IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/pacfin/v82y2023ics0927538x23002263.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Systemically important financial institutions and drivers of systemic risk: Evidence from India

Author

Listed:
  • Narayan, Shivani
  • Kumar, Dilip
  • Bouri, Elie

Abstract

The aim of this study is twofold: (1) identify the systemically important financial institutions in India and their contributing role to Indian systemic risk during various global and domestic events; and (2) uncover the factors driving systemic risk in Indian financial institutions. To serve the first aim, we estimate financial institutions' involvement in the overall risk of the Indian financial market using the component expected shortfall approach. The results show that the State Bank of India, ICICI Bank, HDFC Bank, and HDFC Ltd. contribute more than 50% to the aggregate risk in India, demonstrating a significant systemic risk concentration. These financial institutions are also referred to as domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs) by the Reserve Bank of India (the central bank in India). Financial institutions show an increased contribution to overall systemic risk after the systemic events considered in the study. Furthermore, results indicate that banks play a dominating role in contributing to systemic risk in India; however, the analysis also indicates the increasing contribution of non-banking financial companies and insurance firms to the gross risk of the Indian financial market in recent years. To serve the second aim, we apply panel data regressions and show that the probability of default, leverage, loan, liquidity, board size, and Basel norms are significant drivers of systemic risk. Besides the importance of our findings for investment and risk management decisions during crisis periods, our findings have implications for policymakers overseeing the financial system in India, assessing potential vulnerabilities and designing prudential regulatory and action plans to maintain financial stability.

Suggested Citation

  • Narayan, Shivani & Kumar, Dilip & Bouri, Elie, 2023. "Systemically important financial institutions and drivers of systemic risk: Evidence from India," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:pacfin:v:82:y:2023:i:c:s0927538x23002263
    DOI: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2023.102155
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927538X23002263
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.pacfin.2023.102155?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Systemic risk; Systemically important financial institutions (SIFI); Component expected shortfall (CES); Marginal expected shortfall (MES); SRISK;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C22 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models; Diffusion Processes
    • C53 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Forecasting and Prediction Models; Simulation Methods
    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:pacfin:v:82:y:2023:i:c:s0927538x23002263. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/pacfin .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.