mustern der Kommunikation auf die Schliche kommen.

Suggested Citation

  • Friedrichsen, Jana, 2023. "Preise absprechen: Die Rolle der Kommunikation bei Kartellen und ihrer Verfolgung," WZB-Mitteilungen: Quartalsheft für Sozialforschung, WZB Berlin Social Science Center, issue 181 (3/23, pages 23-27.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:wzbmtn:327855
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/327855/1/f-25756_repo.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gaurab Aryal & Federico Ciliberto & Benjamin T Leyden, 2022. "Coordinated Capacity Reductions and Public Communication in the Airline Industry," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 89(6), pages 3055-3084.
    2. Andres, Maximilian & Bruttel, Lisa & Friedrichsen, Jana, 2023. "How communication makes the difference between a cartel and tacit collusion: A machine learning approach," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    3. Fonseca, Miguel A. & Normann, Hans-Theo, 2012. "Explicit vs. tacit collusion—The impact of communication in oligopoly experiments," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(8), pages 1759-1772.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maximilian Andres, 2024. "Equilibrium selection in infinitely repeated games with communication," CEPA Discussion Papers 75, Center for Economic Policy Analysis.
    2. Xu Han & Zengqing Wu & Chuan Xiao, 2023. ""Guinea Pig Trials" Utilizing GPT: A Novel Smart Agent-Based Modeling Approach for Studying Firm Competition and Collusion," Papers 2308.10974, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2024.
    3. Lisa Bruttel & Maximilian Andres, 2024. "Communicating Cartel Intentions," CEPA Discussion Papers 77, Center for Economic Policy Analysis.
    4. Martin, Simon & Rasch, Alexander, 2024. "Demand forecasting, signal precision, and collusion with hidden actions," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    5. Sindri Engilbertsson & Sander Onderstal & Leonard Treuren, 2025. "How the design of cartel fines affects prices: Evidence from the lab," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 25-012/VII, Tinbergen Institute.
    6. Michael L. Polemis, 2025. "What Determines Cartel Duration? Global Evidence Using Quantile Regression Analysis," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 1-28, December.
    7. Thomas Bourveau & Guoman She & Alminas Žaldokas, 2020. "Corporate Disclosure as a Tacit Coordination Mechanism: Evidence from Cartel Enforcement Regulations," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 58(2), pages 295-332, May.
    8. Kyung Hwan Baik & Subhasish M. Chowdhury & Abhijit Ramalingam, 2021. "Group size and matching protocol in contests," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(4), pages 1716-1736, November.
    9. Matthew Embrey & Friederike Mengel & Ronald Peeters, 2019. "Strategy revision opportunities and collusion," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 22(4), pages 834-856, December.
    10. Turner, Douglas C., 2024. "The impact of cartel dissolution on prices: Evidence from the air cargo cartel," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    11. Andreoli-Versbach, Patrick & Franck, Jens-Uwe, 2015. "Endogenous price commitment, sticky and leadership pricing: Evidence from the Italian petrol market," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 32-48.
    12. Hinloopen, Jeroen & Onderstal, Sander, 2014. "Going once, going twice, reported! Cartel activity and the effectiveness of antitrust policies in experimental auctions," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 317-336.
    13. Patrick Rey & Jean Tirole, 2019. "Price Caps as Welfare-Enhancing Coopetition," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 127(6), pages 3018-3069.
    14. Werner Güth & Manfred Stadler & Alexandra Zaby, 2020. "Capacity precommitment, communication, and collusive pricing: theoretical benchmark and experimental evidence," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 49(2), pages 495-524, June.
    15. Boulu-Reshef Béatrice & Monnier-Schlumberger Constance, 2025. "Do Sanctions or Moral Costs Prevent the Formation of Cartel Agreements?," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 21(2), pages 283-321.
    16. Luke Garrod & Matthew Olczak, 2017. "Collusion Under Imperfect Monitoring with Asymmetric Firms," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 65(3), pages 654-682, September.
    17. Feltovich, Nick & Grossman, Philip J., 2015. "How does the effect of pre-play suggestions vary with group size? Experimental evidence from a threshold public-good game," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 263-280.
    18. Stephen Davies & Peter L. Ormosi, 2014. "The economic impact of cartels and anti-cartel enforcement," Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Competition Policy (CCP) 2013-07v2, Centre for Competition Policy, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
    19. Chen, Gang & Rytter, Niels G.M. & Jiang, Liping & Nielsen, Peter & Jensen, Lars, 2017. "Pre-announcements of price increase intentions in liner shipping spot markets," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 109-125.
    20. Tomaso Duso & Joseph E., Jr. Harrington & Carl Kreuzberg & Geza Sapi, 2025. "Public Communication and Collusion: New Screening Tools for Competition Authorities," CESifo Working Paper Series 12029, CESifo.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:wzbmtn:327855. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wzbbbde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.