IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/idb/wpaper/idb-wp-467.html

Are Environmentally Related Taxes Effective?

Author

Listed:
  • Sebastian Miller

  • Mauricio Vela

Abstract

This paper focuses on the question of whether the magnitude of long-established environmentally related taxes (ERT) is related to countries environmental performance. While environmental taxes efficiencies have previously been discussed, those taxes contribution to reducing pollution and improving environmental quality has not been fully explored. This paper therefore analyzes the effectiveness of environmental taxes by examining the environmental performance of 50 countries from all regions in association with the amount of revenues from environmentally related taxes each country collects. Using a cross-section regression and a panel dynamic regression, the paper finds that countries with higher revenues from these types of taxes also exhibit higher reductions in CO2 emission, PM10 emissions, and energy consumption and production from fossil sources.

Suggested Citation

  • Sebastian Miller & Mauricio Vela, 2013. "Are Environmentally Related Taxes Effective?," Research Department Publications IDB-WP-467, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.
  • Handle: RePEc:idb:wpaper:idb-wp-467
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.iadb.org/research/pub_hits.cfm?pub_id=38311333
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Djula Borozan, 2018. "Efficiency of Energy Taxes and the Validity of the Residential Electricity Environmental Kuznets Curve in the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, July.
    2. Ali Eren Alper, 2018. "Analysis of Carbon Tax on Selected European Countries: Does Carbon Tax Reduce Emissions?," Applied Economics and Finance, Redfame publishing, vol. 5(1), pages 29-36, January.
    3. Fawzia Mohammed Idris, "undated". "Evaluating an environmental tax as a source of funding for Social Health Insurance: Sudan case," Review of Socio - Economic Perspectives 202194, Reviewsep.
    4. Iana Paliova, 2024. "Challenges of Bulgaria‘s Fiscal Policy towards Green Transition in the European Union," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 2, pages 27-49.
    5. Marian Zaharia & Aurelia Pătrașcu & Manuela Rodica Gogonea & Ana Tănăsescu & Constanța Popescu, 2017. "A Cluster Design on the Influence of Energy Taxation in Shaping the New EU-28 Economic Paradigm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-21, February.
    6. Richard M. Bird, 2018. "Are global taxes feasible?," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 25(5), pages 1372-1400, October.
    7. Ionel Bostan & Mihaela Onofrei & Elena-Doina Dascalu & Bogdan Fîrtescu, 2016. "Impact of Sustainable Environmental Expenditures Policy on Air Pollution Reduction, During European Integration Framework," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 18(42), pages 286-286, May.
    8. Runst, Petrik & Höhle, David, 2022. "The German eco tax and its impact on CO2 emissions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    9. Aysen Simsek Kandemir & Ramshah Rashid Lone & Rasim Simsek, 2024. "Women in Parliaments and Environmentally Friendly Fiscal Policies: A Global Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-27, September.
    10. Bartosz Jóźwik & Antonina Gavryshkiv, 2022. "Wpływ podatku środowiskowego na emisję gazów cieplarnianych w państwach Grupy Wyszehradzkiej," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 1, pages 66-78.
    11. Borozan, Djula, 2019. "Unveiling the heterogeneous effect of energy taxes and income on residential energy consumption," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 13-22.
    12. Shiqin Su & Siying Li, 2025. "Energy efficiency suppression and spatial spillover effect: a quasi-natural experiment based on China’s environmental protection tax law," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 6397-6422, March.
    13. Sanjay Kumar Patel & Piyush Jhalani, 2024. "Formulation of variables of environmental taxation: a bibliometric analysis of Scopus database (2001–2022)," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 7687-7714, March.
    14. Alina Georgiana Manta & Nicoleta Mihaela Florea & Roxana Maria Bădîrcea & Jenica Popescu & Daniel Cîrciumaru & Marius Dalian Doran, 2020. "The Nexus between Carbon Emissions, Energy Use, Economic Growth and Financial Development: Evidence from Central and Eastern European Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-21, September.
    15. Josef Gotvald, 2024. "The role of environmental taxes and other political instruments on the road to climate neutrality [Role environmentálních daní a dalších politických nástrojů na cestě za klimatickou neutralitou]," Český finanční a účetní časopis, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2024(1), pages 47-76.
    16. Donatella Baiardi & Simona Scabrosetti, 2025. "Does the Quality of Political Institutions Matter for the Effectiveness of Environmental Taxes? An Empirical Analysis on CO2 Emissions," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(2), March.
    17. Edmond Domguia Noubissi & Hilaire Nkengfack & Thierry Messie Pondie & Borice Augustin Ngounou, 2024. "Economic impact of the carbon tax: Evaluation of the reduction in CO2 emissions," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 48(3), pages 859-886, August.
    18. Beata Zofia Filipiak & Dorota Wyszkowska, 2022. "Determinants of Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions in European Union Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-24, December.
    19. Jaime Vallés-Giménez & Anabel Zárate-Marco, 2020. "A Dynamic Spatial Panel of Subnational GHG Emissions: Environmental Effectiveness of Emissions Taxes in Spanish Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-22, April.
    20. Tipper, Adam & Harkness, Jane, 2018. "Environmental Taxation and Expenditure in New Zealand," Working Paper Series 7627, Victoria University of Wellington, Chair in Public Finance.
    21. Nihal Ahmed & Adnan Ahmed Sheikh & Zeeshan Hamid & Piotr Senkus & Ricardo Cosio Borda & Aneta Wysokińska-Senkus & Waldemar Glabiszewski, 2022. "Exploring the Causal Relationship among Green Taxes, Energy Intensity, and Energy Consumption in Nordic Countries: Dumitrescu and Hurlin Causality Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-15, July.
    22. Yemane Wolde-Rufael & Eyob Mulat-weldemeskel, 2023. "Effectiveness of environmental taxes and environmental stringent policies on CO2 emissions: the European experience," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(6), pages 5211-5239, June.
    23. Tipper, Adam & Harkness, Jane, 2018. "Environmental Taxation and Expenditure in New Zealand," Working Paper Series 20835, Victoria University of Wellington, Chair in Public Finance.
    24. Roxana Maria Bădîrcea & Nicoleta Mihaela Florea & Alina Georgiana Manta & Silvia Puiu & Marius Dalian Doran, 2020. "Comparison between Romania and Sweden Based on Three Dimensions: Environmental Performance, Green Taxation and Economic Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, May.
    25. Richard M. Bird, 2014. "Global Taxes and International Taxation: Mirage and Reality," International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series, at AYSPS, GSU paper1429, International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • H23 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Externalities; Redistributive Effects; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies
    • Q53 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Air Pollution; Water Pollution; Noise; Hazardous Waste; Solid Waste; Recycling
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:idb:wpaper:idb-wp-467. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Felipe Herrera Library (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iadbbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.