IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijpsjl/v18y2026i2p82.html

An Experimental Verification of Present-Biasedness

Author

Listed:
  • Eric A. L. Li

Abstract

An experiment was originally intended to empirically estimate the strength of delayed reward discounting through the real option approach (Li, 2017). There we encountered an unknown effect we could not account for at the time. In this paper we offer an explanation of this anomaly. We hypothesize that when two of the three conditions for real option, namely, uncertainty and option to delay, are present, then a time-inconsistent behavior of present-biasedness would arise. When the third condition, namely, inability to reverse, is also present, then the full real option would emerge to cause delayed-reward-discounting behavior. We re-visited the original data and calculated the values of present-biasedness in the original experiment. Under different scenarios our calculations matched the observed anomaly.

Suggested Citation

  • Eric A. L. Li, 2026. "An Experimental Verification of Present-Biasedness," International Journal of Psychological Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 18(2), pages 1-82, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijpsjl:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:82
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijps/article/download/0/0/53312/58151
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijps/article/view/0/53312
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijpsjl:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.