IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Ex Post Heterogeneity and the Business Cycle

Listed author(s):
  • Jang-Ok Cho
Registered author(s):

    The reason why the assumption of a representative agent is so popular in the equilibrium business cycle literature is mainly that equilibrium allocations are derived by solving a concave programming problem, whereas once heterogeneity is introduced it is necessary to solve for weights on individual utilities and this generally involves solving a complicated fixed point problem. The representative agent framework is extended in a way that permits workers to have different skills. The key feature is that each agent faces a stochastic productivity ex ante but a different realized productivity ex post from others'. This means that there is no ex ante heterogeneity but ex post heterogeneity, and hence an equal weight is applied to the utilities of all agents. The results show how serious the aggregation problem is in aggregate fluctuations. The responsiveness of labor supply in physical units is larger than that of labor supply in efficiency units. On the contrary, productivity in physical units responds to the aggregate productivity shock less vigorously than productivity in efficiency units. So the relative ratio of standard deviation of aggregate hours to that of productivity tends to be exaggerated in the actual data, which measures the aggregate labor supply only in physical unit. In addition, a heterogeneity helps the model economy produce a more plausible correlation structure. Furthermore, the results show that a high elasticity of intertemporal substitution of labor is not required for a real business cycle model to mimic the key feature observed in the actual economy.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    File Function: First version 1990
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Queen's University, Department of Economics in its series Working Papers with number 788.

    in new window

    Date of creation: Mar 1990
    Handle: RePEc:qed:wpaper:788
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6

    Phone: (613) 533-2250
    Fax: (613) 533-6668
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:qed:wpaper:788. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Mark Babcock)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.