IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ces/ceswps/_12405.html

When Music is Made by AI: Effects on Preferences and Willingness to Pay

Author

Listed:
  • Jana Friedrichsen
  • Julia Schwarz
  • Michel Clement

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly reshaping society, including the music industry. Recent advancements in generative AI enable users to create music from text-based prompts, raising questions about public perception and valuation of AI-generated music. We conducted three studies with German-speaking participants (Study 1: N=2000, Study 2: N=425; Study 3: N=1248) to explore awareness, enjoyment, and willingness to pay for AI music. After finding no clear rejection of AI composed music in Study 1, Study 2 varied whether listeners knew the music was AI-generated. Study 3 involved regular listeners of pop and electronic dance music, manipulating song origin (human vs. AI) and disclosure. Results show that listeners generally could not distinguish between AI and human-made songs. When unaware, participants slightly preferred AI music and valued it equally. However, disclosing that AI had been used to create compositions reduced appreciation and willingness to pay. We explore how reactions differ by genre and individual attitudes toward AI and discuss implications for the music industry and for regulatory initiatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Jana Friedrichsen & Julia Schwarz & Michel Clement, 2026. "When Music is Made by AI: Effects on Preferences and Willingness to Pay," CESifo Working Paper Series 12405, CESifo.
    • Handle: RePEc:ces:ceswps:_12405
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/cesifo1_wp12405.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frederik Juul Jensen, 2024. "Rethinking royalties: alternative payment systems on music streaming platforms," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 48(3), pages 439-462, September.
    2. Tubadji, Annie & Huang, Haoran & Webber, Don J, 2021. "Cultural proximity bias in AI-acceptability: The importance of being human," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    3. Frederik Juul Jensen, 2024. "Rethinking royalties: alternative payment systems on music streaming platforms," Post-Print hal-04885870, HAL.
    4. David H. Autor & Frank Levy & Richard J. Murnane, 2003. "The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 118(4), pages 1279-1333.
    5. Carlo Ludovico Cordasco & Carissa Véliz, 2025. "Self-Esteem and Technological Unemployment: Should We Halt AI to Protect Meaningful Work?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 202(1), pages 21-33, November.
    6. Dufwenberg, Martin & Kirchsteiger, Georg, 2004. "A theory of sequential reciprocity," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 268-298, May.
    7. Max J. Pachali & Hannes Datta, 2025. "What Drives Demand for Playlists on Spotify?," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(1), pages 54-64, January.
    8. Xueming Luo & Siliang Tong & Zheng Fang & Zhe Qu, 2019. "Frontiers: Machines vs. Humans: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Disclosure on Customer Purchases," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(6), pages 937-947, November.
    9. Janek Meyn & Michael Kandziora & Sönke Albers & Michel Clement, 2023. "Consequences of platforms' remuneration models for digital content: initial evidence and a research agenda for streaming services," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 114-131, January.
    10. Regner, Tobias & Barria, Javier A., 2009. "Do consumers pay voluntarily? The case of online music," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 71(2), pages 395-406, August.
    11. Czarnitzki, Dirk & Fernández, Gastón P. & Rammer, Christian, 2023. "Artificial intelligence and firm-level productivity," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 188-205.
    12. Muhammad Umair Shah & Umair Rehman & Bidhan Parmar & Inara Ismail, 2024. "Effects of Moral Violation on Algorithmic Transparency: An Empirical Investigation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 193(1), pages 19-34, August.
    13. David A. Spencer, 2023. "Automation and Well-Being: Bridging the Gap between Economics and Business Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 187(2), pages 271-281, October.
    14. Santiago Mejia, 2023. "The Normative and Cultural Dimension of Work: Technological Unemployment as a Cultural Threat to a Meaningful Life," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 185(4), pages 847-864, July.
    15. David H. Autor & Frank Levy & Richard J. Murnane, 2003. "The skill content of recent technological change: an empirical exploration," Proceedings, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, issue nov.
    16. Abel, Martin & Johnson, Reed, 2025. "AI Bias for Creative Writing: Subjective Assessment Versus Willingness to Pay," IZA Discussion Papers 17646, IZA Network @ LISER.
    17. Sarah Bankins & Paul Formosa, 2023. "The Ethical Implications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) For Meaningful Work," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 185(4), pages 725-740, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bernd Irlenbusch, 2026. "Human Trust in AI: Evidence from Experimental Economics," ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 417, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gierens, Jakob, 2026. "Weighted Pro-Rata: Exploration of a Promising New Music Streaming Remuneration System," MPRA Paper 127101, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Hakan Yilmazkuday, 2025. "Artificial intelligence and labor markets: evidence from google trends," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 49(4), pages 1078-1093, December.
    3. Zhou, Yuwen & Shi, Xin, 2025. "How does digital technology adoption affect corporate employment? Evidence from China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    4. Florencia Jaccoud, 2025. "Robots & AI exposure and wage inequality: a within occupation approach," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 15(4), pages 1035-1090, December.
    5. Jaccoud, Florencia, 2025. "Robots & AI Exposure and Wage Inequality," MERIT Working Papers 2025-013, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    6. Torrent-Sellens, Joan, 2024. "Digital transition, data-and-tasks crowd-based economy, and the shared social progress: Unveiling a new political economy from a European perspective," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    7. Gao, Fei & Peng, Benhong & Zhao, Yinyin & Wei, Guo, 2026. "Tech for Good: The employment effects of policy-driven artificial intelligence development," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    8. Xiang Hui & Oren Reshef & Luofeng Zhou, 2023. "The Short-Term Effects of Generative Artificial Intelligence on Employment: Evidence from an Online Labor Market," CESifo Working Paper Series 10601, CESifo.
    9. Sun, Quan & Huang, Minjie, 2026. "Firm-level evidence on AI-driven output expansion and productivity in China," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    10. Anastasiia Pustovalova & Priit Vahter, 2024. "Automation-Skill Complementarity: The Changing Returns To Soft Skills In Different Stages Of Technology Adoption," University of Tartu - Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Working Paper Series 146, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Tartu (Estonia).
    11. Bradler, Christiane & Neckermann, Susanne & Warnke, Arne Jonas, 2016. "Incentivizing creativity: A large-scale experiment with tournaments and gifts," ZEW Discussion Papers 16-040, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    12. Moreau, François & Wikström, Patrik & Haampland, Ola & Johannessen, Rune, 2024. "Alternative payment models in the music streaming market: A comparative approach based on stream-level data," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    13. Wu, Yongqiu & Lin, Zhiwei & Zhang, Qingcui & Wang, Wei, 2024. "Artificial intelligence, wage dynamics, and inequality: Empirical evidence from Chinese listed firms," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(PC).
    14. Samantha A. Sharpe & Cristina M. Martinez-Fernandez, 2021. "The Implications of Green Employment: Making a Just Transition in ASEAN," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-19, July.
    15. Tommaso AGASISTI & Geraint JOHNES & Marco PACCAGNELLA, 2021. "Tasks, occupations and wages in OECD countries," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 160(1), pages 85-112, March.
    16. Katrin Huber & Geske Rolvering, 2023. "Public child care and mothers’ career trajectories," Working Papers 228, Bavarian Graduate Program in Economics (BGPE).
    17. Loebbing, Jonas, 2018. "An Elementary Theory of Endogenous Technical Change and Wage Inequality," VfS Annual Conference 2018 (Freiburg, Breisgau): Digital Economy 181603, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    18. Conny Wunsch & Felix Rochlitz & Patrick Arni, 2025. "Jobseekers’ skills and job search behaviour," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, Springer;Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics, vol. 161(1), pages 1-31, December.
    19. Patrick Mellacher, 2021. "Growth, Inequality and Declining Business Dynamism in a Unified Schumpeter Mark I + II Model," Papers 2111.09407, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2023.
    20. Keller, Wolfgang & Utar, Hale, 2023. "International trade and job polarization: Evidence at the worker level," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D12 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
    • Z11 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economics of the Arts and Literature
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ceswps:_12405. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cesifde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.